Notices
Member's Gallery Pictures of your pride and joy

lets see your forester sti's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 May 2010, 11:24 PM
  #31  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

wtf how the hell can it be quicker when it WEIGHS some 200kilos more ?? more power? it's only 15bhp more than your classic, believe me it will feel slow compared to your classic lol
Old 22 May 2010, 11:32 PM
  #32  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bioforger
wtf how the hell can it be quicker when it WEIGHS some 200kilos more ?? more power? it's only 15bhp more than your classic, believe me it will feel slow compared to your classic lol
have you driven one then?
Old 22 May 2010, 11:38 PM
  #33  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Sort of, I've driven a type R classic with 340/330, my current car is a blob STi with a mapped 330/330, which is similar weight to a forester ~ 1400-1450kilos, same 6speed same engine. The type R is alot quicker in all situations. Ok the forester will feel alot more refined than a classic as it is stiffer n better equipped, but if u want raw peformance a 300+ classic is pretty much unbeatable for the road. Anyway no harm in test driving one is there, go for it.
Old 22 May 2010, 11:44 PM
  #34  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's a couple of mine







Pete
Old 22 May 2010, 11:44 PM
  #35  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know what u mean,what sort of power/torque would i need roughly from the fsti for it to feel as quick ish lol? although it might not feel as quick it probably would be as quick?maybe lol?
Old 22 May 2010, 11:46 PM
  #36  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pj748r
Here's a couple of mine



[IMG]http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f17/pj2886lfc/Germany%202008/DSC_0100.jpg[/IMG





Pete
that is georgeous mate,love the colour too,what year/spec etc? what is it like to drive etc? the more info i can get,the better. very very nice.
Old 22 May 2010, 11:46 PM
  #37  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon
i know what u mean,what sort of power/torque would i need roughly from the fsti for it to feel as quick ish lol? although it might not feel as quick it probably would be as quick?maybe lol?
400+
Old 22 May 2010, 11:50 PM
  #38  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bioforger
400+
really???? if u had a 350bhp forester,it would possibly have say 360-370lbft,surely it would eat the road quicker? i know it is heavier but the extra power and torque should easily cover the weight gain,shouldnt it?
Old 22 May 2010, 11:56 PM
  #39  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

dunno I'm guessing yea might be enough, depends on the car that's modded/mapped
Old 23 May 2010, 12:03 AM
  #40  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bioforger
dunno I'm guessing yea might be enough, depends on the car that's modded/mapped
i assumed that going from a 315/320 classic to a 330/330 fsti,that the forester would be as quick roughly,maybe a fraction slower,but i didnt think it would feel sluggish!wouldnt want it to be noticeably slower hence why i been looking at a litchfield supplied one.(330/330). would be nice to get an answer from someone who has been fortunate enough to compare.
Old 23 May 2010, 12:07 AM
  #41  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Couple more





Mines got BC Coilovers,Whiteline ARB and strut braces,EBC YellowStuff,Gooodridge Brake Hoses,Motul RBF 600 Brake Fluid,Mocom re-map(about 300/300),Vredestein Ultrac Sessantas,

It's plenty quick as it is for a family bus as the fella in an AMG Merc found out in Germany last year

Pete
Old 23 May 2010, 12:10 AM
  #42  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pj748r
Couple more





Mines got BC Coilovers,Whiteline ARB and strut braces,EBC YellowStuff,Gooodridge Brake Hoses,Motul RBF 600 Brake Fluid,Mocom re-map(about 300/300),Vredestein Ultrac Sessantas,

It's plenty quick as it is for a family bus as the fella in an AMG Merc found out in Germany last year

Pete
what year is it mate?have u been able to compare with a modded classic?
Old 23 May 2010, 12:12 AM
  #43  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

have to say.....it looks amazing!
Old 23 May 2010, 12:12 AM
  #44  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon
i assumed that going from a 315/320 classic to a 330/330 fsti,that the forester would be as quick roughly,maybe a fraction slower,but i didnt think it would feel sluggish!wouldnt want it to be noticeably slower hence why i been looking at a litchfield supplied one.(330/330). would be nice to get an answer from someone who has been fortunate enough to compare.
um I already told u I have compared! ok it's a blob eye sti versus a type R classic, but the weights are pretty much the same for both! Type R wins!

It's simple physics mate, a car that weighs alot more than another with similar power is going to be significantly slower!
Old 23 May 2010, 12:16 AM
  #45  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol,but the forester is nicer!
Old 23 May 2010, 12:17 AM
  #46  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a late '06.I had an '05 Wrx that i changed it for.Totally night and day.

Never driven a classic so can't compare but they're not slow by any stretch of the imagination.

I've had mine upto 145mph(GPS not speedo) on the Autobahn and it was still climbing,had to slow down for slower traffic,so didn't get the chance to V max it.
I like it becuase it's a bit of a Q car,doesn't really attract the wrong type of attention,only from people who know what it is and it's very practical.

Pete
Old 23 May 2010, 12:17 AM
  #47  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a late '06.I had an '05 Wrx that i changed it for.Totally night and day.

Never driven a classic so can't compare but they're not slow by any stretch of the imagination.

I've had mine upto 145mph(GPS not speedo) on the Autobahn and it was still climbing,had to slow down for slower traffic,so didn't get the chance to V max it.
I like it becuase it's a bit of a Q car,doesn't really attract the wrong type of attention,only from people who know what it is and it's very practical.

Try http://www.subaruforester.org/vbulletin/index.php for more info.

Pete

Last edited by pj748r; 23 May 2010 at 12:19 AM.
Old 23 May 2010, 12:18 AM
  #48  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had a little race with a friends blob sti once,he was running 258/250(standard),i was running 238/280,nothing in it at all.
Old 23 May 2010, 12:20 AM
  #49  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pj748r
It's a late '06.I had an '05 Wrx that i changed it for.Totally night and day.

Never driven a classic so can't compare but they're not slow by any stretch of the imagination.

I've had mine upto 145mph(GPS not speedo) on the Autobahn and it was still climbing,had to slow down for slower traffic,so didn't get the chance to V max it.
I like it becuase it's a bit of a Q car,doesn't really attract the wrong type of attention,only from people who know what it is and it's very practical.

Pete
if u dont mind.....where did u purchase?
Old 23 May 2010, 12:25 AM
  #50  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bought it from Car Planet in Warrington

Pete
Old 23 May 2010, 12:26 AM
  #51  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pj748r
Bought it from Car Planet in Warrington

Pete
ok cheers. love your forester btw.will you be keeping or selling in the next year?
Old 23 May 2010, 12:38 AM
  #52  
pj748r
Scooby Regular
 
pj748r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wirral
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm keeping it for the moment,did think of changing ofr an M3 but the servicing costs are stupid!!

Pete
Old 23 May 2010, 12:39 AM
  #53  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pj748r
I'm keeping it for the moment,did think of changing ofr an M3 but the servicing costs are stupid!!

Pete
if u do decide to sell in the next 12 months or so,then let me know mate.and thanks for your info
Old 08 October 2010, 11:50 PM
  #54  
HighlanderJC
Scooby Newbie
 
HighlanderJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grantham, Lincs
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My pal had an sti saloon 2.0L re-mapped to 320/330. I have the forester STI 2.5L from Litchfield imports. His saloon was slightly quicker on acceleration, but he did have straight through exhaust and I have a sports cat and 70kg heavier.

Last edited by HighlanderJC; 11 October 2010 at 09:37 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
18 November 2015 07:49 AM



Quick Reply: lets see your forester sti's



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM.