Schumacher.......
#62
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As you ask it was complately deliberate, but then I never said he was perfect. As it happens Villeneive was never going to make the corner anyway, but that is a whole different story.
At least it wasn't pre-meditated unlike Senna's move on Prost at Japan 1990, then again Senna isn't German so that's OK
#63
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#64
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just wondering if you were going to try and defend him on everything.
Personally, I was really looking forward to having Schumacher back in F1 but it's been a completely underwhelming return. Yes the car isn't great but Nico has performed a lot better in it that Schumacher has.
I hope that next year the FIA readdress the stupid rule of no 'in season' testing because I think it's robbing us of some decent races this season. Lets be honest, if Redbull hadn't been unreliable/made mistakes they'd have had this season sown up by now, just as Jenson did last year.
Personally, I was really looking forward to having Schumacher back in F1 but it's been a completely underwhelming return. Yes the car isn't great but Nico has performed a lot better in it that Schumacher has.
I hope that next year the FIA readdress the stupid rule of no 'in season' testing because I think it's robbing us of some decent races this season. Lets be honest, if Redbull hadn't been unreliable/made mistakes they'd have had this season sown up by now, just as Jenson did last year.
#65
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just wondering if you were going to try and defend him on everything.
Personally, I was really looking forward to having Schumacher back in F1 but it's been a completely underwhelming return. Yes the car isn't great but Nico has performed a lot better in it that Schumacher has.
I hope that next year the FIA readdress the stupid rule of no 'in season' testing because I think it's robbing us of some decent races this season. Lets be honest, if Redbull hadn't been unreliable/made mistakes they'd have had this season sown up by now, just as Jenson did last year.
Personally, I was really looking forward to having Schumacher back in F1 but it's been a completely underwhelming return. Yes the car isn't great but Nico has performed a lot better in it that Schumacher has.
I hope that next year the FIA readdress the stupid rule of no 'in season' testing because I think it's robbing us of some decent races this season. Lets be honest, if Redbull hadn't been unreliable/made mistakes they'd have had this season sown up by now, just as Jenson did last year.
I will say he has given me a lot of pleasure with some amazing races, but like many geniuses is flawed ... very like Senna in fact.
#66
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
He's not without flaws admittedly but as a person he's not too bad
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/SPORT/01...ief/index.html
Graham Hill once said 'you get a nicer class of driver at the back of the grid'.
However niceness doesn't win races.
#67
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Adelaide looked more like bumper cars than F1...
The fact that if Michael was still driving a fully fit car, would he have cut off Hill's dive so brutally? we will never known...
Hill was an idiot I agree, but not for the reason you quoted
The fact that if Michael was still driving a fully fit car, would he have cut off Hill's dive so brutally? we will never known...
Hill was an idiot I agree, but not for the reason you quoted
Last edited by scooby L; 03 August 2010 at 11:13 AM.
#68
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately he hasn't performed as well as he might (Schuey) even allowing for a slightly sub-standard car, and what's worse he's resorted to showing the pups a few of his old tricks.
The worst bit is that Schumacher doesn't need to stoop to using gutter level tactics by playing dangerous games, he's far too talented a driver for that.
#69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bristol
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to hear how Schuey parking his car at the Rascass in Monaco wasn't cold, cynical, calculated cheating.......F1 fan care to defend him on this one too?
For me he's a very fast driver who is just way too prepared to win at any cost.
And read my first post in this thread, I'm not (wasn't) anti-Schuey.......
For me he's a very fast driver who is just way too prepared to win at any cost.
And read my first post in this thread, I'm not (wasn't) anti-Schuey.......
#70
In a car which started off way inferior to the Mclaren. I think part of the problem is that Michael is a Kraut, if he was a British driver I don't think he would be copping all this flak. Bear in mind when he joined Ferrari from Benetton, Ferrari were completely in the wilderness. Schumacher's input and teamwork with the engineers put Ferrari back on the map. To be the best you have to be ruthless and take risks. To say he put Barrichello's life in danger is just sensationalising. These cars will cope with a shunt like that without any problem.
He's not without flaws admittedly but as a person he's not too bad
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/SPORT/01...ief/index.html
Graham Hill once said 'you get a nicer class of driver at the back of the grid'.
However niceness doesn't win races.
He's not without flaws admittedly but as a person he's not too bad
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/SPORT/01...ief/index.html
Graham Hill once said 'you get a nicer class of driver at the back of the grid'.
However niceness doesn't win races.
What sort of speed would you say they were doing when he pushed Barrichello towards that wall? How would you feel if you were driving and he did that to you? Barrichello got himself into a position to pass by his driving skill. Are you saying it is part of the sport to deliberately try to make another driver crash into a wall? Is that how you want to see F1 as standard practice?
If Barrichllo had hit that wall if it was longer are you saying it could be certain that he would suffer no injury? Is that the right way to go racing? When I was racing anyone who behaved like that would have got a right sorting out after the race and deservedly so.
This is not stock car racing. Winning is supposed to be a combination of a good car and skilfull driving as well as good teamwork. Behaviour like that of your hero should be heavily punished even to the extent of removing his licence. There is no way that risking injury to another driver in order to win can be justified.
Les
#71
Scooby Regular
I am not going to get into this for the umpteenth time, but he did nothing deliberate to Damon in 1994. In fact if anyone is to blame for that it is Damon who should just have waited a second to see where Schumacher's stricken car would end up. This deliberate raming him off the track nonsense is just that... nonsense.
Here is a quote from a journalist who was actually there to see it unfold:
Hope that helps
Here is a quote from a journalist who was actually there to see it unfold:
Hope that helps
Then you have the Villeneuve issue and lets not forget "parking his car" in Monaco. And now you have the act of a desperate man who tries to drive another competitor into a pit wall. This is not a race for the lead, this is a fight over 10th place.
I'm not saying that others have not been guilty, but Schumacher has a history. It's his MO. And he'll be remembered for it.
Its interesting how he's been, well, a bit crap this year. Unable to test, with a team not geared 100% to him, and not the best car he's, well, proving to be a bit crap. Rosberg easily having the measure of him in equal machinery. Just as Barichello and Massa did at Ferrari when the team allowed them too.
Eddie Irvine ihas gone on record to say that Schumacher was useless at set up. 1000s of miles of testing can of course overcome that. Trial and error to see what works. But that's no use to him this year.
He may have won 7 world championships, but he's had plenty of help along the way. IMO, Schumacher's achievements have as much to do with the car/team/orders/tactics as they do with his raw talent,
Where he's been exceptional, has been in engineering his situation in a a given team, to extract the absolute maximum from the team, the car, himself.
But now that he can't do that, he's floundering and resorting to type.
"Cheating" may have been acceptable at Benetton/Renault (as the facts prove) and Ferrari (again as the facts prove) but I doubt that Mercedes Benz will want that association with their global brand.
#72
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
In the first place it is nothing to do with his nationality. A Brit behaving like that would get just as much criticism for unsporting and dangerous behaviour which is his standard method.
What sort of speed would you say they were doing when he pushed Barrichello towards that wall? How would you feel if you were driving and he did that to you? Barrichello got himself into a position to pass by his driving skill. Are you saying it is part of the sport to deliberately try to make another driver crash into a wall? Is that how you want to see F1 as standard practice?
If Barrichllo had hit that wall if it was longer are you saying it could be certain that he would suffer no injury? Is that the right way to go racing? When I was racing anyone who behaved like that would have got a right sorting out after the race and deservedly so.
This is not stock car racing. Winning is supposed to be a combination of a good car and skilfull driving as well as good teamwork. Behaviour like that of your hero should be heavily punished even to the extent of removing his licence. There is no way that risking injury to another driver in order to win can be justified.
Les
What sort of speed would you say they were doing when he pushed Barrichello towards that wall? How would you feel if you were driving and he did that to you? Barrichello got himself into a position to pass by his driving skill. Are you saying it is part of the sport to deliberately try to make another driver crash into a wall? Is that how you want to see F1 as standard practice?
If Barrichllo had hit that wall if it was longer are you saying it could be certain that he would suffer no injury? Is that the right way to go racing? When I was racing anyone who behaved like that would have got a right sorting out after the race and deservedly so.
This is not stock car racing. Winning is supposed to be a combination of a good car and skilfull driving as well as good teamwork. Behaviour like that of your hero should be heavily punished even to the extent of removing his licence. There is no way that risking injury to another driver in order to win can be justified.
Les
#73
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So let me get this straight. You are basing your evidence that Schumacher's move on Hill was not deliberate on the views of one Jounalist who was there at the time, rather than the views and opinions of many others who were there at the time, and have analysed the video evidence subsequently? Remember too, that at that time Schumacher had not shown his true "win at all costs" colours..
As for the rest of your rant. you don't like him. We get it. Hence not much point debating. Although did laugh at your mention of Irvine ... like when has anything Eddie said not been taken with a pinch of salt.
P.S. He won at least two championships in not the best car... arguably 4. More luck I guess.
Last edited by f1_fan; 03 August 2010 at 12:02 PM.
#74
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to hear how Schuey parking his car at the Rascass in Monaco wasn't cold, cynical, calculated cheating.......F1 fan care to defend him on this one too?
For me he's a very fast driver who is just way too prepared to win at any cost.
And read my first post in this thread, I'm not (wasn't) anti-Schuey.......
For me he's a very fast driver who is just way too prepared to win at any cost.
And read my first post in this thread, I'm not (wasn't) anti-Schuey.......
#75
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What cliche to use? There are so many to pick from.
We all know that he'll try anything to win, to beat down his competitors. I believe most, if not all of his infamous little incidents have been mentioned on this thread. I agree it's his MO. If you can't win/beat them outright, then bend the rules/outright cheat to get them.
There's being an aggressive driver, then there is being a menace and a true danger, and that is what we saw on Sunday. He'd have been the same arrogant **** if Rubens had gone in the wall and been seriously injured. He'd have still insisted he wasn't doing anything wrong, as per usual.
I fully expect that no matter what car he is in, he'd be pulling the same tricks. If he were in a red bull he'd be taking out Lewis and Jenson.
One can of course say Senna was a menace, and it's very true, he was, as one particular incident showed, hmm, I seem to recall someone else pulling a similar move to guarantee a victory, wonder where they learnt that from.
I would have liked to have seen him black flagged, which would be nothing new to him, he's had one before, and given a two race ban.
We all know that he'll try anything to win, to beat down his competitors. I believe most, if not all of his infamous little incidents have been mentioned on this thread. I agree it's his MO. If you can't win/beat them outright, then bend the rules/outright cheat to get them.
There's being an aggressive driver, then there is being a menace and a true danger, and that is what we saw on Sunday. He'd have been the same arrogant **** if Rubens had gone in the wall and been seriously injured. He'd have still insisted he wasn't doing anything wrong, as per usual.
I fully expect that no matter what car he is in, he'd be pulling the same tricks. If he were in a red bull he'd be taking out Lewis and Jenson.
One can of course say Senna was a menace, and it's very true, he was, as one particular incident showed, hmm, I seem to recall someone else pulling a similar move to guarantee a victory, wonder where they learnt that from.
I would have liked to have seen him black flagged, which would be nothing new to him, he's had one before, and given a two race ban.
#76
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have picked your last point up as I wonder if you know why he was black flagged? For passing on the parade lap, a rule broken every week by drivers before and after that event and one since consigned to the bin. If you knew anything about the internal machinations of F1 in 1994 you would know why he was black flagged and why he was given a 2 race ban and later why he was disqulaified from wining the Belgian GP. Do some research on Senna's death, Ecclestone's manipulation of the championship in order to 'save' F1 after the loss of its greatest driver, Benetton's suspected infringements and the whole sorry behind the scenes legal mess that ensued there..... maybe then you can make a more informed and sensible comment... until then why not just go back to posting about your beloved Apple products.... something you actually know something about!!
#77
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Too old and desperate now - cheating vile loathsome man. No self-respect at all. Might be rich & successful, but goes to show - put him in a rubbish car, he's pretty average.
Same stands for people like Villeneuve etc - put them in average cars, and they're "genius" soon vanishes.
Same stands for people like Villeneuve etc - put them in average cars, and they're "genius" soon vanishes.
Too old and desperate - for what?
No self respect - he's old school FFS
The car to be fair is not average
However - I bet that next year will be a whole different matter.
don't forget - when he went to Ferrari all those years ago that was probably an "average" car and look how that turned out.
I'm not defending his action on Sunday - it was 100% wrong.
And a 10 place grid penalty is well deserved for that, but they should have fined him also.
#78
A shunt like what? Locking wheels at that speed would send one of the cars flying. Which particular landing points would have been "no problem"? What about flying debris? What if someone had been exiting the pits?
I'm no Michael fan and I agree that Adelaide '94 was as much Damon's fault but his first instinct in these scenarios is worrying at best............
Last edited by SimonD; 03 August 2010 at 12:47 PM.
#79
Scooby Regular
In hindsight Hill is at fault too, for not waiting, but then its racing, you have to take opportunities as they arise.
As for the rest of your rant. you don't like him. We get it. Hence not much point debating. Although did laugh at your mention of Irvine ... like when has anything Eddie said not been taken with a pinch of salt.
P.S. He won at least two championships in not the best car... arguably 4. More luck I guess.
No, I don't like him. Nothing to do with nationality. Nothnoig to do with his arrogance. What I don't like is the fact that he is prepared to blatantly cheat to gain advantage. Being hard, difficult, even arrogant is one thing. Having to resort to cheating when all else fails is another. It's pathetic, and it undermines all that is good about him.
He's good, no question. But is he any better in terms of raw talent than many others who haven't won 7 championships (or even any)? I'm not so sure.
He's been beaten like for like by teammates over the years, team mates who were just faster on the day, and none of whom have won championships.
The Senna comparison is interesting, but I believe different. Schumacher doesn't appear to care who he takes off, or tries to take off. The Senna/Prost relationship was personal. Doesn't make it right, but doesn't excuse Schumacher's tactics either.
And Senna was sublime in a racing car. When the cars were unquestionably harder to drive and far more dangerous. Schumacher has had moments of brilliance, but when the car is not set up 100% to his liking, he's been distinctly average too. Much like Button in many respects.
It used to be said that Schumacher could drive around a problem. Clearly he's forgotton how to do that this year.
ps -no silly smilies from me
Last edited by Devildog; 03 August 2010 at 12:53 PM.
#80
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure what the rules would have been if someone was exiting the pit lane at that point?
Probably Rubens would have been penalized for crossing the white line, even though it was Michael who actually pushed him there..
I'm all for driving defensively and well done to MS for being such a wide road block... but these erratic coarse changes to deter overtaking when he's obviously out gunned in a straight line really seam OTT.
When he did it to Massa in Canada, he gave him no room to pass up the inside, fair enough, but then (once he's committed Massa to taking the outside) he dives back to the racing line even though Massa had a slight overlap, and off his front wing as a result.. no penalty as per usual, because MS is a master at knowing what he can get away with, but it does not make it good or sportsmanlike.
Probably Rubens would have been penalized for crossing the white line, even though it was Michael who actually pushed him there..
I'm all for driving defensively and well done to MS for being such a wide road block... but these erratic coarse changes to deter overtaking when he's obviously out gunned in a straight line really seam OTT.
When he did it to Massa in Canada, he gave him no room to pass up the inside, fair enough, but then (once he's committed Massa to taking the outside) he dives back to the racing line even though Massa had a slight overlap, and off his front wing as a result.. no penalty as per usual, because MS is a master at knowing what he can get away with, but it does not make it good or sportsmanlike.
#81
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure what the rules would have been if someone was exiting the pit lane at that point?
Probably Rubens would have been penalized for crossing the white line, even though it was Michael who actually pushed him there..
I'm all for driving defensively and well done to MS for being such a wide road block... but these erratic coarse changes to deter overtaking when he's obviously out gunned in a straight line really seam OTT.
When he did it to Massa in Canada, he gave him no room to pass up the inside, fair enough, but then (once he'd committed Massa to taking the outside line) he dives back to the racing line even though Massa had a slight overlap, and takes off Massa's front wing as a result.. no penalty (as per usual), because MS is a master at knowing what he can get away with, but it does not make it right or remotely sportsmanlike.
if Rubens had opted for the outside in Hungary, we'd have seen MS carry out the same sweeping move as he did on Massa... Relying on the "if you're behind , it's your resposibility to avoid a collision"
Probably Rubens would have been penalized for crossing the white line, even though it was Michael who actually pushed him there..
I'm all for driving defensively and well done to MS for being such a wide road block... but these erratic coarse changes to deter overtaking when he's obviously out gunned in a straight line really seam OTT.
When he did it to Massa in Canada, he gave him no room to pass up the inside, fair enough, but then (once he'd committed Massa to taking the outside line) he dives back to the racing line even though Massa had a slight overlap, and takes off Massa's front wing as a result.. no penalty (as per usual), because MS is a master at knowing what he can get away with, but it does not make it right or remotely sportsmanlike.
if Rubens had opted for the outside in Hungary, we'd have seen MS carry out the same sweeping move as he did on Massa... Relying on the "if you're behind , it's your resposibility to avoid a collision"
Last edited by scooby L; 03 August 2010 at 04:35 PM.
#83
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not that I have a problem with Schumacher or Senna driving hard and pushing the limits of acceptability. It's why they have 10 championships between them - they are winners!
If he is so crap at driving a poor car how come he was miles in front of Barrichello in 2005 when the Ferrari was a dog. He still came 3rd in the championship that year. Oh and how about coming second in a car with only 5th gear. Like Button FFS LOL!!!!
#85
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
He's good, no question. But is he any better in terms of raw talent than many others who haven't won 7 championships (or even any)? I'm not so sure. Schumacher has had moments of brilliance, but when the car is not set up 100% to his liking, he's been distinctly average too. Much like Button in many respects.
#86
Scooby Regular
The alternate view is that Schumacher cheats because he knows he won't get hurt, which makes it even more pre meditated and hence worse.
Just like your discussions with Jack, you tend to misinterpret what is posted
This is always going to be difficult given that your light emits form Schumachers ****
Button needs the car set up 100% to his liking otherwise he can't perform to his best. That was the only comparison I was making. You are correct in that they are very different in all other respects. For one, Button isn't a cheating *******
The Ferrari he took to second with a knackered gearbox was set up exactly how he liked it, after extensive testing.
The 2005 Ferrari may have been a "dog" at he start of the year (he was lapped in the opening race IIRC) but was a lot better as the year went on. He outqualified Barrichello 12-7 in 2005. That's less than 3 races away from a 50:50 result, and practically his worse showing against him year on year. Let's look at that again - in the car you describe as a dog, he had his 2nd worst qualifying record against his teammate. Race results against Barrichello don't count given the team orders situation that have alway existed.
My only reference to his being crap were my comments about his performance in this year's car - his being a "bit crap". He can't get anywhere this year in a car not built around him and that he can't test. A car that's not set up 100% for him, and a car that Ross Brawn publicly states Michael is struggling to get the set up right, to get the tyres working. He's been soundly beaten by his team mate (when his team mate has 4 wheels on his car). He's been beaten by rookies (who've also had zero testing) in what should be inferior cars.
If he was as good as you say, he should be performing better than he is. there is no question that he has had some stunning drives, but he's no God, and he's no better than many others.
Not that I have a problem with Schumacher or Senna driving hard and pushing the limits of acceptability. It's why they have 10 championships between them - they are winners!
LOL - that is the best laugh I've had in ages.
If he is so crap at driving a poor car how come he was miles in front of Barrichello in 2005 when the Ferrari was a dog. He still came 3rd in the championship that year. Oh and how about coming second in a car with only 5th gear. Like Button FFS LOL!!!!
LOL - that is the best laugh I've had in ages.
If he is so crap at driving a poor car how come he was miles in front of Barrichello in 2005 when the Ferrari was a dog. He still came 3rd in the championship that year. Oh and how about coming second in a car with only 5th gear. Like Button FFS LOL!!!!
This is always going to be difficult given that your light emits form Schumachers ****
Button needs the car set up 100% to his liking otherwise he can't perform to his best. That was the only comparison I was making. You are correct in that they are very different in all other respects. For one, Button isn't a cheating *******
The Ferrari he took to second with a knackered gearbox was set up exactly how he liked it, after extensive testing.
The 2005 Ferrari may have been a "dog" at he start of the year (he was lapped in the opening race IIRC) but was a lot better as the year went on. He outqualified Barrichello 12-7 in 2005. That's less than 3 races away from a 50:50 result, and practically his worse showing against him year on year. Let's look at that again - in the car you describe as a dog, he had his 2nd worst qualifying record against his teammate. Race results against Barrichello don't count given the team orders situation that have alway existed.
My only reference to his being crap were my comments about his performance in this year's car - his being a "bit crap". He can't get anywhere this year in a car not built around him and that he can't test. A car that's not set up 100% for him, and a car that Ross Brawn publicly states Michael is struggling to get the set up right, to get the tyres working. He's been soundly beaten by his team mate (when his team mate has 4 wheels on his car). He's been beaten by rookies (who've also had zero testing) in what should be inferior cars.
If he was as good as you say, he should be performing better than he is. there is no question that he has had some stunning drives, but he's no God, and he's no better than many others.
Last edited by Devildog; 03 August 2010 at 02:56 PM.
#87
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 2005 Ferrari may have been a "dog" at he start of the year (he was lapped in the opening race IIRC) but was a lot better as the year went on. He outqualified Barrichello 12-7 in 2005. That's less than 3 races away from a 50:50 result, and practically his worse showing against him year on year. Let's look at that again - in the car you describe as a dog, he had his 2nd worst qualifying record against his teammate. Race results against Barrichello don't count given the team orders situation that have alway existed.
My only reference to his being crap were my comments about his performance in this year's car - his being a "bit crap". He can't get anywhere this year in a car not built around him and that he can't test. A car that's not set up 100% for him, and a car that Ross Brawn publicly states Michael is struggling to get the set up right, to get the tyres working. He's been soundly beaten by his team mate (when his team mate has 4 wheels on his car). He's been beaten by rookies (who've also had zero testing) in what should be inferior cars.
I know what I have seen, if you choose not to see it then fair enough. I consider myself lucky to have seen Schumacher's career and that of Senna, Prost and Mansell.... they will be who I rememeber whereas I doubt I shall bother recalling too much about Button, Damon or that perennial underachiever Coulthard in my dotage.
#88
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=f1_fan;9528686] Have you any idea how sad and pathetic you sound? No change there then LOL!
quote]
.
Nope that would be you. You say you are a big fan of the sport . But defend the most dangerous man on the track. Its not the first time he's put someones life at risk. Sooner or later this idiot will kill someone.
quote]
.
Nope that would be you. You say you are a big fan of the sport . But defend the most dangerous man on the track. Its not the first time he's put someones life at risk. Sooner or later this idiot will kill someone.