Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

God made the World!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 September 2010, 08:25 AM
  #241  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
Hi Les,

This story is one of the reasons I do not like the Royal Family status.

How is it possible that they would even consider that they had a right to 2% of the WHOLE budget allocated to the WHOLE of the UK to support extraordinary heating bills. Makes me sick.

Of course it was refused but they should never have asked on the beginning.

If they cannot afford to be the Royal Family then they should do what other countries have done - trade down or make it commercially viable. And if they bring in Billions as everyone says then the ability to monetise it should a piece of cake!
I'd agree, but the idea of becoming a republic scares me with the new breed of professional politicians and cynical public 'servants' feathering their nest with an bloated public sector full of non-jobs.

The less power these peeps have the better IMHO.
Old 26 September 2010, 08:27 AM
  #242  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you a Marxist?
Old 26 September 2010, 08:31 AM
  #243  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
Are you a Marxist?
Yes and no.

But that does not make me a political activist.
Old 26 September 2010, 08:34 AM
  #244  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was just curious as your posts read like a theoretical Marxist.
Old 26 September 2010, 09:51 AM
  #245  
salsa-king
Scooby Senior
 
salsa-king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nottm
Posts: 15,069
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

France is a nice place to live
Old 26 September 2010, 09:54 AM
  #246  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
I was just curious as your posts read like a theoretical Marxist.
Well I like Marx's historical materialism as a way to explain history and view the current economic arrangements of society, but otoh I agree with Popper that is negates the role of the individual and potentially is at odds with the notion of democracy.

But basically when it comes to personal political views I'm more of a liberal and would probably vote Tory.
Old 26 September 2010, 11:00 AM
  #247  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by salsa-king
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa-king View Post
http://thesimpleanswers.com/2009/08/08/does-god-exist/

has anyone else read this yet?
That just demonstrates how open the Bible is to interpretation.
Old 26 September 2010, 11:49 AM
  #248  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
Hi Les,

This story is one of the reasons I do not like the Royal Family status.

How is it possible that they would even consider that they had a right to 2% of the WHOLE budget allocated to the WHOLE of the UK to support extraordinary heating bills. Makes me sick.

Of course it was refused but they should never have asked on the beginning.

If they cannot afford to be the Royal Family then they should do what other countries have done - trade down or make it commercially viable. And if they bring in Billions as everyone says then the ability to monetise it should a piece of cake!
I had not seen that story and agree that the aide should have known better. Maybe he was trying to make a name for himself in the royal household.

I don't think much of the way that Prince Andrew plays the system using expensive transport for his royal duty which always seems to end up in a free game of golf, or the way that Prince Charles does not seem to be able to do anything much for himself-getting a manservant to hold his specimen jar for him while he fills it is going too far! Having several boiled eggs done in the morning so that he can find one that is suitably cooked is another example.

The Queen has made positive efforts to save money in transport etc. Princess Anne is well known for the very large amount of work she does in her royal duties, bit hard to keep up with I'd have thought, I hear also that Prince Philip does not drag his heels either, especially at his age.

As I understand it, the Royal Family has returned a great deal into the possession of the country in exchange for the civil list. The Queen has to pay all the expenses out of that. She does pay tax. She does have to maintain the royal palaces and household etc. by virtue of her position.

I think that the advantages we get in return from having a royal family make them well worth having and I think this country would be very much poorer without them.

Les
Old 26 September 2010, 12:09 PM
  #249  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
Having several boiled eggs done in the morning so that he can find one that is suitably cooked is another example.
Yes we could half the deficit by stopping such outrageous waste!
Old 26 September 2010, 02:30 PM
  #250  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Prince Charles also abuses his position in my view. He stopped a perfectly valid commercial property venture by writing to the Qatari Royal family to tell them of his displeasure. His aides allegedly then tried to cover up the communication when the venture owners and the architect sued both parties.

To me this is a complete abuse of a very privileged position.

If a senior political figure intervened in such a way there would be an outcry!
Old 26 September 2010, 03:32 PM
  #251  
Gregsti01
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Gregsti01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Charles is one of the old school Royals,I believe behind the scenes he plays a good part,he was one of many to object to the planners,would you like to have that built next to you? Royal Family do a lot of good for our country,at least they pay taxes more than I can say for 6mill of population give or take one ore two,Just imagine president blair
Old 26 September 2010, 03:58 PM
  #252  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I was next door to it then yes I would have been happy for it to be built.

I think it is entirely wrong for an untrained self-appointed representative of conservative values in architecture to abuse this position.

Some of our most historic buildings were seen as radical and nouveau in their day.

Now we will just have some anodyne pastiche of our glorious past rather than a bold statement of the direction for our country celebrating some of the talent of the best architects in the world that come from yes, London, where they are stifled from practising.
Old 26 September 2010, 04:01 PM
  #253  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BTW - as for taxation - they may pay an honorary amount. Please convince me that they pay for a) their full share taxed as if it were a commercial venture and b) pay more than reap from the public purse supporting their ventures.
Old 26 September 2010, 04:09 PM
  #254  
Gregsti01
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Gregsti01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Trout
BTW - as for taxation - they may pay an honorary amount. Please convince me that they pay for a) their full share taxed as if it were a commercial venture and b) pay more than reap from the public purse supporting their ventures.
http://www.duchyofcornwall.org/index.htm

Interesting insight
Old 26 September 2010, 04:51 PM
  #255  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
If I was next door to it then yes I would have been happy for it to be built.

I think it is entirely wrong for an untrained self-appointed representative of conservative values in architecture to abuse this position.

Some of our most historic buildings were seen as radical and nouveau in their day.

Now we will just have some anodyne pastiche of our glorious past rather than a bold statement of the direction for our country celebrating some of the talent of the best architects in the world that come from yes, London, where they are stifled from practising.
Maybe, but otoh isn't he allowed an opinion? All he did was voice it?

Yes we should experiment with architecture but otoh lots of our cities have been blighted with buildings which put quick profit over quality. It's very sad to see and is 3rd world in some respects with the lack of proper town planning. Manchester is a prime example with cheap apartment blocks thrown up ***** nilly in a mix of styles like they were designed by some schizophrenic architect in a manic phase. It's given the place a discordant feel and made it a mess.
Old 26 September 2010, 05:41 PM
  #256  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do not think that writing directly to the Qatari royal family as the Prince of Wales is quite the same as 'voicing an opinion'! Simply by doing what he did would have created a major diplomatic problem had the Qatari's ignored him.

And this was not some cheap development but a development by one of the world's leading architects.
Old 26 September 2010, 05:51 PM
  #257  
Trout
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gregsti01
Hi Greg,

I am not sure what I have learned from looking at this other than to feel more republican than when I started

I am certainly failing to see past the privilege to understand whether Charlie Chester is paying his full tax on his true commercial value.
Old 27 September 2010, 10:20 AM
  #258  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
I do not think that writing directly to the Qatari royal family as the Prince of Wales is quite the same as 'voicing an opinion'! Simply by doing what he did would have created a major diplomatic problem had the Qatari's ignored him.
Even better, he only voiced his opinion in private!
Old 27 September 2010, 11:59 AM
  #259  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Yes we could half the deficit by stopping such outrageous waste!
So you have found the magic bullet! How very impressive. I think Prince Charles is a well meaning sort of chap in general, but some of the examples he sets are thoughtless. That is the point in case you did not realise it!

How about the amount that is spent on the police protection insisted on for his daughters by his brother Prince Andrew? None of the other royal children feel that necessity.

Les
Old 27 September 2010, 12:02 PM
  #260  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One good thing is the power the Queen has to prorogue Parliament should that become necessary, even if it is unlikely. At least that is something that could be used to keep the government in check.

Les
Old 27 September 2010, 12:14 PM
  #261  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,046
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
One good thing is the power the Queen has to prorogue Parliament should that become necessary, even if it is unlikely. At least that is something that could be used to keep the government in check.

Les
She should have done it seven years ago!
Old 28 September 2010, 12:26 PM
  #262  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
She should have done it seven years ago!
Funny you should say that!

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Pro-Line Motorsport
ScoobyNet General
9
28 September 2015 09:48 PM



Quick Reply: God made the World!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.