Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

TV License.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 November 2010, 06:44 PM
  #61  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dedrater
You do not need a TV licence to watch Iplayer, this is fact and I have got the letter from the BBC to confirm this.

I haven't paid a TV licence for over 10 years, still get 1-2 letters a month telling me they are taking me to court.

All our TV is downloaded and streamed round the house.
See the extract from TVL above - definitively you do need a TV Licence if you watch content live on the iPlayer. It is dubious whether you need one for on-demand.

I am also not sure whether a letter from the BBC counts. You need a letter from the TV Licensing Authority which is not the BBC - they have jurisdiction on this matter.
Old 19 November 2010, 06:57 PM
  #62  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
See the extract from TVL above - definitively you do need a TV Licence if you watch content live on the iPlayer. It is dubious whether you need one for on-demand.

I am also not sure whether a letter from the BBC counts. You need a letter from the TV Licensing Authority which is not the BBC - they have jurisdiction on this matter.
This whole subject looks like a legal can of worms.
Surely it is not the TVLA who would have the final say in this matter, but some Judge in the High Court, re TVLA vs Joe Bloggs or whatever.
Why if I didn't know any better, I would guess our legislators are just a bunch of scamming lawyers on the make.
Old 19 November 2010, 07:02 PM
  #63  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My analogy is that Lloyds Bank may have a view on financial regulation; but it is the FSA who will give absolute guidance.

As with all these matters, you are right that if it came to it the High Court would be the final arbitration.
Old 19 November 2010, 07:07 PM
  #64  
madscoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
madscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: u cant touch this
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ChefDude
i don't watch any broadcast tv and, just through constant harrassment, have relented and bought a tv license.

i have 2 tvs but we just watch dvds. we have no aerials, etc.

really p!sses me off.
have a tv engineer remove the reciever part of you telly , rendering them incapable of recieving a signal, make sure you get a invoice to prove the work has been done, they then become a monitor for your dvd player or video player they cannot do you for watchind payed for dvds etc
Old 19 November 2010, 07:07 PM
  #65  
1978transam
Scooby Regular
 
1978transam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: cardiff
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont pay the tv license thankfull, my landlord does........... but if he stops paying for it, I can get FIRED! stealing from the company...... i work on set for some of the programmes....dr who, torchwood etc


still dont watch them tho. more a dvd guy.
Old 19 November 2010, 08:21 PM
  #66  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
See the extract from TVL above - definitively you do need a TV Licence if you watch content live on the iPlayer. It is dubious whether you need one for on-demand.

I am also not sure whether a letter from the BBC counts. You need a letter from the TV Licensing Authority which is not the BBC - they have jurisdiction on this matter.
If it is live, as it is being broadcast , then yes you do (Although is is completely unenforceable). On demand, you 100% do not need one.

The TVLA is the BBC btw, it is funded by them and they have no jurisdiction on anything.
Old 19 November 2010, 08:23 PM
  #67  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madscoob
have a tv engineer remove the reciever part of you telly , rendering them incapable of recieving a signal, make sure you get a invoice to prove the work has been done, they then become a monitor for your dvd player or video player they cannot do you for watchind payed for dvds etc
At the end of the day, it will not matter to the TVLA what you do, you will still receive threat o grams every month, trust me
Old 19 November 2010, 08:25 PM
  #68  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here you go, from the BBC itself, I can scan the letter mimicking what it says it the link, if anyone needs it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcintern...re_a_tv_1.html
Old 19 November 2010, 09:16 PM
  #69  
Scooby.Newbie
Scooby Regular
 
Scooby.Newbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Are we there yet?
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wish
I too hate paying for the TV licence when it arrives on the door mate every September
Try DD, it costs the same but it only hurts when you check your bank statement a month later, ergo a months extra happyness
Old 19 November 2010, 10:23 PM
  #70  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madscoob
have a tv engineer remove the reciever part of you telly , rendering them incapable of recieving a signal, make sure you get a invoice to prove the work has been done, they then become a monitor for your dvd player or video player they cannot do you for watchind payed for dvds etc
I don't think you need to do that. Having a TV is not evidence enough for a prosecution - as I understand it - the TV license people need evidence you are watching broadcast TV.
Old 20 November 2010, 10:56 AM
  #71  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isn't it something like £12 a month? So 40p a day?
Do you have sky?

Someone needs to get out more!
Old 20 November 2010, 11:00 AM
  #72  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its even cheaper if you dont pay it...........................
Old 20 November 2010, 11:56 AM
  #73  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stef_2010
Its even cheaper if you dont pay it...........................
Or put up with 6 months of free bog paper, before renewing it for a further year


It took them around 10 months to even send somebody out when i tested the system after moving into my new pad
Old 20 November 2010, 09:05 PM
  #74  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I don't think you need to do that. Having a TV is not evidence enough for a prosecution - as I understand it - the TV license people need evidence you are watching broadcast TV.
The only evidence they can get, is the TVLA actually catching you watching live TV, they are the biggest scumbag company operating in the UK.

One of the biggest lies they had the public believe, was their TV detection vans, they even had 24 of them driving around the country and in the back of them was......**** all, poor lads driving them, most of been soul destroying.
Old 20 November 2010, 10:49 PM
  #75  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dedrater
The only evidence they can get, is the TVLA actually catching you watching live TV, they are the biggest scumbag company operating in the UK.
It's all commission with them.

Had one threaten me when I was a student. He was a weird insidious bloke.
Old 20 November 2010, 10:54 PM
  #76  
Jamz3k
Scooby Regular
 
Jamz3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I aint paid mine in over a year as the money they were taking out of my bank account didn't add up to the price of a TV License so now they get nothing.
Old 20 November 2010, 11:14 PM
  #77  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It's all commission with them.

Had one threaten me when I was a student. He was a weird insidious bloke.
Not forgetting violent (check the Guardian and Youtube) and none of them are CRB checked, the BBC say that someone needs to come and check your house, that person could be a rapist, murderer, pedo.

Anyone reading this, never let them in your household, phone the Police.
Old 21 November 2010, 02:48 PM
  #78  
22BUK
Scooby Regular
 
22BUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From: http://www.bbctvlicence.com/Tips%20f...harassment.htm

Fortunately, there is a way to stop TVL/BBC approaches. Although houses and flats are private property, there exists an "implied right of access" to enable postal deliveries, newspaper rounds, and other people who wish to visit. This means that the pathway, doorbell and letter box may be used by visitors without the express permission of the owner. Invitiation to use them is implied. As a result of this, TVL/BBC can come up your path and ring your door bell.
To prevent TVL/BBC approaching your property, write to them, stating that you have withdrawn their implied right of access. There is no need to indicate whether you have a television, and you do not need to give your name. You can withdraw access in the name of "legal occupier".
That will (should) keep their employees away, but it will not stop the delivery of TVL/BBC letters, since it is the postman who uses your letter box. So, inform TVL/BBC that you consider their written contact as harassment. This combined approach - withdrawing the right of implied access and informing them that their contact is harassment - should prevent further contact. At least for a while.
Old 22 November 2010, 12:23 AM
  #79  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 22BUK
From: http://www.bbctvlicence.com/Tips%20f...harassment.htm

Fortunately, there is a way to stop TVL/BBC approaches. Although houses and flats are private property, there exists an "implied right of access" to enable postal deliveries, newspaper rounds, and other people who wish to visit. This means that the pathway, doorbell and letter box may be used by visitors without the express permission of the owner. Invitiation to use them is implied. As a result of this, TVL/BBC can come up your path and ring your door bell.
To prevent TVL/BBC approaching your property, write to them, stating that you have withdrawn their implied right of access. There is no need to indicate whether you have a television, and you do not need to give your name. You can withdraw access in the name of "legal occupier".
That will (should) keep their employees away, but it will not stop the delivery of TVL/BBC letters, since it is the postman who uses your letter box. So, inform TVL/BBC that you consider their written contact as harassment. This combined approach - withdrawing the right of implied access and informing them that their contact is harassment - should prevent further contact. At least for a while.
Can they get a warrant?
Old 22 November 2010, 01:20 AM
  #80  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Can they get a warrant?
Yes. They can apply for a warrant through the courts.
Old 22 November 2010, 01:24 AM
  #81  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Yes. They can apply for a warrant through the courts.
Sure but on what grounds? That you ignore them?

You may not even have a TV.

Can a judge grant a warrant to effectively check your property with no just-cause?
Old 22 November 2010, 03:43 PM
  #82  
22BUK
Scooby Regular
 
22BUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Search warrants are rare for several good reasons:
- they cost TVL/BBC money to apply for
- they need evidence to present to a magistrate... simply seeing a TV is not good enough as you could have easily just been watching a DVD/playing a console game
- if a search warrant went wrong, i.e. there was nothing tuned in to receive live broadcasts then the publicity alone would be very damaging to the BBC/TVL... especially if you filmed the whole event.

You don't even have to shut your blinds... just angle them so that light comes in and those TVL idiots can't see in. Other than that, ignore the letters and slam the door in the TVL goons face when they visit. NEVER answer any of their questions.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LSherratt
Non Scooby Related
32
22 November 2015 05:43 PM
Boss Hogg
Other Marques
17
03 December 2003 11:08 PM
rb5 286
Non Scooby Related
3
01 April 2003 09:15 PM



Quick Reply: TV License.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.