Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Israeli - Pleatinian conflict...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 April 2002, 01:13 PM
  #33  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Like I already said,
Britain is a state.
there was no state in Israel!
there was no man's land ruled by you the British, and in this land where living both Jews and Arabs so it was decieded to split the land!!
whats not fair here????
Old 10 April 2002, 01:35 PM
  #35  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

NO!!
1948 - Israel declares independence, arab countries react by attacking Israel!
during this war Israel gain some of the Arab's lands. they fought and lost!
1967 - after a lot of military acts against Israel. Israel decieds to fight the Arabs, during this war which lasts only 6 days Israel occupies the Sinai, west bank, Gaza and the Golan hieghts.
Israel offers to give back those lands in return for peace' the Arab countries refuse.
1973 - All Arab countries attack Israel on one of the most sacred day for Jews "Yom Kipur" after harsh fightings Israel win!!
1978 - Egypt takes on Israel prposal and sign a peace treaty in return for the Sianai (proof that Israel meant what they said).
1994 - Israel signs the Oslo agreement and gives back most of Gaza and the West bank...
2000 - Camp david, Israel and U.S offer Arafat a state on 95% of the land, including east Jerusalem.. Arafat says NO!!
Old 10 April 2002, 01:42 PM
  #36  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So time began in 1948?
Old 10 April 2002, 01:45 PM
  #37  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

NO'
before that like wrote there was a British rule, and before tham there was a Turkish rule...should I go on.
and there where both Jews and Arabs living in the Land we know now as Israel!!
Old 10 April 2002, 01:52 PM
  #39  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Now I understand that most British people are pro Palestinians...
I wish you should never have to deal with the resaults of feeling sorry for them, like Isaid before play with a snake its goona bite.
look at what happened in NY, don't think London is ammuned.
I feel bad as I'm half English myself.
Old 10 April 2002, 02:03 PM
  #42  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Surely that 5% is not that important to Israel yet if it gets the Palestinians into peace agreements then it would be worth it.
its not the 5% that made them leave the table,
they want us to let all the refugees go back to Israel, we are not planning to let that happen,
those million refugees joined forces with the Arab countries around us against Israel cause they beleived we'll lose and they'll get our lands in return.
we (6 million) see them as traitors, and we don't plan on giving them any prizes for their actions in the past.
also some say arafat actually wants to go back to the 1948 lands, and this will never happen cause these lands where lost during a war they inniated, even the U.N say its ours!!

P.S
on a raid on one of Arafat's offices the IDF found chemical weapons that was probably destined to be used in a terror act against Israel.
Old 10 April 2002, 02:17 PM
  #44  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

read my post...its not the 5% that made them say NO,
its the refugees issue, and we will never have over million refugees, that left willingly and even fought us come back to Israel.
those people are traitors in our book.
its like 10 million (proportions) british would have joined the Germans during WW2 with the promise that if Germany wins they'll rule England.
would you take them back ???
Old 10 April 2002, 02:35 PM
  #46  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

95% of the occupied trritories those we took in 1967 when we iniated the war.
the lands from 1948 are ours because we didn't win them over from no one!!
there was no Palestine state on the other side and the land was also not of any other arab country, so when they called war on Israel, we manged to increase our lands, but not on anybody's acoount.
the arabs living on these lands either ran away (the refugees) or stayed and are now Israeli citizens (in a rescent survey 80% said they want to stay under Israeli rule!!)/

agian the 5% is about the 1967 war...and thats not what made arafat leave the peace talks but rather the refugees issue!!
on which I wrote:
its the refugees issue, and we will never have over million refugees, that left willingly and even fought us come back to Israel.
those people are traitors in our book.
its like 10 million (proportions) british would have joined the Germans during WW2 with the promise that if Germany wins they'll rule England.
would you take them back ???
Old 10 April 2002, 02:43 PM
  #47  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Now I understand that most British people are pro Palestinians
I am not pro Palestinian. Both sides are using agression to defeat agression. Much like the British Army and IRA did for 25 years (this time round) There are two sides to every story, and only when people in control can see both sides, or are forced to see both sides can any progress be made. Your view seems to be that there are only two extreme views, either pro Israel or pro Palestinian. As we don't agree with you we are Pro Palestinian This is the root of the problem. When you and your people are brave enough to look at a a wider view there can be no progress towards resolution. The same statement applies to the Palestinians
Old 10 April 2002, 02:47 PM
  #48  
tonybooth
Scooby Regular
 
tonybooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In Faecorum Semper Solum Profundum Variat
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think it is all very sad in this day and age. Wish I lived in Switzerland right now.

TONY
Old 10 April 2002, 02:50 PM
  #50  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You know Israel already showed its intentions in the past...
*we gave back Sinai to Egypt
*We got out of Lebanon
*We voted for Rabin and Barak, sat down with the Palestinians and got spitt on the face.

What else do you want us to do?????

I didn't see the big effort the Palestinians did.
belive me if I didn't see the other's side I wouldn't have voted for Rabin and Barak...
but I must tell you the last year made me think I was wrong.
Old 10 April 2002, 02:59 PM
  #51  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Anyway,
Thank you guys for writing your views, its basically what I wanted (to hear what the British think)
No hard feelings, I tried my best to express my point of view.
Have a nice day...
Old 10 April 2002, 03:00 PM
  #52  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

p.s. Don't be fooled by propaganda. Treat everything you hear about the other side as propaganda. Go and find out what their propaganda says. Somewhere in the middle is the truth.

You see - I heard from a reliable source that the IDF planted the chemical weapons. If you simply dismiss this or believe it without question then you have been taken in by the propaganda. Ask youself which seems most realistic?

Would you store your own chemical weapons in your office? I certainly wouldn't, but maybe some would. In any case you cannot justifiably use this as fact
Old 10 April 2002, 03:07 PM
  #53  
tonybooth
Scooby Regular
 
tonybooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In Faecorum Semper Solum Profundum Variat
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Alright then maybe not Switzerland then. Andorra maybe.

TONY
Old 10 April 2002, 03:10 PM
  #55  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Would you store your own chemical weapons in your office? I certainly wouldn't, but maybe some would. In any case you cannot justifiably use this as fact
I trust the IDF competely, and if my offices (its a compound not a room) where the last place for the other side too look for than ...YES!
Old 10 April 2002, 03:30 PM
  #56  
tonybooth
Scooby Regular
 
tonybooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In Faecorum Semper Solum Profundum Variat
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

At least I could go skiing everyday

TONY

Mr Sharon & Mr Arafat - Have a word with yourselves.
Old 04 October 2002, 10:12 AM
  #57  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Quite simply while Sharon is in power the situation will continue to get worse
Sharon is in power for how long? .. less than 2 years.
this situation is going on for how long? ... 15 years.
in between we had Rabin, Peres and Barak...and what did we get...Terror.
During all this time who was in power on the other side...Arafat.

He is an ex military leader bent on seeing a blood bath and using all the military power he once was part of
and what is Arafat...an ex (I say present) Terrorist!!

you see the Israeli soldiers smiling and laughing in front of the cameras and telling the news crews to get out because they dont want the outside world seeing what they are doing
worng!
they are not smiling while we also have deads (22 soldiers yesturday) and we don't cover up anything, the reason is because we already had one Italian reporter killed by mistake.

personally I would be sh!tting myself and be far from smiling
I have reserves next month (and I'm a tank commander) belive me they're are ****ting not smiling!!

but by going in and murdering innocent Palestinians
What?? there are about 500 Palestinians killed by now, 99% armed men, 1% innocent (and not on purpose).
You must be joking, if Israel wanted to kill innocent people why send in troops, we can use artilery, and bomb the hell out of this place.
Q: When England had troops in N. Irland and innocent people where killed by mistake it was because England wanted to kill them? I say NO!!

Quite simply if another country invaded my neighborhood I wouldnt exactly be too hospitable to them to say the least.
if you would have joined hands with the my enemies be prepared to pay the price!

Just because the terrorists are hiding in refugee camps doesnt then mean u should bomb the **** out of the refugee camps, what about the innocent people such as children???
If this was the case we could have just drop bombs on them using our Jet fighters, but we don't we use infentry to seach the place for wanted people.
and by the way they use places like churches to hide and to shoot from knowing we won't shoot back.



[Edited by elondan - 4/10/2002 10:13:28 AM]
Old 04 October 2002, 10:50 AM
  #58  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ok so all those cobra attack helicopters firing missiles like there is no tomorrow is using infantry is it or have the international press been making it up???
Missiles aren't like bombs, they hit a target as big as a window, and there is also another reason for them and it to keep the terrorists away from the rooftops where they ambush the infentry searching the streets.

an equivalent person in charge of Israels affairs
he is not an equivalent not by far.

As for your figures of 99% are armed men, I am sorry no conflict in the world has that sort of success rate - ie 1% innocent casualties.
I was makling a point that most casualties are not innocent at all.

As for my comments on smiling soldiers, I know what I have seen on the news and these were tank commanders outside the church which is currently beseiged. They certainly didnt look like they were ****ting themselves to me!
You never know what they where smiling about, and while in front of the reporters they are not doing any combat,
be sure that while in combat they don't smile.



[Edited by elondan - 4/10/2002 10:51:48 AM]
Old 04 October 2002, 01:00 PM
  #59  
elondan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
elondan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's quite simple, there where always!! jews living in Israel/Palestine (call hoever you like).
its true there was a smaller number of Jews due to the fact many where deported, but there was always a Jewish community living in Israel.
more than that you had Jews living in Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Egypt Morroco...
My family goes back a lot of generetions in Israel (on my father's side) and English on my mom's side.
What you're saying is like why make an Anglican chuch in Catholic Europe...

a Muslim state created smack bang in the middle of Britain
unlike Britain, there was no Arab state, it was under different rules, Turkish, British...
and the land on which you had Arabs and Jews living was splitted.

[Edited by elondan - 4/10/2002 1:10:03 PM]
Old 04 October 2002, 03:46 PM
  #60  
Sbradley
Scooby Regular
 
Sbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

FWIW, I served in Beirut with the UN and in Ulster with the Royal Marines. I've seen and experienced plenty of terrorist action, thank you

Elondan, I sympathise with you and the Israeli people for the terrorist acts being carried out against you. Unfortunately, I also sympathise with the Palestinians who were displaced by the heavy handed and, frankly, imperialist behaviour of the British government and Lord Balfour in particular.

Right now, nobody is doing anything useful. It may be true that Israel is taking as moderate a line as the electorate will allow. The trouble is, the rest of the world doesn't see it that way, and in the war for hearts and minds Israel is way down on points against Arafat. And in the long run that matters.

Like Mr Churchill said, "Jaw, jaw is far better than war, war."

Oh, and as regards your neighbours and there being no christians or jews in power, take a look at, of all places, Iraq. Tariq Aziz, foreign minister, is a christian. In act, Iraq has the largest proportion of christian people in the Middle East after Israel.

How do I know? Because I'm married to a christian Iraqi.

Made life complicated during the Gulf War, but that's a different story...

Edited to add that while in Beirut I watched the Israeli Air Force bomb an artillery site which had been shelling them. Very accurate bombing, too, from a professional viewpoint. The site was near a school (normal practice to site a high value target near a school, hospital or church to maximise the risk of civilian casualties) but the strike was beatifully contained and nothing else was hit.

Which made the BBC report of an air-riad on a refugee camp a little harder to believe

Propaganda goes both ways and we cannot believe all we see or hear ont he news. I suspect that both sides are distorting things a little, and journalists do have a habit of building a story out of nothing. ("We can't go there because it's dangerous" = Bugger, there goes my bonus. "We can't go there because the (Insert name of army here) are shooting at us" = Maybe I can get something extra for this.

[Edited by Sbradley - 4/10/2002 3:53:37 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
moses
Non Scooby Related
15
14 August 2006 04:20 PM



Quick Reply: Israeli - Pleatinian conflict...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM.