Hayward&Scott SERIOUS fitment problems
#121
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
£500 surely they could of made him another 1 for that, the mark up must be high, as the material cost will be low, the rest is labour witch wont cost them much if at all
#123
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
why would you need a mis-shaped manifold back to reset the jig in the corect position ? im sure that when the jig was made it wasnt aligned with the use of a mis-shaped manifold !
Last edited by white.akita; 17 December 2010 at 06:07 PM.
#126
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
H&SIAL ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Not H&S fault you didn't send it back correctly, it's a £1000 exhaust and you didn't check insurance.
Offering £500 was a good will gesture, it's not admitting fault, fault of what, you not getting insurance!?
Asking for the £500 after declining 8 months later realsiing you made the mistake. haha
If they received the item back i'm sure they would have corrected the issue, if they didn't that's something.
I'm not forgetting the fact the item from the photo's was clearly an incorrect fit, but it happens.
And you agreed to send the item back, you could have said i would like you (H&S) to arrange this, if they declined, then seek legal advise! But both agreed to do it how you did and they offered the costs back.
Hard luck buddy! I'm not judging you![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks
Sam
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Not H&S fault you didn't send it back correctly, it's a £1000 exhaust and you didn't check insurance.
Offering £500 was a good will gesture, it's not admitting fault, fault of what, you not getting insurance!?
Asking for the £500 after declining 8 months later realsiing you made the mistake. haha
If they received the item back i'm sure they would have corrected the issue, if they didn't that's something.
I'm not forgetting the fact the item from the photo's was clearly an incorrect fit, but it happens.
And you agreed to send the item back, you could have said i would like you (H&S) to arrange this, if they declined, then seek legal advise! But both agreed to do it how you did and they offered the costs back.
Hard luck buddy! I'm not judging you
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks
Sam
#129
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Blob STi
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#130
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Why's it put you off! H&S said their side of the story and it was totally legitimate.
There are many more please customers with H&S than unpleased!
My H&S Subaru design back box fit perfectly.
Thanks
Sam
There are many more please customers with H&S than unpleased!
My H&S Subaru design back box fit perfectly.
Thanks
Sam
#131
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
So because of an issue with this exhaust, then the op makes an error and is out of pocket, bitches about it, gets offered £500 quid from H&S who dont have their part back (to get a refund you have to send the part back and it has to be received, as stated in several posts), but the OP skimped on the insurance, now you have also heared H&S's version (always 2 sides to a story), OP declines the £500 quid and goes to what sounds to be a small claims court, and loses, then asks for the £500 quid again which is refused (he lost the case, you dont get an offer twice
) so your not going to buy any H&S parts, well I feel sorry for you, if your that short sighted I wouldnt even contemplate doing a search on here, or look for the guy who had a 2 year old back box from H&S that had some corrosion, they replaced it with no issues.
Me, I will stick to buying from H&S, the rest can do what you like, especially if you want to spite yourselves for something someone else did incorrectly (ie not enough insurance on the postage then takes them to small claims court, loses, asks for the cash again, gets a blunt refusal etc).
Tony
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
Me, I will stick to buying from H&S, the rest can do what you like, especially if you want to spite yourselves for something someone else did incorrectly (ie not enough insurance on the postage then takes them to small claims court, loses, asks for the cash again, gets a blunt refusal etc).
Tony
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
#132
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
well either way this tread will have cost them some business only takes a small thing like this to ruin any reputation its sad but true.
so what ever the manufacturing cost of the exhaust was, will it be more than the custom they loose?
so what ever the manufacturing cost of the exhaust was, will it be more than the custom they loose?
#133
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
i've had 2 exhaust systems off of h&s and haven't had a problem, its certainly alot better quality then most other exhausts. plus one mistake doesn't mean everything is wrong.
#139
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't get the point of this whole thread...
The OP is clearly in the wrong for not getting proper insurance on the postage, which H&S already agreed to refund, i.e. why skimp on postage in the first place?
Massive fail on the part of the OP, take it on the chin, and learn from it, don't however decline an initial £500 refund, take it up with the courts, lose the court case, and have the audacity to cry for the £500 you already declined months ago being greedy.
Astonishing that people think H&S are at fault here...
The OP is clearly in the wrong for not getting proper insurance on the postage, which H&S already agreed to refund, i.e. why skimp on postage in the first place?
Massive fail on the part of the OP, take it on the chin, and learn from it, don't however decline an initial £500 refund, take it up with the courts, lose the court case, and have the audacity to cry for the £500 you already declined months ago being greedy.
Astonishing that people think H&S are at fault here...
#140
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
the manifold should never of been sent out in that state.
id be furious if i had bought a £1000 manifold then paid a main dealer to fit it to then discover it was so badly mis-aligned because of a problem with the companys quality control checks.
it has been proven that the manifold was scrap, i bet h&s were over the moon when it get stolen in the post.
even if the courts deem that the buyer doesn't deserve a refund should not excuse the company from blame.
this buyer has lost over £1000 because of a company that had sent out scrap and a thief postal employee.
id be furious if i had bought a £1000 manifold then paid a main dealer to fit it to then discover it was so badly mis-aligned because of a problem with the companys quality control checks.
it has been proven that the manifold was scrap, i bet h&s were over the moon when it get stolen in the post.
even if the courts deem that the buyer doesn't deserve a refund should not excuse the company from blame.
this buyer has lost over £1000 because of a company that had sent out scrap and a thief postal employee.
#142
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
#144
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
exactly, how many people would just say "oh well ive just lost £1000 but its ok " ??
nobody would ,even if they were 100% to blame. the buyer was only partially to blame for his loss.
nobody would ,even if they were 100% to blame. the buyer was only partially to blame for his loss.
#145
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
i think you will find that honda had a 100% success rate with their vtec engines for over 10 years with not 1 failing under warrenty and thats an engine not some tubing !
Last edited by white.akita; 18 December 2010 at 11:16 AM.
#146
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.
The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
#147
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
You got a point there, i think companies should, now and again, take £1000 off a customer, send them the wrong product, and then, as a test of the customers knowledge of distance selling regulations, ask THEM to return it, and if it goes **** up, then the fault can be solely put on the customer, kind of a darwins law for online purchasers.
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
#148
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
To sit there and basically say its the OP's fault, take it on chin is total bollox!
#149
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've lost more than £1000 pounds on account of not doing my homework or half assing something if you will. Almost £6000 out of pocket importing my car from the UAE in 2004 in back taxes since I didn't read local laws thoroughly enough.
Only once though, now I always give everything my due diligence.
As for the honda comment, keep thinking any company on earth has a 100% success rate on any product they sell.
Only once though, now I always give everything my due diligence.
As for the honda comment, keep thinking any company on earth has a 100% success rate on any product they sell.
#150
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...0&postcount=15
he has a problem, how are you going to help him?
he has a problem, how are you going to help him?
![Thumb](images/smilies/thumb.gif)
The Op has a right to be pis5ed off, but he doesn't have a right to a refund having *****'d up a simple return. Everything else is speculation
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
There is a process to protect consumers but ffs you have to follow it !
![Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif)
It's not a nice situation, but a situation he wholly contributed to. I would have taken the money offered and vowed not to be so naive in future about long distance cross border purchases. Mistakes happen, and mistakes often cost money.
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Top company IMHO, and the outraged of scoobynet
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
![Cool](images/smilies/cool.gif)
As for customer service it's always been spot on, but cooperation is a two way street
![Thumb](images/smilies/thumb.gif)