Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Hayward&Scott SERIOUS fitment problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 December 2010, 05:51 PM
  #121  
m@t STImulation
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
m@t STImulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

£500 surely they could of made him another 1 for that, the mark up must be high, as the material cost will be low, the rest is labour witch wont cost them much if at all
m@t STImulation is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 05:55 PM
  #122  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the poor workmanship of that £1000 manifold shows the company for what they are.
they blamed the jigs for the mistake ! a bad workman and all that !
white.akita is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 05:59 PM
  #123  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m@t STImulation
£500 surely they could of made him another 1 for that, the mark up must be high, as the material cost will be low, the rest is labour witch wont cost them much if at all
good point, they say there is no point in sending another one out because the jigging must be wrong ,so why wasnt it checked ?
why would you need a mis-shaped manifold back to reset the jig in the corect position ? im sure that when the jig was made it wasnt aligned with the use of a mis-shaped manifold !

Last edited by white.akita; 17 December 2010 at 06:07 PM.
white.akita is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 06:25 PM
  #124  
deepy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
deepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No ones mentioned the poor sod that thieved it and has most likely ended up in the same boat as the op.

Cant even nick a decent fitting exhaust these days.
deepy is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 06:40 PM
  #125  
stiggy wiggy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
stiggy wiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Brilliant!!! Ha ha /\ /\ /\ lol
stiggy wiggy is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 07:00 PM
  #126  
Saalro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Saalro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

H&SIAL

Not H&S fault you didn't send it back correctly, it's a £1000 exhaust and you didn't check insurance.

Offering £500 was a good will gesture, it's not admitting fault, fault of what, you not getting insurance!?
Asking for the £500 after declining 8 months later realsiing you made the mistake. haha

If they received the item back i'm sure they would have corrected the issue, if they didn't that's something.

I'm not forgetting the fact the item from the photo's was clearly an incorrect fit, but it happens.

And you agreed to send the item back, you could have said i would like you (H&S) to arrange this, if they declined, then seek legal advise! But both agreed to do it how you did and they offered the costs back.

Hard luck buddy! I'm not judging you

Thanks
Sam
Saalro is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 07:06 PM
  #127  
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
gallois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it's not a £1000 exhaust if it was made incorrectly, it becomes £50 worth of scrap.
gallois is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 07:12 PM
  #128  
Saalro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Saalro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So £90 insurance was an over quote lol.

Thanks
Sam
Saalro is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 08:16 PM
  #129  
Herbie.
Scooby Regular
 
Herbie.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Blob STi
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by j4mou
I dont know about anyone else, but this would seriously put me off buying from H&S.
Same here. Was going to buy a decat from them after New Year.
Herbie. is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 08:33 PM
  #130  
Saalro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Saalro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why's it put you off! H&S said their side of the story and it was totally legitimate.

There are many more please customers with H&S than unpleased!

My H&S Subaru design back box fit perfectly.

Thanks
Sam
Saalro is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 08:34 PM
  #131  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So because of an issue with this exhaust, then the op makes an error and is out of pocket, bitches about it, gets offered £500 quid from H&S who dont have their part back (to get a refund you have to send the part back and it has to be received, as stated in several posts), but the OP skimped on the insurance, now you have also heared H&S's version (always 2 sides to a story), OP declines the £500 quid and goes to what sounds to be a small claims court, and loses, then asks for the £500 quid again which is refused (he lost the case, you dont get an offer twice ) so your not going to buy any H&S parts, well I feel sorry for you, if your that short sighted I wouldnt even contemplate doing a search on here, or look for the guy who had a 2 year old back box from H&S that had some corrosion, they replaced it with no issues.
Me, I will stick to buying from H&S, the rest can do what you like, especially if you want to spite yourselves for something someone else did incorrectly (ie not enough insurance on the postage then takes them to small claims court, loses, asks for the cash again, gets a blunt refusal etc).

Tony
TonyBurns is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 08:48 PM
  #132  
m@t STImulation
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
m@t STImulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well either way this tread will have cost them some business only takes a small thing like this to ruin any reputation its sad but true.

so what ever the manufacturing cost of the exhaust was, will it be more than the custom they loose?
m@t STImulation is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 09:37 PM
  #133  
belliott69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
belliott69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i've had 2 exhaust systems off of h&s and haven't had a problem, its certainly alot better quality then most other exhausts. plus one mistake doesn't mean everything is wrong.
belliott69 is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 10:00 PM
  #134  
m@t STImulation
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
m@t STImulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a company cant be correct all the time its how you deal with problems that arise in this instance.........
m@t STImulation is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 10:12 PM
  #135  
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
gallois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

completely agree^^^^, some people on here fail to see that.
gallois is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 10:20 PM
  #136  
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Jamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a house full of girls!
Posts: 23,346
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...0&postcount=15

he has a problem, how are you going to help him?
Jamo is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 10:34 PM
  #137  
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
gallois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

stop getting all excited, one thing at a time
gallois is offline  
Old 17 December 2010, 10:53 PM
  #138  
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Jamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a house full of girls!
Posts: 23,346
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

its the same guy, except he asked the question back in february...
Jamo is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 06:31 AM
  #139  
DisoDisp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
DisoDisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't get the point of this whole thread...

The OP is clearly in the wrong for not getting proper insurance on the postage, which H&S already agreed to refund, i.e. why skimp on postage in the first place?

Massive fail on the part of the OP, take it on the chin, and learn from it, don't however decline an initial £500 refund, take it up with the courts, lose the court case, and have the audacity to cry for the £500 you already declined months ago being greedy.

Astonishing that people think H&S are at fault here...
DisoDisp is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 07:34 AM
  #140  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the manifold should never of been sent out in that state.
id be furious if i had bought a £1000 manifold then paid a main dealer to fit it to then discover it was so badly mis-aligned because of a problem with the companys quality control checks.
it has been proven that the manifold was scrap, i bet h&s were over the moon when it get stolen in the post.
even if the courts deem that the buyer doesn't deserve a refund should not excuse the company from blame.
this buyer has lost over £1000 because of a company that had sent out scrap and a thief postal employee.
white.akita is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 09:20 AM
  #141  
simon57
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
simon57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: And there was my scoob gone it was..
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saalro
So £90 insurance was an over quote lol.

Thanks
Sam
...
simon57 is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 10:38 AM
  #142  
DisoDisp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
DisoDisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.

No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.

The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
DisoDisp is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 10:41 AM
  #143  
ghg
Scooby Regular
 
ghg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im sure you would be saying that if it was you that had lost £1000 Diso...

NOT
ghg is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 11:09 AM
  #144  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

exactly, how many people would just say "oh well ive just lost £1000 but its ok " ??
nobody would ,even if they were 100% to blame. the buyer was only partially to blame for his loss.
white.akita is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 11:12 AM
  #145  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DisoDisp
The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.

No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.

The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
where have you pulled this fact that no company in the world has a 100% success rate ???
i think you will find that honda had a 100% success rate with their vtec engines for over 10 years with not 1 failing under warrenty and thats an engine not some tubing !

Last edited by white.akita; 18 December 2010 at 11:16 AM.
white.akita is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 11:16 AM
  #146  
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
gallois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DisoDisp
The fact that the manifold did not fit, and the price paid are completely moot imho.

No company on the planet (in any field) will have a 100% success rate with any product or service they sell, i.e. there will always be duds/mistakes, and until you are able to completely eliminate human error, nothing will ever be perfect every time.

The fact of the matter is the OP botched up the return, i.e. blame lies with him, end of.
You got a point there, i think companies should, now and again, take £1000 off a customer, send them the wrong product, and then, as a test of the customers knowledge of distance selling regulations, ask THEM to return it, and if it goes **** up, then the fault can be solely put on the customer, kind of a darwins law for online purchasers.
gallois is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 11:19 AM
  #147  
white.akita
Scooby Regular
 
white.akita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gallois
You got a point there, i think companies should, now and again, take £1000 off a customer, send them the wrong product, and then, as a test of the customers knowledge of distance selling regulations, ask THEM to return it, and if it goes **** up, then the fault can be solely put on the customer, kind of a darwins law for online purchasers.
white.akita is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 11:22 AM
  #148  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ghg
im sure you would be saying that if it was you that had lost £1000 Diso...

NOT
You have hit the nail on the head there fella. All those people griping that he didnt have adequate insurance, if wasnt faulty it was the wrong size blah blah blah would do exactly the same as the OP if it was them that were in the OP's postion....end of!!

To sit there and basically say its the OP's fault, take it on chin is total bollox!
jayallen is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 12:03 PM
  #149  
DisoDisp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
DisoDisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've lost more than £1000 pounds on account of not doing my homework or half assing something if you will. Almost £6000 out of pocket importing my car from the UAE in 2004 in back taxes since I didn't read local laws thoroughly enough.

Only once though, now I always give everything my due diligence.

As for the honda comment, keep thinking any company on earth has a 100% success rate on any product they sell.
DisoDisp is offline  
Old 18 December 2010, 12:25 PM
  #150  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by j4mou
https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...0&postcount=15

he has a problem, how are you going to help him?
Should of bought H&S

The Op has a right to be pis5ed off, but he doesn't have a right to a refund having *****'d up a simple return. Everything else is speculation

There is a process to protect consumers but ffs you have to follow it !

It's not a nice situation, but a situation he wholly contributed to. I would have taken the money offered and vowed not to be so naive in future about long distance cross border purchases. Mistakes happen, and mistakes often cost money.

Top company IMHO, and the outraged of scoobynet that say they won't use them off the back of this are missing an opportunity. I've had H&S supply and fit on all three of my scoobs and has been awesome everytime !

As for customer service it's always been spot on, but cooperation is a two way street
53 is offline  


Quick Reply: Hayward&Scott SERIOUS fitment problems



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.