Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Judaism

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 January 2011, 07:53 PM
  #211  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I answered the question, I said it's to annoy you.
But you started posting them before you knew of me..... are you clairvoyant too?
f1_fan is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 08:23 PM
  #212  
Luan Pra bang
Scooby Regular
 
Luan Pra bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
That's just the narrative you subscribe to not reality.

Jewish people were driven out of large parts of the Islamic world by pogroms in the 1940's, it's hardly surprising they formed militias in Palestine to secure themselves. Yes I acknowledge there were atrocities on both side - and that includes masacres of Jewish people, but as I understand it the Jewish state did not by default confiscate private land owned by Arabs unless absent. Do you know otherwise? You are the one saying they 'stole' land.



Sure it was a pro-Turkish plan.

Turkey ethnically cleansed it's half. Before the invasion Cyprus was minority Turkey. How do you square that with your support of the Palestinians?

Military intervention (like Iraq).
Re-settlement and ethnic bias (like Israel (allegedly))
Once again facts escape you the two arab pogroms took place many years after the formation of the zionist terrorist groups but you knew that already didn't you ?

You seem to think that stealing land for refugees is OK by that logic stealing things from Jewish refugees after ww2 was an acceptable thing to do ?

Turkey never had half of cyprus and still does not and the Greek side comitted more than their fair share of crimes but ultimately the drama was started by greek nationalism that refused to aknowledge the rights of turkish cypriots.
Luan Pra bang is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 08:32 PM
  #213  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luan Pra bang
Once again facts escape you the two arab pogroms took place many years after the formation of the zionist terrorist groups but you knew that already didn't you ?

You seem to think that stealing land for refugees is OK by that logic stealing things from Jewish refugees after ww2 was an acceptable thing to do ?
I think the refugees should not have left and should have secured their property. I don't know the state of Ottoman private property records but in the transition to a new Israeli administration it's hard to expect your property to remain in your name if you leave.

Originally Posted by Luan Pra bang
Turkey never had half of cyprus and still does not and the Greek side comitted more than their fair share of crimes but ultimately the drama was started by greek nationalism that refused to aknowledge the rights of turkish cypriots.
Does Hamas acknowledge Jewish rights in Israel?
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 08:58 PM
  #214  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I think the refugees should not have left and should have secured their property. ?
classic ploy of the oppressor -- blame the victims, used throughout history to justify mass murder, and used by you throughout this thread
hodgy0_2 is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 09:00 PM
  #215  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
classic ploy of the oppressor -- blame the victims, used throughout history to justify mass murder, and used by you throughout this thread
Most left w/out seeing an Israeli soldier. It's hard to say they were forced out.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:00 PM
  #216  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
These discussions are about principle, passion, history, theology and politics. Whilst I understand that Tony doesn't give way and that this gets on peoples' ****, it does the other side of the room no favours by resorting to ad homs. It's not my place to to judge, I know that, but your argument is, in my view, strong enough not to have to resort to insults. Tony is on the the thick end of a disproportionate amount of flack but always attacks the position and not the man. In my view that's worthy.
Sorry James, but that is nonsense. Your friend attacked me personally, that is the end of it. I don't consider that I have insulted him recently to be honest. If I have it is far less than he deserves.

No one is forcing him to say what he does, he chooses to get on everyones ****, as you say. His defensiveness about certain things, such as his own background, give him away, especially when he attacks the background of others as a basis of an arguement.

In fact, I don't even know what your post is on about! Your self confessed double standard, on another thread, when it comes to your friend means that your arguments defending him are meaningless.

Asif
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:01 PM
  #217  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
So do you think or feel that Ezekiel 40-47 is of little relevance to Zionists?
I don't know. Is that the bit Samuel L Jackson paraphrases in 'Pulp Fiction'? Sounds good.
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:08 PM
  #218  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
Sorry James, but that is nonsense. Your friend attacked me personally
I think I called you silly once or something? I was wrong to do so I admit.

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
especially when he attacks the background of others as a basis of an arguement.
That is a lie.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:17 PM
  #219  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
I don't know. Is that the bit Samuel L Jackson paraphrases in 'Pulp Fiction'? Sounds good.
No, that's 25:17, I think.
Bubba po is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:32 PM
  #220  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I think I called you silly once or something? I was wrong to do so I admit.
Tony, if you make me regret this post to you, I will resort to simply insulting you at every opportunity...

You attacked my arguments about defending Palestinians on the basis of "What business is it of yours about the Palestinians?", simply because I am not Palestinian.

This is an example of where you attacked me and not my argument.

In fact you have never attacked my argument AT ALL, because you only ever responded to any point I made with some spurious counter allegation about something irrelevant. I was very polite to you, argued in a reasonable way, and all I got was insults, ignorance, and accusations, such as being called a liar. Funnily enough, like below!

I then chose to reciprocate at first, then to ignore you. And now here we are.


Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
That is a lie.
Did you not ask Jimbob what business was it of his to criticise Zionism on Post #23? This thread is essentially about Zionism and your defence of it.

I am sure a quick trawl through your posts will unearth more examples.

No one is forcing you to post what you do Tony, I personally have no problem at all if you dislike Muslims, Homosexuals, Non white people, disabled people, whatever. It does not bother me in the slightest.

However, if you come on SN and air such an opinion, you do need to be prepared to explain yourself, give a reason for your opinion, be prepared to defend it (properly) and then either put up or shut up.

People can agree to disagree you know? And then you move on.

If you know this already, then you are a wind up merchant, if you don't know this already...well I don't know in that case.

I am not going to go back to debating with you Tony, but just to carry on ignoring you. This post is an exception, so you don't have to respond to this. If I sense your posting style change (not your opinions of course) then I will re engage with you. If you deteriorate, then I will do what I said at the beginning of this post.

Asif

Last edited by AsifScoob; 20 January 2011 at 11:42 PM.
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 20 January 2011, 11:57 PM
  #221  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
Tony, if you make me regret this post to you, I will resort to simply insulting you at every opportunity...

You attacked my arguments about defending Palestinians on the basis of "What business is it of yours about the Palestinians?", simply because I am not Palestinian.

This is an example of where you attacked me and not my argument.
It's a legitimate question. If you are going to claim solidarity with a people, a bias in favour of them, it is entirely fair to ask why. If you are Palestinian it would make sense.

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
Did you not ask Jimbob what business was it of his to criticise Zionism on Post #23? This thread is essentially about Zionism and your defence of it.
Sure why not?
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:11 AM
  #222  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It's a legitimate question. If you are going to claim solidarity with a people, a bias in favour of them, it is entirely fair to ask why. If you are Palestinian it would make sense.



Sure why not?
But this is my point Tony, on both counts. Why do I have to have the same race as someone I choose to defend? We are having a hypothetical discussion on an internet website. I can attack or defend whomever I like. I can choose to see both sides of an argument. I do so based upon what I read, not the colour of my skin.

Am I therefore not allowed to criticise Pakistani Muslims who are born and brought up in the UK, because I am one of them? It makes no sense.

Am I not allowed to say, "Those starving Ethiopians are having a hard time", unless I am a starving Ethiopian?

If background is what gives your argument legitimacy, you have been asked on numerous occasions about your background, but refuse to give any details. People ask, not because they are nosey, but because you put so much stall into others' backgrounds, but are so coy about your own.

It is clear to me that you feel revealing your own background will undermine all your arguments. I suggest to you therefore, if your arguments are so weak and fragile that they will fall down once you reveal a bit more about yourself, that perhaps you change the subject a tad?

It won't do you any harm.

Asif
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:21 AM
  #223  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It's a legitimate question. If you are going to claim solidarity with a people, a bias in favour of them, it is entirely fair to ask why. If you are Palestinian it would make sense.
Much the same as it is fair to ask the same of you and your defence of Israel, and seeming slating of Muslims, but you won't answer and claim 'bullying' when asked if you were Jewish.

If you are not (and I personally couldn't care) then you have an opinion about a subject being discussed, just as others have theirs and surely then it shouldn't matter where they are from either.

Btw, I am not picking on you.
Lisawrx is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:37 AM
  #224  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
I don't know. Is that the bit Samuel L Jackson paraphrases in 'Pulp Fiction'? Sounds good.
I just find it odd that you don't recognise the overwhelming religious issue in play, even Boney M did a turn on the subject.

Third Temple?
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:40 AM
  #225  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
Much the same as it is fair to ask the same of you and your defence of Israel, and seeming slating of Muslims, but you won't answer and claim 'bullying' when asked if you were Jewish.

If you are not (and I personally couldn't care) then you have an opinion about a subject being discussed, just as others have theirs and surely then it shouldn't matter where they are from either.

Btw, I am not picking on you.
It's well framed, it's rational.......good luck, Tony.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:51 AM
  #226  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It's a legitimate question. If you are going to claim solidarity with a people, a bias in favour of them, it is entirely fair to ask why. If you are Palestinian it would make sense.
So you are from Israel then. Or are you just a hypocrite?
f1_fan is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:56 AM
  #227  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
I just find it odd that you don't recognise the overwhelming religious issue in play, even Boney M did a turn on the subject.

Third Temple?

Are you referring to this?

http://endtimepilgrim.org/thirdtemple.htm

Definitely gives creedence to my previous point. Quite frightening in fact.

PS. I did receive a copy of Night Flight To Venus for my 10th birthday, but didn't spot any subversive Zionism on there!
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:10 AM
  #228  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
It's well framed, it's rational.......good luck, Tony.
And you have the nerve to complain about people making personal attacks.

I may not be the best (by a long shot) at wording things, but my point stands.

By his reasoning..... he is either Jewish and 'it would make sense', or he's not, then 'what business is it of his' (as was said to Asif).

I think here F1 has summed it up.

You can have a go at me all you like, I have far greater worries right now than what someone I don't even know thinks of me, based upon the way I put a point across.
Lisawrx is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:11 AM
  #229  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
Your self confessed double standard, on another thread, when it comes to your friend means that your arguments defending him are meaningless.

Asif
This is a cororally (a weak one) founded on an untruth. I haven't 'confessed' to a 'double standard', you accused me of such.

'by the river of Babylon......when we remember Ziiiiion'. Psalm 136:1, pop charts no.1:1978.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:15 AM
  #230  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
And you have the nerve to complain about people making personal attacks.

I may not be the best (by a long shot) at wording things, but my point stands.

By his reasoning..... he is either Jewish and 'it would make sense', or he's not, then 'what business is it of his' (as was said to Asif)
Simmer down, I'm agreeing with you. After a sterling effort Tony's trapped himself.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:20 AM
  #231  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Simmer down, I'm agreeing with you. After a sterling effort Tony's trapped himself.
I do apologise.

I just know I don't have the way with words that some people do, and thought you were mocking. Sorry.
Lisawrx is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:27 AM
  #232  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
I do apologise.

I just know I don't have the way with words that some people do, and thought you were mocking. Sorry.
Don't worry, it's cool, I can see how it may have read like that.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 01:29 AM
  #233  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Don't worry, it's cool, I can see how it may have read like that.
Thank you.

I am a very sensitive soul.
Lisawrx is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 03:17 AM
  #234  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
Much the same as it is fair to ask the same of you and your defence of Israel, and seeming slating of Muslims, but you won't answer and claim 'bullying' when asked if you were Jewish.

If you are not (and I personally couldn't care) then you have an opinion about a subject being discussed, just as others have theirs and surely then it shouldn't matter where they are from either.

Btw, I am not picking on you.
I'm more interested in the motivations and hypocrisy of Israels enemies and why they claim solidarity with the Palestinians.

I've said before my ethnicity/religion is irrelevant, it has been used to attack me personally instead of my arguments in a sinister racist way.

We have posters here who claim to share solidarity with the Palestinians based on a shared religion (even though the Palestinians are not exclusively of that religion), by extension in is claimed that members of that religion living 1000's of miles away are victims by association and justified to take action.

There is plenty of injustice in this world but the Palestinians seem to get more than their fare share of 'solidarity' - or at least people adopting their cause, western liberals and lefties, plus many from a particular religion and the extremists etc - and deciding what exactly the Palestinians must want and what injustices they have endured, if you like making the Palestinians their clients. It's a question worth asking, and if these people were also Palestinians then you could argue that it is filial loyalty making them march on the street - there is some logic there, it's a solidarity based on something 'real'....religion is also but it is weaker IMHO and most of it is fake, you have British born people of Pakistani origin with the tube bombings who seemed to consider themselves victims because of what the Palestinians may or may not endure. It makes no sense from any critical POV.

Whilst Israel remains a pretext/justification for members of a particular religion/political movement to want to attack my country, endanger my life and want to take my freedoms etc then the Israel-Palestinian conflict is my business and it is reasonable for me to want to take an interest. As that pretext is by an large fake IMHO...a religious solidarity...then I will attack it and criticise it and by extension Israels enemies since these enemies are also my enemies.

So for that reason I have solidarity with Israel.

Last edited by tony de wonderful; 21 January 2011 at 03:18 AM.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 07:47 AM
  #235  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I'm more interested in the motivations and hypocrisy of Israels enemies and why they claim solidarity with the Palestinians.

I've said before my ethnicity/religion is irrelevant, it has been used to attack me personally instead of my arguments in a sinister racist way.

We have posters here who claim to share solidarity with the Palestinians based on a shared religion (even though the Palestinians are not exclusively of that religion), by extension in is claimed that members of that religion living 1000's of miles away are victims by association and justified to take action.

There is plenty of injustice in this world but the Palestinians seem to get more than their fare share of 'solidarity' - or at least people adopting their cause, western liberals and lefties, plus many from a particular religion and the extremists etc - and deciding what exactly the Palestinians must want and what injustices they have endured, if you like making the Palestinians their clients. It's a question worth asking, and if these people were also Palestinians then you could argue that it is filial loyalty making them march on the street - there is some logic there, it's a solidarity based on something 'real'....religion is also but it is weaker IMHO and most of it is fake, you have British born people of Pakistani origin with the tube bombings who seemed to consider themselves victims because of what the Palestinians may or may not endure. It makes no sense from any critical POV.

Whilst Israel remains a pretext/justification for members of a particular religion/political movement to want to attack my country, endanger my life and want to take my freedoms etc then the Israel-Palestinian conflict is my business and it is reasonable for me to want to take an interest. As that pretext is by an large fake IMHO...a religious solidarity...then I will attack it and criticise it and by extension Israels enemies since these enemies are also my enemies.

So for that reason I have solidarity with Israel.
Well you have finally answered my question in a roundabout way. The problem is I think you are for some reason blind to the wrongs that Israel and the West commit whereas you are only too ready to attack anything and everything about Islam.

That is why I think people are interested in yout ethinicity/religion as they are looking for a reason as to why you are so pro West/Israel and anti Islam and the role of a 'typical Jew' would fit that nicely... that is a figure of speech not an attack btw.

I would take issue with this:

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I've said before my ethnicity/religion is irrelevant, it has been used to attack me personally instead of my arguments in a sinister racist way.
I haven't seen anywhere where anyone has attacked you in a 'sinister racist way' certainly not any more than you and Taylor have alienated certain posters on this board not so much by what you have said exactly, but by the general undertone of your posts and seeming neverending crusade against all things Islam.

I would implore you to try and be more neutral and look at how your posts come across to many people on this board as it is quite unpleasant sometimes. I promise you I am not alone in this viewpoint.
f1_fan is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 10:54 AM
  #236  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good post.

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I'm more interested in the motivations and hypocrisy of Israels enemies and why they claim solidarity with the Palestinians.

I've said before my ethnicity/religion is irrelevant, it has been used to attack me personally instead of my arguments in a sinister racist way.

We have posters here who claim to share solidarity with the Palestinians based on a shared religion (even though the Palestinians are not exclusively of that religion), by extension in is claimed that members of that religion living 1000's of miles away are victims by association and justified to take action.

There is plenty of injustice in this world but the Palestinians seem to get more than their fare share of 'solidarity' - or at least people adopting their cause, western liberals and lefties, plus many from a particular religion and the extremists etc - and deciding what exactly the Palestinians must want and what injustices they have endured, if you like making the Palestinians their clients. It's a question worth asking, and if these people were also Palestinians then you could argue that it is filial loyalty making them march on the street - there is some logic there, it's a solidarity based on something 'real'....religion is also but it is weaker IMHO and most of it is fake, you have British born people of Pakistani origin with the tube bombings who seemed to consider themselves victims because of what the Palestinians may or may not endure. It makes no sense from any critical POV.

Whilst Israel remains a pretext/justification for members of a particular religion/political movement to want to attack my country, endanger my life and want to take my freedoms etc then the Israel-Palestinian conflict is my business and it is reasonable for me to want to take an interest. As that pretext is by an large fake IMHO...a religious solidarity...then I will attack it and criticise it and by extension Israels enemies since these enemies are also my enemies.

So for that reason I have solidarity with Israel.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 11:47 AM
  #237  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm on the side of the Palestinians and I have no religion at all. Neither do I have any racial affinity with them.
Bubba po is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:13 PM
  #238  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
I'm on the side of the Palestinians and I have no religion at all. Neither do I have any racial affinity with them.
Which I get and believe and feel is a noble position, but understand that you are in the company, overwhelmingly, of Islamic theocrats and anti-Semites. I too have sympathy with the Palestinian people but fear that their sponsors are opposed to freedom of expression and free religion and would happily see the infidel extirpated.

There needs to be a distinction made between solidarity with the proletariat and a criticism of the forces who use their plight to usher in a much broader relgio-political agenda. Much of which Tony has countered is the narrative of these forces.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 12:58 PM
  #239  
Luan Pra bang
Scooby Regular
 
Luan Pra bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have solidarity with any opressed people, it just so happens that Palestinians feature highly becuase the shocking crimes committed against the palestinian people by Israel and is supporters has a knock on effect all over the world including the UK. Years of UK American and Russian support for Israels crimes has helped create a definate divide between the Islamic and christian world that helps those who gain self importance from terrorism find easy reccruits. From a point of view of a paelstinian who has had their own children wife or relatives murdered by the IDF why would they not support terrorism against the west ? Western leaders support Israel in their treatment of Palestinians as a sub human species with no right to life land or freedom and we support those leaders.
If an Arab nation acted they way Israel do we would probably find an excuse to invade yet we don't make the slightest effort to curb their excess', A simple round of economic sanctions and an arms embargo against Israel may get their attention and even stop terrorist attacks from being targeted at the UK. Frankly the fact that we trade with Israel is a joke.
Luan Pra bang is offline  
Old 21 January 2011, 03:05 PM
  #240  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Which I get and believe and feel is a noble position, but understand that you are in the company, overwhelmingly, of Islamic theocrats and anti-Semites.
I am against Israel, it does not make me an anti-Semite. The religion of Israel and it's supporters is irrelevant, it's their behaviour. Don't try to play the anti-Semitism game

If anyone behaved like this I would find it abhorrent.

I against Judaism in the same way I am against Christianity or Islam, but I am in no way against Jews, Christians or Muslims. There is a very important difference.

Geezer

Last edited by Geezer; 21 January 2011 at 03:06 PM.
Geezer is offline  


Quick Reply: Judaism



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM.