Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Question Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 January 2011, 11:27 PM
  #31  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't realise you were in it.
Old 24 January 2011, 07:02 AM
  #32  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Yes and everyone is living happily ever after in Iraq... wel everyone our troops ddn't kill in the illegal war that is
Talking of reality checks ~ that's a total lie of course which makes you really quite ignorant indeed. The biggest cause of death is brown on brown religious sectarian violence. The RoP strikes again!

But why let the truth get in the way of your beliefs, eh?
Old 24 January 2011, 08:14 AM
  #33  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
The “peaceniks” you so cavalierly condemn were campaigning against the arming of Saddam and Iraq in the 80’s, in a war that cost a million lives, were campaigning against supplying him with the chemicals used to gas the inhabitants of Halabja, and campaigned in the millions against the illegal invasion of Iraq – causing, well who knows, as they did not bother to account for the innocent lives lost.

The “peaceniks” you support, were supplying “in the name of Realpolitik” the guns and chemicals that prolonged a war that caused a million deaths, the “peaceniks” that you support unleashed on the innocent peoples of Iraq the “dogs of war” in a carnage of biblical proportions.

it reminds me of the American general fighting in Vietnam who said - "To save this village we have to destroy it"

Bizarre – that’s all
Just to clarify, it isn't the peaceniks I'm supporting, you seem a little confused. Additionally, please explain the Vietnam reference, this is obscure also.
Old 24 January 2011, 08:21 AM
  #34  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
Talking of reality checks ~ that's a total lie of course which makes you really quite ignorant indeed. The biggest cause of death is brown on brown religious sectarian violence. The RoP strikes again!

But why let the truth get in the way of your beliefs, eh?
Two things. One you are talking crap and secondly even if what you say was true surely the invading fiorce that has destroyed the country is in some way to blame for the civil war that now exists there.

P.S. If you would like to supply me with some evidence that the invading US/UK troops did not kill any civilians then I would be very pleased to receive it. I presume you have it due to your comment about what I said being a total lie, not even a partial one. If not a retraction will be fine.

Last edited by f1_fan; 24 January 2011 at 08:25 AM.
Old 24 January 2011, 09:07 AM
  #35  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
A sickening question really but would it be fair to argue that far less people would have been killed and Iraq would be a stable country if we had left Saddam alone?

dl
Originally Posted by David Lock
And, of course, while this was all going on we let nice Mr Mugabe starve his people and reduce the life expectancy of people - sorry I know this is not relevant but lack of action in Zimbabwe has always pissed me off

dl
David, you seem to be implying that we should have left Saddam in power but that we should remove Mugabe. Would you be so good as to explain your logic please?
Old 24 January 2011, 09:40 AM
  #36  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
David, you seem to be implying that we should have left Saddam in power but that we should remove Mugabe. Would you be so good as to explain your logic please?
I was just posing a question really for discussion. I don't know whether leaving Saddam would have been the lesser of two terrible evils? But when the West did take him out we seem to have made a pretty big ***** up of the whole business.

Mugabe presented/presents a quite different scenario. Any action would have had to be taken by African force with discrete help from the West so that he didn't play the race/colonial card. But there is a reasonable opposition there and there is little doubt that the country could regain its status if only.......

An assassin's bullet might do the trick in Zimbabwe but it wouldn't have worked in Iraq?

dl
Old 24 January 2011, 10:06 AM
  #37  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can say all you like about SH and his evil ways, as well as his egregious sons, but the fact remains that it was an internationally illegal war and SH was not a good enough excuse to attack Iraq. They should have tried harder to get support from the UN.

I wonder why Billy Boy and Dubya decided that there would be no official record kept of the casualties which ensued from that war.

Les
Old 24 January 2011, 01:06 PM
  #38  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I suspect that over the next few years we are going to be presented with an equally difficult a divisive problem: Iran.

Do we simply allow the Iranian regime nuclear weapons, or do we do all we can' and that mean ultimately military intervention, to prevent it?

I'm sure Galloway would be happy to salute the Iranian regime and support their 'right' to nuclear arms.

For me the potential consequences of Iran have a nuke, far outweigh the consequences of preventing it.
Old 24 January 2011, 07:00 PM
  #39  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Mugabe issue is tough: China and Russia have often opposing interests in Zimbabwe, so we'd effectively be siding with one or t'other. We have issues with the African Union with whom diplomacy remains embryonic and there's South Africa to consider. Couple that with the fact we're stretched in the middle east and that there's no advantage to be gained, Mugabe's off the radar.

Originally Posted by David Lock
I was just posing a question really for discussion. I don't know whether leaving Saddam would have been the lesser of two terrible evils? But when the West did take him out we seem to have made a pretty big ***** up of the whole business.

Mugabe presented/presents a quite different scenario. Any action would have had to be taken by African force with discrete help from the West so that he didn't play the race/colonial card. But there is a reasonable opposition there and there is little doubt that the country could regain its status if only.......

An assassin's bullet might do the trick in Zimbabwe but it wouldn't have worked in Iraq?

dl

Last edited by JTaylor; 24 January 2011 at 07:02 PM.
Old 24 January 2011, 07:05 PM
  #40  
Jamz3k
Scooby Regular
 
Jamz3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Question Time has been a bit of a let down ever since your boyo from the BNP was on it.
Old 24 January 2011, 07:09 PM
  #41  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I suspect that over the next few years we are going to be presented with an equally difficult a divisive problem: Iran.

Do we simply allow the Iranian regime nuclear weapons, or do we do all we can' and that mean ultimately military intervention, to prevent it?

I'm sure Galloway would be happy to salute the Iranian regime and support their 'right' to nuclear arms.

For me the potential consequences of Iran have a nuke, far outweigh the consequences of preventing it.
To the bulging basket of advantages of the Iraq invasion, you can add strategic and geo-political advantage regarding Iran.
Old 24 January 2011, 10:52 PM
  #42  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Two things. One you are talking crap and secondly even if what you say was true surely the invading fiorce that has destroyed the country is in some way to blame for the civil war that now exists there.

P.S. If you would like to supply me with some evidence that the invading US/UK troops did not kill any civilians then I would be very pleased to receive it. I presume you have it due to your comment about what I said being a total lie, not even a partial one. If not a retraction will be fine.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree if you seriously expect an apology from me.

You made a propoganda statement inferring that British troops were deliberately killing all the darkies they could and hadn't yet succeeded in doing them all. You really should be ashamed of yourself for making such a low-brow assertion. But somehow I expect you're proud you made your big point on behalf of "the brothers", innit.

My point of sectarian violence being the biggest problem still stands. Google "Iraq Mosque Bomb" if you want some examples. The causes are complex for sure and the removal of Saddam from power would certainly be a catalyst - as a totalitarian regime was taken out leaving people free to do what they wanted. Peace and democracy weren't high on the agenda for some it seems
Old 24 January 2011, 10:57 PM
  #43  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
An assassin's bullet might do the trick in Zimbabwe but it wouldn't have worked in Iraq?

dl
Would never have worked in Iraq, because Saddam had several dozen doubles and told nobody (not even his sons) where he would be in advance.
Old 24 January 2011, 11:06 PM
  #44  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
I think you're barking up the wrong tree if you seriously expect an apology from me.
Don't expect or want an apology, just a retraction.

Originally Posted by Suresh
You made a propoganda statement inferring that British troops were deliberately killing all the darkies they could and hadn't yet succeeded in doing them all. You really should be ashamed of yourself for making such a low-brow assertion. But somehow I expect you're proud you made your big point on behalf of "the brothers", innit.
Where on earth did you get that from in my post??? British troops deliberately killing civilians FFS??? Where did I even infer that?

My point is that if you go invading a country like Iraq you are going to end up causing the deaths of civilains, it's inevitable. If you don't invade it then you won't.

My comment merely juxtaposed the lives of those left alive in Iraq today against those that were killed as a result of our invasion (British and American forces). I don't blame the troops on the ground one iota, they were just doing a job, I do however blame Blair and Bush.

You know what I will have that apology as what you drew form my post was what you wanted to, not what it said and is actually quite twisted.
Old 24 January 2011, 11:30 PM
  #45  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Would never have worked in Iraq, because Saddam had several dozen doubles and told nobody (not even his sons) where he would be in advance.
Reminds me of the old Saddam doubles joke: -

There was a bomb attack on Saddam and all the doubles were called in and waited for the news. Saddam's aide came in with a serious look on his face. "Well there's good news and bad news boys". Fortunately our master lives on. But sadly he lost an arm in the attack

dl
Old 25 January 2011, 03:19 PM
  #46  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
I think you're barking up the wrong tree if you
seriously expect an apology from me.

You made a propoganda statement inferring that British troops were deliberately killing all the darkies they could and hadn't yet succeeded in doing them all. You really should be ashamed of yourself for making such a low-brow assertion. But somehow I expect you're proud you made your big point on behalf of "the brothers", innit.

My point of sectarian violence being the biggest problem still stands. Google "Iraq Mosque Bomb" if you want some examples. The causes are complex for sure and the removal of Saddam from power would certainly be a catalyst - as a totalitarian regime was taken out leaving people free to do what they wanted. Peace and democracy weren't high on the agenda for some it seems
There are rumours, and I'm sure they're just that, that f1_fan was a member of the far-left splinter group, Pacifists for Saddam.
Old 25 January 2011, 04:34 PM
  #47  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
There are rumours, and I'm sure they're just that, that f1_fan was a member of the far-left splinter group, Pacifists for Saddam.
Yes I was Chief Brainwasher, but you already know that don't you..... news travels fast on SN
Old 25 January 2011, 04:44 PM
  #48  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Hussein not Halliburton!" was one of the chants, it's rumoured.
Old 25 January 2011, 07:58 PM
  #49  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Just to clarify, it isn't the peaceniks I'm supporting, .
agreed

the Vietnam quote sums up the fact that American foreign policy does not seem to have changed much in the last 30 years,

"To save Iraq is was necessary to destory it" -- seems to be the basic premise of the whole exercise - when you strip away the self righteous claptrap.

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 25 January 2011 at 07:59 PM.
Old 26 January 2011, 12:48 AM
  #50  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
agreed

the Vietnam quote sums up the fact that American foreign policy does not seem to have changed much in the last 30 years,
It's changed enormously.

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
"To save Iraq is was necessary to destory it" -- seems to be the basic premise of the whole exercise - when you strip away the self righteous claptrap.
Not so. Iraq hasn't been destroyed; where it's been damaged we're rebuilding.

Is this about logic and principle, Hodgy, or do you just dislike The Septics?
Old 26 January 2011, 07:45 AM
  #51  
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We're not rebuilding the "damage"- it's restructuring on a mass scale that's taking place, at least get the basic principles right.
Old 26 January 2011, 08:45 AM
  #52  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
We're not rebuilding the "damage"- it's restructuring on a mass scale that's taking place, at least get the basic principles right.
Quite - it misses the point as spectacularly as saying the Mussolini made the trains run on time

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Is this about logic and principle, Hodgy, or do you just dislike The Septics?
I don't dislike the Americans, but they have a pretty long history of pushing their weight around and actively and militarily muddling in other countries affairs - leaving them alot worse off

I find it ironic that you give them such an easy time considering 50% of them discount the theory of evolution, believe humans kept T-Rex's as pets and the Earth is less than 5000 years old -pretty fundamental beliefs

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 26 January 2011 at 08:47 AM.
Old 26 January 2011, 09:46 AM
  #53  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Quite - it misses the point as spectacularly as saying the Mussolini made the trains run on time
This is another simile (of four so far) that I don't follow, I'm afraid.

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
I don't dislike the Americans, but they have a pretty long history of pushing their weight around and actively and militarily muddling in other countries affairs - leaving them alot worse off
...and of contributing significantly to the liberation of Europe in WW2, lest we forget. Regarding the doomed intervention in Indochina, if you wish to discuss this and the insipid Henry Kissinger and the self-pitying Robert McNamara, perhaps you could start a thread on the subject. It'd be good to find out your views. By the way, I'm happy to tear the policy in South America to shreads at any time, too. I'm equally happy to applaud the recognition of Cory Aquino in the Philippines in '86 despite this meaning a base was lost but by supporting the people in Manila that year, the Yanks helped democracy movements spread through Taiwan and South Korea and even as far Tiananmen Square in '89. Wolfowitz and Kissinger, same accent, different heart.

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
I find it ironic that you give them such an easy time considering 50% of them discount the theory of evolution, believe humans kept T-Rex's as pets and the Earth is less than 5000 years old -pretty fundamental beliefs
Old 26 January 2011, 09:47 AM
  #54  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I suspect that over the next few years we are going to be presented with an equally difficult a divisive problem: Iran.

Do we simply allow the Iranian regime nuclear weapons, or do we do all we can' and that mean ultimately military intervention, to prevent it?

I'm sure Galloway would be happy to salute the Iranian regime and support their 'right' to nuclear arms.

For me the potential consequences of Iran have a nuke, far outweigh the consequences of preventing it.
I would agree with what you say Martin, but the attacking of Iran without positive agressive action from them in the first place would just not be worth the candle. It would cause world wide recrimination.

Les
Old 26 January 2011, 10:09 AM
  #55  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I would agree with what you say Martin, but the attacking of Iran without positive agressive action from them in the first place would just not be worth the candle. It would cause world wide recrimination.

Les
So you're prepared to watch Ahmadinejad acquire nuclear weapons.
Old 26 January 2011, 10:27 AM
  #56  
GC8WRX
Scooby Regular
 
GC8WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Yes and everyone is living happily ever after in Iraq... wel everyone our troops ddn't kill in the illegal war that is
when is war ever legal?


Your muslim loving traits coming out again, you sound like you should give a speech in a mosque!
Old 26 January 2011, 10:31 AM
  #57  
GC8WRX
Scooby Regular
 
GC8WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kingofturds
I'm outta this thread

does lisa wrx have you on red alert and search every post for potential swear filter bypass?


Its getting worse in here, next it will be vaping the word islam to please f1 fan!



mint gif btw!
Old 26 January 2011, 10:36 AM
  #58  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8WRX
when is war ever legal?


Your muslim loving traits coming out again, you sound like you should give a speech in a mosque!
Whereas you sound like you should give one to Combat 18

Anyway where have you been, we have missed you

Last edited by f1_fan; 26 January 2011 at 10:37 AM.
Old 26 January 2011, 10:38 AM
  #59  
GC8WRX
Scooby Regular
 
GC8WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Don't expect or want an apology, just a retraction.



Where on earth did you get that from in my post??? British troops deliberately killing civilians FFS??? Where did I even infer that?

My point is that if you go invading a country like Iraq you are going to end up causing the deaths of civilains, it's inevitable. If you don't invade it then you won't.

My comment merely juxtaposed the lives of those left alive in Iraq today against those that were killed as a result of our invasion (British and American forces). I don't blame the troops on the ground one iota, they were just doing a job, I do however blame Blair and Bush.

You know what I will have that apology as what you drew form my post was what you wanted to, not what it said and is actually quite twisted.
seriously, do you have ties to that part of the world, do you have a muslim wife or something?


You harp on about this sh1te all the time, are you going to blow up a plane soon to avenge your muslim brothers!



We went to war for maybe the wrong reasons on the face of it all but saddam needed removing, end of.


You act like its a crusade against all muslims, just like the nutters who end up blowionig themselves up!




Serious question, where does it all come from, what ties do you have to islam?
Old 26 January 2011, 10:40 AM
  #60  
GC8WRX
Scooby Regular
 
GC8WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Whereas you sound like you should give one to Combat 18

Anyway where have you been, we have missed you
oh hello lover, i missed you too lol!








Quick Reply: Question Time



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 AM.