JDM STi tune
#31
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Although all engines are different, but isn't that a little low on power compared to the torque? Weak actuator and boost drop in the high rpm? Dont know, just speculating.
What kind of power i should expect with those mods installed? I guess in healthy engine the mapping should take me somewhere around 350/350 mark, some have had even more.
I'll have to measure my boost since i think the actuator is not holding boost like it should. I feel a certain amount of creeping boost after it has peaked. Could be the original solenoid too.
What kind of power i should expect with those mods installed? I guess in healthy engine the mapping should take me somewhere around 350/350 mark, some have had even more.
I'll have to measure my boost since i think the actuator is not holding boost like it should. I feel a certain amount of creeping boost after it has peaked. Could be the original solenoid too.
I consider an uprated actuator a good move.
Simon
#32
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
personally I dont charge extra for using megarom.. its just starting from a different rom file when you begin.. it takes extra time playing with in gear stuff etc but worth it.
Simon
Simon
Good choice, but like I have said previously..... I would take advantage of the MegaROM functionality on your ECU with the EcuTEK software. It will probably cost you a bit more, but the driveability advantages are worth it in my opinion.
What a single gear dyno run doesn't show you is how your car reaches boost in the various gears and actually drives. Per gear wastegate control is one of the advantages of MegaROM and you can certainly see the difference that attention to this area provides on the road..... and that is where it counts.
You have the facilities available with your ECU, so my advice is to use them to their potential.
What a single gear dyno run doesn't show you is how your car reaches boost in the various gears and actually drives. Per gear wastegate control is one of the advantages of MegaROM and you can certainly see the difference that attention to this area provides on the road..... and that is where it counts.
You have the facilities available with your ECU, so my advice is to use them to their potential.
#33
That graph looks awesome for a VF36
I would imagine its holding over 1.5 bar from 3500rpm to 5000rpm! This must really help it achieve its 360bhp. How did you manage to stop the boost dropping off sooner & hence not lose any hp further along the rev range? Do you think it was more the actuator holding boost or to do with the boost cut levels you set? (I would imagine car is only going to do what it wants to do regardless of the upper boost limit set?). I also wonder what aftermarket actuator Nic was using as I have heard the odd negative comment with the Forge actuator (blue spring) I am currently using.
Thanks for your input Simon
I would imagine its holding over 1.5 bar from 3500rpm to 5000rpm! This must really help it achieve its 360bhp. How did you manage to stop the boost dropping off sooner & hence not lose any hp further along the rev range? Do you think it was more the actuator holding boost or to do with the boost cut levels you set? (I would imagine car is only going to do what it wants to do regardless of the upper boost limit set?). I also wonder what aftermarket actuator Nic was using as I have heard the odd negative comment with the Forge actuator (blue spring) I am currently using.
Thanks for your input Simon
#34
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
That graph looks awesome for a VF36
I would imagine its holding over 1.5 bar from 3500rpm to 5000rpm! This must really help it achieve its 360bhp. How did you manage to stop the boost dropping off sooner & hence not lose any hp further along the rev range? Do you think it was more the actuator holding boost or to do with the boost cut levels you set? (I would imagine car is only going to do what it wants to do regardless of the upper boost limit set?). I also wonder what aftermarket actuator Nic was using as I have heard the odd negative comment with the Forge actuator (blue spring) I am currently using.
Thanks for your input Simon
I would imagine its holding over 1.5 bar from 3500rpm to 5000rpm! This must really help it achieve its 360bhp. How did you manage to stop the boost dropping off sooner & hence not lose any hp further along the rev range? Do you think it was more the actuator holding boost or to do with the boost cut levels you set? (I would imagine car is only going to do what it wants to do regardless of the upper boost limit set?). I also wonder what aftermarket actuator Nic was using as I have heard the odd negative comment with the Forge actuator (blue spring) I am currently using.
Thanks for your input Simon
that was the standard actuator.. however it was nearly new..
no it ran something like 1.5bar tailing to 1.1bar at redline iirc.. if I remember when I am next back at surrey rr I will pull the boost plot up for nics car.
You set a target boost and an amount of duty for the boost solenoid to bleed air off but if the wastegate actuator cannot hold the wastegate shut then it matters not..
I am not a fan of the forge dumpvalve, well thats unfair I am not a fan of any after market dumpvalve.. either no dumpvalve or oe is best.. however the forge wastegates work quite well and being able to change the springs is good etc..
Simon
#37
I have seen power of Vf36/37's range anywhere from 320bhp to 360bhp. IMO 340bhp is about average & anymore is a bonus. (They are relatively small turbos compared to what is out there now). The torque is more what i would be concerned with & how quickly it spools up.
After trying different maps & using different mappers on my two Jdm's I can see that each have their own style of mapping. Some might say that the JDM twin scrolls are all about hitting peak boost quickly & shorter gearing, with emphasis on 0mph to 100mph. This does work by throwing in a lot of boost early, but just as quickly as these turbos hit that peak boost on a steeper torque curve, the quicker they drop boost. (even with an uprated actuator). So what you end up with is peak boost of e.g. 370 ft/lbs torque at 3900rpm but only for a short spike, after which it drops off rapidly. On the other hand Iv seen mappers feed in the boost a bit more gradually & less of it & then gradually building the boost. This does mean that peak boost comes in a few hundred rpm later ( & may only hit e.g. 350 ft/lbs) but seems to sustain for a large rev range, on a shallower torque curve. You could say its more usable day to day but I suppose on a drag strip you may think differently.
ps these are only my opinions & Im sure the Mappers will know more.
After trying different maps & using different mappers on my two Jdm's I can see that each have their own style of mapping. Some might say that the JDM twin scrolls are all about hitting peak boost quickly & shorter gearing, with emphasis on 0mph to 100mph. This does work by throwing in a lot of boost early, but just as quickly as these turbos hit that peak boost on a steeper torque curve, the quicker they drop boost. (even with an uprated actuator). So what you end up with is peak boost of e.g. 370 ft/lbs torque at 3900rpm but only for a short spike, after which it drops off rapidly. On the other hand Iv seen mappers feed in the boost a bit more gradually & less of it & then gradually building the boost. This does mean that peak boost comes in a few hundred rpm later ( & may only hit e.g. 350 ft/lbs) but seems to sustain for a large rev range, on a shallower torque curve. You could say its more usable day to day but I suppose on a drag strip you may think differently.
ps these are only my opinions & Im sure the Mappers will know more.
After compiling together lots of various VF36/37 graphs from newages including a fair few of my own, the main thing that I think makes these differences in power & torque is engine compression & condition of turbo. (assuming all other components on the car are in a similar condition, which itself is impossible to say!). Both engine compression & turbo condition deteriorate over time & usage or mis-usage!
ps Have you considered JGM (posted above) to map your car, there not many people out there that know more about these cars than him.
ps Have you considered JGM (posted above) to map your car, there not many people out there that know more about these cars than him.
Hehe, i hope that you are talking about Swedish girls. Since i love them even though i'm Finnish.
Thank you for the compliments. I have strong passion for anything related to technology. This is my second Subaru actually, i kind of liked my winter beater Impreza STI Type-R Ver. IV few years back. It was a solid car, it just felt a little old for me, being a 1997.
Good choice, but like I have said previously..... I would take advantage of the MegaROM functionality on your ECU with the EcuTEK software. It will probably cost you a bit more, but the driveability advantages are worth it in my opinion.
What a single gear dyno run doesn't show you is how your car reaches boost in the various gears and actually drives. Per gear wastegate control is one of the advantages of MegaROM and you can certainly see the difference that attention to this area provides on the road..... and that is where it counts.
You have the facilities available with your ECU, so my advice is to use them to their potential.
What a single gear dyno run doesn't show you is how your car reaches boost in the various gears and actually drives. Per gear wastegate control is one of the advantages of MegaROM and you can certainly see the difference that attention to this area provides on the road..... and that is where it counts.
You have the facilities available with your ECU, so my advice is to use them to their potential.
How you can improve your spool up by mapping? How much does the solenoid and the map itself affect the spool up? Of course the turbocharger has its physical limits and you are not able to change its efficiency islands, but can i expect a little better spool up? I think it could have a little better spool up in stock form. Of course there are a lot of different things that affect the spooling, but could it be improved in any way with the stock turbine?
Last edited by Twilight; 22 July 2011 at 08:17 AM.
#38
Thats is actually a very nice curve. I was impressed by the power curve since it only varies by mere 2% in the 5700 - 7000rpm zone. Nice output. Torque is also very nice in between of 3700-5200rpm. It must have been a joy to drive.
Last edited by Twilight; 22 July 2011 at 11:43 AM.
#39
Heres another one for you to look at with a slight difference, has the ususal wabro fuel pump, K+N Panel filter, 3 port boost solenoid, and 3" cat back exhaust all maped by Paul@ Zen using megarom, only difference to the norm is I run on 15% E85 (mainly due to ease of supply) Don`t think it made much difference to power, but the mid range torque feels quite fierce. Car has done 40,000miles and is on standard actuator and dump valve.
Zen`s rollers:
And just for an interesting comparison, same car, only chages between the two are the switch from E85 pump fuel to E85 from Anglo American Oils. There is no way it`s making that much torque, was quite funny watching the operator poo himself when it tried to climb out of his rollers though
Zen`s rollers:
And just for an interesting comparison, same car, only chages between the two are the switch from E85 pump fuel to E85 from Anglo American Oils. There is no way it`s making that much torque, was quite funny watching the operator poo himself when it tried to climb out of his rollers though
#40
How you can improve your spool up by mapping? How much does the solenoid and the map itself affect the spool up? Of course the turbocharger has its physical limits and you are not able to change its efficiency islands, but can i expect a little better spool up? I think it could have a little better spool up in stock form. Of course there are a lot of different things that affect the spooling, but could it be improved in any way with the stock turbine?
I had one map on my car that ran more boost at a given RPM and spooled quicker than my current map, however with the current map the car is quicker on the road / more responsive and also shows a better curve on the dyno (just to be clear - car has never been mapped on a dyno). The only difference was the map...... primarily different parameters for the VVT and ignition timing (and lower boost lol).
This is what sets apart a mapper that knows his potatoes, against another that doesn't!
I don't even worry about boost levels or spool now...... it's how it drives and how it accelerates in-gear that is my comparison!
#41
Hello Shaun.
Yes, you are true. I think it doesn't matter what kind of figures you get out as long as you are satisfied on the ride. The mapper is very professional and i'm sure he can map the car just the way i want it. Quicker spool and wider torque band on the lower gears and a little modified in the higher gears.
Just bought the Hayward & Scott downpipe. £228,00 + VAT. The downpipe reduces to 2.5", i guess that is not a problem in my build?
I also found a new Prodrive 3- port solenoid from the Americas, and the Forge actuator from UK. Looking good now.
Yes, you are true. I think it doesn't matter what kind of figures you get out as long as you are satisfied on the ride. The mapper is very professional and i'm sure he can map the car just the way i want it. Quicker spool and wider torque band on the lower gears and a little modified in the higher gears.
Just bought the Hayward & Scott downpipe. £228,00 + VAT. The downpipe reduces to 2.5", i guess that is not a problem in my build?
I also found a new Prodrive 3- port solenoid from the Americas, and the Forge actuator from UK. Looking good now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post