Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Drivers 'cut petrol use by 15%' research suggests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 October 2011, 07:07 PM
  #31  
Adrian F
Scooby Regular
 
Adrian F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have stopped going out most weekends to events and stopped entering competions due to the cost of travel

As to the country being in debt being use to justify taking my wages from me in Tax, the situation cant be that bad as we can afford to give billions in foreign aid each year
Old 05 October 2011, 07:18 PM
  #32  
RobsyUK
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
RobsyUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Milk on Beans
Posts: 6,412
Received 185 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

We havn't changed tbh, but then for the last 6yrs we have been putting all of our funds on the £35k debt we had. Now we have £16k left to go.

We still go on yearly holidays, lunches, dinners.

We do however only buy what we need. Always stick to £50 (now £80) a week on food. We have always budgeted £50 a week for social and this rolls over if we don't go out.

Saying that though in the last 4yrs our house income has gone up by £40k.
Old 05 October 2011, 07:21 PM
  #33  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Truth is, painful as it may seem, Fuel Tax is an OPTIONAL tax .... some people take the steps and pay much less (like buying a quality diesel).

Others still continue to get shafted .... but they are slow to catch on and probably deserve all they get

If you don't like it - don't pay it - it IS entirely optional ......
Old 05 October 2011, 07:32 PM
  #34  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
Truth is, painful as it may seem, Fuel Tax is an OPTIONAL tax .... some people take the steps and pay much less (like buying a quality diesel).

Others still continue to get shafted .... but they are slow to catch on and probably deserve all they get

If you don't like it - don't pay it - it IS entirely optional ......
Buying fuel is optional Pete, paying tax on it isn't.
Old 05 October 2011, 07:37 PM
  #35  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You know what I mean .... at 50mpg I now pay HALF as much fuel tax as I did when driving my Scooby - or course, the fact that the Impreza isn't the car it once was helped make my mind up.

But the residual loss on the Subaru was just so horrific that you were paying more fuel tax AND losing pots loads on resale!

It really is a no-brainer ....
Old 05 October 2011, 08:06 PM
  #36  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
You know what I mean .... at 50mpg I now pay HALF as much fuel tax as I did when driving my Scooby - or course, the fact that the Impreza isn't the car it once was helped make my mind up.

But the residual loss on the Subaru was just so horrific that you were paying more fuel tax AND losing pots loads on resale!

It really is a no-brainer ....
A no-brainer maybe, but COMPLETELY misses the point so far as this thread is concerned, since it fails to take into account that a significant proportion of the people contributing to that 15% average national drop in fuel purchases may well have already switched to more economical vehicles, yet STILL can't afford to travel as far as they used to or would like to.
Old 05 October 2011, 08:13 PM
  #37  
dagger
Scooby Regular
 
dagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SHEFFIELD
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
I drive about 40k miles a year & can say with certainty that most people are driving slower these days = more mpg ... I still maintain 85 clicks on the m/way & now find myself flying past people who must be doing way below 70mph ...

TX.

That would be me - I only do 60 mph on motorways, it's fookin boring, but have to save some dosh somehow
Old 06 October 2011, 02:59 PM
  #38  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't understand the statements that it is important that we stay in the Eu in order to use our influence to improve our lot.

Does "Dave" not realise that the people are intelligent enough to realise that with 10% of the seats in the European Parliament that our own influence is worth the square root of hardly anything at all?

Its the same old excuse that has been uttered by all the politicians over the years and one has to ask why they all find it so vital that we stay in Europe and it won't be very long now before they start to recommend full federation for the reasons that Monnet recommended were used when he first proposed a federated Europe just after WW2.

Wonder what advantages we shall see should it ever happen...God forbid!

Les
Old 06 October 2011, 03:05 PM
  #39  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dagger
That would be me - I only do 60 mph on motorways, it's fookin boring, but have to save some dosh somehow
I can do 100 MPH and still return 45mpg ...... no point having a fast car if you must drive slowly due to the fuel cost!!

At a constant 60 MPH I get 60mpg! But 45mpg is fine for me to zoom past all the crawling Scoobies
Old 06 October 2011, 03:08 PM
  #40  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
I can do 100 MPH and still return 45mpg ...... no point having a fast car if you must drive slowly due to the fuel cost!!

At a constant 60 MPH I get 60mpg! But 45mpg is fine for me to zoom past all the crawling Scoobies

Wind your neck in you old ****.
Old 06 October 2011, 07:05 PM
  #41  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Will a Civic derv even make it to 100 mph ?


I have had some pretty heft MTB crashes in the past 2 months, dislocated shoulder, 2 fractured ribs (separate occasions) and various other pain related injury's, this has actually helped my miles per tank, jump from 260-270 to 300 as i have been unable to use most of my gears, so i have been pulling away and just dumping it in whatever jigh gear i can manage
Old 06 October 2011, 08:33 PM
  #42  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The point I am trying to make is this:-

You can drive economical, better equipped, cars faster than a Scooby if you cannot afford the fuel so need to limit your use of the power available.

In everyday driving, a 50mpg car does exactly the same as an 18mpg Scooby - of that there is no doubt.

So, I'm not surprised that those with gas guzzlers are tapering their use ..... times have moved on.
Old 06 October 2011, 08:38 PM
  #43  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
The point I am trying to make is this:-

You can drive economical, better equipped, cars faster than a Scooby if you cannot afford the fuel so need to limit your use of the power available.

In everyday driving, a 50mpg car does exactly the same as an 18mpg Scooby - of that there is no doubt.

So, I'm not surprised that those with gas guzzlers are tapering their use ..... times have moved on.
A £50 street hooker does the same job as a £1000 high class escort....it's not quite the same though.
Old 06 October 2011, 08:53 PM
  #44  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the £50 hooker looks like this and goes like a steam train:-

http://thewondrous.com/wp-content/up..._mendes_20.jpg

And the £1000 Escort looks like this and goes like an old Escort:-

http://ididafunny.com/wp-content/upl...n-pictures.jpg

THAT's the analogy you need to be using .......
Old 06 October 2011, 09:02 PM
  #45  
Dirk Diggler 75
Scooby Regular
 
Dirk Diggler 75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pottering around ...
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Wind your neck in you old ****.
He can't it's too far up his anus.............
Old 06 October 2011, 09:49 PM
  #46  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
The point I am trying to make is this:-

You can drive economical, better equipped, cars faster than a Scooby if you cannot afford the fuel so need to limit your use of the power available.
... ... So, I'm not surprised that those with gas guzzlers are tapering their use ..... times have moved on.
I made the point before, but since it seems to have gone straight over your head the first time I'll make it again. What evidence do you have that owners of gas guzzlers, as you put it, are responsible for more than a tiny fraction of the national tapering off in fuel consumption which has occurred?
Old 06 October 2011, 10:12 PM
  #47  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What evidence do you have that it isn't?

Logic dictates that someone who has made a concious decision to own a car doing 80mpg is less likely to need to cut back than someone 'stuck' with a gas guzzler doing 18mpg!!

Last edited by pslewis; 06 October 2011 at 10:14 PM.
Old 06 October 2011, 10:26 PM
  #48  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
What evidence do you have that it isn't?

Logic dictates that someone who has made a concious decision to own a car doing 80mpg is less likely to need to cut back than someone 'stuck' with a gas guzzler doing 18mpg!!
Logic also dictates that anyone who's made a conscious decision to own a car which has relatively poor fuel economy is confident that they can afford the extra cost, and conversely that anyone who's made a conscious decision to own a more fuel efficient car thinks the exact opposite, ie. that they'll struggle to meet any extra cost.

As for my lack of hard proof, I'm not the one who started off making sweeping claims about this or that type of car owner having cut back the heaviest on their fuel purchasing, so the onus isn't on me to come up with any.

In any case, a 15% cut and £1 Billion lost in treasury revenue should send a massive signal to the government, that they and their predecessors have got fuel taxation policy completely ****-backwards. I severely doubt that they or anyone else in British politics today would have the integrity and ***** to admit it, but you can always hope.
Old 06 October 2011, 10:53 PM
  #49  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Logic also dictates that anyone who's made a conscious decision to own a car which has relatively poor fuel economy is confident that they can afford the extra cost,
You make some valid points ... but, the quote above only is relevant if fuel costs remain the same.

I had a Scooby when fuel broke through £1 a litre, it was affordable for me - of course. But, I didn't get where I am today by ignoring the future when it becomes clear.

A blind man on a galloping horse could see that fuel was just going up and up and up and up ..... and, consequently, cars like the Impreza would quickly fall out of favour and fall in value.

Add to that the hike in the asking prices for new Imprezas and it was madness to even consider staying with the game ...... anyone who bought an Impreza in the past 5 years should not concern themselves about fuel costs as they made an optional choice to pay more fuel tax than someone who made a decision to pay less of the optional tax.
Old 06 October 2011, 11:13 PM
  #50  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
You make some valid points ... but, the quote above only is relevant if fuel costs remain the same.

I had a Scooby when fuel broke through £1 a litre, it was affordable for me - of course. But, I didn't get where I am today by ignoring the future when it becomes clear.

A blind man on a galloping horse could see that fuel was just going up and up and up and up ..... and, consequently, cars like the Impreza would quickly fall out of favour and fall in value.

Add to that the hike in the asking prices for new Imprezas and it was madness to even consider staying with the game ...... anyone who bought an Impreza in the past 5 years should not concern themselves about fuel costs as they made an optional choice to pay more fuel tax than someone who made a decision to pay less of the optional tax.
If this was a thread about the falling value of certain types of cars, yours would be a terrifically insightful answer. Maybe you should go and find one, or start one of your own?
Old 07 October 2011, 03:28 PM
  #51  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"Pile it high, flog it cheap", I have said this before that if they lowered the duty they would make back the extra money plus more because of people feeling more flush and going out doing more stuff, like people have said they dont go to events due to the cost and as such dont buy stuff when they are there or pay to attend said event.

Realistically the whole eco green bollocks will make **** all difference compared to natrual events, industry and whatever, our use in this country is a fraction of the usage and emisions compared to the rest of the world.

Drop it 10 p a litre and get things moving again and probably still end up in the same or better position revenue wise but with a load of goodwill and morale boosts that get people out and spending as at the moment its in a stalemate where they have spanked this Golden Goose that bit too hard and long and its stopping laying.

I cycle to work or work from home, zero cost fuel wise most weeks, my car does 230 miles to sixty or seventy quids worth, its crap but I can afford that once a month, might even go for a proper guzzler seeing as everyone is giving them away so they can spunk 25 large on a BMW that does 50 mpg.
Old 07 October 2011, 03:39 PM
  #52  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are we completely sure that the decrease in petrol consumption and/or tax revenue isn't due more to the improving efficiency of cars and use of alternative fuels, than merely the fact that people can't afford it? Anyone got any figures? Are people travelling just as far but using less petrol? That's what the Government would want.

Decreasing duty isn't going to happen, regardless of the maths.
Old 07 October 2011, 03:43 PM
  #53  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Will be a combination of factors contribution to the 15 percent, and I agree they will never lower duty to stimulate the rest of the ecomomy.
Old 07 October 2011, 04:38 PM
  #54  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I noticed some lower fuel prices today, might be a good sign.

Les
Old 07 October 2011, 05:05 PM
  #55  
lordharding
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
lordharding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: cumbria
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My fuel costs have gone up from £190 to £240 per month in the last 2years so I would imagine it is similar to most families along with £40 a month more on gas / electricity

Something has to give for the average families ,wherever it's days out ,less drink,****,bingo or clothes or luxury snacks or sweets or chocolates

That's a billion less to send to other countries and the polish workers children choild benefits abroad and all the asylum seekers living in luxury and the scum in prison with PS3 and every new game

The last to leave the country please switch off the lights ,although it won't save the planet as cow plats and factories in Asia and the wood chopped down in south America has done that ,not the performance car driver
Old 07 October 2011, 06:08 PM
  #56  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There was an article recently which stated that £1500 a year is the tipping point for most families with regards energy costs ...... I guess there is a tipping point for transport fuel too - don't know what it is though?
Old 08 October 2011, 12:15 PM
  #57  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
A £50 street hooker does the same job as a £1000 high class escort....it's not quite the same though.
You must be doing quite well then to be able to afford that.

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
04 October 2015 09:49 PM
Scooby_Lee101
General Technical
3
26 September 2015 12:04 AM



Quick Reply: Drivers 'cut petrol use by 15%' research suggests



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM.