Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Please let this be true

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 November 2011, 07:32 PM
  #31  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chocolate_o_brian
I doubt it. Killing an innocent toddler. Torturing him first by sticking batteries up his anus or cutting his fingers off one by one. You think that's more twisted than having someone punished by means of the death sentance. I'm sorry but that it absolute bollocks
I don't get this at all.

You are seriously suggesting that society should be jailing abused and damaged children in the knowledge that they will then be killed when they are 18? That would be just about the point that this country hit rock-bottom and in every way more twisted and calculated. I seriously wonder about people that could lust for such a thing.


Why wait until they are 18? why not kill them as 10 years olds then?...you really want that? or would that be too kind, far better to make them suffer for 8 years first?

Societies shouldn't be shaped by what they did, it's how we react to what they did that makes us civilised
Old 09 November 2011, 07:35 PM
  #32  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
COB, I think most of us with kids will see it differently to those without.

What point are you making here?

It's terrible to kill children...no ****?

I despise the argument that says that you cannot have a proper view on an issue like this unless you have kids..pointless and vacuous way to debate.



Are those without children somehow less able to tell right from wrong?

Last edited by Martin2005; 09 November 2011 at 07:52 PM.
Old 09 November 2011, 07:43 PM
  #33  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got kids. My kids would not be child killers.

However, I have been involved with families where neglect and abuse has taken place from an early age and the damage can be horrific.

We will never understand what these killers went through as most of us have led fairly normal lives. Although on some of these sink estates, abuse and neglect is rife. Not just out of choice, but these young parents don't know how to care for kids, as they had no role models to show them.

Thankfully, the list of child killers is very short, so getting much meaningful data is very difficult.

I would still not want a person who killed a child at 10 years old, who served his time, to be killed by adults trying to seek vengence. This makes them just as guilty. They were 10 when they did it. Can you remember what you were doing at 10? I am certain it was nothing like these boys. What they did was horrific, and thankfully pretty much a one off.
Old 09 November 2011, 07:45 PM
  #34  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,046
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

....

Last edited by ALi-B; 09 November 2011 at 07:47 PM. Reason: davy summed it up nicely
Old 09 November 2011, 07:49 PM
  #35  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,046
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

I would still not want a person who killed a child at 10 years old, who served his time, to be killed by adults trying to seek vengence. This makes them just as guilty. They were 10 when they did it. Can you remember what you were doing at 10? I am certain it was nothing like these boys. What they did was horrific, and thankfully pretty much a one off.
Exactly. What sort of message would parents advocating vigilante murder/vengence send out their own kids?
Old 09 November 2011, 07:50 PM
  #36  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
I've got kids. My kids would not be child killers.

However, I have been involved with families where neglect and abuse has taken place from an early age and the damage can be horrific.

We will never understand what these killers went through as most of us have led fairly normal lives. Although on some of these sink estates, abuse and neglect is rife. Not just out of choice, but these young parents don't know how to care for kids, as they had no role models to show them.

Thankfully, the list of child killers is very short, so getting much meaningful data is very difficult.

I would still not want a person who killed a child at 10 years old, who served his time, to be killed by adults trying to seek vengence. This makes them just as guilty. They were 10 when they did it. Can you remember what you were doing at 10? I am certain it was nothing like these boys. What they did was horrific, and thankfully pretty much a one off.
Much more elloquently put than my rambling.

Yes I too have children, a boy of 10 included btw.
Old 09 November 2011, 07:52 PM
  #37  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
That would be even more twisted and calculating than the 2 boys were in the first place
You have got to be sh!tting me.

You think the death penalty for two child murderers is worse than the crime they committed? You really have lost the plot
Old 09 November 2011, 07:54 PM
  #38  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
You have got to be sh!tting me.

You think the death penalty for two child murderers is worse than the crime they committed? You really have lost the plot

Somehow I don't think it's me that lost the plot

btw I said more twisted and calulating , which it demonstrably would be

Last edited by Martin2005; 09 November 2011 at 07:56 PM.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:02 PM
  #39  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

lol the board's extreme leftie strikes again. Ah the poor little mites, must not go against their human rights eh?

They were and will be for the rest of their lives brutal and sadistic child killers. The USA has the right stance on this, it's called the death penalty.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:03 PM
  #40  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
What point are you making here?

It's terrible to kill children...no ****?

I despise the argument that says that you cannot have a proper view on an issue like this unless you have kids..pointless and vacuous way to debate.



Are those without children somehow less able to tell right from wrong?
Right, first off, just stop being an argumentative arsehole.

Let me explain.

When this appalling crime happened, I didn't have kids.
I was abhorred by what happened but to be really honest it didn't hit a chord with me.
It was 'just' another nasty crime involving kids - I had more important (to me) things happening in my life.

Now I have kids, and re-visiting a crime such as this feels somewhat worse, thinking what it would be like to happen to your own little ones.



So don't give me all that $hit that it's a 'pointless and vacuous way to debate' - you are just way to quick to jump on people from your Ivory Tower.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:10 PM
  #41  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
They were and will be for the rest of their lives brutal and sadistic child killers. The USA has the right stance on this, it's called the death penalty.
They were child, child killers. I don't think the US kills children. They might be adults now, they were children at the time.

Originally Posted by zip106
When this appalling crime happened, I didn't have kids.

Now I have kids, and re-visiting a crime such as this feels somewhat worse, thinking what it would be like to happen to your own little ones.
Do you think your kids will kill another child?
Old 09 November 2011, 08:13 PM
  #42  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
lol the board's extreme leftie strikes again. Ah the poor little mites, must not go against their human rights eh?

They were and will be for the rest of their lives brutal and sadistic child killers. The USA has the right stance on this, it's called the death penalty.

How is anything I've said 'lefty'. Is that you just admitting you don't have any sort of coherent argument here?

So your argument goes something like this...it's wrong to torture and murder children...unless the state does it, then it's OK?
Old 09 November 2011, 08:16 PM
  #43  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
Right, first off, just stop being an argumentative arsehole.

Let me explain.

When this appalling crime happened, I didn't have kids.
I was abhorred by what happened but to be really honest it didn't hit a chord with me.
It was 'just' another nasty crime involving kids - I had more important (to me) things happening in my life.

Now I have kids, and re-visiting a crime such as this feels somewhat worse, thinking what it would be like to happen to your own little ones.



So don't give me all that $hit that it's a 'pointless and vacuous way to debate' - you are just way to quick to jump on people from your Ivory Tower.
Err I believe you were busting for the argument by your earlier comment. Implying that I didn't have kids and therefore my views were invalid.
Maybe I should of let it slide, but then again I am 'an argumentative *******'.

Last edited by Martin2005; 09 November 2011 at 08:18 PM.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:18 PM
  #44  
chocolate_o_brian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
chocolate_o_brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
Right, first off, just stop being an argumentative arsehole.

Let me explain.

When this appalling crime happened, I didn't have kids.
I was abhorred by what happened but to be really honest it didn't hit a chord with me.
It was 'just' another nasty crime involving kids - I had more important (to me) things happening in my life.

Now I have kids, and re-visiting a crime such as this feels somewhat worse, thinking what it would be like to happen to your own little ones.



So don't give me all that $hit that it's a 'pointless and vacuous way to debate' - you are just way to quick to jump on people from your Ivory Tower.
Fantastically put
Old 09 November 2011, 08:20 PM
  #45  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

As for the argument on paedos and child killers having terrible upbringings do you think that can be said of Ronnie Barkers Son who I believe was due to be charged with child pornography offences before his disappearance? So how does your argument stand up with that fact or are you suggesting Ronnie Barker and his wife must have been terrible abusive parents for one of their 3 kids to indulge in child ****?
Old 09 November 2011, 08:21 PM
  #46  
chocolate_o_brian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
chocolate_o_brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I don't get this at all.

You are seriously suggesting that society should be jailing abused and damaged children in the knowledge that they will then be killed when they are 18? That would be just about the point that this country hit rock-bottom and in every way more twisted and calculated. I seriously wonder about people that could lust for such a thing.


Why wait until they are 18? why not kill them as 10 years olds then?...you really want that? or would that be too kind, far better to make them suffer for 8 years first?

Societies shouldn't be shaped by what they did, it's how we react to what they did that makes us civilised
Read what I posted. There was no suggestion, merely the fact I thought your comment was bollocks, which it was, and which others obviously agree with. I have made zilch suggestion... I argued your logic of thinking a premeditated punishment was more sick and twisted than that of two pre-pubescent children torturing and murdering a toddler!
Old 09 November 2011, 08:26 PM
  #47  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
As for the argument on paedos and child killers having terrible upbringings do you think that can be said of Ronnie Barkers Son who I believe was due to be charged with child pornography offences before his disappearance? So how does your argument stand up with that fact or are you suggesting Ronnie Barker and his wife must have been terrible abusive parents for one of their 3 kids to indulge in child ****?

Maybe it was all those 'four candles' 'Fork Handles' type gags he did it, or all that cross-dressing?

The fact are though that the abused to very often become abusers, that's not some left wing conspiracy btw and I know it doesn't fit comfortably with our sense of outrage when something terrible happens.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:28 PM
  #48  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
How is anything I've said 'lefty'. Is that you just admitting you don't have any sort of coherent argument here?

So your argument goes something like this...it's wrong to torture and murder children...unless the state does it, then it's OK?
I've been around long enough on here to see many of your leftie arguments, not just this one. The fact remains that the two Bulger killers are sadistic child murderers. That is the lowest crime of all and deserves the most severe punishment. What they did was evil, it wasn't a bit of rough play that went wrong or just bullying, it was planned and sustained torture and then murder of a toddler. There is no help for anyone who can do that no matter what their age because to be that sadistic they are always going to be that way inclined.

If you can't tell the difference between what they did and capital punishment for the most serious crime possible then you really are a sad individual.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:28 PM
  #49  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
Do you think your kids will kill another child?
At the moment, no.
They're only 9 and 6.

Who knows what the future brings.

I wasn't a manic depressive when I was a kid. Now....

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Err I believe you were busting for the argument by your earlier comment. Implying that I didn't have kids and therefore my views were invalid.
I wasn't looking for an argument.

But through experience I can see (and have explained) it through the eyes of those with and those without, kids.

It may come as a surprise to you, but I think most people see the world differently when they are parents.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:31 PM
  #50  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chocolate_o_brian
Read what I posted. There was no suggestion, merely the fact I thought your comment was bollocks, which it was, and which others obviously agree with. I have made zilch suggestion... I argued your logic of thinking a premeditated punishment was more sick and twisted than that of two pre-pubescent children torturing and murdering a toddler!
Well my view is that a premeditated punishment, effectively held over 2 children for 8 years, by supposedly rational adults is clearly more twisted and calcualted. Let's just respectively agree that we think each others view on this are 'bollocks'
Old 09 November 2011, 08:35 PM
  #51  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
I've been around long enough on here to see many of your leftie arguments, not just this one. The fact remains that the two Bulger killers are sadistic child murderers. That is the lowest crime of all and deserves the most severe punishment. What they did was evil, it wasn't a bit of rough play that went wrong or just bullying, it was planned and sustained torture and then murder of a toddler. There is no help for anyone who can do that no matter what their age because to be that sadistic they are always going to be that way inclined.

If you can't tell the difference between what they did and capital punishment for the most serious crime possible then you really are a sad individual.
Just goes to show how fuking pointless it is trying to have a grown conversation with juveniles

I'm going to ignore you from now on, please do the same to me
Old 09 November 2011, 08:37 PM
  #52  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Just goes to show how fuking pointless it is trying to have a grown conversation with juveniles

I'm going to ignore you from now on, please do the same to me
Oh pick your toys up you pathetic child. You are the one showing yourself up for not being able to put together a sensible reply.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:46 PM
  #53  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
As for the argument on paedos and child killers having terrible upbringings do you think that can be said of Ronnie Barkers Son who I believe was due to be charged with child pornography offences before his disappearance? So how does your argument stand up with that fact or are you suggesting Ronnie Barker and his wife must have been terrible abusive parents for one of their 3 kids to indulge in child ****?
Ronnie Barker's son was an adult.

Something can and does go wrong with adults that we are unable to explain. However, we don't know he wasn't exposed to something as a child. Maybe with counselling he will be able to find out why he chose this path and found not stop himself.

A normal child does not kill another child at 10 years old. Something went wrong in their lives for this to happen.

I'm not looking for an argument, but I have been exposed to some of this and as a consequence understand childhood behaviour a (very) little bit.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:49 PM
  #54  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
That is the lowest crime of all and deserves the most severe punishment
When committed by an adult I agree.
Old 09 November 2011, 08:50 PM
  #55  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who gives a **** what happened to Venables as a child.

He's taking the ****ing **** out of us all just now.

Release him to the mob - ASAP.

He'll finally know that he's not a ****ing b list celebrity.

Old 09 November 2011, 08:52 PM
  #56  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
At the moment, no.
They're only 9 and 6.

Who knows what the future brings.

I wasn't a manic depressive when I was a kid. Now....



I wasn't looking for an argument.

But through experience I can see (and have explained) it through the eyes of those with and those without, kids.

It may come as a surprise to you, but I think most people see the world differently when they are parents.
OK look I have let myself get bad-tempered on this thread (something I said to myself I wouldn't do). Anyway I misunderstood your comment and apologise for jumping off the deep-end, something I would get grumpy with my kids for ironically
Old 09 November 2011, 08:53 PM
  #57  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasey
Who gives a **** what happened to Venables as a child
I'll just throw an idea out there....it might stop it happening again.

No, wait. Rather thank stop it, and try and understand it. We can have another case, and lynch them later in life.

Yay, way more fun!
Old 09 November 2011, 08:58 PM
  #58  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
OK look I have let myself get bad-tempered on this thread (something I said to myself I wouldn't do). Anyway I misunderstood your comment and apologise for jumping off the deep-end, something I would get grumpy with my kids for ironically


Well, if anything is going to get the SN massif frothing at the mouth it'd be a thread like this.

(And Muslims/Islam, lorry drivers, wimmins, Post Office.... ad infinitum.... )
Old 09 November 2011, 09:26 PM
  #59  
chocolate_o_brian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
chocolate_o_brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well my view is that a premeditated punishment, effectively held over 2 children for 8 years, by supposedly rational adults is clearly more twisted and calcualted. Let's just respectively agree that we think each others view on this are 'bollocks'
We'll also agree that my views are clearly in the majority whilst yours....


Old 09 November 2011, 09:39 PM
  #60  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chocolate_o_brian
We'll also agree that my views are clearly in the majority whilst yours....


Not sure how you can say that. But in the desire to cool the debate off a bit then fine. Sometimes the minority are all that stands between sanity and anarchy.
I do find it difficult to try hold a reasoned debate on such an emotive issue. Maybe it's my style of posting, I don't know, I do seem to draw the fire a bit. It's funny though how being (wrongly) branded as a 'lefty' puts me almost on a par with child killers and paedos though.
I do understand the emotion believe me, I just don't think we should allow ourselves into the pit just because some seriously disturbed kids did.

Last edited by Martin2005; 09 November 2011 at 09:40 PM.


Quick Reply: Please let this be true



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM.