Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Type R advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 January 2012, 02:02 AM
  #31  
craigo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
craigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: surrey/west sussex
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by prodriverules
It's pointless arguing the toss about classic and newage as there will always be lovers of both and one will not back down over the other.
BUT the facts are obvious
1.Classic feels raw
2.Newage feels more refined
3.similar powered classic/newage,the classic WILL out accelerate newage given weight advantage[but only in the right hands lol]

yes, this advice is correct.....
craig
Old 08 January 2012, 04:59 AM
  #32  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a Type R running over 350bhp with a 6 speed box etc. My car now weighs just short of 1300kgs and 'feels' very quick, but it's always on the edge. I only drive it at 90% as it's a challenging drive. Great fun, but it will bite you in the *** it provoked. A 400bhp newage would be easier and more relaxing to drive at the same 'speed'.
Old 08 January 2012, 07:07 AM
  #33  
playtime
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
playtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: flying by sti
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mshill
I don't want a classic v's newage thread, but how will 350bhp Type r compare to a 400bhp bugeye/ newage?

Would be a weekend toy and not an everyday car.
i have had 3no newage cars before up to 400bhp and looking to get back into a scoob real soon, always fancied a Type R
or minted / moddified classic
Just buy a type r sti and be done with it you tart your as bad if not worse than me for waiting on that advice that will make your mind up for you.
Old 08 January 2012, 07:49 AM
  #34  
scoobydoobytim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
scoobydoobytim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cheshire
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mshill
Spec c would be my ideal car but too expensive for a weekend toy, really looking at a budget of around the 5k region.

No abs could be a challenge tho

Would a sorted classic with abs be a quick as a type r?
I bought an automatic 1996 JDM motor as as far as I can remember this was the only early classic with ABS then converted to five speed manual this is pushing out the sort of power your after I even did the Brembo conversion and tbh I wouldn't fancy no ABS if your going to drive it hard.
Old 08 January 2012, 09:01 AM
  #35  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Er, your Spec C will be 200kg heavier & down on power yet you think you'd be ok

TX.

100kg heavier, more torque, actually quicker to 100mph than a type R quicker 0-60, quicker in gear, more aerodynamic, quicker pickup etc, take your pick
Remember I own both

Tony
Old 08 January 2012, 09:08 AM
  #36  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
100kg heavier, more torque, actually quicker to 100mph than a type R quicker 0-60, quicker in gear, more aerodynamic, quicker pickup etc, take your pick
Remember I own both

Tony
Which would you say is more fun though Tony?
Old 08 January 2012, 09:09 AM
  #37  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by prodriverules
It's pointless arguing the toss about classic and newage as there will always be lovers of both and one will not back down over the other.
BUT the facts are obvious
1.Classic feels less refined (not raw)
2.Newage feels more refined (and the right ones feel more responsive/give better feedback)
3.similar powered classic/newage,the classic WILL NOT out accelerate a newage JDM even with a weight advantage
EFA

Also see me
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg

And no, ive never seen a Spec C with that power output, I have the same fuel remap and its similar to my last Spec C power output on the standard JDM map
Its heavier "brother" loses a 10th of a sec here and there but not much.

Tony

Last edited by TonyBurns; 08 January 2012 at 09:10 AM.
Old 08 January 2012, 09:17 AM
  #38  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by gpssti4
Which would you say is more fun though Tony?

The new age JDM, they are completely different to a newage UK, dont get me wrong, the type R is a fantastic machine but ensure you get a limited or a version 6 with the quickrack standard as the fastrack does not complement the chassis enough tbh it feels a little numb, but the gearing is manic and you do get noticed more in a type R than you do in a new age STI.
Its good to own one but you do notice the improvements on the new age JDM's alot more than you do on a UK STI.

Tony
Old 08 January 2012, 10:11 AM
  #39  
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bonesetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 3,492
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mshill
I don't want a classic v's newage thread, but how will 350bhp Type r compare to a 400bhp bugeye/ newage?

Would be a weekend toy and not an everyday car.
i have had 3no newage cars before up to 400bhp and looking to get back into a scoob real soon, always fancied a Type R or minted / moddified classic
I have a Type R runing 331bhp (and have owned New Age JDM twin scroll 370/360 and currently run a V7 STi 345bhp Wagon). I prefer the Type R for a few reasons.

I can have more fun at lower speeds. I found I needed to drive the JDM very fast indeed to start to get it to have fun
The Type R is alot more nimble. It has a complianct, yielding, femanine quality which is very nice The JDM's drive is butch
Real world driving you can adjust speed more easily and intuitively. Feel yourself going a little too fast into a situation? Just lift off and the car will slow, where the New Age will need a dab of brake
You have the confidence to go into stuff at higher speed because you know you have the braking capacity to stop more quickly (I do have Brembo's on the Type R though)
It feels faster than the New Age JDM
The Type R 'drive' spanks the JDM's when it comes to enjoyment. It's as much fun at 20 mph as it is at 120

Personally, ~330 in the Type R is a sweet spot for road use. I would say ample power

Sorry it's a bit of a comparison which you didn't want, but I don't see any other way of making the point

HTH's, good luck

Last edited by bonesetter; 08 January 2012 at 10:12 AM.
Old 08 January 2012, 11:17 AM
  #40  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
100kg heavier, more torque, actually quicker to 100mph than a type R quicker 0-60, quicker in gear, more aerodynamic, quicker pickup etc, take your pick
Remember I own both

Tony
If both cars are standard yes Tony, you were comparing a 350bhp type R to a 300bhp spec C though.
Old 08 January 2012, 11:21 AM
  #41  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by the hamster
A 350bhp type r will rape a 400 newage. Its much more of a drivers car and that amount of power is about perfect for a fast road Type R. Its also rarer and more respected than a newage.

Others will say different, but imo i'd take the type r all day long.
just got to ask, you have opinions on a lot of the various imprezas.
have you driven all the cars you comment on or read about them on a forum? who's 400 bhp newage did you drive?

this is not to start an arguement, i am just wondering how you can offer this opinion.

tony has both cars so his opinion should be more valid to the op.

what models of impreza have you owned out of interest?

Last edited by tubbytommy; 08 January 2012 at 12:16 PM.
Old 08 January 2012, 11:50 AM
  #42  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
If both cars are standard yes Tony, you were comparing a 350bhp type R to a 300bhp spec C though.
And?

I gave a 340bhp classic a run for its money in a "316bhp" spec c
Dont go on BHP alone, you should also go on torque and pickup, midrange can make a BIG difference, and if you see what a "350" bhp spec c can do, it may scare you

Look at the link I put up, we all know that a Spec C pushes around 290-300bhp out of the box and that a P1 pushes around 280-290bhp in standard form, you just have to look at the difference in times between both (all) of the cars shown there, demonstrates the difference really

Tony
Old 08 January 2012, 11:56 AM
  #43  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
The new age JDM, they are completely different to a newage UK, dont get me wrong, the type R is a fantastic machine but ensure you get a limited or a version 6 with the quickrack standard as the fastrack does not complement the chassis enough tbh it feels a little numb, but the gearing is manic and you do get noticed more in a type R than you do in a new age STI.
Its good to own one but you do notice the improvements on the new age JDM's alot more than you do on a UK STI.

Tony
That's why I changed my standard rack on my V4 Type R to a quickrack. Also to a set of Brembo's and a newage DCCD gearbox. perhaps I should have just bought a newage lol, aghhhhhh too many doors now I remember
Old 08 January 2012, 12:11 PM
  #44  
chris_wrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
chris_wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: warwick
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so going by this thread is mine perfect? with the best of both worlds

cool grey type r v5( fastest colour lol)
jdm twincroll conversion using vf36
spec d 6 speed box
simtek with toys


Last edited by chris_wrx; 08 January 2012 at 12:12 PM.
Old 08 January 2012, 12:17 PM
  #45  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by craigo
TALENT- yes....... a to b type r is and will always be faster in the right hands !
Mate, i and tony have both, so no axe to grind, the type r feels faster, but is really not, and thats with the same hands, that are reasonably talented, not saying i'm the best out there because i'm not, but i'm pretty decent when in maximum attack mode.

I know it's not a popular view but it's the truth, and i have driven them back to back on the same course and when you look at the speedo it tells a different story.
Old 08 January 2012, 12:20 PM
  #46  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Mate, i and tony have both, so no axe to grind, the type r feels faster, but is really not, and thats with the same hands, that are reasonably talented, not saying i'm the best out there because i'm not, but i'm pretty decent when in maximum attack mode.

I know it's not a popular view but it's the truth, and i have driven them back to back on the same course and when you look at the speedo it tells a different story.
so whos opinion is valid?
owners of both or others who havent driven both or worst still either?

you decide but i know who i would trust
Old 08 January 2012, 12:26 PM
  #47  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mshill
Cosworth engine, whole car for £6k ... I call bullsh*t!

TX.
Old 08 January 2012, 12:32 PM
  #48  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
100kg heavier, more torque, actually quicker to 100mph than a type R quicker 0-60, quicker in gear, more aerodynamic, quicker pickup etc, take your pick
Remember I own both

Tony
You don't own a 350hp Type R though

TX.

Edit - as you know I owned a 375hp MY05 Spec C a few years ago, wonderful car that I'd have back in a instant. This thread isn't about how wonderful a Spec C though is it ...

Last edited by Terminator X; 08 January 2012 at 12:40 PM.
Old 08 January 2012, 12:46 PM
  #49  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Cosworth engine, whole car for £6k ... I call bullsh*t!

TX.
Only a saloon sti 3, so car itself is not worth that much
Old 08 January 2012, 12:50 PM
  #50  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Cosworth engine, whole car for £6k ... I call bullsh*t!

TX.
+1...

Why would you spend a small fortune on a cosworth build to run it at 320bhp.. Something smells fishy there.
Old 08 January 2012, 12:51 PM
  #51  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
Only a saloon sti 3, so car itself is not worth that much
Steady....STI V3's are the best though Banny, you know that
Old 08 January 2012, 12:58 PM
  #52  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
so whos opinion is valid?
owners of both or others who havent driven both or worst still either?

you decide but i know who i would trust
Thats the problem Tommy, people read things on here and repost it when they either dont have a clue what they are talking about or have no experience of the topic.

My RA felt quick as **** up and down through the gears and having done many trackdays in it, it was a very capable car.....but.....My bug feels equally as fast without the snap back in the seat effect.
Old 08 January 2012, 01:03 PM
  #53  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jayallen
Thats the problem Tommy, people read things on here and repost it when they either dont have a clue what they are talking about or have no experience of the topic.

My RA felt quick as **** up and down through the gears and having done many trackdays in it, it was a very capable car.....but.....My bug feels equally as fast without the snap back in the seat effect.
that was my point exactly, hamster has posted opinions on a few cars lately i was wondering which of the impreza models he has owned and driven.

i would say 400bhp newage cars are quite rare as are 350 bhp type r so wondered whos he had driven?

how can you offer an opinion as to which is faster etc. if the only experience you have is something you read on a forum???
if i write that a sport is faster than a 500bhp newage will hamster take this as fact??

i have driven both versions of these cars (standard though) and actually owned one of them.
the type r feels faster as it more raw to drive but in reality the newage car was faster through the gears etc but there really is hardly anything in it i thought and it would come down to looks etc for me.

i love the 2 door version of the impreza much rarer and better looking than most of the other models,

as the three people on here that have driven both all agree newage is quicker, i wondered how he formed his opinion that the type r will "rape" as he put it a newage jdm sti?

Last edited by tubbytommy; 08 January 2012 at 02:40 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
just me
Non Scooby Related
26
03 January 2020 11:12 AM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM



Quick Reply: Type R advice



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 PM.