Clock is running a bit fast on the BBS
08 February 2001, 03:34 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AWD, Why have you edited my message? Whats more, how have you edited my message. We are living in different spatialities at the same time, and the STC continuum won't get warped unil this gets muppetised.
Aha, Now I understand. This will go to THE forum at some stage in the future when you can come back and do the edit, but the edit appears now as I have followed a slightly different probability curve. I bet you can't remember doing the edit? Am I correct?
Aha, Now I understand. This will go to THE forum at some stage in the future when you can come back and do the edit, but the edit appears now as I have followed a slightly different probability curve. I bet you can't remember doing the edit? Am I correct?
08 February 2001, 04:04 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello little post. Would you like a sweetie. Would you like a go in my Scoob?
Edit to say don't worry. this is scaring me as well
[This message has been edited by fast bloke (edited 08 February 2001).]
Edit to say don't worry. this is scaring me as well
[This message has been edited by fast bloke (edited 08 February 2001).]
08 February 2001, 04:34 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AWD,
Lay of the molesting and viscious mauling. I'll be getting a bad reputation. Well.. worse reputation... mmmmm I suppose it isn't really going to make any difference.
[This message has been viciously attacked with a spell chequer and tested for grrammattical errords by AWD (attacked 15 December 4).]
[This message has been subsequently buried by Ed the Dead (RIP 16 December 4).]
[After that this message was dug up by Fast bloke and put back in its rightful place (Exhumed 17 December 4).]
Lay of the molesting and viscious mauling. I'll be getting a bad reputation. Well.. worse reputation... mmmmm I suppose it isn't really going to make any difference.
[This message has been viciously attacked with a spell chequer and tested for grrammattical errords by AWD (attacked 15 December 4).]
[This message has been subsequently buried by Ed the Dead (RIP 16 December 4).]
[After that this message was dug up by Fast bloke and put back in its rightful place (Exhumed 17 December 4).]
08 February 2001, 05:46 PM
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hold on, now none of my other time pieces match... I altered them all to Scoobynet time (gmt+ 3mins).
Can you put the clock forward again please, or I'll be late for work in morning
[This message has been edited by ed the dead (edited 08 February 2001).]
Can you put the clock forward again please, or I'll be late for work in morning
[This message has been edited by ed the dead (edited 08 February 2001).]
06 April 2001, 04:37 PM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rather than start a new topic mentioning the same thing and subsequently getting BBQ'd by ed the dead and DTS, I thought I would find this one and say "Webby, the clock is running a bit fast on the BBS"..... again
06 April 2001, 07:31 PM
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I said it was running fast some weeks ago (but after the last time, but before this time) .... and nobody took any notice
perhaps they will this time ..... cos it is running fast
09 April 2001, 09:38 AM
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Rebecca:
<B>
after the last time, but before this time[/quote]
Would the time before this time not be the last time? Therfore the time after the last time would be this time would it not? Bex - your statement is a paradox. Could this be caused by the distortion of the space time continuum due to the rest of the world using their own version of time as opposed to the correct one used by SDB?
p.s. About 4 mins IMHO
[This message has been lightly mauled by AWD - again (hospitalised 07 April 2001).]
<B>
after the last time, but before this time[/quote]
Would the time before this time not be the last time? Therfore the time after the last time would be this time would it not? Bex - your statement is a paradox. Could this be caused by the distortion of the space time continuum due to the rest of the world using their own version of time as opposed to the correct one used by SDB?
p.s. About 4 mins IMHO
[This message has been lightly mauled by AWD - again (hospitalised 07 April 2001).]
09 April 2001, 07:58 PM
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by fast bloke:
<B> Would the time before this time not be the last time? Therfore the time after the last time would be this time would it not? Bex - your statement is a paradox. Could this be caused by the distortion of the space time continuum due to the rest of the world using their own version of time as opposed to the correct one used by SDB?
p.s. About 4 mins IMHO
[This message has been lightly mauled by AWD - again (hospitalised 07 April 2001).][/quote]
No, I don't think so
The last time the clock went wrong and was running fast, SDB fixed it so it was right again. Then it started to run fast again, so I posted a thread (can't be bothered to find it) to say that it was running fast, but because I was ahead of everybody else, it took a bit of time for everybody else to catch up. Anyway it didn't get fixed
Now, .... someone else has posted that it's running fast .... IMHO about 2 mins
and it's not been fixed yet .... but I'm glad that everybody has finally caught up with me (apart from Dave T-S who appears to be another 2 mins in front ... always want to be in the lead don't you Dave )
<B> Would the time before this time not be the last time? Therfore the time after the last time would be this time would it not? Bex - your statement is a paradox. Could this be caused by the distortion of the space time continuum due to the rest of the world using their own version of time as opposed to the correct one used by SDB?
p.s. About 4 mins IMHO
[This message has been lightly mauled by AWD - again (hospitalised 07 April 2001).][/quote]
No, I don't think so
The last time the clock went wrong and was running fast, SDB fixed it so it was right again. Then it started to run fast again, so I posted a thread (can't be bothered to find it) to say that it was running fast, but because I was ahead of everybody else, it took a bit of time for everybody else to catch up. Anyway it didn't get fixed
Now, .... someone else has posted that it's running fast .... IMHO about 2 mins
and it's not been fixed yet .... but I'm glad that everybody has finally caught up with me (apart from Dave T-S who appears to be another 2 mins in front ... always want to be in the lead don't you Dave )
