Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

dump valve.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 March 2012, 07:47 PM
  #31  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was tempted to run DV less on the 20g but was abit worried that it would cause damage?
Old 21 March 2012, 08:10 PM
  #32  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by barnshaw
I am not denying the standard unit is better, but the comment you make is not really a comparison.

a K&N panel filter for example, might be better then a standard unit and more free flowing but they dont fit them as standard? needless to say it does not mean a K&N filter will have a negative effect on the car.

It may well be in some cases they can cause problems and possibly overfuel/borewash etc but how many years for example have baileys dumpvalves been about? I know they are slated to high hell on here but how many genuine engine failures have there ever been to a baileys dumpvalve? compared to how many people use them (and on other marques aswell)
See, this is the reason I've all but given over posting about them.

Your questioning of facts is odd. You agree that they cause borewash, amongst other problems, but then ask whether this can actually cause an engine failure.

Have you HAD an engine failure on a Scoob? Surely, anyone with any sense doesn't want one, and will go to high hell and back again to avoid the cost and inconvenience? I know I now do, after sufffering a catastrophic failure caused by ignorance.

You say my repeating of the facts about vta dumpvalves and Baileys in particular are "wearing thin". Do you want people to NOT be given the information? What sort of a site would this be if we all kept schtum for fear of boring someone, and all the newbie's cars exploded?

So where is the sense in fitting something that is KNOWN to cause engine problems, then excusing it by saying, "We don't KNOW for SURE it was that which caused the engine failure."
It's like putting a sub-standard part onto a Ferrari because you liked the weird noise it made. Would anyone do that?

In the end, it's YOUR car. YOU do what YOU want with it.

Just don't cry on here when it's costing you £££'s in repairs, or running like a dog.
Old 21 March 2012, 08:15 PM
  #33  
barnshaw
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
barnshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your doing it again, yes i have suffered a major engine failure and experienced that pain.

i am interested in this comment - "What sort of a site would this be if we all kept schtum for fear of boring someone, and all the newbie's cars exploded?"

so again how many peoples cars have exploded because of a VTA dump valve? any examples? genuine question.

you can stick your fingers up or say as you like, however you have no facts, surely a car mapped with a VTA valve will be no less dangerous then a re-circ? the fuelling is surely suited to the map? unless i am missing something?
Old 21 March 2012, 08:27 PM
  #34  
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (29)
 
mickywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by barnshaw
so again how many peoples cars have exploded because of a VTA dump valve? any examples? genuine question.
Mine didn't, reverted back to a recirc as the noise was getting on my nerves.

Mine hasn't blown up with an FMIC and not being remapped either.

Last edited by mickywrx; 21 March 2012 at 09:06 PM. Reason: Typo, doh.
Old 21 March 2012, 08:32 PM
  #35  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
Mine didn't, reverted back to a recirc as the noise was getting on my nerves.

Mine has blown up with an FMIC and not being remapped either.
Micky is that has or hasn't blown up as I'm reading it as it hasn't
Old 21 March 2012, 09:07 PM
  #36  
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (29)
 
mickywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by jdc1
Micky is that has or hasn't blown up as I'm reading it as it hasn't
Should really check what I type.

Thanks for the heads up mate.
Old 21 March 2012, 09:11 PM
  #37  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No worries mate
Old 21 March 2012, 10:05 PM
  #38  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by barnshaw
your doing it again, yes i have suffered a major engine failure and experienced that pain.

i am interested in this comment - "What sort of a site would this be if we all kept schtum for fear of boring someone, and all the newbie's cars exploded?"

so again how many peoples cars have exploded because of a VTA dump valve? any examples? genuine question.

you can stick your fingers up or say as you like, however you have no facts, surely a car mapped with a VTA valve will be no less dangerous then a re-circ? the fuelling is surely suited to the map? unless i am missing something?
Three points and they will be my last on this thread:

1. When I give out advice, I do so to the best of my knowledge. I don't just say, "Oh it'll be OK, we have no proof. I ALWAYS err on the side of caution, because if I don't, MY ADVICE COULD END UP COSTING SOMEONE ELSE £££'s.

2. When I talk about cars "exploding" I mean catastrophic failure. Been there, seen that and paid for it. Someone else's stupidity cost me my engine. I don't want anyone else in that position because I kept quiet, and NOT JUST ABOUT DUMP VALVES.
Would you have those who advise against the use of a cone filter covered in oil on a 99 car "shut up" too? Or how about those who always warn about using the correct thickness geasket after having the heads skimmed? Or those who warn about geting the map checked after adding XYZ? Should they shut up too because their comments might bore YOU?
It may have escaped your attention that there ARE people, and now FLOODS of them coming onto this site with no basic knowledge of the cars...NONE. Should we NOT tell them stuff because it might bore one member?

3. If you think a car can be "mapped to a vta dumpvalve" then yes, you are missing something. Basic knowledge of mapping, I'd say

As I said, your car, your decision.

If YOU are happy giving out advice to people to do ABC because "it might be ok, we have no evidence it's not", then go for it. (That's what people said about smoking, to draw a parallel).

I am not, and won't.
Old 21 March 2012, 10:05 PM
  #39  
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
trevsjwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,660
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by barnshaw
your doing it again, yes i have suffered a major engine failure and experienced that pain.

i am interested in this comment - "What sort of a site would this be if we all kept schtum for fear of boring someone, and all the newbie's cars exploded?"

so again how many peoples cars have exploded because of a VTA dump valve? any examples? genuine question.

you can stick your fingers up or say as you like, however you have no facts, surely a car mapped with a VTA valve will be no less dangerous then a re-circ? the fuelling is surely suited to the map? unless i am missing something?
the important thing is to get the car checked after fitting, re-circ or vta and not just fit them *****-nilly which is what most people do, including myself.
I fitted an aftermarket re-circ and suddenly found the car was producing 0.3bar more boost, 1.9bar from 1.6bar. I wouldn't have been aware of this had I not been running a boost gauge.
Trev
Old 21 March 2012, 10:32 PM
  #40  
barnshaw
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
barnshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Three points and they will be my last on this thread:

1. When I give out advice, I do so to the best of my knowledge. I don't just say, "Oh it'll be OK, we have no proof. I ALWAYS err on the side of caution, because if I don't, MY ADVICE COULD END UP COSTING SOMEONE ELSE £££'s.

2. When I talk about cars "exploding" I mean catastrophic failure. Been there, seen that and paid for it. Someone else's stupidity cost me my engine. I don't want anyone else in that position because I kept quiet, and NOT JUST ABOUT DUMP VALVES.
Would you have those who advise against the use of a cone filter covered in oil on a 99 car "shut up" too? Or how about those who always warn about using the correct thickness geasket after having the heads skimmed? Or those who warn about geting the map checked after adding XYZ? Should they shut up too because their comments might bore YOU?
It may have escaped your attention that there ARE people, and now FLOODS of them coming onto this site with no basic knowledge of the cars...NONE. Should we NOT tell them stuff because it might bore one member?

3. If you think a car can be "mapped to a vta dumpvalve" then yes, you are missing something. Basic knowledge of mapping, I'd say

As I said, your car, your decision.

If YOU are happy giving out advice to people to do ABC because "it might be ok, we have no evidence it's not", then go for it. (That's what people said about smoking, to draw a parallel).

I am not, and won't.

ok if that makes you sleep better at night, still awaiting any form of proof of engines blowing up though due to a VTA, i will keep a keen eye on the thread for when that evidence surfaces

also, since you seem to know i know nothing about mapping, care to explain why a VTA could not be mapped safe?

Last edited by barnshaw; 21 March 2012 at 10:35 PM.
Old 21 March 2012, 10:37 PM
  #41  
Sy5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Sy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just binned my hks sq due to poor running. Standard one back on and all is well.
Old 21 March 2012, 11:03 PM
  #42  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,701
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Had mine mapped with the hks ssqv vta. No problems at all. Runs sweet, mapper very happy.
Old 22 March 2012, 12:08 AM
  #43  
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Brun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Harrogate
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Never suffered any running problems with my VTA's and am yet to see any evidence which suggests that they do / will cause any engine damage. If i was to jump back in a Scoob however, i'd certainly run a Turbo which is strong enough for no d/v
Old 22 March 2012, 12:19 AM
  #44  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've run like with DV(Forge VTA) on VF34,which we are run due VF range is not strong as TD/Garrett.

Now we are running MDX321T and we are running DVless.

I prefer run DVless,but on some turbo i wouldn't run/advice to run DVless,about the OE recirc or VTA DV,if i would stick with DV i would go again and again with Forge VTA(Bailey are not the best bet)

Failures engines(MAF related problems) and DV this is known on Classic and on new age i never heard.


Jura
Old 22 March 2012, 07:42 AM
  #45  
Carlh
Scooby Regular
 
Carlh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Telford
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HKS SQV III sounds nice, not too loud but loud enough.
Old 22 March 2012, 08:29 AM
  #46  
barnshaw
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
barnshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh right, so all the above people who used VTA's with no problems how did you get your cars mapped with them if you cant map VTA's?
Old 22 March 2012, 08:34 AM
  #47  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,701
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

You can map a vta. That's what I have fitted. That's why I can run mine without any running problems or worries!
Old 26 March 2012, 05:55 PM
  #48  
coldflame90
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
coldflame90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I knew id get burnt for asking for a loud dump valve mind.When my dad used to have his he had a baileys on it and it ran fine. what are the turbosmart ones like? I had a forge split r on my leon which flashed the engine management light due to the way vag engines run so i know that vta can be dangerous but I like them so its my preference.

thanks for the replys guys keep them coming
Old 26 March 2012, 07:20 PM
  #49  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coldflame90
i know that vta can be dangerous but I like them so its my preference.

And I promise not to come on here whining about rebuild costs if it does let go, or doggers running, etc etc.

thanks for the replys guys keep them coming

EFA
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 11:59 AM
buckerz69
Subaru Parts
0
29 September 2015 04:16 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
28 September 2015 01:06 PM
psport
Subaru Parts
2
21 September 2015 01:53 PM
ossett2k2
General Technical
9
13 September 2015 09:35 AM



Quick Reply: dump valve.....



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 AM.