Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Ok, so there is no optimax in the area. Great

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31 March 2012, 04:58 PM
  #31  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu.sti
My 2003 sti is pretty standard an not mapped. Is it ok for me to use 95ron? New to the site btw thanx
NO. at the very least i would say super 97ron and drive off boost. STi's need 98+ ron. 95 is no good imo. Some will say your ecu can adjust for it if its on a standard map. Maybe their right but i wouldn't risk it.
Old 31 March 2012, 05:32 PM
  #32  
zs_phil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zs_phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: yorkshire (mostly)
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not had a turbo car for a few years now so i just put unleaded in my civic type r (ep3) and was none in east hull except for tesco 99 (momentum) and was quite suprised how cheap it is really compared to asda
137.7 at asda for unleaded
139,9 for tesco 99

Old 31 March 2012, 06:18 PM
  #33  
Stu.sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Stu.sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stirling
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
NO. at the very least i would say super 97ron and drive off boost. STi's need 98+ ron. 95 is no good imo. Some will say your ecu can adjust for it if its on a standard map. Maybe their right but i wouldn't risk it.
Thanks mate. The garage i got it from said I can use 95 as long as its not from a supermarket.
Old 31 March 2012, 06:25 PM
  #34  
madisonmonkey
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (4)
 
madisonmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MSOC
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrx9181
People mention the government mr m monkey because they released a statement saying to go out and buy fuel
Which then changed to only if you've got less that half a tank.
Hope that explains it to ya pal
I'm well aware of the statements released, but am also capable of assessing a situation myself and taking appropriate action.
As stated previously, if we all did everything "the government" suggested where would we be?
Old 31 March 2012, 06:27 PM
  #35  
Stu.sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Stu.sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stirling
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can it actually damage the car using the chap petrol?
Old 31 March 2012, 06:40 PM
  #36  
scooby546
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
scooby546's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu.sti
Can it actually damage the car using the chap petrol?
Potentially YES, however the ECU should be able to detect knock and pull timing before any serious damage is done, as long as it isn't driven hard etc. The problem occurs as the fuel ignites too early; the expansion forces the piston back down before it can get past top dead centre, which can result in a lot of forces disagreeing with each other... 95 RON will ignite earlier than 98 RON because it is 'easier' to light and the heat of compression, boost etc. can actually ignite the fuel / air mix before the spark does. Higher RON fuel needs more pressure & heat before spontaneous ignition, so is better suited to cars running high pressure intakes such as ours

This is another reason why I'll be getting mine mapped on 95 RON when it gets done to give me a wider choice of fuel for events such as this. Its my daily driver, so I can't really afford for it to be out of action for too long
Old 31 March 2012, 08:26 PM
  #37  
Stu.sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Stu.sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stirling
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks mate. That explains a lot. So basically I will be fine using 95, as long as I don't roast it. I think I will use 99 just to be on the safe side.
Old 31 March 2012, 08:56 PM
  #38  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu.sti
Thanks mate. That explains a lot. So basically I will be fine using 95, as long as I don't roast it. I think I will use 99 just to be on the safe side.
Maybe, maybe not. Detonation can still occur at lower revs especially if your under bonnet temps are high from being in traffic jams ect. Its more likely to occur at high revs due to cylinder pressure, heat and advanced ignition timing.
Old 01 April 2012, 04:38 AM
  #39  
Stu.sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Stu.sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stirling
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So the moral is... Always use 99
Old 01 April 2012, 10:33 AM
  #40  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu.sti
So the moral is... Always use 99
Yes, but if caught short on a long trip use 97 super but stay off boost. There's no excuse for using 95ron imo. If your at home and cant get 99 then catch the bus and leave the car until you can get 99ron fuel.
Old 01 April 2012, 02:32 PM
  #41  
Stu.sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Stu.sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stirling
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Only reason I used it was because the garage told me it was ok. After reading this I won't be using it again. This is my first turbo car and I've only had it a week. I know nothing about them
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
buckerz69
Subaru Parts
7
08 October 2015 07:51 PM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
04 October 2015 09:49 PM
sivo
ScoobyNet General
12
26 September 2015 12:34 PM



Quick Reply: Ok, so there is no optimax in the area. Great



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.