Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.1 or 2.5 For Road Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 April 2012, 05:41 PM
  #31  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What front mount u got jef?? A hybrid??
Old 28 April 2012, 05:43 PM
  #32  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah a hybrid, one of the older gt 2 kits i thnk with bespoke pipework. was removed from my previous set up

itll remain as it is for time being, its jsut a possibilty maybe over the winter to look inot

no reverse scoop

but back on topic lol
Old 28 April 2012, 05:50 PM
  #33  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pleased I went aps 725
Old 28 April 2012, 06:16 PM
  #34  
P1Drifter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
P1Drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toyney83
get the full spec up mate,. as if i were to choose the 2.1 route i'd be going with the wiseco/k1 set up. im guessing e.t did your build?
yeah enginetuner built the long block and i did the rest, spec:

CDB
Nitrided 2.5 crank
Wiseco Pistons
K1 Rods
ARP head studs
ACL race bearings
Cosworth head gaskets and baffle plate
RCM 850cc injectors
Turbo technics S206 billet turbo
STI V3 heads (stock)
ACT single plate organic clutch
Parallel fuel rails with swirl pot and external bosch 044
Reversed inlet manifold and flipped intercooler
Probably loads ive forgotten plus all the usual stuff suspension, brakes, handling etc, brilliant setup, love it

Old 28 April 2012, 06:31 PM
  #35  
toyney83
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
toyney83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: grimsby
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks a lovely set up that mate. Dont know much about the k1 rods but alan jeffery told me there a well made product. how does the 2.1 feel different to the 2.5? when mine was an the 2.0ltr bottom end i was running 420/380 and that felt alot quicker than the 2.5 with 380/420
Old 28 April 2012, 06:47 PM
  #36  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any mapper will tell you that a 2.1/2.35 will rev so much better than the 2.5 and can be mapped to a much higher boost level. I am going 2.35 so that I have future proofing.
Old 28 April 2012, 09:07 PM
  #37  
P1Drifter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
P1Drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

like i said the initial torque hit on the 2.5 was great but then it felt like it died off pretty quick, the 2.1 just hits hard and doesn't stop until i change gear at 8k and it all starts again i run 2bar of boost on the 2.1

If you want to know anything about the engine etc give Alan or Martyn a ring at enginetuner, think they have turned out more of these than they have had hot dinners !
Old 28 April 2012, 10:01 PM
  #38  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P1Drifter
like i said the initial torque hit on the 2.5 was great but then it felt like it died off pretty quick, the 2.1 just hits hard and doesn't stop until i change gear at 8k and it all starts again i run 2bar of boost on the 2.1

If you want to know anything about the engine etc give Alan or Martyn a ring at enginetuner, think they have turned out more of these than they have had hot dinners !
ET will be handling my rebore and rear thrust conversion when i eventually get the funds together but i'm so tempted to just them to do the full build on bottom end. Although part of me wants to do it myself and learn about tolerances and plastigauge.
Old 28 April 2012, 10:14 PM
  #39  
P1Drifter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
P1Drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
ET will be handling my rebore and rear thrust conversion when i eventually get the funds together but i'm so tempted to just them to do the full build on bottom end. Although part of me wants to do it myself and learn about tolerances and plastigauge.
if i were you i would ring Alan, you might be surprised at what they charge to put it all together, plus you know its been done 100%

you may get away with a little mistake here or there on a low power build, but do you really want to put all that time and effort in, ramp the power up only for it to fail for some stupid reason ?
Old 29 April 2012, 08:09 AM
  #40  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevep360
Pleased I went aps 725
in hindsight, probably wouldve done same, but live and learn cant exactly say im dissapointed lol - what money was in the APS kit mate? and fully built yourself barr the long block?, nice work mate!!

sorry for being a pic *****, but i do love it, lol

Old 29 April 2012, 08:34 AM
  #41  
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
stealthy55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jef
in hindsight, probably wouldve done same, but live and learn cant exactly say im dissapointed lol - what money was in the APS kit mate? and fully built yourself barr the long block?, nice work mate!!

sorry for being a pic *****, but i do love it, lol

nice
Old 29 April 2012, 08:56 AM
  #42  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jef
in hindsight, probably wouldve done same, but live and learn cant exactly say im dissapointed lol - what money was in the APS kit mate? and fully built yourself barr the long block?, nice work mate!!

sorry for being a pic *****, but i do love it, lol
Very very nice! I looked into the APS kits and they certainly aren't cheap. A reverse scoop i thought did the reverse of a standard scoop IE will throw air out of the engine bay thus helping the FMIC stay cool, thats why they are more common on Evo's. There's also a water spray kit in the selling section for like £60, and i've read some people fit them under the top section of the bumper out of sight, spraying onto the FMIC.

I may be way off but it should get the temps down.
Old 29 April 2012, 09:18 AM
  #43  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

didnt even think about reverse scoop, but tbh i really dont like the look of what ive seen, im not about all T.A look and rather stay starndard as possibe looking, within reason.

water spray, better i/c , turbo blanket, reverse scoop all possibilities, but for time being will be as is, but defo something to look into, if a iever get "bored" with the power lol.
Old 29 April 2012, 09:20 AM
  #44  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stealthy55
nice
paid a grand second hand but it was boxed new guy never fitted it
Old 29 April 2012, 10:03 AM
  #45  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jef
didnt even think about reverse scoop, but tbh i really dont like the look of what ive seen, im not about all T.A look and rather stay starndard as possibe looking, within reason.

water spray, better i/c , turbo blanket, reverse scoop all possibilities, but for time being will be as is, but defo something to look into, if a iever get "bored" with the power lol.
Bored lol, i'm still not bored with my near-std WRX after 6 yrs with only around 250BHP.
Old 29 April 2012, 09:00 PM
  #46  
s5ooob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
s5ooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: staffordshire
Posts: 180
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can anyone say exactly, what prevents the 2.5 revving like a 2.0/2.1 etc?

Looking at it, most of these configurations, barring the 2.0, use the same ej257 crank and I believe some 2.5s also utilise the 2.0 length rods...so the only difference I see there is piston size and bore diameter, is this an issue?

Is breathing a limiting factor? would bigger valves and/or higher lift/duration cams be of benetit?

A 2.5 that revs strongly to 8000rpm, really must be like having your cake and eating it.
Old 29 April 2012, 09:36 PM
  #47  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Good god there's some nonsense being posted here!

There's nothing wrong with a 2.5 built with the right parts.

They don't rev? Nonsense!

I've a forged 2.5 it made 601bhp and 565 ftlbs on STANDARD cams and UNPORTED heads 2bar by 3800rpm on the dyno it spooled quicker on the road and easily revved to 8000rpm and beyond. My 1 and only day on a dry drag strip ever and it did a 10.90 1/4. 0-100 mph in 7 seconds flat in 220 yards at circa 520 bhp.

The 2.1 and 2.35 are great engines but Those who say the 2.5 won't perform are talking absolute rubbish.
Old 29 April 2012, 09:53 PM
  #48  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Good god there's some nonsense being posted here!

There's nothing wrong with a 2.5 built with the right parts.

They don't rev? Nonsense!

I've a forged 2.5 it made 601bhp and 565 ftlbs on STANDARD cams and UNPORTED heads 2bar by 3800rpm on the dyno it spooled quicker on the road and easily revved to 8000rpm and beyond. My 1 and only day on a dry drag strip ever and it did a 10.90 1/4. 0-100 mph in 7 seconds flat in 220 yards at circa 520 bhp.

The 2.1 and 2.35 are great engines but Those who say the 2.5 won't perform are talking absolute rubbish.
glad im not one of them tehn tbh

ive catagorically stated with just forged pistons and decent bearings, mine was great!

i never said mine wouldnt rev, i said i was afraid to rev it
Old 29 April 2012, 10:02 PM
  #49  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jef
glad im not one of them tehn tbh

ive catagorically stated with just forged pistons and decent bearings, mine was great!

i never said mine wouldnt rev, i said i was afraid to rev it
Wasn't referring to anyone in particular Jef it just grates me when people say the 2.5's don't perform. Admittedly with the wrong combination of parts they won't but that's the same for any engine
Old 29 April 2012, 10:11 PM
  #50  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Wasn't referring to anyone in particular Jef it just grates me when people say the 2.5's don't perform. Admittedly with the wrong combination of parts they won't but that's the same for any engine
totally agree, thats why from start of this thread ive said you must drive both abd choose the one that suits your expectations best - anything else is just here-say tbh
Old 29 April 2012, 10:36 PM
  #51  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Wasn't referring to anyone in particular Jef it just grates me when people say the 2.5's don't perform. Admittedly with the wrong combination of parts they won't but that's the same for any engine
I dont profess to be an engine expert I was only basing my thoughts on what I had been advised by a few respected mappers. Hence the reason I decided to go 2.35.
Old 29 April 2012, 11:23 PM
  #52  
Tommy2396
Scooby Regular
 
Tommy2396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NOYFB
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 2.5 pulls like a train and revs hard if I feel in the mood to give it a thrashing which is not often. Still to this day I feel like a naughty boy afterwards and am left with the shakes and worry with what wear I've caused lmfao
Old 30 April 2012, 12:21 AM
  #53  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevep360
I dont profess to be an engine expert I was only basing my thoughts on what I had been advised by a few respected mappers. Hence the reason I decided to go 2.35.
2.35 is a belting engine and again with the right parts will produce great results. They are cost prohibitive though. I was just sticking up for the 2.5 because it gets unnecessary bad press and a lot of that is from people who have never had one. One thing will say is that i think the limit for a 2.5, is around 600 bhp beyond that you need to be looking at cdb and stroker options. But this thread is specifically for road use and anything over 600 for road is bonkers .

As a closing statement. A forged 2.5 with a billet gt30 is just about as god as you can get fora road car
Old 30 April 2012, 12:30 AM
  #54  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah going billet gt30 on mine
Old 30 April 2012, 02:07 AM
  #55  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Mine is a billet 35R and it's perfect for the 2.5.

Billet 30 and a 2.35 is a fantastic combination. I'm sure you'll have lots of fun with that

My next engine will be a stroker of some variety purely because I want the strength to get the best from the turbo. Although my current block is pinned I daren't go further with boost and timing.

Last edited by dazdavies; 30 April 2012 at 02:09 AM.
Old 30 April 2012, 06:52 AM
  #56  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Mine is a billet 35R and it's perfect for the 2.5.

Billet 30 and a 2.35 is a fantastic combination. I'm sure you'll have lots of fun with that

My next engine will be a stroker of some variety purely because I want the strength to get the best from the turbo. Although my current block is pinned I daren't go further with boost and timing.
Have you seen alyn's inserts?
Old 30 April 2012, 09:34 AM
  #57  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
behave yourself fella
Old 30 April 2012, 09:48 AM
  #58  
toyney83
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
toyney83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: grimsby
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
2.35 is a belting engine and again with the right parts will produce great results. They are cost prohibitive though. I was just sticking up for the 2.5 because it gets unnecessary bad press and a lot of that is from people who have never had one. One thing will say is that i think the limit for a 2.5, is around 600 bhp beyond that you need to be looking at cdb and stroker options. But this thread is specifically for road use and anything over 600 for road is bonkers .

As a closing statement. A forged 2.5 with a billet gt30 is just about as god as you can get fora road car
what liners were you using on yours daz?
Old 30 April 2012, 10:33 AM
  #59  
legacy_gtb
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
legacy_gtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 for the 2.5 on the road! For the road, a decent 2.5 with an SC46 is stunning!
Old 30 April 2012, 10:41 AM
  #60  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's also worth remembering with all this talk of revving etc that even the JDMs cars that rev to 8k have given their best well before that point!

On a 2.5 without an upgraded valves etc there is just no point in going above 7k (the hard limit is set at that on mine), all it's doing it making more noise at that point! It'll get to 7k rpm really quickly though! I can tell you from experience, that a 2.5 with an SC46 rips though even the long ratio UK 6 speed box very nicely!

Last edited by New_scooby_04; 30 April 2012 at 12:06 PM.


Quick Reply: 2.1 or 2.5 For Road Car?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM.