Killed their kids????
#93
Anyone else watch the Panorama documentary on this tonight? Lot of information about these scumbags and their behaviour after this crime.
If they have any remorse or honour they will hang themselves in their cell's.
If they have any remorse or honour they will hang themselves in their cell's.
#96
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Telford
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
watched that programme on channel 5 last night about them. He's a sick manipulative w@nker. I hope they both kill themselves and saves the tax payer from feeding and putting a roof over his head. Sick sick people.
#100
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Grantham
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heard on the radio this morning from a Derby Evening Telegraph reporter that the money the locals raised to pay for the children's funerals he wanted for himself, some £11,000 and to add the most bitter insult he wanted to raffle the teddy bears and toys that were left on the pathway outside to make more money. Evil **** and I really really hope that as said earlier on here that he gets his 4rsehole stretched for the next 25 years.
By the way according to the Panorama program he even got the wife to join in a threesome with his mate whilst in the travelodge that the coppers had put him in before the kids were buried. Hangings too good for some people.
By the way according to the Panorama program he even got the wife to join in a threesome with his mate whilst in the travelodge that the coppers had put him in before the kids were buried. Hangings too good for some people.
#101
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We all expect and hope that he will go down for a very long time, even a real life sentence.
But if he had got very drunk and killed all the kids in a car smash the max sentence would be 10 years (is that correct, perhaps it's 6 x 10 years??).
How does that square?
dl
But if he had got very drunk and killed all the kids in a car smash the max sentence would be 10 years (is that correct, perhaps it's 6 x 10 years??).
How does that square?
dl
Last edited by David Lock; 03 April 2013 at 06:58 PM.
#104
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this is isn't a reason to bring back capital punishment, I don't know what is.
Easy way out for them may be, but I'd rather that than risk anymore children suffering at the hands of that evil, twisted individual.
What sickens me more is what this numpty said today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22025035
A debate? A f&cking debate? And they wonder why voters are reducing in numbers.
Easy way out for them may be, but I'd rather that than risk anymore children suffering at the hands of that evil, twisted individual.
What sickens me more is what this numpty said today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22025035
A debate? A f&cking debate? And they wonder why voters are reducing in numbers.
#105
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What sickens me more is what this numpty said today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22025035
A debate? A f&cking debate? And they wonder why voters are reducing in numbers.
lol seriously WTF?
#106
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
life in prison but will serve at least 15 years, life should be life!
and the other 2 sentenced to 17 years each but will only have to serve half of it? whats the point of giving them 17 years. if you give them a sentence then they should serve that. those 6 kids are gone forever not a few years, and those responsable should pay for what they did. with any luck they will get what they deserve every single day in prison even the woman, i dont for one minuite condone hitting women but ide give her a pasting if i could along with the other two.
and the other 2 sentenced to 17 years each but will only have to serve half of it? whats the point of giving them 17 years. if you give them a sentence then they should serve that. those 6 kids are gone forever not a few years, and those responsable should pay for what they did. with any luck they will get what they deserve every single day in prison even the woman, i dont for one minuite condone hitting women but ide give her a pasting if i could along with the other two.
#108
Someone reported that he was intending to sell the shrine made by his neighbours for a wodge of cash! I find that hard to believe, even of him!
They have got big sentences but what they did was bound to put their childrens' lives in jeopardy since it was so dangerous as was effectively proved.
I think it would not be a step too far if they were never released from gaol!
Les
They have got big sentences but what they did was bound to put their childrens' lives in jeopardy since it was so dangerous as was effectively proved.
I think it would not be a step too far if they were never released from gaol!
Les
#109
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Makes you wonder what you have to do to get locked up forever? Burning 6 children to death and possibly out in 15 years all to get back with some woman and have a bigger council house? In what universe can that be seen as justice?
#111
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ar-salary.html
#112
What's really disgusting is that so much money was handed out with so little responsibility in return. Why wouldn't he keep sponging if this was the response. He was amongst the top 2% of earners in this country, all without working. Discussing if this is the best way to run things is responsible, not disgusting. Its disgusting that this situation developed, and disgusting that you are trying to close down the debate on it, and disgusting that people are paying more tax to fund this freeloading scum. Don't talk to me about disgusting, your attitude is the worst of all, implicitly supporting the status quo
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ar-salary.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ar-salary.html
Also like to add that in the few programmes I've seen about the Philpott case, all the adults involved came across as being complete and utter pond life however connected.
#114
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's daft.
Idiots like him would exist with or without a benefits system.
I do wish people would stop using this terrible tragedy to make silly points and push their own agendas
Last edited by Martin2005; 04 April 2013 at 06:47 PM.
#115
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Philpott was an evil man long before he got onto benefits, repeatedly stabbed a female whilst he was still working so benefit system didn't create him as such.
If anyone is to blame it is those who set up and then operated a system that allowed this vile man to father all those children, live with two 'wives' in a council house whilst claiming 60k in benefits and not looking for work!
90% of those who claim are genuine, probably more but some aren't and instead of dealing with just those screwing the system over the government are using it as an excuse to treat everyone as potential philpotts.
Blair and Brown along with their cabinets should have been in the dock alongside them!
#116
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
Philpott was an evil man long before he got onto benefits, repeatedly stabbed a female whilst he was still working so benefit system didn't create him as such.
If anyone is to blame it is those who set up and then operated a system that allowed this vile man to father all those children, live with two 'wives' in a council house whilst claiming 60k in benefits and not looking for work!
90% of those who claim are genuine, probably more but some aren't and instead of dealing with just those screwing the system over the government are using it as an excuse to treat everyone as potential philpotts.
Blair and Brown along with their cabinets should have been in the dock alongside them!
If anyone is to blame it is those who set up and then operated a system that allowed this vile man to father all those children, live with two 'wives' in a council house whilst claiming 60k in benefits and not looking for work!
90% of those who claim are genuine, probably more but some aren't and instead of dealing with just those screwing the system over the government are using it as an excuse to treat everyone as potential philpotts.
Blair and Brown along with their cabinets should have been in the dock alongside them!
he was evil, but he lived a cushy lifestyle funded by benefits and set fire to that house in the hope the system would rehome his family in a larger house.
#117
Scooby Regular
I have heard of people living a champagne lifestyle on lemonade money
Seems like mr philpot was leading a lemonade lifestyle on champagne money
He gives a bad name to useless lazy cvnts
Good riddance
Seems like mr philpot was leading a lemonade lifestyle on champagne money
He gives a bad name to useless lazy cvnts
Good riddance
#118
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He is evil, no person how skint of worried about money sets fire to a property with people in it, let alone kids - it is the act of a sosciopath or such, a purely evil and moral free person with no regard for human life.
Benefits didn't create him, they didn't help but they didn't create him - face it if that was the case this would-be an everyday occurrence.
Benefits didn't create him, they didn't help but they didn't create him - face it if that was the case this would-be an everyday occurrence.
#119
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
He is evil, no person how skint of worried about money sets fire to a property with people in it, let alone kids - it is the act of a sosciopath or such, a purely evil and moral free person with no regard for human life.
Benefits didn't create him, they didn't help but they didn't create him - face it if that was the case this would-be an everyday occurrence.
Benefits didn't create him, they didn't help but they didn't create him - face it if that was the case this would-be an everyday occurrence.
agreed he was but the fact is the reason he set fire to that house was to get a bigger one for free from derby council.
so the soft benefit system helped to create the scumbag
#120
BANNED
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In a sh1tty mans world...
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it was actually to get his 5 kids off his ex mistress, they were due in court for a hearing the day he set fire to his house. It was all a malicious plan that he hatched for months before saying that his ex had sent threatening messages saying she was going to torch the house, he made it very clear to tell as many people this, im not disputing the fact that he wanted these 5 kids aswell as his 6 to get a bigger house. He was sick in the head.