Notices

Major ECU confusion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 June 2012, 11:08 PM
  #31  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wrong. i have decat and mine has no cel. and you dont have a bov. as i said above it looks like a standard re-circ to me.
Old 15 June 2012, 11:09 PM
  #32  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, ive just re read you first post. So a new 02 sensor resolved the issues? if so did the garage use a genuine Subaru part?

Pattern 02 sensors have been known to fail after a very short time, always best to use genuine.

Last edited by jayallen; 15 June 2012 at 11:18 PM.
Old 15 June 2012, 11:09 PM
  #33  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dj219957
wrong. i have decat and mine has no cel. and you dont have a bov. as i said above it looks like a standard re-circ to me.
+1

Ludford, who is feeding you this info? They appear to be cluless.
Old 15 June 2012, 11:12 PM
  #34  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

agree with jayallen, after market o2 sensors can cause problems too.
Old 15 June 2012, 11:19 PM
  #35  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know if they used a genuine Subaru part.

Guy feeding me info is an American friend with a Impreza 2.5 RS with EJ20 JDM engine swap
Old 15 June 2012, 11:45 PM
  #36  
Scott.T
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Scott.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Blimey, I've not read a thread on early classic running issues in here for years, and there seems to be an auwful lot of bull floating around in here.......

o2 sensor CEL doesn't even normally come on if the 02 sensor is faulty or disconnected, unless you do a diagnostics check.
It normally flags due to something else.

I would suggest marking the idle speed control valve position, taking the top off and giving it a clean (it's a magnetic rotary affair). Refit in orig position or adjust if idle is wrong.

Z4 or U8 ECU will be fine but Z4 is the cleaner map with slightly higher boost then the U8 (260ps for Z4, 240ps for U8).
Old 16 June 2012, 12:44 AM
  #37  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scott.T
Blimey, I've not read a thread on early classic running issues in here for years, and there seems to be an auwful lot of bull floating around in here.......

o2 sensor CEL doesn't even normally come on if the 02 sensor is faulty or disconnected, unless you do a diagnostics check.
It normally flags due to something else.

I would suggest marking the idle speed control valve position, taking the top off and giving it a clean (it's a magnetic rotary affair). Refit in orig position or adjust if idle is wrong.

Z4 or U8 ECU will be fine but Z4 is the cleaner map with slightly higher boost then the U8 (260ps for Z4, 240ps for U8).

It's had a new idle control switch that the previous owner put on a week before selling it. Idle adjusted when I was at the garage last too. Idling at 1,000
Old 16 June 2012, 01:06 PM
  #38  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got the code read today it's a new code.

42 Idle control switch. So it's not the original codes I had.
Old 16 June 2012, 01:10 PM
  #39  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

has previous owner fitted correct idle control valve it shoudl have a green label? is the connector in good condition?
Old 16 June 2012, 01:39 PM
  #40  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it just needs a clean. When I get my next paycheck the car is going in for a full service, fluids, spark plugs, coil pack, I'll have it cleaned too.

I think this will solve all the problems.
Old 16 June 2012, 02:16 PM
  #41  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

theres 4 coil packs and they are expensive to replace so prob best to take the tips off and check if they are ok before lashing out on new ones at circa £60 each.
Old 16 June 2012, 03:06 PM
  #42  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok Z4 is now back on the car. No CEL. Acceleration extremely rapid.

Was concerned with the ECU getting wet as the plate protecting it was a little damp, wrapped ECU in a plastic bag.

Hopefully CEL doesn't come back.
Old 16 June 2012, 05:55 PM
  #43  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well done. so the chip in the ecu has been de activated? maybe a bad chip.
Old 16 June 2012, 05:59 PM
  #44  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

God damn, CEL is now back on even with Z4 back in.

Error 42 idle control switch.
Old 16 June 2012, 06:11 PM
  #45  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

try doing what scot said in post 36. check the spindle moves freely.
Old 18 June 2012, 04:54 PM
  #46  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cleaned out ICV was full of gunk. Put back on the car and did an ECU reset as described on sboobypedia. But when it should have flashed half second pulses it flashed 4 long and 2 short flashes which is 42 Idle switch.

But when I took it out of diagnostic mode and turned the car on there was no CEL.

So is it fixed or what?
Old 18 June 2012, 05:53 PM
  #47  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so apparently there was a major cockup.

I took it into the garage to have the entire ICV unit taken off and cleaned. Got back the car. Did the ECU reset and still have the flashes like I said early.

Anyway I was driving it around to see if the CEL would come on. Boosting quite high and there was a massive CLANG and sudden deceleration. At first I thought the gearbox had gone. Car was still drivable though but spluttered and wouldn't rev past 4,000.

Took it back to the garage where it turns out he'd removed the throttle body, Not the ICV and cleaned it. He then failed to put it together properly and the loud clang was my intercooler shooting off into my firewall.

It's attached back up now and i'm booked in tomorrow to have the right part cleaned
Old 18 June 2012, 06:00 PM
  #48  
Baz82
Scooby Regular
 
Baz82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dublin,Ireland
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A mechanic that doesnt know what the difference between an Idle control valve and and throttle body should not be working on your car , plus sounds like he left the intercooler brackets un bolted.

What the reason for it over boosting?
Old 18 June 2012, 06:02 PM
  #49  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baz82
A mechanic that doesnt know what the difference between an Idle control valve and and throttle body should not be working on your car , plus sounds like he left the intercooler brackets un bolted.

What the reason for it over boosting?

I don't think it was overboosting, he just hadn't done up the hose clamps to it shot off.
Old 18 June 2012, 09:51 PM
  #50  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ffs your unlucky! first you got bad advise and now your mechanic has made two boo boos. take the car somewhere else or just take the magnet off and test it yourself. its only two screws. mark the position before you take it off though.
Old 19 June 2012, 12:48 AM
  #51  
Ludford
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ludford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dj219957
ffs your unlucky! first you got bad advise and now your mechanic has made two boo boos. take the car somewhere else or just take the magnet off and test it yourself. its only two screws. mark the position before you take it off though.
I did that part myself. I wanted the entire unit taken off though cause I heard the mechanism can get dirty.
Old 19 June 2012, 06:18 AM
  #52  
jakea
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
jakea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1992-1996.5 Ej20g v1/2 have 440cc injectors. I have no idea why you guys think they are 380.

OP, did you happen to jump the j1 connection to revert to the stock rom? I think something is fishy with the chip setup
Old 19 June 2012, 06:38 AM
  #53  
marcevs72
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
marcevs72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: devon
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[quote=jakea;10672354]1992-1996.5 Ej20g v1/2 have 440cc injectors. I have no idea why you guys think they are 380.

they are 380 as standard mate.have them as standard on my93 wrx.they are one of the limiting factors of going over 280ish and it was the sti that had 440's as standard.
Old 19 June 2012, 06:40 AM
  #54  
jakea
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
jakea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

there is 0 difference in wrx td04-sti type ra as far as injectors go.

in the states we have done extensive mapping with these injectors.
Old 19 June 2012, 07:44 AM
  #55  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jakea
there is 0 difference in wrx td04-sti type ra as far as injectors go.

in the states we have done extensive mapping with these injectors.
All pre 96 cars have 380cc injectors whether that be WRX,RA,STI or UK.
Old 19 June 2012, 07:48 AM
  #56  
jakea
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
jakea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

proof in the puddin mates


http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...t=flow+results


if they were 380s, the 16gs would not be able to run up to a bar safely, which is where the 440s hit near 95% duty.
Old 19 June 2012, 07:49 AM
  #57  
marcevs72
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
marcevs72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: devon
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jakea
there is 0 difference in wrx td04-sti type ra as far as injectors go.

in the states we have done extensive mapping with these injectors.
well i must have the wrong injectors fitted from the factory then mate or maybe the states are just different.
Old 19 June 2012, 07:09 PM
  #58  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://wikibaru.com/wiki/Subaru_Fact...tted_Injectors
Old 19 June 2012, 07:11 PM
  #59  
jakea
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
jakea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so the evidence is:
a flow test by America's best injector suite
and
a wiki page of your peers that THINK these are 380s


anyone have a flow sheet at 43psi and the same specific gravity of fuel that says they are 380s?

also, consider how a 16g could even fathom 275bhp w/ 380cc of fuel
Old 19 June 2012, 07:16 PM
  #60  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



Quick Reply: Major ECU confusion.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.