Cambridge diet
#31
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't have to count the calories, people generally eat the same stuff, so if you are staying at the same weight or putting it on, just eat less volume. It really isn't hard.
Portion control, you don't even have to weigh, either put visibly less on the plate or don't eat what's all on the plate.
Fad diets just do not work. Apart from being bad for you, invariably people put at least as much as they lost and quite often more when they stop.
Just eat a little less and do a little more!
All the people I know who are really fat are the ones who have been on and off stupid diets, unsurprisingly.
Geezer
Portion control, you don't even have to weigh, either put visibly less on the plate or don't eat what's all on the plate.
Fad diets just do not work. Apart from being bad for you, invariably people put at least as much as they lost and quite often more when they stop.
Just eat a little less and do a little more!
All the people I know who are really fat are the ones who have been on and off stupid diets, unsurprisingly.
Geezer
#32
Eat less do more ? how does that account for adjustments to metabolism, Lean BF% changes and things like Wilsons syndrome. I have met people who ate 1 meal a day and were still fat, they just wasted away their muscle to the point of starvation and still had too much fat on them. Some of the advice on here from jjones is just the sound of alot of stupid talking loudly. If you know **** all then perhaps you should shut up.
#33
#34
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 meal a day is bad.
A body will store any calories it gets because it doesn't know when they are next coming.
Eating a balanced diet, regular meals etc is vital. It's why you should always have breakfast. Hell seems you can even have choclate cake a lose weight
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...se-weight.html
5t.
A body will store any calories it gets because it doesn't know when they are next coming.
Eating a balanced diet, regular meals etc is vital. It's why you should always have breakfast. Hell seems you can even have choclate cake a lose weight
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...se-weight.html
5t.
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blimey, is the Cambrige fad Diet still kicking about?
It's so straightforward.
Eat less food. Smaller portions. Drink less booze.
Exercise more.
Repeat for 40 years.
Next.
It's so straightforward.
Eat less food. Smaller portions. Drink less booze.
Exercise more.
Repeat for 40 years.
Next.
#36
#37
Scooby Regular
sounds seriously dangerous to me, totaly screwing around with your diet and dropping that fast
i managed to loose 1.5 stone in 5 days,,,,, but i did nealry end up in hospital with food poisening.
Proper balanced diet combined with excerise for the win.
i managed to loose 1.5 stone in 5 days,,,,, but i did nealry end up in hospital with food poisening.
Proper balanced diet combined with excerise for the win.
#40
#42
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eat less do more ? how does that account for adjustments to metabolism, Lean BF% changes and things like Wilsons syndrome. I have met people who ate 1 meal a day and were still fat, they just wasted away their muscle to the point of starvation and still had too much fat on them. Some of the advice on here from jjones is just the sound of alot of stupid talking loudly. If you know **** all then perhaps you should shut up.
99.99999999% of people who are overweight are overweight because they take in more calories than they burn. It really is that simple. If only everything in life was that simple!
There is only a very small handful of conditions that truly prevent weight loss, and even then , ye canna change the laws pf physics, if you stopped eating, you would lose weight. There are no recorded cases that I am aware of people taking nourishment directly from the air......
I am not advocating that people don't eat, obviously.
So, there you go, eat less, do more, it really is that simple for most people.
Should I guess you're fat and in denial? I know plenty of people like that........
Geezer
Last edited by Geezer; 02 July 2012 at 04:00 PM.
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But, alcazar, you can't eat an Atkins diet for life. If he hasn't already put the weight back on, he will do, unless he's fundamentally changed his eating habits. And if he's managed to do that by way of the Atkins crash diet course, then ok, fair play to him, but he'd be highly, highly unusual.
#46
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
i think its principles 101 that eating less and moving ya *** is the goal, but unfortuenly and most probably 80% of the UK carry a bit too much luggage LOL
apart from my wife whos a sport billy, none of my mates or people i know are an ideal weight thoses that even play footy. i personally think its just the ay sociaty is nowadays
We are all guilty of it.
The cambridge is just an EASY wat to lose it no food counting no excercise just sit on ya as drink a shake and it falls off, i agree cant be healthy but in some ways it probably is better for u if your 30 stone,
Girl at work was told by her doctor lose it if you want kids as shes having issues, having a baby, so she was told to use this diet by her doctor.
Love the banter lets all calm down, for all you on the iphone dload and install my fitness pal and for a laugh just tell me how much you consume in Cals a day, its amazing how much we nail just scoffin and working.
apart from my wife whos a sport billy, none of my mates or people i know are an ideal weight thoses that even play footy. i personally think its just the ay sociaty is nowadays
We are all guilty of it.
The cambridge is just an EASY wat to lose it no food counting no excercise just sit on ya as drink a shake and it falls off, i agree cant be healthy but in some ways it probably is better for u if your 30 stone,
Girl at work was told by her doctor lose it if you want kids as shes having issues, having a baby, so she was told to use this diet by her doctor.
Love the banter lets all calm down, for all you on the iphone dload and install my fitness pal and for a laugh just tell me how much you consume in Cals a day, its amazing how much we nail just scoffin and working.
Last edited by Littleted; 02 July 2012 at 04:16 PM.
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Littleted, please understand that you lose weight. Loose is when your belt isn't tight round your trousers. You lose weight. Lose, lose, lose.
Sorry 5t, just have to keep trying
Sorry 5t, just have to keep trying
#49
But, alcazar, you can't eat an Atkins diet for life. If he hasn't already put the weight back on, he will do, unless he's fundamentally changed his eating habits. And if he's managed to do that by way of the Atkins crash diet course, then ok, fair play to him, but he'd be highly, highly unusual.
#50
I suggest unless you understand some very basic principles about how the body works, you should shut the **** up
99.99999999% of people who are overweight are overweight because they take in more calories than they burn. It really is that simple. If only everything in life was that simple!
There is only a very small handful of conditions that truly prevent weight loss, and even then , ye canna change the laws pf physics, if you stopped eating, you would lose weight. There are no recorded cases that I am aware of people taking nourishment directly from the air......
I am not advocating that people don't eat, obviously.
So, there you go, eat less, do more, it really is that simple for most people.
Should I guess you're fat and in denial? I know plenty of people like that........
Geezer
99.99999999% of people who are overweight are overweight because they take in more calories than they burn. It really is that simple. If only everything in life was that simple!
There is only a very small handful of conditions that truly prevent weight loss, and even then , ye canna change the laws pf physics, if you stopped eating, you would lose weight. There are no recorded cases that I am aware of people taking nourishment directly from the air......
I am not advocating that people don't eat, obviously.
So, there you go, eat less, do more, it really is that simple for most people.
Should I guess you're fat and in denial? I know plenty of people like that........
Geezer
What you eat and when you eat it can have huge implications for how effective your diet is, and to be honest I am not sure I can be arsed to try to explain to you when your ability to understand is minimal.
As for me being fat depends on your definition my BF percentage is probably around 18 I would imagine this should drop to 15 in two months and after that depending on how much muscle I lose I will either keep going or start to eat more and get heavier. Either way I am in denial about **** all and am very happy with how my 5 days a week in the gym for the last few years are paying off.
#51
I love this app, so far to day I have eaten, 1500 and have 750 left to play with, Only problem is that is does not seem to think weight training burns calories.
#52
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your ability to demonstrate complete ignorance is astounding, losing weight on its own is a pointless endeavour, losing fat would be what people actually aspire to, starting a cut last week I lost 3.5 kilos in a few days a small percentage of which was fat only now while sticking to a keto diet and a calorie deficit will I be burning fat, by understanding how the human body works I can hopefully trim to a reasonable BF% without losing too much muscle. The simple equation of eat less do more may lose weight initially but it will not get huge changes in appearance that most people want. A strict adherence to something like Atkins until fat percentage is low enough followed by careful management of diet after will.
What you eat and when you eat it can have huge implications for how effective your diet is, and to be honest I am not sure I can be arsed to try to explain to you when your ability to understand is minimal.
As for me being fat depends on your definition my BF percentage is probably around 18 I would imagine this should drop to 15 in two months and after that depending on how much muscle I lose I will either keep going or start to eat more and get heavier. Either way I am in denial about **** all and am very happy with how my 5 days a week in the gym for the last few years are paying off.
What you eat and when you eat it can have huge implications for how effective your diet is, and to be honest I am not sure I can be arsed to try to explain to you when your ability to understand is minimal.
As for me being fat depends on your definition my BF percentage is probably around 18 I would imagine this should drop to 15 in two months and after that depending on how much muscle I lose I will either keep going or start to eat more and get heavier. Either way I am in denial about **** all and am very happy with how my 5 days a week in the gym for the last few years are paying off.
People who eat too much are fat (whatever that definition) is. Eat less, do more, decrease the ratio between intake an energy used, reduce weight. The do more bit is key, as less food on it's own won't necessarily burn up your fat, which as you correctly point out is what most people want.
The simple fact remains though, I'm afraid.
I'm very pleased for you that you feel the need to tell us all that go to the gym 5 days a week........
So, you were fat before?
Geezer
#53
I think Luan's point is that depending upon what and how much you eat and genetics, you might be losing muscle rather than fat. You could drop a stone of muscle and stay the same in terms of fat mass...your bodyfat % would actually go up.
#55
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
said it before and no dobt countless times ahead.
a "diet plan" implies there will be in the future a time when you come "off" the diet.
for long term sustainable results a lifestyle habit change is whats needed
yes a protein/fat only diet will result in fast weight loss, as your body rids itself of the water previosly retained. hence its hyped up success.
also portion reduction diets without consideration to macro nutrient % often lead to failurefor a rogh idea of your genetic presipostion look to family members and have the ability to understand your genetic make up.
the goal should be loosing fat, not blindly loosing weight. avoid scales, they are easily misleading
ultimately it takes time to accumulate fat storage to a noticable degree- and im afraid it takes time to loose it - in general
a "diet plan" implies there will be in the future a time when you come "off" the diet.
for long term sustainable results a lifestyle habit change is whats needed
yes a protein/fat only diet will result in fast weight loss, as your body rids itself of the water previosly retained. hence its hyped up success.
also portion reduction diets without consideration to macro nutrient % often lead to failurefor a rogh idea of your genetic presipostion look to family members and have the ability to understand your genetic make up.
the goal should be loosing fat, not blindly loosing weight. avoid scales, they are easily misleading
ultimately it takes time to accumulate fat storage to a noticable degree- and im afraid it takes time to loose it - in general
#56
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
muscle is the metabolic factory for burning kcals, so the less you have the lower the amount of kcals are expended keeping it. hence why portion reduction diets dont work long term unless macro nutrient %s are considered.
#57
#58
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think i'm elevating lose/loose to top 5 on this evidence What were all these people doing at school? Just waiting for the home-time bell to go by the look of it. Shockingly bad.
And Geezer still doesn't understand it's/its
Using an "app" to control calorie intake is amusing, when we have several "apps" that can do that for you without the need for any electricity whatsoever. Including mirrors, scales and that most elusive "app" of all, our own hunger mechanism. If more people could override that and stop being so bloody greedy, this country wouldn't be disappearing under a blubbery layer of obesity.
And Geezer still doesn't understand it's/its
Using an "app" to control calorie intake is amusing, when we have several "apps" that can do that for you without the need for any electricity whatsoever. Including mirrors, scales and that most elusive "app" of all, our own hunger mechanism. If more people could override that and stop being so bloody greedy, this country wouldn't be disappearing under a blubbery layer of obesity.
#59
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
but muscle tissue is calorifically expense for the body to keep, so ther more muscle you have the more kcals are spent maintaining it - and therefore not stored as bodyfat.
muscle is the metabolic factory for burning kcals, so the less you have the lower the amount of kcals are expended keeping it. hence why portion reduction diets dont work long term unless macro nutrient %s are considered.
muscle is the metabolic factory for burning kcals, so the less you have the lower the amount of kcals are expended keeping it. hence why portion reduction diets dont work long term unless macro nutrient %s are considered.
#60
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand it perfectly Tel, I just seem unable to stop doing it! Seeing as one of my pet hates is also the loose/lose thing, and generally incorrect usage of word, it's a constant source of shame that I continue to do it
Please do not stop reminding me
Whilst we're on this, why do people use jealous when they should use envious?.........
Geezer
Please do not stop reminding me
Whilst we're on this, why do people use jealous when they should use envious?.........
Geezer