When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Very nice addition to the garage, Chris. Admittedly I'm not a fan of the wheels (possibly just the colour/polished combination) but it has a nice presence.
Cheers, as I said not sure about the wheels myself yet LOL!
Hope it is more reliable than the Top Gear reliabilty tests let on, for a prestige brand they never score to well. Alloys look gangster as well but other than that looks okay.
Hope it is more reliable than the Top Gear reliabilty tests let on, for a prestige brand they never score to well. Alloys look gangster as well but other than that looks okay.
Yes me too, but then again nothing could be as unreliable as the 2003 STI I had so these tests don't always mean that a specific car will or will not be reliable
It's not a comparable car to an Impreza, in the legendary twisties a good driver in an Impreza will be quicker obviously, in a straight line the Merc will be quicker!
I doubt it, my fairly standard WRX had my father in laws C43 AMG with relative ease.
And the rust warnings are very very true. He sold his as the jacking point fell out! The arches were gone as well. He part ex'ed it to a dealer and the dealer even lost money selling it on.
Definitely far far better options for the money you've probably spent on it. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
I doubt it, my fairly standard WRX had my father in laws C43 AMG with relative ease.
Please don't take this the wrong way as it isn't a p1ssing up the wall contest, but this statement is nonsense. A standard WRX does 0-60 in around 5.7s and 0-100 in around 15s, the standard CL55K does those times in 4.8s and 9.9s, once rolling it's in a diffferent league to a WRX and seeing as I have driven both I think I am qualified to say wich is the (much) faster and it isn't the Subaru!
Originally Posted by Kwik
And the rust warnings are very very true. He sold his as the jacking point fell out! The arches were gone as well. He part ex'ed it to a dealer and the dealer even lost money selling it on.
Definitely far far better options for the money you've probably spent on it. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
Please don't take this the wrong way as it isn't a p1ssing up the wall contest, but this statement is nonsense. A standard WRX does 0-60 in around 5.7s and 0-100 in around 15s, the standard CL55K does those times in 4.8s and 9.9s, once rolling it's in a diffferent league to a WRX and seeing as I have driven both I think I am qualified to say wich is the (much) faster and it isn't the Subaru!
That's OK, I'll live
I've driven both, and witnessed both from driving the C43 and from my old WRX that off the line there literally was no comparison, the WRX didn't just get away quicker, it was practically gone before the C43 had started.
Now I understand yours is a 5.5 but I doubt there is much difference between the 2. This is from driving, not reading inflated figures in a brochure.
Had I known at the time how liable they were to falling apart I probably would never got in the death trap to be honest.
Don't get me wrong they are lovely looking car and refined to drive. Had you driven a scooby beforehand you'd know there was no comparison.
*Sorry forgot to add they are 2 different cars - one's a fast road, the other is more refined for the older gentleman. Speed for the AMG wasn't what it was made for.
I've driven both, and witnessed both from driving the C43 and from my old WRX that off the line there literally was no comparison, the WRX didn't just get away quicker, it was practically gone before the C43 had started.
Now I understand yours is a 5.5 but I doubt there is much difference between the 2. This is from driving, not reading inflated figures in a brochure.
Had I known at the time how liable they were to falling apart I probably would never got in the death trap to be honest.
Don't get me wrong they are lovely looking car and refined to drive. Had you driven a scooby beforehand you'd know there was no comparison.
*Sorry forgot to add they are 2 different cars - one's a fast road, the other is more refined for the older gentleman. Speed for the AMG wasn't what it was made for.
Had I driven a Scooby beforehand???? I have a Scooby and it's my 5th having owned them continuously since 1996! Oh and please stop comparing a C43 with a CL55, they are totally different cars!
Last edited by f1_fan; 15 October 2012 at 10:27 AM.
Guy I work with has one of these - year, quick cars.
But show it a non dry road and its bloody useless.
He has gassed his tool, but its need attention now for rust on the front wings.
Had I driven a Scooby beforehand???? I have a Scooby and it's my 5th having owned them continuously since 1996! Oh and please stop comparing a C43 with a CL55, they are totally different cars!
Pah! And I've got an F40 lol. So many people on t'internet have this, that and the other. I'm sorry but I find it very hard to believe you have driven, let alone ever owned a scoob judging by your opinion. I call custard/loaf on this one....
What is it with this site and liars at the moment?.
Strange, it's like owning an Enzo and saying your golf is faster. Sorry obrian it's not I don't believe you but it's hard to believe, this f1 guy isn't even phased at how they fall apart.
When you pop round my way, I'll get a loaf of bread, that days paper and my Scoob in the same pic. See if we're still lying then
He'd probably still say we were
Originally Posted by Ant
mate has one of these and there a lovely car and a lot of car for what they cost, his is silver but i prefer your black a lot more
Yeah I had the chance of a very good silver car but held out for black in the end!
Originally Posted by Ste RB5138
Thats a cool car in my opinion, I bet the classic Impreza feels really harsh to drive compared to the Merc.
Cheers The Impreza does feel more raw to drive, but very chuckable - it's just such a different car to the Merc, I like them both and vive le difference!