UK economy 2013 Q1 - the excuses are being lined up
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I held off and am glad I did.
Probably doing some seed investment in a rather exciting new business but apart from that, we are making f all on it while its sat in the usual savings/isas.
Probably doing some seed investment in a rather exciting new business but apart from that, we are making f all on it while its sat in the usual savings/isas.
#34
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0.3% contraction in 2012 Q4.
Jonathan Portes, an economist from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, sums up how I feel about the current situation and what I said 2 years ago:
"Underlying it, ignoring all the special factors, what we see is the economy is not delivering the sustainable growth that we would normally see at this point in the cycle."
"This is due to the [UK] government's policies and the failure of governments in the eurozone.
"They should not have cut the deficit so quickly and before the recovery was sustained."
Correct, but too late now!
Jonathan Portes, an economist from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, sums up how I feel about the current situation and what I said 2 years ago:
"Underlying it, ignoring all the special factors, what we see is the economy is not delivering the sustainable growth that we would normally see at this point in the cycle."
"This is due to the [UK] government's policies and the failure of governments in the eurozone.
"They should not have cut the deficit so quickly and before the recovery was sustained."
Correct, but too late now!
#35
Scooby Regular
Thanks Tories!!!!
For leading the country into a THIRD Recession!!!
Bring back Labour and let's get this country working again ....... once again to pick up the Economy from the Tories, after they have messed it all up!!
Bring back Labour and let's get this country working again ....... once again to pick up the Economy from the Tories, after they have messed it all up!!
#37
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Partly yes, but also because of a global recession and because of this current government's flawed policies!
To think all our ills are down to the Labour government is stupid or the views of a Tory which is the same thing really
To think all our ills are down to the Labour government is stupid or the views of a Tory which is the same thing really
#39
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
There were no problems under a government run by Tony Blair, as soon as Gordon Brown became leader of the Labour party and in turn PM (who nobody voted for by the way), things went down hill.
But yes, the banking collapse was mainly to blame for the current financial situation.
The same problems existed in the 80's under Thatcher, recession and lack of jobs, and she had to bear the brunt of people's frustration, but she turned it around and Britain began to prosper and come out of recession, which led to Labour having a relatively easy time of things.
It's foolish to blame strictly the current coalition for the mess we exist in today. People want to be greedy and make money by claiming expenses on second houses and silly nonsense like that, which is another silly reason that the government - past and present - is strapped for cash. And these expenses scandal goes back further than the current government for sure!
Unfortunately the current coalition will always get the blame, and all they are doing is having to make the tough choices that i'm sure Ed Miliband would also have to make if he were in power.
On a personal level, if you have no money, your rather frugal, if you have lots, your more adventurous with your money. Same applies to the government.
But yes, the banking collapse was mainly to blame for the current financial situation.
The same problems existed in the 80's under Thatcher, recession and lack of jobs, and she had to bear the brunt of people's frustration, but she turned it around and Britain began to prosper and come out of recession, which led to Labour having a relatively easy time of things.
It's foolish to blame strictly the current coalition for the mess we exist in today. People want to be greedy and make money by claiming expenses on second houses and silly nonsense like that, which is another silly reason that the government - past and present - is strapped for cash. And these expenses scandal goes back further than the current government for sure!
Unfortunately the current coalition will always get the blame, and all they are doing is having to make the tough choices that i'm sure Ed Miliband would also have to make if he were in power.
On a personal level, if you have no money, your rather frugal, if you have lots, your more adventurous with your money. Same applies to the government.
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I don't get is that they are still over spending, by around £75 billion!
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
#45
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I don't get is that they are still over spending, by around £75 billion!
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#48
Are you refering to this alarmist advertisement? Do you have your free wealth preservation report? Apparently you can avert your personal doomsday financial meltdown if you take up their subscription.
http://www.moneyweek.com/endofbritain
http://www.moneyweek.com/endofbritain
a) I'm a salesperson
b) I build websites that sell
c) I've read and learned loads about selling
I find it galling that they claim to be impartial and only interested in helping the poor and vulnerable people of Britain for FREE....then they charge £hundreds for their newsletter.
We are in something of a financial crisis and it will probably get worse. However, the people that make money out of it are those that take advantage of the stupidity and desperation of others. Desperate fat people pay £100's for magic slimming pills that do nothing. The same is/will happen(ing) here.
If these people genuinely cared they would forgo profit and offer the advice for free. If the advice was genuinely good then it would be in demand and droves of people would go to their website to read it. All they need is some Google ads on the website and their costs are more than covered. The fact they didn't adopt this model almost certainly suggests that they don't have 'your interests' at heart.
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#51
There's no smoke without fire - as they say - so I would imagine they are drawing on some reasonable facts and analysis. They may even be 100% right about what is going to happen; whether the avoidance advice they give has any value remains to be seen.
#52
I did ask you once Pete,what would be your advice to a government which inherited an economy which had been destroyed by the previous government because of their hopeless, irresponsible, and self seeking overborrowing?
Les
Les
#53
Scooby Regular
Les ....... I do not recognise the previous government you state.
All I can see is that Labour 'just happened' to be holding the baby when the baby crapped itself .... that's all'
You cannot hold Labour responsible for the world financial crisis - can you? Look at Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc. - in much more of a pickle than us!
Labour saved the world by showing the way through the mess ...... the Tory boys don't have a clue!
All I can see is that Labour 'just happened' to be holding the baby when the baby crapped itself .... that's all'
You cannot hold Labour responsible for the world financial crisis - can you? Look at Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc. - in much more of a pickle than us!
Labour saved the world by showing the way through the mess ...... the Tory boys don't have a clue!
#54
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Labour saved the world.....really..
Both these parties are as bad as each other..
The tories are only ntrested in raping the countrys working mans pockets, to line their own, and pay for second mortgages, and ridiculous expenses..
And labour are only intrested in making the lazy jobless, alcholoic, drug crazed scum of our country sit at home even longer claimin every benifit under the sun.......
Either way the working class of the UK pay for ******** who do nothing but sit on their **** & laugh at the rest of us, it's time for a change IMO
Both these parties are as bad as each other..
The tories are only ntrested in raping the countrys working mans pockets, to line their own, and pay for second mortgages, and ridiculous expenses..
And labour are only intrested in making the lazy jobless, alcholoic, drug crazed scum of our country sit at home even longer claimin every benifit under the sun.......
Either way the working class of the UK pay for ******** who do nothing but sit on their **** & laugh at the rest of us, it's time for a change IMO
#55
If I had to pick one I'd much, much, much rather have my money taken to make the rich richer than to allow jobless, layout, scum with a <80 IQ sit on their **** smoking, drinking and taking drugs all day.
End the benefits system now. End the NHS now*. Stop supporting every tom, dick and harry now.
* FWIW I think the NHS is amazing but we can't afford it. At the very least make people pay when their ailments which are clearly attributable to their own actions/abuse (i.e. morbid obesity, drink and drug use, etc)
End the benefits system now. End the NHS now*. Stop supporting every tom, dick and harry now.
* FWIW I think the NHS is amazing but we can't afford it. At the very least make people pay when their ailments which are clearly attributable to their own actions/abuse (i.e. morbid obesity, drink and drug use, etc)
#58
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Les ....... I do not recognise the previous government you state.
All I can see is that Labour 'just happened' to be holding the baby when the baby crapped itself .... that's all'
You cannot hold Labour responsible for the world financial crisis - can you? Look at Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc. - in much more of a pickle than us!
Labour saved the world by showing the way through the mess ...... the Tory boys don't have a clue!
All I can see is that Labour 'just happened' to be holding the baby when the baby crapped itself .... that's all'
You cannot hold Labour responsible for the world financial crisis - can you? Look at Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc. - in much more of a pickle than us!
Labour saved the world by showing the way through the mess ...... the Tory boys don't have a clue!
GORDON IS A MORON by vernan cole, eye opener or what
#59
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I don't get is that they are still over spending, by around £75 billion!
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
Have they cut all there is to cut or what?
I agree that cuts to capital investment was not a great idea if they wanted growth to return, but they can't keep over spending can they? There has to be a limit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM