What ever became of David Bellamy?
03 February 2013, 04:28 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
"IF" David Bellamy does make a comeback, it may well be accompanied by the return of Lenny Henry too
sorry, but that is a risk I am not prepared to take
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 03 February 2013 at 04:31 PM.
04 February 2013, 02:50 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To quote you from a different thread...'You are using the thread as an excuse to air your personal feelings.'
This 'science' you refer to has been thoroughly debunked.
I suggest you try reading more than one side of the argument in future...before you go shooting you mouth off
This 'science' you refer to has been thoroughly debunked.
I suggest you try reading more than one side of the argument in future...before you go shooting you mouth off
I mentioned it of course to support David Bellamy who is the subject of this thread.
Please show us where the science you mention has been "debunked".
The scientists who have recently told us that there is no significant GBW were the ones who reported it's existence in the first place because of the innaccuracy of their measuring equipment at the time. Who has done the debunking? I have not seen it reported by a trustworthy source. Or have I missed it somehow?
Les
04 February 2013, 04:24 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep I think it only fair Martin proves his claims rather than just stating it as fact and while he's about it why doesn't he also give us the reasons why getting out of the EU would be so catastrophic for the UK rather than just telling us we are all stupid for suggesting it 
04 February 2013, 05:08 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I mentioned it of course to support David Bellamy who is the subject of this thread.
Please show us where the science you mention has been "debunked".
The scientists who have recently told us that there is no significant GBW were the ones who reported it's existence in the first place because of the innaccuracy of their measuring equipment at the time. Who has done the debunking? I have not seen it reported by a trustworthy source. Or have I missed it somehow?
Les
Please show us where the science you mention has been "debunked".
The scientists who have recently told us that there is no significant GBW were the ones who reported it's existence in the first place because of the innaccuracy of their measuring equipment at the time. Who has done the debunking? I have not seen it reported by a trustworthy source. Or have I missed it somehow?
Les
04 February 2013, 07:30 PM
#39
04 February 2013, 11:57 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All I'm trying to point out to the absolutists (on both sides) is that there is no way anyone can be certain, yet I keep reading on here absolutist statements from people who cannot possibly know enough to be certain.
Believe or not I'm actually skeptical too, but but there a world of difference between skepticism and outright cynicism and ideological myopia
05 February 2013, 02:37 AM
#41
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe people wouldn't be so cynical if the world's governments didn't use something unproven as a basis for levying yet more taxation upon the population. Just a thought!
05 February 2013, 11:47 AM
#43
Never ever, ever, ever, have I ever said that 'the science is settled' if it were then this wouldn't even be a discussion.
All I'm trying to point out to the absolutists (on both sides) is that there is no way anyone can be certain, yet I keep reading on here absolutist statements from people who cannot possibly know enough to be certain.
Believe or not I'm actually skeptical too, but but there a world of difference between skepticism and outright cynicism and ideological myopia
All I'm trying to point out to the absolutists (on both sides) is that there is no way anyone can be certain, yet I keep reading on here absolutist statements from people who cannot possibly know enough to be certain.
Believe or not I'm actually skeptical too, but but there a world of difference between skepticism and outright cynicism and ideological myopia
05 February 2013, 11:55 AM
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No I'm quite happy to point out that anyone on here that claims to KNOW for sure, is either lying or bonkers
05 February 2013, 12:04 PM
#45
05 February 2013, 12:25 PM
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 February 2013, 02:21 PM
#47
05 February 2013, 02:55 PM
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post