FAO Les
22 January 2014, 10:37 PM
#121
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,347
Received 55 Likes
on
42 Posts
I think Les was ill when he was postwhoring here, and I think he's much better since he has been away from the keyboard. I remember opening NSR page, and finding about 6 to 8 top-of-the page threads, all ending with our Les's posts. It was obvious that he had been on a mission. 
I'm not saying that you have to be ill to be on SN, but you would be doing better things if you were well, don't you think?
I'm not saying that you have to be ill to be on SN, but you would be doing better things if you were well, don't you think?
22 January 2014, 11:16 PM
#122
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
23 January 2014, 10:34 PM
#125
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The way I see it....is that a few regular posters here were concerned cos Les hadn't posted for a while and we were concerned for him.
Considering the general bad press received about the "Iinternet" and the **** that sometimes goes down on Twitter from time to time, I think this forum bucks the trend (well sometimes)
Considering the general bad press received about the "Iinternet" and the **** that sometimes goes down on Twitter from time to time, I think this forum bucks the trend (well sometimes
)
Last edited by Fabioso; 23 January 2014 at 10:44 PM.
26 January 2014, 02:18 PM
#127
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No. I thought his posting style was a bit different. But then again, either we develop a conspiracy theory, or just let the plot thicken/ fog thin itself. I'm on for the latter, meself.
26 January 2014, 02:30 PM
#128
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At first I thought that myself. The first one was fine, but the second seemed not quite right. It was the wink after his name that was the most odd so I looked at a few of his earlier posts in December and there was a wink after his name in at least one of them so, as you say, I think we can can the conspiracy theories!
26 January 2014, 07:28 PM
#129
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At first I thought that myself. The first one was fine, but the second seemed not quite right. It was the wink after his name that was the most odd so I looked at a few of his earlier posts in December and there was a wink after his name in at least one of them so, as you say, I think we can can the conspiracy theories!
I may be completely wrong, though.
Although we all know that ID theft on internet can take place sometimes. Could be his cat typing if you think about it.
But I'd rather not knock any conspiracy theory together tbh. Because if it turns out to be he himself, then he won't like that I thought he was a cat. It's not fair on real Leslie.
26 January 2014, 10:34 PM
#131
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 February 2014, 08:52 PM
#135
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know, Joz, I thought I might attract his attention by bumping this. It seems odd that Les doesn't acknowledge a five page thread dedicated to him.
06 February 2014, 09:16 PM
#138
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...&postcount=265
06 February 2014, 09:27 PM
#139
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely fascinating, Joz. Now then, Turbohot (Swati) wrote this interpretation/analysis of Melencolia I by Dürer and I'm surprised it's escaped your attention. What do you make of it?
https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...&postcount=265
https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...&postcount=265
Oye! Why are you asking him that for?? I told you it wasn't a haw haw matter!
Honestly, some people!
06 February 2014, 09:29 PM
#140
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 February 2014, 10:41 PM
#142
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By the way, the man in question does sound (I mean, virtually) like himself on Schumacher accident thread.
I reckon he could be our Leslie, but he's switching from personality to personality for some strange reason. He wrote- "What a plonker!" on some thread. Now that is not really much like our usual Les, is it.
It's all very weird.
I reckon he could be our Leslie, but he's switching from personality to personality for some strange reason. He wrote- "What a plonker!" on some thread. Now that is not really much like our usual Les, is it.
It's all very weird.
06 February 2014, 11:10 PM
#143
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By the way, the man in question does sound (I mean, virtually) like himself on Schumacher accident thread.
I reckon he could be our Leslie, but he's switching from personality to personality for some strange reason. He wrote- "What a plonker!" on some thread. Now that is not really much like our usual Les, is it.
It's all very weird.
I reckon he could be our Leslie, but he's switching from personality to personality for some strange reason. He wrote- "What a plonker!" on some thread. Now that is not really much like our usual Les, is it.
It's all very weird.
06 February 2014, 11:23 PM
#144
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, right! In that case, he could be the usual suspect, but he's still not himself. If he were, he would have posted at least "Thanks for thinking about me, you plonkers!".
Anyway, we'll see.
06 February 2014, 11:27 PM
#145
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 February 2014, 09:34 PM
#147
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He could be just shy, and doesn't like mass attention.
And with all these assumptions, we continue to discuss him; as if he's still out of our sight, and can't hear us. All virtually, I mean.
We really are prize plonkers, fair play.
12 February 2014, 03:40 PM
#148
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never been one of Les' fans as I think he contributes nothing of any substance whatsoever, just the same generic, sitting on the fence nonsense.
The fact that he ignored this thread when people went to the effort to even write him a letter, proves that he is a bit of a ****.
Some will flame me for saying it but so what.
The fact that he ignored this thread when people went to the effort to even write him a letter, proves that he is a bit of a ****.
Some will flame me for saying it but so what.
12 February 2014, 04:38 PM
#149
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flame you? To be honest I am appalled at your comments, they are grossly unjustified.
Like a few others on this forum I have met Les and spent quite some time with him so I know just what an honest and upstanding man he is. To call him what you have is just ridiculous as you evidently know absolutely nothing about him or his past.
I am sure others who have met him will agree.
Like a few others on this forum I have met Les and spent quite some time with him so I know just what an honest and upstanding man he is. To call him what you have is just ridiculous as you evidently know absolutely nothing about him or his past.
I am sure others who have met him will agree.
12 February 2014, 04:46 PM
#150
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flame you? To be honest I am appalled at your comments, they are grossly unjustified.
Like a few others on this forum I have met Les and spent quite some time with him so I know just what an honest and upstanding man he is. To call him what you have is just ridiculous as you evidently know absolutely nothing about him or his past.
I am sure others who have met him will agree.
Like a few others on this forum I have met Les and spent quite some time with him so I know just what an honest and upstanding man he is. To call him what you have is just ridiculous as you evidently know absolutely nothing about him or his past.
I am sure others who have met him will agree.
