Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

New UK Subaru Sti - Due April/May

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 July 2014, 12:26 PM
  #1471  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mangoletsi Subaru
For those that have been asking for exact figures on our full 340 upgrade with exhaust and warranty etc, I have the exact figures now.

The BHP increase is 43.4, and torque is increased by 42 FT LB. The car feels much faster than the figures show, but I am more than happy with the result. I can't upload the print out yet, as it has a registration number on it, but will do ASAP.
John. I would give Scoobyclinic a ring. There is another 60ftlb to be gained with a good map. Power sounds good but you will notice torque on the road.
Old 09 July 2014, 02:53 PM
  #1472  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chris j t
Hi John,

If possible could you show both before and after print outs if not all ready doing so.

And I think you had mentioned that you may be able to give new figures, ie 0-60.

As always John, thanks for your time.

Chris.
I have the printout yes, just need to delete the customers registration number and personal details off there before I can upload it, but will try and do it before I go today. 0-60 times etc will be done next week when we can test it properly.

Been really busy out of the dealership today, working on our next Modifica WRX STi v2. I am afraid I am not doing the 400bhp version anymore, instead I am doing a 450bhp version.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:26 PM
  #1473  
Littleted
Scooby Regular
 
Littleted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

thatll be a 10k uplift then ?im pretty sure the well renown modifiers wouldn't touch 450 unless the block was fully forged internals ?

Think cheapest quote I got was 7k

Lichfields wanted 20 LOL

Last edited by Littleted; 09 July 2014 at 03:28 PM.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:34 PM
  #1474  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Littleted
thatll be a 10k uplift then ?im pretty sure the well renown modifiers wouldn't touch 450 unless the block was fully forged internals ?

Think cheapest quote I got was 7k

Lichfields wanted 20 LOL
My target is sub £40k for the car, but absolutely it would have to be and will be forged internals without doubt.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:42 PM
  #1475  
Littleted
Scooby Regular
 
Littleted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

good number though 450 vroom
Old 09 July 2014, 03:44 PM
  #1476  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Printout attached. This is a car that has had the exhaust and re-map.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
image2014-07-09-153700.pdf (264.7 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by Mangoletsi Subaru; 09 July 2014 at 03:45 PM.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:45 PM
  #1477  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Will it be a closed deck block? Getting close to the reliable limit for the standard block.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:47 PM
  #1478  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
Will it be a closed deck block? Getting close to the reliable limit for the standard block.
That was one of the things he was talking to me about today, so maybe yes, but he is the expert, he's done it for over 15 years, so I am in his hands, and we have to build the same tolerances in so that a warranty can be offered on the car as well.
Old 09 July 2014, 03:48 PM
  #1479  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Littleted
good number though 450 vroom
Sounds better than 400
Old 09 July 2014, 04:08 PM
  #1480  
Littleted
Scooby Regular
 
Littleted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

but your so close to 500 it would be rude not to
Old 09 July 2014, 04:22 PM
  #1481  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Littleted
but your so close to 500 it would be rude not to
That would be nice, but have to draw the line on cost somewhere, sadly.
Old 10 July 2014, 08:23 AM
  #1482  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
John. I would give Scoobyclinic a ring. There is another 60ftlb to be gained with a good map. Power sounds good but you will notice torque on the road.
Another 60 ft lb would make a 100 ft lb in total increase over standard? I assume you mean 60 ft lb total increase over standard. We can and have achieved that, but it puts the engine way too critical on temperature, and there is no way we would cover that on warranty.

If it is 100 ft lb, there must be some serious additional cooling on board, as there is no way a standard engine can run that amount of extra torque for any length of time.

Would be interested to see the list of mods done, and dyno printout.
Old 10 July 2014, 09:23 AM
  #1483  
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (17)
 
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: WMI
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

http://midlandscoobies.invisionzone....opic=33933&hl=
Old 10 July 2014, 11:42 AM
  #1484  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mangoletsi Subaru
Another 60 ft lb would make a 100 ft lb in total increase over standard? I assume you mean 60 ft lb total increase over standard. We can and have achieved that, but it puts the engine way too critical on temperature, and there is no way we would cover that on warranty.

If it is 100 ft lb, there must be some serious additional cooling on board, as there is no way a standard engine can run that amount of extra torque for any length of time.

Would be interested to see the list of mods done, and dyno printout.
See scoobydoo link above.
It is 100ftlb of torque. But it was mapped by the master Pat Hepburn.
Old 10 July 2014, 11:47 AM
  #1485  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Might be some new figure up today for a billet turbo addition.
Old 10 July 2014, 01:04 PM
  #1486  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not able to view it for some reason?
Old 10 July 2014, 01:07 PM
  #1487  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
See scoobydoo link above.
It is 100ftlb of torque. But it was mapped by the master Pat Hepburn.
What else was done to the car?
Old 10 July 2014, 01:13 PM
  #1488  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...48108571993273

Try this link.
Old 10 July 2014, 01:34 PM
  #1489  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
Cheers terzoscooby. What else was done as well as re-map?
Old 10 July 2014, 01:54 PM
  #1490  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From memory just Miltek sports cat, Miltek system and remap. The magic is in the mapper.
Old 10 July 2014, 02:22 PM
  #1491  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
From memory just Miltek sports cat, Miltek system and remap. The magic is in the mapper.
OK, studied the map and with the exhaust system and sports cat as well, it does make complete sense now. However this isn't something I would be offering and willing to warrant.
Old 10 July 2014, 08:41 PM
  #1492  
rob84
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
rob84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 5,287
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mangoletsi Subaru
Another 60 ft lb would make a 100 ft lb in total increase over standard? I assume you mean 60 ft lb total increase over standard. We can and have achieved that, but it puts the engine way too critical on temperature, and there is no way we would cover that on warranty.

If it is 100 ft lb, there must be some serious additional cooling on board, as there is no way a standard engine can run that amount of extra torque for any length of time.

Would be interested to see the list of mods done, and dyno printout.
The biggest issue you have with them is the crap radiator which is fitted in std form, they are like this to keep the engine at an optimum higher temperature to get the best fuel efficiency and emissions as possible. your best bet would be go down the route of the earlier hawkeye rad or a big core alloy version. 2.5's have been known to run quite warm when pushed on.
Old 11 July 2014, 01:10 AM
  #1493  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You also have the issue of the clutch, 400lbs of torque is quite a lot to put through it, the map John has is for reliability and drivability to retain the warranty and tbh its the best of both worlds, not just which mapper is best but you need to look at a wider picture on a new car with a warranty.
Old 11 July 2014, 07:56 AM
  #1494  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well this could be an interesting debate. It is all a question of thermodynamics. Now if both engines are running the same boost it is likely the lower torque one is running hotter as it cannot breath and get rid of the heat from the cylinders so timing has had to be pulled to stop detonation. As the turbo is maxed out at 340bhp it is likely they are both running full boost from 3700rpm. There is more to mapping than winding up the boost and altering fuel and timing tables.

I am sure Subaru don't use a small rad for quick warm up as this can be achieved with a thermostat. More likely cost.

The clutch will depend on the driver if it doesn't slip at 400 ftlb then no issue. And that has been proven Clutches only wear when they are slipping so if you ride it a lot or do lots of launches then expect problems.
Old 11 July 2014, 09:57 AM
  #1495  
redace
Scooby Regular
 
redace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
It is all a question of thermodynamics. Now if both engines are running the same boost it is likely the lower torque one is running hotter as it cannot breath and get rid of the heat from the cylinders


Torque is effectively the force produced by each 'bang' in each cylinder, power is a function of this relative to how many of these 'bangs' occur in an amount of time e.g RPM. Not wanting to have to regurgitate years of thermodynamic engineering teachings right now, but I'm certain (without getting into extreme -20 degree turbo anti-lag setups or engines with timing problems) that an engine producing less torque (less bang) does not run hotter.
Old 11 July 2014, 12:23 PM
  #1496  
Mangoletsi Subaru
Former Sponsor
 
Mangoletsi Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
Well this could be an interesting debate. It is all a question of thermodynamics. Now if both engines are running the same boost it is likely the lower torque one is running hotter as it cannot breath and get rid of the heat from the cylinders so timing has had to be pulled to stop detonation. As the turbo is maxed out at 340bhp it is likely they are both running full boost from 3700rpm. There is more to mapping than winding up the boost and altering fuel and timing tables.

I am sure Subaru don't use a small rad for quick warm up as this can be achieved with a thermostat. More likely cost.

The clutch will depend on the driver if it doesn't slip at 400 ftlb then no issue. And that has been proven Clutches only wear when they are slipping so if you ride it a lot or do lots of launches then expect problems.
It's actually the other way around Terzoscooby, as redace says, the more torque, the bigger the bang, the more heat, and heat is the killer, that's why with just a re-map we dialled our's back to prevent det or sudden power drop off.

Agree with you on the clutch though, don't see a problem with that at all.
Old 11 July 2014, 05:16 PM
  #1497  
terzoscooby
Scooby Regular
 
terzoscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with the bigger bang makes torque but if the gas cannot then get out of the cylinder you get heat soak and pumping losses and retard ignition. So back to my conditions for two identical engines running the same boost pressure but one being able to get rid of the exhaust gases better than the other the result is lower torque and more heat soak.
Old 11 July 2014, 05:40 PM
  #1498  
renny
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
renny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, this thread has evolved since I last visited.
Old 11 July 2014, 05:54 PM
  #1499  
redace
Scooby Regular
 
redace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terzoscooby
I agree with the bigger bang makes torque but if the gas cannot then get out of the cylinder you get heat soak and pumping losses and retard ignition
On a 'regular' engine, the exhaust valves are belt/chain driven (non adjustable/mechanically driven) and with the piston heading north at 90mph towards the open exhaust valve, that gas is coming out whether you like it or not.

Are you talking about the vvt tuning on the exhaust cam?
Old 11 July 2014, 06:24 PM
  #1500  
rob84
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
rob84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 5,287
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

If each car is being setup individually, what fuel are you using. Are you stating one specific type or a broad range from 97 to 99 as this will have a big factor into the figures being lower than Scoobyclinics if your trying to go broad scale.

lower RON fuel you are no going to want huge amounts of torque from a 97 as it would most likely not take the timing so would det for fun...


Quick Reply: New UK Subaru Sti - Due April/May



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM.