JDM Hatch UK Hatch
09 January 2018 | 06:13 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,640
Likes: 772
From: Harpenden
In theory.
When the pillow balled front arms came in, they revised the chassis design in that area and went with the "draw stiffeners" to tighten up the front subframe/crossmember.
With the later WRX and other models with the FA engine they only use one
This lower arm bar has link ***** on both ends and is to be installed between both ends of the under floor cross member. Similar to the Flexible Tower Bar, this design controls the input of unnecessary forces.* For A/B type vehicles with turbo
* The explanation of this product is for Japanese specification.
* The explanation of this product is for Japanese specification.
When the pillow balled front arms came in, they revised the chassis design in that area and went with the "draw stiffeners" to tighten up the front subframe/crossmember.
This STI original sports performance part applies moderate tension between the vehicle body and cross member to prevent the chassis from bending when you drive the vehicle. This results in agile and responsive initial steering, as well as a comfortable ride. The vehicle will boast better grip on all four wheels, improved stability when cornering, and also fast and responsive steering performance.* The explanation of this product is for Japanese specification.
This STI original sports performance part applies moderate tension between the vehicle body and cross member to prevent the chassis from bending when you drive the vehicle. This results in agile and responsive initial steering, as well as a comfortable ride. The vehicle will boast better grip on all four wheels, improved stability when cornering, and also fast and responsive steering performance.* This product was designed under the assumption that the STI flexible tower bar (Part No. ST20502VV000) is also mounted on the vehicle.
* The explanation of this product is for Japanese specification.
* The explanation of this product is for Japanese specification.
10 January 2018 | 12:30 PM
#36
Gonna be honest here. I like JDM models and have owned a Spec C Type RA which was a brilliant car, but I think they sound utter rubbish. People say about them 'screaming', sounding like rally cars etc etc, but to me, they just sound like any other car with a big ol' coke can on the back. I much prefer the low, distinctive rumble of the unequal setup. Personal preference and all that.
10 January 2018 | 12:52 PM
#37
Gonna be honest here. I like JDM models and have owned a Spec C Type RA which was a brilliant car, but I think they sound utter rubbish. People say about them 'screaming', sounding like rally cars etc etc, but to me, they just sound like any other car with a big ol' coke can on the back. I much prefer the low, distinctive rumble of the unequal setup. Personal preference and all that.
10 January 2018 | 03:06 PM
#38
Gonna be honest here. I like JDM models and have owned a Spec C Type RA which was a brilliant car, but I think they sound utter rubbish. People say about them 'screaming', sounding like rally cars etc etc, but to me, they just sound like any other car with a big ol' coke can on the back. I much prefer the low, distinctive rumble of the unequal setup. Personal preference and all that.
Jet engine maybe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 04:48 PM