A slag
10 February 2014, 04:22 PM
#181
Absolute crap. The way people use derogatory terms for being gay as an insult on here is precisely because they view it as a weakness otherwise why use the term in the way they do. Gheyer, bender, shirtlifter etc.... all that sort of thing that people use over and over and when questioned just say they are having a laugh. If they didn't see it as a wekaness they wouldn't use it as a form of ridicule! If you cannot understand that then that's not my problem, it's yours!
Listen to him! Forgive me if what someone like you thinks of me doesn't rate too highly on my give-a-****-o-meter Take a chill pill.
10 February 2014, 04:29 PM
#182
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for it being light hearted it doesn't matter, it still reveals that those making such jibes view it as a weakness. It's not up for argument, it's a fact.... the trouble is you don't see it as frankly you're too dimwitted
I do care what some people think of me, you're right... just not thick ***** like you 
Last edited by f1_fan; 10 February 2014 at 04:31 PM.
10 February 2014, 04:35 PM
#183
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolute crap. The way people use derogatory terms for being gay as an insult on here is precisely because they view it as a weakness otherwise why use the term in the way they do. Gheyer, bender, shirtlifter etc.... all that sort of thing that people use over and over and when questioned just say they are having a laugh. If they didn't see it as a wekaness they wouldn't use it as a form of ridicule! If you cannot understand that then that's not my problem,
Mind you, you've even been called a migrant here in some b1tchfights.
10 February 2014, 05:00 PM
#187
Why? They were thieves! Or do you class gay people in the same ilk as thieves? They deserve a bit of ill feeling do they? Very illuminating. As for it being light hearted it doesn't matter, it still reveals that those making such jibes view it as a weakness. It's not up for argument, it's a fact.... the trouble is you don't see it as frankly you're too dimwitted LOL, I see the amateur psychology is up there with the betting skills. You refer to me as a bellend yet I am the aggressive one. Whatever I do care what some people think of me, you're right... just not thick ***** like you
As for it being light hearted it doesn't matter, it still reveals that those making such jibes view it as a weakness. It's not up for argument, it's a fact.... the trouble is you don't see it as frankly you're too dimwitted LOL, I see the amateur psychology is up there with the betting skills. You refer to me as a bellend yet I am the aggressive one. Whatever I do care what some people think of me, you're right... just not thick ***** like you It's perfectly acceptable to call someone thick, but not gay?
10 February 2014, 05:05 PM
#189
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Once again, no point wishing anyone dead, or have cancer on a forum. I know f1 can stand his ground without wishing him all that, he's that ******* great!
Retaliating insults only begets more insults. One should rise above it IMO.
10 February 2014, 05:07 PM
#190
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10 February 2014, 05:08 PM
#191
Wishing anyone dead for mere argument over politics etc. is wrong, so is calling someone gay to belittle them. As a matter of fact, it makes sod all difference to his prestige, as he's not gay. Nor does he mind to be called gay, he doesn't give a damn if anyone think he is! The point is that some people call him gay, because they think by calling him so puts him down more. It should explain that they're using 'gay' term as a derogatory one. Once again, no point wishing anyone dead, or have cancer on a forum. I know f1 can stand his ground without wishing him all that, he's that ******* great! Retaliating insults only begets more insults. One should rise above it IMO.
Retaliating insults only begets more insults. One should rise above it IMO.As much as you are right, calling someone gay is wrong, but not in the same league as wishing someone contract cancer. If you honestly believe they are the same then there's no point continuing this conversation.
10 February 2014, 05:09 PM
#192
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thieves is a strong word for someone that downloads films from the Internet. However you want to dress it up it was a horrible thing to say and most of this site were surprised you weren't banned for saying that, and from what I understand the mods were very close to doing so. The fact you don't see it as wrong, and think some light hearted banter is remotely comparable just shows how distant you are from reality.
10 February 2014, 05:16 PM
#195
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will be clear here. I wish anyone who copies and distributes someone's creative material without paying for it or without their express permission (i.e. they steal it) so they can make money out of it a nasty and prolonged death! Yes!
I have had it happen several times to me and why should the money and effort I put in to create something be taken free of charge by someone else for them to profit from it?
I wouldn't let them steal my car or burgle my house (or anally rape my boyfriend
) without a fight so they can have what's coming to them as far as I am concerned!!
The tacit acceptance of pirated material as somehow being OK by a lot of people on this forum and the internet in general does not impress me one bit!
I have had it happen several times to me and why should the money and effort I put in to create something be taken free of charge by someone else for them to profit from it?
I wouldn't let them steal my car or burgle my house (or anally rape my boyfriend
) without a fight so they can have what's coming to them as far as I am concerned!!The tacit acceptance of pirated material as somehow being OK by a lot of people on this forum and the internet in general does not impress me one bit!
Last edited by f1_fan; 10 February 2014 at 05:18 PM.
10 February 2014, 05:22 PM
#196
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, it's answered above, but you insist on my target being someone downloading a couple of illegal movies whereas I was always referring to those actually pirating it in the first place. That of course does not suit your agenda as per usual!
10 February 2014, 05:44 PM
#197
The thread was vaped and you were I believe given a stern warning.
You are changing what was said, even though a few people saw it before it was deleted purely because you realise how hypocritical you look.
You aren't the sharpest tool in the box, calling people idiots is just as hypocritical.
You are complaining about being called gay when you regularly name call.
Whatever your sexuality you are a hypocrite.
10 February 2014, 05:54 PM
#199
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Except I think the expression was anyone who pirates any creative work. Not just films Nope, no stern warning was forthcoming. The thread was just vaped!
Sharper than you though
Descriptive in your case ... stop acting like one and I will reconsider.
No I am not complaining about being called gay, couldn't care less. I just don't like the way it is used as an insult and a form of ridicule. Now I have written that several times in here and either you just don't want to read it or you are an idiot. You choose!
As I said your opinion of me is unimportant! Think what you like!
Last edited by f1_fan; 10 February 2014 at 06:02 PM.
10 February 2014, 09:40 PM
#202
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kwik, you didn't call him gay directly, but you clearly questioned in your post 185 whether him being called gay is preferable than him wishing someone having cancer, right?
Read again>
Post #185
That is why, answer to your later post i.e..............
...........is > no.
It is easily visible in your post #185 that you prefer him being called gay when he's not than him wishing someone (you, was it?) have cancer. This indirectly and very clearly shows that in your eyes, he'd rather be called gay for an insult because he wished you cancer for your download.
One word > Childish.
By a previous post #178 of yours, you may like to establish how accepting you are about gays, but you have shown in #185 that you'd rather f1 be called gay for an insult than he wishing someone having cancer. This means you think gay is a swear word.
Now please don't ask me to point out where you said that 'gay' is a swear word.
What I believe is that he should indeed rise above being called gay, but I understand his point, which I have already explained in my previous post #189, so I'm not going over it again.
What I believe it that everyone should rise above insults, and stick to the core subject of the thread. Once again, he should, and so should you.
League or no league, your argument in post #185 about cancer and gay is ridiculous. You say it should be preferable to call him gay when he's not, so with this theory, why should you give a **** if he wishes you cancer when you haven't got cancer ??? Your comparison between both insults sucks, as both are bad, and making comparison between the two is, quite frankly, juvenile.
Both insults i.e. wishing someone have cancer for an illegal download or calling someone gay to belittle them, are equally childish. Whether you can see it or not doesn't matter.
Read again>
Post #185
That is why, answer to your later post i.e..............
...........is > no.
It is easily visible in your post #185 that you prefer him being called gay when he's not than him wishing someone (you, was it?) have cancer. This indirectly and very clearly shows that in your eyes, he'd rather be called gay for an insult because he wished you cancer for your download.
One word > Childish.
By a previous post #178 of yours, you may like to establish how accepting you are about gays, but you have shown in #185 that you'd rather f1 be called gay for an insult than he wishing someone having cancer. This means you think gay is a swear word.
Now please don't ask me to point out where you said that 'gay' is a swear word.
What I believe it that everyone should rise above insults, and stick to the core subject of the thread. Once again, he should, and so should you.
League or no league, your argument in post #185 about cancer and gay is ridiculous. You say it should be preferable to call him gay when he's not, so with this theory, why should you give a **** if he wishes you cancer when you haven't got cancer ??? Your comparison between both insults sucks, as both are bad, and making comparison between the two is, quite frankly, juvenile.
Both insults i.e. wishing someone have cancer for an illegal download or calling someone gay to belittle them, are equally childish. Whether you can see it or not doesn't matter.
10 February 2014, 09:47 PM
#203
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10 February 2014, 10:00 PM
#207
Scooby Regular
The 'bottom' line is Kwik has never called F1 Fan gay (not that being gay is an insult, just an observation sometimes)
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
Last edited by Dingdongler; 10 February 2014 at 10:02 PM.
10 February 2014, 10:06 PM
#209
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After all who is going to take notice of a man who pretends to be something he is not!
Last edited by f1_fan; 10 February 2014 at 10:08 PM.
10 February 2014, 10:11 PM
#210
Scooby Regular
You can put as many smilies up as you like, I'm not the one wishing people to die a horrible, slow and painful death
Btw, don't bother replying, I'm not interested. Comprendez?
Last edited by Dingdongler; 10 February 2014 at 10:13 PM.