A slag
10 February 2014, 10:13 PM
#211
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No worries D***
Last edited by f1_fan; 10 February 2014 at 10:26 PM. Reason: Whoops, my fingers nearly slipped up again!
10 February 2014, 10:32 PM
#212
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 'bottom' line is Kwik has never called F1 Fan gay (not that being gay is an insult, just an observation sometimes)
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
10 February 2014, 10:56 PM
#213
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know what went on when he said that, but if he was being nasty by saying that toward someone who didn't deserve to be wished that, then I agree that he shouldn't have.
You shouldn't be ridiculing him by supporting the use of the word 'gay' for him, if you think that being gay is no weakness.
10 February 2014, 11:05 PM
#214
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
Last edited by Turbohot; 11 February 2014 at 12:03 AM.
10 February 2014, 11:16 PM
#215
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations for your chippy sarcasm, Chip. I see it has been bubbling for a while. But where's this *** group you are mentioning about?
To my experience, I'm standing on my own as his 'much needed female' body guard, as some misogynists refer such position as. 'Much needed' because he can't defend himself? Awww, poor f1! His weakness picked again from thin air by the key board warriors. Some people never change. 
10 February 2014, 11:21 PM
#216
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10 February 2014, 11:31 PM
#217
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But by calling him names, don't you think people bring themselves down to his level of childish anger, and then it becomes like a school play ground fight? Why do it? Instead, wouldn't it be better if people pointed it out to him, and thus stop him to do so?
Most of you are cool people here. He's cool, too. Why can't you all be nice to each other FFS????
10 February 2014, 11:38 PM
#218
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When Lee Rigby was murdered there was a whole great long thread of people saying they wanted his attackers dead with some offering to carry out the deed themselves and no one batted an eyeld.
I want a few thieves to die a nasty death and I am the devil incarnate! Well f**k it, that is just a cross I will have to bear
11 February 2014, 12:24 AM
#219
Why indeed?
Well, I don't expect everyone to get on, people clash sometimes and we end up with some conflict. It's not the end of the world, but it would be nice, if some people could learn to be a bit more civil.
I've asked time and time again for people to ignore each other and it just doesn't happen and I'm not going to fool myself into thinking it ever will. And before anyone jumps in, I'm not getting into the whole 'he started it', that is equally as childish as any name calling.
We all get it, some of you don't like each other, not every thread has to descend into a slanging match as a result though.
I ask politely that if you can't get along, and ignoring each other is not an option for whatever reason, then can you guys just try to rein in the personal insults and possibly just stick to arguing over the topics at hand and not just calling each other.
That would be greatly appreciated by me, and I'm sure plenty of other people here.
I didn't make it a secret that at the time of your original comment, that I didn't agree with it. That said, it is true that very similar comments have been made on various threads over the years in response to stories that have caused anger etc. Just because one crime may be (perceived to be) more severe than another doesn't change the fact that the comment is still the same and it is either right or wrong to say it. We can't really say it's ok in some instances and not in others just because of our own opinions of the context it's made in. For that reason, it wasn't acted on, other than to remove the thread and let things calm down. If in the future, members wish for such comments to be treated more harshly, then fine, but that will have to apply to all, no matter what the context is. I always say, 'be careful what you wish for'. Anyhow, with that said, can we please let that lie now. It's in the past, and was dealt with how we saw fit at the time.
Well, I don't expect everyone to get on, people clash sometimes and we end up with some conflict. It's not the end of the world, but it would be nice, if some people could learn to be a bit more civil.
I've asked time and time again for people to ignore each other and it just doesn't happen and I'm not going to fool myself into thinking it ever will. And before anyone jumps in, I'm not getting into the whole 'he started it', that is equally as childish as any name calling.
We all get it, some of you don't like each other, not every thread has to descend into a slanging match as a result though.
I ask politely that if you can't get along, and ignoring each other is not an option for whatever reason, then can you guys just try to rein in the personal insults and possibly just stick to arguing over the topics at hand and not just calling each other.
That would be greatly appreciated by me, and I'm sure plenty of other people here.
I didn't make it a secret that at the time of your original comment, that I didn't agree with it. That said, it is true that very similar comments have been made on various threads over the years in response to stories that have caused anger etc. Just because one crime may be (perceived to be) more severe than another doesn't change the fact that the comment is still the same and it is either right or wrong to say it. We can't really say it's ok in some instances and not in others just because of our own opinions of the context it's made in. For that reason, it wasn't acted on, other than to remove the thread and let things calm down. If in the future, members wish for such comments to be treated more harshly, then fine, but that will have to apply to all, no matter what the context is. I always say, 'be careful what you wish for'. Anyhow, with that said, can we please let that lie now. It's in the past, and was dealt with how we saw fit at the time.
11 February 2014, 12:30 AM
#220
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't make it a secret that at the time of your original comment, that I didn't agree with it. That said, it is true that very similar comments have been made on various threads over the years in response to stories that have caused anger etc. Just because one crime may be (perceived to be) more severe than another doesn't change the fact that the comment is still the same and it is either right or wrong to say it. We can't really say it's ok in some instances and not in others just because of our own opinions of the context it's made in. For that reason, it wasn't acted on, other than to remove the thread and let things calm down. If in the future, members wish for such comments to be treated more harshly, then fine, but that will have to apply to all, no matter what the context is. I always say, 'be careful what you wish for'. Anyhow, with that said, can we please let that lie now. It's in the past, and was dealt with how we saw fit at the time.
11 February 2014, 12:40 AM
#221
Being a clever bloke, I thought you would have got that.
(my fault though, for the lack of paragraphs and clarification
)
11 February 2014, 12:42 AM
#222
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was quoting you with reference to what you said about the same sort of comment being made on different threads/subjects. Not the letting it lie bit, that was aimed at those bringing it all up again.
Being a clever bloke, I thought you would have got that.
(my fault though, for the lack of paragraphs and clarification)
Being a clever bloke, I thought you would have got that.
(my fault though, for the lack of paragraphs and clarification
) No worries
11 February 2014, 06:45 AM
#225
Scooby Regular
No wonder many have given up posting here these days.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
11 February 2014, 11:48 AM
#226
To be fair, I stopped him once when he said something nasty to you. I don't know who was losing or winning, but that was childish of him, I thought. But by calling him names, don't you think people bring themselves down to his level of childish anger, and then it becomes like a school play ground fight? Why do it? Instead, wouldn't it be better if people pointed it out to him, and thus stop him to do so? Most of you are cool people here. He's cool, too. Why can't you all be nice to each other FFS????
11 February 2014, 01:44 PM
#228
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look in the mirror.
Ding, whoever he/she/it is, comes across as a far more balanced individual than you are ever likely to, kids or not.
11 February 2014, 01:49 PM
#229
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,347
Received 55 Likes
on
42 Posts
No wonder many have given up posting here these days.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
11 February 2014, 01:53 PM
#230
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You prefer DIng, fine, why not engage him, you should get on just fine
11 February 2014, 02:01 PM
#231
Back on topic, somewhat left field but i'm sure the intellectuals amongst you will get the general idea, divide and conquer distraction techniques, while the minions are busy fighting and pointing the finger at one another the real issues are left un-addressed, the rich get richer the poor get poorer thus maintaining the status quo.
It's an old formula but as stated in the text very effective to this day.
http://www.iupui.edu/~blacksu/PDF%20...ynchLetter.pdf
It's an old formula but as stated in the text very effective to this day.
http://www.iupui.edu/~blacksu/PDF%20...ynchLetter.pdf
11 February 2014, 02:14 PM
#232
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back on topic, somewhat left field but i'm sure the intellectuals amongst you will get the general idea, divide and conquer distraction techniques, while the minions are busy fighting and pointing the finger at one another the real issues are left un-addressed, the rich get richer the poor get poorer thus maintaining the status quo.
It's an old formula but as stated in the text very effective to this day.
http://www.iupui.edu/~blacksu/PDF%20...ynchLetter.pdf
It's an old formula but as stated in the text very effective to this day.
http://www.iupui.edu/~blacksu/PDF%20...ynchLetter.pdf
11 February 2014, 02:16 PM
#233
So councils are strapped for cash? I pity the folk of Northants whose council tax bills will be going towards keeping the council in luxury.
http://m.northamptonchron.co.uk/news...well-1-5868932
http://m.northamptonchron.co.uk/news...well-1-5868932
11 February 2014, 03:59 PM
#235
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11 February 2014, 04:21 PM
#236
The 'bottom' line is Kwik has never called F1 Fan gay (not that being gay is an insult, just an observation sometimes)
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
Therefore the self appointed (but much needed) F1 Fan female body guard is talking absolute nonsense in trying to justify her previous comments towards Kwik.
It doesn't matter how many lines of nonsense she writes the issue is that Kwik has never called F1 a homosexual.
On that basis the female body guard should have the decency to retract her statement and/or apologise to him (Kwik)
And for the record, wishing anybody a life threatening, soul destroying and painful disease is frankly abhorrent and should make those people ashamed of themselves. Justify it as much as you like, it shows a worrying disrespect for human life.
This thread has pretty much exposed the pair of them for what they are.
11 February 2014, 04:39 PM
#237
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seeing as you are still droning on like a child that hasn't got its own way perhaps you can answer the question I asked earlier. Would you care to explain exactly what you meant by this:
Especially the last bit about the choice?
Especially the last bit about the choice?
11 February 2014, 05:20 PM
#238
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No wonder many have given up posting here these days.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
This thread is an all too common example of the pathetic type of posting from complete losers, who clearly have nothing better to do than try to out score other losers in petty meaningless point scoring bouts.
Those involved should take a long look at themselves (as unpleasant as that may be). Truly horrible people.
I think some posters here could start an argument in an empty room. Maybe when everyone else has left and they are just arguing with themselves they'll be happy, because at least then they are having the last word.
11 February 2014, 05:38 PM
#239
This is down to your personality, not sexuality.
Saying it is a "choice" is imho a poor excuse for someone who turns people's stomach's in the "virtual" world and I'd imagine in the real world.
It explains a lot of your bitterness and hatred for the world (as it rejects you).
11 February 2014, 05:45 PM
#240
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the nature of your personality and insisting you argue with anyone you may come across I highly doubt you have much success with meeting anyone, be that male or female. In that case I can understand why anyone would choose to steer clear of you let alone bare a child with you.
This is down to your personality, not sexuality.
Saying it is a "choice" is imho a poor excuse for someone who turns people's stomach's in the "virtual" world and I'd imagine in the real world.
It explains a lot of your bitterness and hatred for the world (as it rejects you).
This is down to your personality, not sexuality.
Saying it is a "choice" is imho a poor excuse for someone who turns people's stomach's in the "virtual" world and I'd imagine in the real world.
It explains a lot of your bitterness and hatred for the world (as it rejects you).
Whatever you say Freud