Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Why do people with dogs -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 February 2014, 02:54 PM
  #91  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
Indeed. In nature, animals are pretty ruthless at dealing with perceived weakness.
One sometimes reads of fatal attacks by dogs on their owners, when their owners gave succumbed to an epileptic fit.
Similar kind of thing I guess.
I think in the context of the original post that you're mixing illnesses/weaknesses with babies - most animals can perceive if something is not-mature and react accordingly. How many times have you seen kittens playing with mature dogs, grown cats allowing chicks to climb over them even the folklore tales of wolves rearing human babies are part based on fact. As part of their natural defences newly born/young of most breeds give off a certain smell and tell tale signs and this includes babies. Dogs/cats and horses (of which I have a fair amount of experience) react very differently to babies and are much more tolerant of them.

I doubt very much in the instance as posted by the OP if the Malamute attacked the child as it thought it was weak and needed culling - more likely the dog was not used to being around young children and lack of supervision by the owner/parents led to a tragic situation.
Old 20 February 2014, 03:29 PM
  #92  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
I think in the context of the original post that you're mixing illnesses/weaknesses with babies - most animals can perceive if something is not-mature and react accordingly. How many times have you seen kittens playing with mature dogs, grown cats allowing chicks to climb over them even the folklore tales of wolves rearing human babies are part based on fact. As part of their natural defences newly born/young of most breeds give off a certain smell and tell tale signs and this includes babies. Dogs/cats and horses (of which I have a fair amount of experience) react very differently to babies and are much more tolerant of them.

I doubt very much in the instance as posted by the OP if the Malamute attacked the child as it thought it was weak and needed culling - more likely the dog was not used to being around young children and lack of supervision by the owner/parents led to a tragic situation.
I think you'll find that it is more likely than not that animals will kill the offspring of other species and sometimes their own if they're not their own!
Old 20 February 2014, 04:05 PM
  #93  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cookstar
I place my kids less at risk by smaller dogs, that don't have the capability to fit their faces in their jaws. And of they tried attacking they would be far easier to deal with with a heavy foot.

And by your own point about different types of dogs acting how you wouldn't expect, that just tells me that you can never be sure how any type of dog is going to behave, which confirms that it's probably best to just not trust any of them!

We've discussed this a couple of times before in the past, I'm not going to change your mind, and you not mine. I don't like dogs, you do, all I ask of dog owners is to not assume everyone likes them and wants to be subjected to them.
Not trying to change your mind mate. Was curious about your thought process.

A healthy respect for all dogs is something kids should be taught. Fear is a different thing though.
Old 20 February 2014, 04:20 PM
  #94  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jay-sti

Maybe I've come across as a dog hater here and I'm certainly not , let me explain my point further

A dog is an animal that CAN at anytime in a split second (for any number of unknown reasons ) act in a unpredictable aggressive manor

The only 100% guaranteed safe way to keep a dog with small children is to have them completely separated of ANY contact 100% of the time

No amount of "being careful" or "acting responsible" will give you that 100% guarantee that you child will come to no harm

The fact of matter is that you are taking a risk to your child's safety , many people are happy to take that risk , and that's there choice to make but IMO it's unnecessary

We had dogs growing up , i rolled around the house playing with our German shepherd from a puppy for 4 years , it slept in my bed , soft as **** , wouldn't hurt a fly , loved kids , we had a neighbour who got one from the same litter , we used to go round and play at there house/garden pretty much every day , again around the dogs , one day the neighbours dog grabbed me by the face and dragged me round the garden , very nearly lost my sight , my parents kicked the dog to get it off me and I was rushed to hospital

In those days things like that were never even reported a lot of the time , they had that dog for years and years and there's actually 4 kids that have been born and bought up around that dog since and as far as I know it's never gone for any of them , that's the point , there unpredictable
You are not coming accross as a dog hater mate, more like a health and safety nightmare. Do you work for the EU?

If you want 100% guarantee that no harm will come to your child you need to do more than get rid of the dog.

You'll need to place it in a locked padded cell. Better not buy it any toys, or a bycicle when its older. Or let it outside to play. I could go on.

I get it - you're not comfortable with having a dog and a child in the same place - fair enough. That's your perogative.

Personally I've got no problem with the concept provided the situation is supervised. We've got friends with small children and babies. They're quite happy for the dog to be around them. Would I ever leave them unsupervised? No. Would I let them be together supervised? Absolutely.

Any animal and any human can act in an unpredictable manner. Not just dogs. If you adopt your attitude you might as well never get out of bed.
Old 20 February 2014, 04:52 PM
  #95  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

As F1 said, they are all "old softies" and "wouldn't hurt a fly" until they lash out one day.

The amount of times I've been out at the park with my son and a dog's come running up to him is crazy. I always make sure I'm there between him and the dog before it gets there. Then you usually get the "don't worry, he loves kids" from the irresponsible owner. I'd like to think all the dogs I've had over the years wouldn't hurt someone elses child but I would never let my dog run up to a child, makes me very angry. If you have a dog and walk it out of control in areas where children are, you are out of order.

All these fashionable dogs are just ridiculous too. Years ago it was Staffies, now it's these Alaskan Malamutes, Japanese Akitas and the top chav choice.. The Husky.

See it all the time when I'm driving to work through rough areas, some dole scronging, work shy ****** looking like a model from JD sports being dragged along by a Husky trying to keep the 'elbows out, total prat' swagger while trying to keep a can of Stella upright and update facebook on his iphone. The dog's must really love the run of the 2 bed semi and 15ft rear garden. What makes me laugh is these dogs are expensive to buy and keep in decent food and the state is funding most of them.

I've nothing against specific dogs but I'd love to see a proper licence system for odd ball breeds.
Old 20 February 2014, 05:14 PM
  #96  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
Indeed. In nature, animals are pretty ruthless at dealing with perceived weakness.
One sometimes reads of fatal attacks by dogs on their owners, when their owners gave succumbed to an epileptic fit.
Similar kind of thing I guess.
Exactly, which is part of what I was trying to get at, as quoted further up the page, animals eg. big cats if the leader of of the pride is defeated all his off spring are killed by the new alfa male so as to induce the females to come on heat so that he can further his own line as opposed to feeding that of an other. I'm not saying this is the case here, but we as humans have spent so much of our existence up close and personal with the wolf and yet so many seem to not get the fact that we are essentially inviting a wolf into our homes when we get a domestic dog, as the saying goes " You can take the ****** out of the ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the ******" which i personally think is something that can be transposed onto dogs.

P.S I'm half black so I get to use the 'N' word for free.
Old 20 February 2014, 06:41 PM
  #97  
cster
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jameswrx

The amount of times I've been out at the park with my son and a dog's come running up to him is crazy. I always make sure I'm there between him and the dog before it gets there. Then you usually get the "don't worry, he loves kids" from the irresponsible owner.
Yes, I have given more than one dog a boot in the head in this circumstance.
It always surprises me how stupid some people are. I mean what are they thinking?
Old 20 February 2014, 07:09 PM
  #98  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
I think you'll find that it is more likely than not that animals will kill the offspring of other species and sometimes their own if they're not their own!
What a lovely image - maybe the lawyer for the couple in the OPs original post could use that as a defence.

This is "more likely" based upon your years of working in the African plains or the Amazonian rain forest as back here in the so-called civilised world I'm not aware of many occasions where domesticated animals eat their off-spring or those of other species ????
Old 20 February 2014, 07:52 PM
  #99  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
What a lovely image - maybe the lawyer for the couple in the OPs original post could use that as a defence.

This is "more likely" based upon your years of working in the African plains or the Amazonian rain forest as back here in the so-called civilised world I'm not aware of many occasions where domesticated animals eat their off-spring or those of other species ????
Cat's, magpies, crows, foxes, dogs to name a few.
Old 20 February 2014, 07:56 PM
  #100  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Cat's, magpies, crows, foxes, dogs to name a few.
Crikey I need to get out more ... in that case my apologies never seen it nor heard of it before today for "domestic animals"

Maybe we could teach a few of the benefit claimers to do the same could provide nourishment for them as well as reducing the number of future benefit seekers - see I knew cannibalism was good for something
Old 20 February 2014, 08:07 PM
  #101  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
What a lovely image - maybe the lawyer for the couple in the OPs original post could use that as a defence.

This is "more likely" based upon your years of working in the African plains or the Amazonian rain forest as back here in the so-called civilised world I'm not aware of many occasions where domesticated animals eat their off-spring or those of other species ????
Where did I say "eat"? The reason for this thread clearly has gone right over your head! A domesticated dog killed a baby, it's not the first time and it won't be the last.
Old 20 February 2014, 08:41 PM
  #102  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Where did I say "eat"? The reason for this thread clearly has gone right over your head! A domesticated dog killed a baby, it's not the first time and it won't be the last.
If you take the time to read, before jumping on your keyboard, you will find that I apologised at my lack of knowledge of events involving certain animals killing (eating, microwaving or boiling) the off-spring of other species and/or their own as it was not something I'd ever come across in the domestic animal world.

However I really don't believe for one single second that the reason that this Malamute killed this poor child was linked to your aforementioned "theory".

Just how many years experience have you actually got in owning, training and living with large powerful dogs or are your expert insights based solely upon things you've read?
Old 20 February 2014, 08:55 PM
  #103  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
If you take the time to read, before jumping on your keyboard, you will find that I apologised at my lack of knowledge of events involving certain animals killing (eating, microwaving or boiling) the off-spring of other species and/or their own as it was not something I'd ever come across in the domestic animal world.

However I really don't believe for one single second that the reason that this Malamute killed this poor child was linked to your aforementioned "theory".

Just how many years experience have you actually got in owning, training and living with large powerful dogs or are your expert insights based solely upon things you've read?
Not my "theory", it is a well known fact! I admit I have no experience in owning or training large powerful dogs, however, a close member of my family was a police dog handler for many years who raised 2 from puppies, who trained, lived and worked with them.
Old 20 February 2014, 09:00 PM
  #104  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Not my "theory", it is a well known fact! I admit I have no experience in owning or training large powerful dogs, however, a close member of my family was a police dog handler for many years who raised 2 from puppies, who trained, lived and worked with them.
Clearly not that well known as I've never heard of it.

So in short you've no personal experience whatsoever - yet you feel that this thread is over my head, lol
Old 20 February 2014, 09:11 PM
  #105  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
Clearly not that well known as I've never heard of it.

So in short you've no personal experience whatsoever - yet you feel that this thread is over my head, lol
Well evidence says yes, Did you not just say you lacked knowledge of events of certain animals killing the offspring of other animals and was something you've not come across in the domestic world? Is this thread not about a domesticated dog killing a baby?
Old 20 February 2014, 09:20 PM
  #106  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Well evidence says yes, Did you not just say you lacked knowledge of events of certain animals killing the offspring of other animals and was something you've not come across in the domestic world? Is this thread not about a domesticated dog killing a baby?
Yes I did indeed say that I was not aware of this event which by definition clarifies that it is not a "well known fact!"

This thread is about a large powerful domestic dog killing a baby but as you have neither experience of large powerful domestic dogs nor babies being killed by one and your input seems to be solely based upon things other people have experienced or you have read, forgive me for not finding the relevance or credence to your posts regarding the subject.
Old 20 February 2014, 09:33 PM
  #107  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
Yes I did indeed say that I was not aware of this event which by definition clarifies that it is not a "well known fact!"

This thread is about a large powerful domestic dog killing a baby but as you have neither experience of large powerful domestic dogs nor babies being killed by one and your input seems to be solely based upon things other people have experienced or you have read, forgive me for not finding the relevance or credence to your posts regarding the subject.
Well then if that is how you see it, unless you have had personal experience of large dogs killing babies other that what you have read, you're just as unlikely to find any relevance or credence to your own posts.

Last edited by jonc; 20 February 2014 at 09:36 PM.
Old 20 February 2014, 09:42 PM
  #108  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Well then if that is how you see it, unless you have had personal experience of large dogs killing babies other that what you have read, you're just as unlikely to find any relevance or credence to your own posts.
Incorrect, you choose to ignore the subdivision of the criteria.

I have many years experience of training and living with large powerful dogs and am extremely pleased to say that I have no experience of any of my dogs harming anyone other than when they were commanded to do so.

So my posts will have half relevance whereas yours will have none whatsoever
Old 20 February 2014, 10:20 PM
  #109  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I have many years raising three kids and pleased to say I my parenting has prevented them from the risk of being mauled by dogs, so my post too have relevance!
Old 20 February 2014, 10:25 PM
  #110  
LVC
Scooby Regular
 
LVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: France
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol I think we could go on forever
Old 20 February 2014, 10:39 PM
  #111  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Old 21 February 2014, 12:34 AM
  #112  
cster
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
lol I think we could go on forever
I think you should.
Old 21 February 2014, 06:08 AM
  #113  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVC
If you take the time to read, before jumping on your keyboard, you will find that I apologised at my lack of knowledge of events involving certain animals killing (eating, microwaving or boiling) the off-spring of other species and/or their own as it was not something I'd ever come across in the domestic animal world.

However I really don't believe for one single second that the reason that this Malamute killed this poor child was linked to your aforementioned "theory".

Just how many years experience have you actually got in owning, training and living with large powerful dogs or are your expert insights based solely upon things you've read?
Whilst not trying to stir the pot, well not too much I think it is linked via anthromurphythingymajig (sp) humanising animals is the problem here and it would appear a distinct lack of intelligence ( ohtheirony ) and understanding which always seems to be present in such cases.

The fact remains whether it be a Malamute, Pit bull or a Jack Russell they are all capable of killing a human and indeed have done so, so why on earth people still continue to leave their offspring in vulnerable situations with dogs is beyond me, you wouldn't leave your child with your pet Lion so why do it with your pet Wolf.

Then they blame the Wolf for acting like a Wolf.
Old 21 February 2014, 08:11 AM
  #114  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So let me get this right.

So dogs are great and lovable until they sense weakness at which point they will try to kill you as it's their natural instinct. WTF!

WMi - I told you Rabbits make better pets than dogs. Nobody has ever been hurt by a rabbit.
Old 21 February 2014, 09:19 AM
  #115  
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
So let me get this right.

So dogs are great and lovable until they sense weakness at which point they will try to kill you as it's their natural instinct. WTF!

WMi - I told you Rabbits make better pets than dogs. Nobody has ever been hurt by a rabbit.
That is absolutely not true.

Not even a year ago a friends rabbit drew blood when it nipped my finger.
Old 21 February 2014, 09:27 AM
  #116  
pimmo2000
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
pimmo2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On a small Island near France
Posts: 14,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

So to summarise:

Everyone is entitled to have a dog, some people dislike dogs and it's the responsibility of the dog owner to assume everyone dislikes them, unless told other wise.

It is also the assumption that no matter how friendly a dog, that they are a risk to a child and should never be left alone with one.

I'd also say that it's the responsibility of a parent to make sure their child has a respect for all animals and is aware of the risks, any parent bringing their child up to be fearful of dogs isn't doing a very good job.

It's also apparent that certain breeds of dog are associated with violence, which is down to the type of owners they have and have had through the years.
Old 21 February 2014, 10:36 AM
  #117  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
So let me get this right.

So dogs are great and lovable until they sense weakness at which point they will try to kill you as it's their natural instinct. WTF!

WMi - I told you Rabbits make better pets than dogs. Nobody has ever been hurt by a rabbit.
At the end of the day any animal can turn on it's keeper to a greater or lesser extent, even chickens can be pretty violent. As for rabbits they'er for the pot, they have no other purpose in life other than to make a great casserole.
Old 21 February 2014, 10:39 AM
  #118  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pimmo2000
So to summarise:

Everyone is entitled to have a dog, some people dislike dogs and it's the responsibility of the dog owner to assume everyone dislikes them, unless told other wise.

It is also the assumption that no matter how friendly a dog, that they are a risk to a child and should never be left alone with one.

I'd also say that it's the responsibility of a parent to make sure their child has a respect for all animals and is aware of the risks, any parent bringing their child up to be fearful of dogs isn't doing a very good job.

It's also apparent that certain breeds of dog are associated with violence, which is down to the type of owners they have and have had through the years.
My best mate feels exactly like that but insert the word children where you have put dog.
Old 21 February 2014, 10:51 AM
  #119  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
At the end of the day any animal can turn on it's keeper to a greater or lesser extent, even chickens can be pretty violent. As for rabbits they'er for the pot, they have no other purpose in life other than to make a great casserole.
They also do a cracking job at keeping weeds and grass in the garden at bay. Their poop fertilizes the soil.
Old 21 February 2014, 10:51 AM
  #120  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cookstar
That is absolutely not true.

Not even a year ago a friends rabbit drew blood when it nipped my finger.


I hope you put it down after that!


Quick Reply: Why do people with dogs -



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.