Missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 - question?
12 March 2014, 11:27 PM
#121
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The plane is being hidden by a.cloaking device...
http://beforeitsnews.com/events/2014...d-2432744.html
http://beforeitsnews.com/events/2014...d-2432744.html
13 March 2014, 09:10 AM
#122
Just seen on BBC breakfast that an object (which they think is wreckage), up to 25 meters long has been pictured in the ocean from satellite images and the Chinese have sent planes over to investigate. The object is just on the outside of the current search area and could have drifted even further.
13 March 2014, 12:43 PM
#123
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just seen on BBC breakfast that an object (which they think is wreckage), up to 25 meters long has been pictured in the ocean from satellite images and the Chinese have sent planes over to investigate. The object is just on the outside of the current search area and could have drifted even further.
Also the datalink to RR in Derby has apparently received data which shows the engines still running 4 hours after the disappearance. Everything released in the media at the moment could be true or false, chinese whispers, made up professionals etc.
Something strange is going on and I recon more is known than we're being told, but unless the plane is discovered intact and the people onboard recovered dead or alive, we'll never know if we've been told the full story.
13 March 2014, 01:25 PM
#125
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you assume it crashed elsewhere, why would radar have been lost so early on, are you suggesting 2 seperate and extremely rare incidents occured at 2 different times on the same flight? Big coincidence, of course a lot of the crap people have said, inc media is obviously going to be untrue, we need someone with tangible proof to put this to rest.
13 March 2014, 01:48 PM
#126
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding the engines. I watched a similar report on breakfast tv this morning, it was pointed out though that if the plane was flying for another four hours it would be very unlikely that it would avoid some form of radar detection.
Nik.
Nik.
I read that they have confirmed there's nothing there, and the had already searched this area.
Also the datalink to RR in Derby has apparently received data which shows the engines still running 4 hours after the disappearance. Everything released in the media at the moment could be true or false, chinese whispers, made up professionals etc.
Something strange is going on and I recon more is known than we're being told, but unless the plane is discovered intact and the people onboard recovered dead or alive, we'll never know if we've been told the full story.
Also the datalink to RR in Derby has apparently received data which shows the engines still running 4 hours after the disappearance. Everything released in the media at the moment could be true or false, chinese whispers, made up professionals etc.
Something strange is going on and I recon more is known than we're being told, but unless the plane is discovered intact and the people onboard recovered dead or alive, we'll never know if we've been told the full story.
13 March 2014, 01:53 PM
#127
Not being able to locate a crashed aircraft isn't a one off, if does happen.
The likelyhood is they are looking in the wrong place. They don't seem to be very well organised out there. It took 5 days to locate the wreckage from the Air France A330 in 2009.
The reality is that the technology isn't as good as we assume it to be.
The likelyhood is they are looking in the wrong place. They don't seem to be very well organised out there. It took 5 days to locate the wreckage from the Air France A330 in 2009.
The reality is that the technology isn't as good as we assume it to be.
13 March 2014, 02:07 PM
#128
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not being able to locate a crashed aircraft isn't a one off, if does happen.
The likelyhood is they are looking in the wrong place. They don't seem to be very well organised out there. It took 5 days to locate the wreckage from the Air France A330 in 2009.
The reality is that the technology isn't as good as we assume it to be.
The likelyhood is they are looking in the wrong place. They don't seem to be very well organised out there. It took 5 days to locate the wreckage from the Air France A330 in 2009.
The reality is that the technology isn't as good as we assume it to be.
13 March 2014, 02:16 PM
#129
13 March 2014, 02:21 PM
#130
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read that they have confirmed there's nothing there, and the had already searched this area.
Also the datalink to RR in Derby has apparently received data which shows the engines still running 4 hours after the disappearance. Everything released in the media at the moment could be true or false, chinese whispers, made up professionals etc.
Something strange is going on and I recon more is known than we're being told, but unless the plane is discovered intact and the people onboard recovered dead or alive, we'll never know if we've been told the full story.
Also the datalink to RR in Derby has apparently received data which shows the engines still running 4 hours after the disappearance. Everything released in the media at the moment could be true or false, chinese whispers, made up professionals etc.
Something strange is going on and I recon more is known than we're being told, but unless the plane is discovered intact and the people onboard recovered dead or alive, we'll never know if we've been told the full story.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ane-flew-hours
14 March 2014, 12:26 PM
#135
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
I've got autohelm on my boat, but once you unclip the power,you're on your own
14 March 2014, 03:01 PM
#136
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.breaking News
Searchers of the missing Malaysian plane have found the Wings.. Mr and Mrs Wing say they don't know where the plane is though.
Searchers of the missing Malaysian plane have found the Wings.. Mr and Mrs Wing say they don't know where the plane is though.
PLANE wong
14 March 2014, 11:17 PM
#140
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014...6pLid%3D249946
A student from Stanford University has touted a theory about what happened to the missing Malaysian Airlines plane, suggesting a slow decompression may have caused passengers and pilot to suffocate without even knowing.
Andrew Aude, a computer science student, who "considered studying Aerospace engineering", theorised there was a likely fuselage failure near the antenna adapter, disabling all or some of the plane's GPS and other satellite and radar communication systems.
"Thus," Aude explains on his Tumblr post, "only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm [nautical mile], and is generally ineffective at high altitudes."
Andrew Aude, a computer science student, who "considered studying Aerospace engineering", theorised there was a likely fuselage failure near the antenna adapter, disabling all or some of the plane's GPS and other satellite and radar communication systems.
"Thus," Aude explains on his Tumblr post, "only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm [nautical mile], and is generally ineffective at high altitudes."
15 March 2014, 08:56 AM
#142
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The PM said last contact was at 08:11 local via an automated system, which considering it took off around 01:30 its gone a long, long way.
If it flew over India / Pakistan then it would defo show on radar.
What worries me is that the aircraft has a max range of around 9000 miles or around 17 hours, so if they managed to get some extra fuel in the range of the aircraft could be well into Iran or it could have even flown west for a few hours, then turned back and gone to somewhere like N Korea. It could even have been flown towards Europe and shot down for all we know.
I also wonder if it was carrying some high value cargo, cash or gold maybe?
If it flew over India / Pakistan then it would defo show on radar.
What worries me is that the aircraft has a max range of around 9000 miles or around 17 hours, so if they managed to get some extra fuel in the range of the aircraft could be well into Iran or it could have even flown west for a few hours, then turned back and gone to somewhere like N Korea. It could even have been flown towards Europe and shot down for all we know.
I also wonder if it was carrying some high value cargo, cash or gold maybe?
15 March 2014, 09:49 AM
#144
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All we know for sure is that at 00:41 it took off, at around 01:30 most systems that communicate with the outside world were turned off, one at a time and as of 08:11hrs on Saturday morning it was still flying.
It could have flown for a further 8 hours or so - if they had enough fuel. They have yet to say how much fuel was actually taken on at KL.
It could have flown for a further 8 hours or so - if they had enough fuel. They have yet to say how much fuel was actually taken on at KL.
15 March 2014, 10:14 AM
#146
Instructing with fear
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Www.Extreme-rally.co.uk
Posts: 5,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It's taken over a week for them to admit it's been possibly hi-jacked and seeing as there is no claims of responsibility or demands for ransom you have to wonder if they have achieved their goals yet.
15 March 2014, 10:29 AM
#149