has any one made close to 450 on standard engine n box
#92
I found the KUNT thing amusing tho
I think the troglodyte applys more to daly.88 with his under developed brain and caveman writing style LOL
PMSL
Last edited by nizmo80; 17 March 2014 at 03:39 AM.
#95
Mmmm well how am I going to reply to this
Right I didnt start taking the **** until ricey spat the dummy out !
once he did then it was fair game.
As for you Daly.88 you came on the thread all guns blazing and were all flash and no bang !
you really need to take a minute and think out what you are writing so you dont come across as a retard as I suspect you are.
And I am not moaning just pointing out how retarded the way you put your points across are and laughing at it as well
Right I didnt start taking the **** until ricey spat the dummy out !
once he did then it was fair game.
As for you Daly.88 you came on the thread all guns blazing and were all flash and no bang !
you really need to take a minute and think out what you are writing so you dont come across as a retard as I suspect you are.
And I am not moaning just pointing out how retarded the way you put your points across are and laughing at it as well
#96
I am not disappointed in the slightest but I am totally LMFAO that you are denying it.
#97
ah your just boring the **** of me now with your "retard" comments your the one thats banging on about the way im writing its plain to see your the retard i could stay here all night writing **** to you but i couldn be bothered you pissed me off with your smart **** other than that i wouldn have bothered simple as that
Last edited by nizmo80; 17 March 2014 at 03:52 AM.
#98
This thread and forum is done!!!
#99
#100
#101
I dont think I am lethal on my laptop as there is nothing lethal about outsmarting a braindead caveman like yourself on a internet forum you fecking knuckle dragger
#102
please tell or show me how you have outsmarted me you said one thing about the way i write on this post WOW you must be some sort of a genius.. you keep referring to me in other posts did i hit a nerve mate..
#103
#111
OH MY DAYZ!!! I fought I wud have a katch up dis mrning n see how dis Fred woz going but their is such a lot of propa inglish and no full stopz so I ran out of bref n then I forgot howz to spell u is all retardz so I is going back to talk to my mates laterz #@<#tardz!!!!!
Oh dear. I was always told, silly questions will only get you silly answers!
Oh dear. I was always told, silly questions will only get you silly answers!
#112
Instructing with fear
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,101
Likes: 1
From: Www.Extreme-rally.co.uk
Had my 03 blobeye wrx mapped on monday by andy forrest. " awesome fella" the car made a good 386hp and 383lbft on the road. He says it well come up more on the roller as no elements .
im well happy just wondered has anyone on standard internals and box made close to 450 mark?
john
im well happy just wondered has anyone on standard internals and box made close to 450 mark?
john
If you use mechanical sympathy and the car has been well looked after who knows it may hold it own and prove an exception to the rule.
#114
I read the first post, as I felt I could offer some figures too.
Then I read the rest of the thread. I'll keep it simple.
From MY experience, my previous car - UK300, had been modified thus;
Full refurbished brembos, BC coilovers, Whiteline ARB's, Drop links, full geometry setup.
VF43 turbo, 560cc injectors, sti9 intercooler, Green panel filter, 3 inch turbo back exhaust system, 3 port solenoid, Walbro pump and FSE FPR.
As well as some other tasteful mods, to keep her looking as clean, presentable and original as possible, whilst utilising other parts to improve on what she was already.
The car had been mapped prior to my ownership, on standard everything by Trackhound, who has now moved overseas.
I had it mapped with Trackhound, and this is the figures it made, to which I received the proof via email.
Low boost at 0.9 bar, 285bhp with 265 ft/lb torque
High boost at 1.45 bar, 386bhp with 378 ft.lb torque.
I never ran the car on low boost, as this was my 'alternative' setting.
It ran without missing a beat for over a year before we parted company. It was used as a daily driver, with some normal and spirited driving. I never had any issues with engine internals or gearbox. The car when it left, was sitting on 98k.
The engine is now running in a rally car over in Switzerland, with no issues at all, still.
My current bug, which was rebuily at 69k before I got her, will be running close to 420bhp on standard internals until later this year once my new engine has been built and fitted.
Again, I expect no issues at all. As far as I am aware, the standard box, can cope comfortably with UP to 450bhp, dependent of driving style etc. HOWEVER it was recommended a 6 speed box would be more beneficial.
Hope this helps
Then I read the rest of the thread. I'll keep it simple.
From MY experience, my previous car - UK300, had been modified thus;
Full refurbished brembos, BC coilovers, Whiteline ARB's, Drop links, full geometry setup.
VF43 turbo, 560cc injectors, sti9 intercooler, Green panel filter, 3 inch turbo back exhaust system, 3 port solenoid, Walbro pump and FSE FPR.
As well as some other tasteful mods, to keep her looking as clean, presentable and original as possible, whilst utilising other parts to improve on what she was already.
The car had been mapped prior to my ownership, on standard everything by Trackhound, who has now moved overseas.
I had it mapped with Trackhound, and this is the figures it made, to which I received the proof via email.
Low boost at 0.9 bar, 285bhp with 265 ft/lb torque
High boost at 1.45 bar, 386bhp with 378 ft.lb torque.
I never ran the car on low boost, as this was my 'alternative' setting.
It ran without missing a beat for over a year before we parted company. It was used as a daily driver, with some normal and spirited driving. I never had any issues with engine internals or gearbox. The car when it left, was sitting on 98k.
The engine is now running in a rally car over in Switzerland, with no issues at all, still.
My current bug, which was rebuily at 69k before I got her, will be running close to 420bhp on standard internals until later this year once my new engine has been built and fitted.
Again, I expect no issues at all. As far as I am aware, the standard box, can cope comfortably with UP to 450bhp, dependent of driving style etc. HOWEVER it was recommended a 6 speed box would be more beneficial.
Hope this helps
#115
Later hawk 5 speed box is a little stronger than previous 5 speed boxes. I know someone who was running 380bhp 410lb/ft on his standard 2.5 WRX engine & 5 speed. No idea how long that lasted as he sold the car almost immediately (And bought a 2.0 STI instead). lol
#116
I read the first post, as I felt I could offer some figures too.
Then I read the rest of the thread. I'll keep it simple.
From MY experience, my previous car - UK300, had been modified thus;
Full refurbished brembos, BC coilovers, Whiteline ARB's, Drop links, full geometry setup.
VF43 turbo, 560cc injectors, sti9 intercooler, Green panel filter, 3 inch turbo back exhaust system, 3 port solenoid, Walbro pump and FSE FPR.
As well as some other tasteful mods, to keep her looking as clean, presentable and original as possible, whilst utilising other parts to improve on what she was already.
The car had been mapped prior to my ownership, on standard everything by Trackhound, who has now moved overseas.
I had it mapped with Trackhound, and this is the figures it made, to which I received the proof via email.
Low boost at 0.9 bar, 285bhp with 265 ft/lb torque
High boost at 1.45 bar, 386bhp with 378 ft.lb torque.
I never ran the car on low boost, as this was my 'alternative' setting.
It ran without missing a beat for over a year before we parted company. It was used as a daily driver, with some normal and spirited driving. I never had any issues with engine internals or gearbox. The car when it left, was sitting on 98k.
The engine is now running in a rally car over in Switzerland, with no issues at all, still.
My current bug, which was rebuily at 69k before I got her, will be running close to 420bhp on standard internals until later this year once my new engine has been built and fitted.
Again, I expect no issues at all. As far as I am aware, the standard box, can cope comfortably with UP to 450bhp, dependent of driving style etc. HOWEVER it was recommended a 6 speed box would be more beneficial.
Hope this helps
Then I read the rest of the thread. I'll keep it simple.
From MY experience, my previous car - UK300, had been modified thus;
Full refurbished brembos, BC coilovers, Whiteline ARB's, Drop links, full geometry setup.
VF43 turbo, 560cc injectors, sti9 intercooler, Green panel filter, 3 inch turbo back exhaust system, 3 port solenoid, Walbro pump and FSE FPR.
As well as some other tasteful mods, to keep her looking as clean, presentable and original as possible, whilst utilising other parts to improve on what she was already.
The car had been mapped prior to my ownership, on standard everything by Trackhound, who has now moved overseas.
I had it mapped with Trackhound, and this is the figures it made, to which I received the proof via email.
Low boost at 0.9 bar, 285bhp with 265 ft/lb torque
High boost at 1.45 bar, 386bhp with 378 ft.lb torque.
I never ran the car on low boost, as this was my 'alternative' setting.
It ran without missing a beat for over a year before we parted company. It was used as a daily driver, with some normal and spirited driving. I never had any issues with engine internals or gearbox. The car when it left, was sitting on 98k.
The engine is now running in a rally car over in Switzerland, with no issues at all, still.
My current bug, which was rebuily at 69k before I got her, will be running close to 420bhp on standard internals until later this year once my new engine has been built and fitted.
Again, I expect no issues at all. As far as I am aware, the standard box, can cope comfortably with UP to 450bhp, dependent of driving style etc. HOWEVER it was recommended a 6 speed box would be more beneficial.
Hope this helps
Boll0cks.....maybe for 10 mims but driven properly no way
#117
However, "driven properly"
I use the car for daily driving, it doesn't get tracked or sprinted. I do occasionally enjoy "spirited driving" as many of us do.
As I said, it would be recommended for a 6 speed box, if I was going to use the car for anything other than what it is already. The 754 box is strong, and as was said the newer 5 speed again, stronger.
The car will, eventually go 6 speed, once the engine is complete, but until then, the 5 speed will be fine for what it will be running
#118
If that's your opinion, then that's fine.
However, "driven gingerly"
I use the car for daily driving, it doesn't get tracked or sprinted. I do occasionally enjoy "spirited driving" as many of us do.
As I said, it would be recommended for a 6 speed box, if I was going to use the car for anything other than what it is already. The 754 box is strong, and as was said the newer 5 speed again, stronger.
The car will, eventually go 6 speed, once the engine is complete, but until then, the 5 speed will be fine for what it will be running
However, "driven gingerly"
I use the car for daily driving, it doesn't get tracked or sprinted. I do occasionally enjoy "spirited driving" as many of us do.
As I said, it would be recommended for a 6 speed box, if I was going to use the car for anything other than what it is already. The 754 box is strong, and as was said the newer 5 speed again, stronger.
The car will, eventually go 6 speed, once the engine is complete, but until then, the 5 speed will be fine for what it will be running
#119
#120