Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

AD DNS design.. look at this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 December 2004, 05:05 PM
  #1  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default AD DNS design.. look at this



how would you configure dns in this environment?

Each circle is a different domain, we want the foreign site to be able to resolve machines on other sites..

At the moment I have delegated the uk.companyname.local dns to a different server IYSWIM..

however this works fine, with FQDN's but not for others (obviously)

Whats the recommended way of doing this, and we dont want to run dns in the companyname.local domain as this wont exist on every site in the uk. where as the uk.companyname.local will.

Any tips, suggestions?

Sorry to be vauge, but its late in the day.

We host nothing public internally (all our entries are hosted on the isp's servers)

David
Old 20 December 2004, 08:45 PM
  #2  
Kieran_Burns
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Kieran_Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First question: different domains, but same forest therefore sub-domains?

cos then it's simply AD integrated....

Plus do you only want the top domain (the one connected to the 'net) to be resolving external names, or can any do that?

Ah hang on... different primary domains (I should loook closer)...

Ummm... AD integrated for each site - secondaries for each primary server to the primary on the other sites... but still the question of external resolution...
Old 20 December 2004, 09:47 PM
  #3  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

AD integrated is fine, however the uk.companyname.local domain is the only one that is going to be at everysite (each site will have a dc in this domain) however the top level domain will only be based at our head office and key sites, but this is the one we want to providing the internet based resolution..

the foreign site also needs to be able resolve uk based clients.

Same Forest though.

David
Old 20 December 2004, 10:10 PM
  #4  
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
KiwiGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2000 or 2003 AD?

DNS zone for companyname.local should be in the root domain. Then delegate zones for uk.company.local and foreignsite.companyname.local to DNS servers (DCs) in each child domain. Then set up relication between all the DCs for the AD Integrated zones onall the DCs. Remember it is still DNS so the structure can exist independantly of the AD structure.

Root domain then has the ISP DNS servers listed in root hints. (Or in our case we have the root AD domain as the root (.) DNS zone. External DNS is done through the proxy server)

If using 2003 set up a separate application partition for DNS that will get replicated to all DCs acting as DNS servers.
Old 20 December 2004, 10:47 PM
  #5  
what would scooby do
Scooby Senior
 
what would scooby do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 52 Festive Road
Posts: 28,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

alternatively.... have a w4nk LOL , pay some mug to do it for yah
Old 21 December 2004, 09:16 AM
  #6  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

unfortunatley we are paid to do it, yet we would like to implement it in the best way possible, not the worst way.

Whats the difference between using the root hints and the forwarders?

companyname.local is in the root domain, and I have delegated the UK domain.

It may be replication I havent set up properly.. I think you tend to treat it as AD and DNS rather than DNS in ad. Ill have a look at the replication settings.

David
Old 21 December 2004, 09:54 AM
  #7  
Jeff Wiltshire
Scooby Regular
 
Jeff Wiltshire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 412 Wheel HP Audi RS4
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
unfortunatley we are paid to do it, yet we would like to implement it in the best way possible, not the worst way.

Whats the difference between using the root hints and the forwarders?

companyname.local is in the root domain, and I have delegated the UK domain.

It may be replication I havent set up properly.. I think you tend to treat it as AD and DNS rather than DNS in ad. Ill have a look at the replication settings.

David
Root Hints are used for recursion (ie from the root servers down). This will mean that the DNS is responible for it's own resolution. Forwarders are used for iterative lookups where your DNS asks another DNS (typically your ISPs) to resolve the name for you. Look up iteration and recursion for a better description.

I assume that the real issue is that the 2 child domains cannot resolve hosts in the other child without using FQDN ?

Have a look here

http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...owDnsWorks.asp

Trending Topics

Old 21 December 2004, 10:34 AM
  #8  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yes, the issue is that the child domains need to use FQDN's, however we were planning on just using forwarders on the root servers for internet resolution as thats the way it worked before (IE NT4).
Old 21 December 2004, 12:20 PM
  #9  
roblane
Scooby Regular
 
roblane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
yes, the issue is that the child domains need to use FQDN's, however we were planning on just using forwarders on the root servers for internet resolution as thats the way it worked before (IE NT4).
To add to what Jeff said then... If you want a client in your "foreign" domain to be able to resolve a host in the UK domain without using the FQDN of that host then assuming you have

i) NO netbios name resolution (WINS) in the environment


ii) the client resolver pointing at a DNS which either holds the UK.mycompany.local zone or can fwd a query to that zone

you'll simply need the clients to be configured with an appropriate dns suffix search list.
e.g

foreign.mycompany.local
uk.mycompany.local
mycompany.local
Old 21 December 2004, 12:28 PM
  #10  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was thinking that..

WINS is not installed as yet as this is a test environment, and we need to be able to do lookups for non WINS enabled hosts.. such as Unix etc.

The main problem we are having is finding the recommended way of doing it..

The root domain is a native 2003 fresh install, so with DNS integrated, we are assuming we then need to tell this to replicate to all servers within the forrest, or just within the domain.

the foreigndomain will also be a new install, do we initially use the root servers as the DNS servers whilst installing, or install a new dns server at the same time? or do we create the delegation before building the domain?

The uk domain is to be an NT4 domain which is being upgraded, from what we can tell we need this to be 'interim mode' - no 2000 dc's, one nt4 dc need to remain for 2 months or so..

We are currently testing in a test lab so Im free to try anything, I have 3 lans / subnets with routing configured and a dedicated internet connection (to provide external dns resolution)

Any suggestions from the beginning.. this is something the MS courses were very 'light' on and its a long time since.

David
Old 21 December 2004, 01:42 PM
  #11  
Jeff Wiltshire
Scooby Regular
 
Jeff Wiltshire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 412 Wheel HP Audi RS4
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Either, as Rob suggested, WINS/Domain suffix or you need to use FQDN. The 'correct' way of doing this will be FQDN....it's also the one the users will hate the most.
Old 21 December 2004, 03:26 PM
  #12  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

argh..

http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...pCltConfig.asp

so we cant even configure the suffixes via DHCP as it says..

A list of DNS suffixes to be appended for use in completing unqualified DNS names used for searching and submitting DNS queries at the client for resolution.
For DHCP clients, this can be set by assigning the DNS domain name option (option 15) and providing single DNS suffix for the client to append and use in searches. To configure additional DNS suffixes, configure TCP/IP manually for DNS configuration.
FQDN's for everything

David
Old 21 December 2004, 03:45 PM
  #13  
Jeff Wiltshire
Scooby Regular
 
Jeff Wiltshire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 412 Wheel HP Audi RS4
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You have to remember that this is the way DNS works. The only time that they will actually need FQDN internally is if they cross from 1 child domain to the other.


The only other alternative is to put everything in the same DNS zone (xxx.yourcompany.local) and not have the sub-domains.
Old 21 December 2004, 04:11 PM
  #14  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

True..

I think im just assuming it can do what we have been told it 'should' do..

with replication configured it seems much better... still playing around though, so any suggestions are welcome.
Old 21 December 2004, 06:36 PM
  #15  
roblane
Scooby Regular
 
roblane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jeff's suggestion is an excellent one.

Ultimately your forest will all be Windows 2003 so having a single mycompany.local zone with subdomains for foreign and uk is perfectly reasonable especially if you change the replication scope of the zone to "All DNS Servers in the Active Directory Forest".

The only downside of this approach is possibly an increase in replication traffic - all hosts will be registering in a single zone which will be replicated to all sites. In practice this is usually far outweighed by the benefit of not having DNS lookups crossing the WAN.

If you're going to have an NT4 only environment then as you know you will need wins for a while.

As for recommended ways to do it - well the DNS infrastructure has historically been in the remit of the unix folks so I guess the classic would be separate zones for each domain with appropriate fwding & search suffixes. Happy to be educated there.

Most big orgs still do it that way but in a greenfield site or as they move to 2003 the forest wide dns zones is definitely the way to go.

You'll still want the search suffixes tho and you CAN do them very easily via group policy. (Computer / Admin template / network /dns clients). So that'll work for your Windows clients assuming they're XP or better...If not you can use the techniques described in Q275553
Old 21 December 2004, 09:03 PM
  #16  
Jeff Wiltshire
Scooby Regular
 
Jeff Wiltshire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 412 Wheel HP Audi RS4
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

David


The way I would do it is....

Work out the hosts that you actually need the users to resolve (there are probable very few once you have discounted the workstations) and manually add the to the top level DNS domain. If you really want to you can manually add them to the 2 child domains as well. Use the same name and IP addresses across all the domains to remain consistant.

Your probable talking about less than 20 addresses so it's an easy fix........
Old 22 December 2004, 09:34 AM
  #17  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your probable talking about less than 20 addresses so it's an easy fix........
LMFAO..

I fookin wish..

8000+ Users + 100's of clients all with their own systems..

Workstations arent a problem as they can use wins to resolve.

We use DNS to get to there systems as each client is on their own net / router behind a pix.. all to complicated..

I Know what you are saying and I can do that, but I think what I will do for the important ones is just keep the existing zone (could allways do some cname records for the ones that cant be changed to fqdn's)

Eitherway aint my problem
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JV
Computer & Technology Related
4
04 September 2003 03:15 PM
Stueyb
Computer & Technology Related
18
01 May 2003 12:11 PM
ozzy
Computer & Technology Related
7
27 March 2003 03:52 PM
DazV
Computer & Technology Related
18
07 October 2002 10:24 AM
BrownDot
Computer & Technology Related
3
22 January 2002 03:00 PM



Quick Reply: AD DNS design.. look at this



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 AM.