PC or Mac?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California, USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PC or Mac?
I'm currently deciding on which computer to get used mainly for product design: adobe illustrator/photoshop. But will be used for video as well. What are the drawbacks to each? Would it be wise to get a Dell rather than a G5? Thanks.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bore Knee Muff
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can afford the difference, get a G5 with a nice cinema screen...
Dell will be loads cheaper though.
In terms of software, if you really are only going to use Adobe or Microshaft stuff then you'll be fine. Web and mail is no different, most files will work crossplatform.
The most common problem I would guess is you can't (without PC anywhere) open Access databases on the G5.
I have a G5 and visit a client with Dell PCs, there is no way earth I would swap my G5 for a Dell. Get at the very least 1gb of RAM, ideally 2gb either way you go.
The Dell (1gb RAM) has been having quite serious issues with Photoshop CS though, takes ages to load and crashes regularly, I don't use it as much on the Mac though so can't comment. The problem maybe due to having roaming profiles and copying all the browser thumbnails around though.
Anyway, you ask a Mac person and they will say Mac - Ask a PC person and they'll say PC so the best thing is to try a Mac, you may hate it. If you've not used one before, go with an open mind, most people who are anti-mac have never really used one for long enough IMHO
Dell will be loads cheaper though.
In terms of software, if you really are only going to use Adobe or Microshaft stuff then you'll be fine. Web and mail is no different, most files will work crossplatform.
The most common problem I would guess is you can't (without PC anywhere) open Access databases on the G5.
I have a G5 and visit a client with Dell PCs, there is no way earth I would swap my G5 for a Dell. Get at the very least 1gb of RAM, ideally 2gb either way you go.
The Dell (1gb RAM) has been having quite serious issues with Photoshop CS though, takes ages to load and crashes regularly, I don't use it as much on the Mac though so can't comment. The problem maybe due to having roaming profiles and copying all the browser thumbnails around though.
Anyway, you ask a Mac person and they will say Mac - Ask a PC person and they'll say PC so the best thing is to try a Mac, you may hate it. If you've not used one before, go with an open mind, most people who are anti-mac have never really used one for long enough IMHO
#3
Definitely Mac, if you are a professional then all the businesses you deal with in that industry will usually have Macs so you will never have problems with files and compatibility etc.
#4
Definately get a mac. I work in a college which specialises in Graphics, Art and Design and Music. Mac's are industry standard and everybody uses them. Plus, its less money to Micro$oft who shouldn't be getting anyones money because of their poor software.
Another reason to buy a Mac is that the user interface is more more accessable. It looks good and functions even better. Its more secure because not many people are writing virus' for them and the code infastructure is more efficient. A 800Mhz Mac is about the equivelent in speed and efficiency as a Pc with double that power. I have had an iBook for over two years and I've never had to format or anything. Mac make all components 'in house' (if you get most Pc's, the hardrive will come from Lacie, the CD writer from Sony etc.) therefore it all works better as a package.
Also with using Mac's you find that everything works a little better than usual. Printers are automatically found, easily updatable and personally I think Mac will become the new system in most homes due to the quality of the hardware and software compared to Windows frequently unfinished and shoddy OS.
Plus, Mac's look great to look at - Design at the heart
Another reason to buy a Mac is that the user interface is more more accessable. It looks good and functions even better. Its more secure because not many people are writing virus' for them and the code infastructure is more efficient. A 800Mhz Mac is about the equivelent in speed and efficiency as a Pc with double that power. I have had an iBook for over two years and I've never had to format or anything. Mac make all components 'in house' (if you get most Pc's, the hardrive will come from Lacie, the CD writer from Sony etc.) therefore it all works better as a package.
Also with using Mac's you find that everything works a little better than usual. Printers are automatically found, easily updatable and personally I think Mac will become the new system in most homes due to the quality of the hardware and software compared to Windows frequently unfinished and shoddy OS.
Plus, Mac's look great to look at - Design at the heart
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If money is no object, I'd maybe get a Mac, otherwise I'd get a PC. Don't listen to what other people are saying about shoddy software on the PC. It is perfectly possible to build a very stable, reliable and quick PC.
I myself use Adobe Photoshop CS2, Premiere Pro 1.5, Encore DVD, After Effects 6.5, Newtek Lightwave 8 and a host of other software on my PC, and I've never had a software or operating system crash with any of this stuff since I built the machine. It's quick as well, and cost a fraction of the price of a Mac. Once you know what you are doing, the user interface is very easy to customise and is (in my opinion), just as easy to use as OSX. It's just different.
From a design point of view, Macs look quite nice (although personally I'm not a big fan), but anyone who makes a business decision about hardware based on the design of the case needs to be removed from the decision making process rather quickly imo
I myself use Adobe Photoshop CS2, Premiere Pro 1.5, Encore DVD, After Effects 6.5, Newtek Lightwave 8 and a host of other software on my PC, and I've never had a software or operating system crash with any of this stuff since I built the machine. It's quick as well, and cost a fraction of the price of a Mac. Once you know what you are doing, the user interface is very easy to customise and is (in my opinion), just as easy to use as OSX. It's just different.
From a design point of view, Macs look quite nice (although personally I'm not a big fan), but anyone who makes a business decision about hardware based on the design of the case needs to be removed from the decision making process rather quickly imo
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jake
The main issue here is fonts. If you have to use certains faces they are not always cut for windows.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can quite happily edit video in Premiere, (including marking chapters, 5.1 channel mixes etc), create dvd menus in photoshop before importing into encore etc. It all works very well together. Can't imagine how it could really be any easier or seamless with them all being in the same program.
p.s. I got the whole Adobe video editing suite (Premiere pro 1.5, Encore Dvd, After Effects 6.5, and Audition), including a hardware accelerated capture / output board (a Matrox RT.X100 Xtreme Pro) for about £760. I see that on Apples web site, Final cut pro is £899, so based on that, I think the PC can compete quite nicely on price
Same on the PC. My machine has 1Gb of ram and it runs very nicely indeed, even with huge images. Not sure how much you need on a Mac to do the same, but I suspect it is similar.
Can you explain what you mean by genuine workflow?
I still believe the PC is a more economical choice, but in reality I suspect the difference between the two different formats is actually very small at the end of the day, and more down to personal preference than anything else.
p.s. I got the whole Adobe video editing suite (Premiere pro 1.5, Encore Dvd, After Effects 6.5, and Audition), including a hardware accelerated capture / output board (a Matrox RT.X100 Xtreme Pro) for about £760. I see that on Apples web site, Final cut pro is £899, so based on that, I think the PC can compete quite nicely on price
Photoshop on OSX is about the same as PC its very much dependant on RAM with OSX so bear that in mind. If you have enough RAM, then Photoshop and Castrator will run beautifully.
When in a genuine workflow, the Photoshop/Final Cut/DVD Studio integration is perfect. Slicker than even Adobe Premier to Photoshop.
I'm a Mac guy so I will obviously be biased towards this option but from what you are asking then the Mac is the intelligent and believe it or not economical choice.
Last edited by Iain Young; 13 September 2005 at 12:03 AM.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you've not used one before, go with an open mind, most people who are anti-mac have never really used one for long enough IMHO
Both are great tools in the right hands. Part of the problem with the pc is that they are not made by one manufacturer, and so you get well made ones and very badly made ones. A good pc can easily work, look and behave every bit as good as a mac.
Best thing to do is to go to an Apple store, and try one yourself to see if it's what you are after. If so, then get one. If not, get a good pc instead
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by angrynorth
quotes removed at request of Andy
I know of a load of people (more from the computer graphics / animation arena than the video editing folks) which have moved to the PC from the mac because of the relative cheapness of processing power when compared to the Mac. Especially apparent when building render farms etc.
As you say though, personal preference...
Last edited by Iain Young; 13 September 2005 at 12:04 AM.
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California, USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to all for the replies. I have a friend who does major Photoshop work and has been working with Macs professionally for 8 years. He says go PC with dual core processors, since it's faster. But issues with video on PC's left me unconvinced. Then again, it could be because the one with the PC doesn't really know how to use it. I suppose it goes down to what clients and suppliers use to prevent any compatibility issues. Again, like above...it also has to do with how much RAM you have.
How good is Final Cut Pro to Adobe Premiere?
How good is Final Cut Pro to Adobe Premiere?
#18
Scooby Regular
FCP - blows Premiere out of the water (IMHO).
I found Adobe really awkward to use..........
FCP just makes more sense (to me) - however IIRC, Mac only...........
Dan
I found Adobe really awkward to use..........
FCP just makes more sense (to me) - however IIRC, Mac only...........
Dan
#19
A PC is always the better choice, always makes me laugh the people that say things about microsofts crap products. If they are so crap how come so many people buy them and they own the market?
Macs are generally for people who know how to use photshop and video editing software, they use a MAC because you can ususally plug something into a MAC and it works straight away.
PC's offer much more flexibility and much more software is available they just dont tend to be as "plug and play" as MAC's.
Macs are generally for people who know how to use photshop and video editing software, they use a MAC because you can ususally plug something into a MAC and it works straight away.
PC's offer much more flexibility and much more software is available they just dont tend to be as "plug and play" as MAC's.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScoobyDoo555
FCP - blows Premiere out of the water (IMHO).
I found Adobe really awkward to use..........
FCP just makes more sense (to me) - however IIRC, Mac only...........
Dan
I found Adobe really awkward to use..........
FCP just makes more sense (to me) - however IIRC, Mac only...........
Dan
Not had a chance to try FCP yet, so can't comment on that. I'm sure it's a fne piece of software though (seems to get glowing reviews from the Mac community).
#21
Originally Posted by bren.wright
A PC is always the better choice, always makes me laugh the people that say things about microsofts crap products. If they are so crap how come so many people buy them and they own the market?
Macs are generally for people who know how to use photshop and video editing software, they use a MAC because you can ususally plug something into a MAC and it works straight away.
PC's offer much more flexibility and much more software is available they just dont tend to be as "plug and play" as MAC's.
I know which one id use a business machine !
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre
I see they let anyone on as moderator these days! 2 posts have been pulled already!
angrynorth - apologies - there was nothing wrong with your posting, except repeating Fuchsrohre's post (which was RTM'd by several people) and yours didn't make sense without it. Chris
Last edited by Chris L; 13 September 2005 at 12:18 AM.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Potters Bar
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having come from a heavy PC background I was converted by Mac and would never go back. They are simply easier to use and more reliable with virtually no problems with security.
Apple are always the innovator and brought lots of things to the mass market, USB, Firewire, Bluetooth etc which the average user can enjoy at no extra cost. Yes lots of things can be done on the PC but sometimes these cost extra to buy.
I now work for MacWarehouse too so thats how much of an impact the Mac had for me !
Using a PC is like driving a Mondeo after driving my Scoob. Still gets you there but its not quite as enjoyable.
AllanB
Apple are always the innovator and brought lots of things to the mass market, USB, Firewire, Bluetooth etc which the average user can enjoy at no extra cost. Yes lots of things can be done on the PC but sometimes these cost extra to buy.
I now work for MacWarehouse too so thats how much of an impact the Mac had for me !
Using a PC is like driving a Mondeo after driving my Scoob. Still gets you there but its not quite as enjoyable.
AllanB
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Over the last few years, I've bought 1 pc, made 4 pcs from components, bought 3 laptops, and they're all still up and running with 100% reliability. I see no reason at all to change format.
Thinking about building another one now next year sometime, (probably a dual core multi-processor jobby with sli and dual 7800s or whatever is at the top of the tree then).
I don't actually like the interface on the mac very much. Too dumbed down for my liking. But then again, I never use windows explorer either. I tend to open a command prompt and do everything from the command line
Each to their own....
Thinking about building another one now next year sometime, (probably a dual core multi-processor jobby with sli and dual 7800s or whatever is at the top of the tree then).
I don't actually like the interface on the mac very much. Too dumbed down for my liking. But then again, I never use windows explorer either. I tend to open a command prompt and do everything from the command line
Each to their own....
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
I don't actually like the interface on the mac very much. Too dumbed down for my liking. But then again, I never use windows explorer either. I tend to open a command prompt and do everything from the command line
#28
Originally Posted by Iain Young
I see no reason at all to change format.
Show me one Mac user who has reverted to PCs and I'll show you a thousand who have gone the other way. Think different!
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, one of our documentation people at work has gone to a PC from a Mac at home, and say they wouldn't go back. So there :P
So where are these thousand of people you know then?
I don't know why you mac people have got so much against pcs. A good, well configured pc is every bit as good as a mac. Both are great machines in the right hands, and both have a good range of software. For some tasks, macs have the edge, and for others the pc is on top. Which you choose depends entirely on what you want to do with it.
So where are these thousand of people you know then?
I don't know why you mac people have got so much against pcs. A good, well configured pc is every bit as good as a mac. Both are great machines in the right hands, and both have a good range of software. For some tasks, macs have the edge, and for others the pc is on top. Which you choose depends entirely on what you want to do with it.