Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

dump valve causing rich mixture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 March 2002 | 10:46 AM
  #1  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

OK, let's understand - this - it up to an individual to choose, there are always people who hate VTAs.

Let's ask the serious question....

....who can explain to me the advantage of a VTA - from a technical perspective?

Why does it make your car run better - not worse?

Trout

PS I have heard that those underbody neon strip lights can really improve a standing quarter time - any comments anyone whilst we are here?


[Edited by Trout - 6/3/2002 9:53:30 AM]
Old 01 June 2002 | 12:44 AM
  #2  
WEBSTER's Avatar
WEBSTER
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Question

I have a 94 wrx which i have just fitted a collins atmos dump valve to but the tail pipe of my exhaust is now really sooted up since i fitted the dump valve , will the dump valve cause any engine damage
Old 01 June 2002 | 01:11 AM
  #3  
gene1's Avatar
gene1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Post

I wouldnt have thought it would make any difference as you are only replacing the standard re-circulating valve with a vent to air valve
Old 01 June 2002 | 07:01 AM
  #4  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

The Subaru ECU is designed to run with a recirc valve and fuels to compensate for the extra air returning through the induction system.

A dump to atmos does not provide this air and so the car WILL run rich.

DTA valves offer no advantage over a good recirc IMHO. All style and no substance.

Trout
Old 01 June 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #5  
planky's Avatar
planky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Home mostly
Post

Perhaps youre caining it more whooooosh pop crackle!!!!! so youre going to find your exhaust is more black.
Theres no proof that a atmo DV uses more fuel.
Old 01 June 2002 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

What sort of proof are you after? As the good man Trout points out the airflow meter has already metered this air and it is now intermittently leaking so it will use more fuel.
Old 02 June 2002 | 12:50 AM
  #7  
planky's Avatar
planky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Home mostly
Smile

I didnt ask for proof,i know there is NO difference to my fuel consumption on my scooby(1yr on rec/8months on atmo)but there always somebody who hates atmos and preferes recs.
Old 02 June 2002 | 01:28 AM
  #8  
Evildead's Avatar
Evildead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Post

well, it will not use MORE fuel, but it will have LESS air to mix this given fuel with.
Old 02 June 2002 | 09:03 AM
  #9  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

Planky,

I wasn't 'hating' VTAs - I was merely commenting that they are a complete waste of time and money - to be frank.

And if it is pretty noise you want - my chirruping recirc is probably louder than most VTAs I have heard on Scoob!

And from the technical perpective - yes it will make the car run rich sporadically as you release boost. Damage - nothing serious.

Trout
Old 02 June 2002 | 12:43 PM
  #10  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

As well as being rich, it will use more fuel absolute as the air that has leaked instead of being recirculated results in more vacuum in the inlet tract = more airflow across MAF = wider injector pulse widths.
Old 02 June 2002 | 01:56 PM
  #11  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

John,

are we agreeing

Trout
Old 02 June 2002 | 02:34 PM
  #12  
MarkF's Avatar
MarkF
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Post

Don't worry about it! I'd rather my car was running slightly rich than slightly lean, especially after all the carry on with engine failures.
Old 02 June 2002 | 02:40 PM
  #13  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

It is rich in completely and utterly the wrong place though!
Old 02 June 2002 | 04:24 PM
  #14  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

Coked up plugs - damaged cat - blown out sparks - big flame grilled whopper of a turbo if you have no cat.

Yeah, nothing to worry about

Trout
Old 02 June 2002 | 04:56 PM
  #15  
RT's Avatar
RT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Post

I second John's and Trout's statements. Those who believe that the car is NOT running rich are mistaken.
Old 03 June 2002 | 01:00 AM
  #16  
planky's Avatar
planky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Home mostly
Thumbs up

RT im NOT mistaken my cars doesnt use anymore more fuel and most of my mates havent seen any change in fuel consumption.
anyway its up to the individual to choose.
Old 03 June 2002 | 02:05 AM
  #17  
NutterKam's Avatar
NutterKam
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: London
Post

As a neutral party I do concur totally with Doctor Banks - even tho I have a Blitz VTA myself!!
Old 03 June 2002 | 02:28 AM
  #18  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

MarkF,
Don't worry about it! I'd rather my car was running slightly rich than slightly lean
But as standard, they run stupidly rich anyway so it's even more stupidly rich with a VTA DV.

There is no chance of it running anywhere near lean if everything is working correctly.....

Matt

Old 03 June 2002 | 03:08 AM
  #19  
RT's Avatar
RT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Post

Quote:
"RT im NOT mistaken my cars doesnt use anymore more fuel and most of my mates havent seen any change in fuel consumption.
anyway its up to the individual to choose. "


I never questioned your right to choose.

I am simply telling you that you (and your mates) are wrong. It is not a question of using more fuel, but having less air to mix the fuel with, as all of it has escaped while making the pssst!

Anyway, it's up to you. Go ask any person worth their salt, and they'll tell you that the only way to run an atmospheric BOV is to use MAP instead of MAF for ECU load.

Its a fact.
Old 03 June 2002 | 03:44 PM
  #20  
RT's Avatar
RT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Post

Trout, what recirc BOV are you running?
Old 03 June 2002 | 03:48 PM
  #21  
dhorwich's Avatar
dhorwich
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Post

trout....

You have not heard an HKS SSQ dump valve on a scoob then..... i can defo say they are alot louder than a recirculating one..... one of the main reasons for the recirculating DV is so it is quiter....!

Dan
Old 03 June 2002 | 06:30 PM
  #22  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

RT,

it was standard - but then I changed intercooler to a Phase 1 IC so I needed to buy an aftermarket one - got a Forge that has been shimmed to leak more slowly - holds the boost a shade longer for gearchanging on track and makes a WRC chirping noise (I know the latter is unnecessary!)

Trout
Old 03 June 2002 | 06:31 PM
  #23  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

Dhorwich,

have you heard my car?

No - well pass judgement when you do. I was not after big noise specifically - but it is at least as loud as the HKS one.

Trout
Old 04 June 2002 | 12:49 AM
  #24  
RT's Avatar
RT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Post

Trout,
Can I have the exact Forge model you have? If its not too much trouble...
tks.
Old 04 June 2002 | 10:10 AM
  #25  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

RT,

it is the MY98 Dump Valve with shim kit. I don't think I ever saw a model number!

Trout
Old 04 June 2002 | 08:33 PM
  #26  
matthew baker's Avatar
matthew baker
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Cool

WEBSTER STOP WINDING THESE PEOPLE UP AND TELL THEM YOU ARE A FULLY TRAINED MOTOR MECHANIC. MINE RUNS RICH AS WELL BUT F£$K IT, IT'S FAST. THANKS FOR THE HELP TODAY I KNOW THE COLOUR LOOKS RUBBISH & IWILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT IN 6 WEEKS TIME.
Old 04 June 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #27  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

This forum is too egalitarian to allow people to pull rank and informed debate holds higher kudos.
Old 04 June 2002 | 11:41 PM
  #28  
WEBSTER's Avatar
WEBSTER
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Talking

ALL I WANT TO NO IS AM I GOING F+++ MY ENGINE UP OR NO , CANT AFFORD BIG REBUILD BILL
Old 04 June 2002 | 11:45 PM
  #29  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Cool

A VTA is VERY unlikely to lead you to an engine rebuild.

Trout

PS But there again I am not a qualified mechanic - so what do I know?
Old 06 June 2002 | 02:58 AM
  #30  
matthew baker's Avatar
matthew baker
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Post

WEBSTER QUIT F$£KING MOANING IT NEVER COMES OUT THE F$£KING GARAGE ANYWAY!!!!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 04:48 PM
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 12:59 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 10:22 AM
buckerz69
Subaru Parts
0
29 September 2015 05:16 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
28 September 2015 02:06 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.