Best induction kit
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Macclesfield, Cheshire
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best induction kit
What would be the best induction kit for a MY00 Turbo?
looking for performance increase, but dont want to kill my engine....
ta
looking for performance increase, but dont want to kill my engine....
ta
#2
There are lots on the market, but if your still running the original MAF sensor in the car, the general opinion seems to be that K+N 57i induction kit is the one to go for. Good performance, and appears to have the least chance of damaging your engine.
Dxx
Dxx
#4
GGR do a MAF friendly induction kit for MY99-00.
Check out GGS036.
http://www.grahamgoode.com/cgi-bin/p...page=speed.htm
Check out GGS036.
http://www.grahamgoode.com/cgi-bin/p...page=speed.htm
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What would be the best induction kit for a MY00 Turbo?
looking for performance increase, but dont want to kill my engine....
The induction kits that provide an apparent performance boost tend to do so by fooling the airflow meter and leaning off the mixture, which makes the car a bit quicker, but can cause dangerous cylinder heating/det.
The standard MY00 induction tract isn't overly restrictive, and thus the best all-round option is simply bunging in a good panel filter like the STi, K&N or Green products.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It applies even moreso to the new age cars Jasoon, as it has the extended inlet that gathers cold, fresh air direct from the upper air intake. Thus, there's even less reason why you'd want to stick a cone on it.
Edited to say, Jamie, pick any three of the four you mentioned and you should be fine. The only one I'd rule out is the ITG, on the grounds that its design makes it prone to losing the "gunk" it is laced with. This gunk has been known to settle on and contaminate the MAF sensor, making the other three safer options.
Edited to say, Jamie, pick any three of the four you mentioned and you should be fine. The only one I'd rule out is the ITG, on the grounds that its design makes it prone to losing the "gunk" it is laced with. This gunk has been known to settle on and contaminate the MAF sensor, making the other three safer options.
Last edited by greasemonkey; 23 February 2004 at 04:02 PM.
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 8,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or try Blitz air filters -
http://www.scoobyworld.co.uk/trolleyed/31/index.htm
Blitz Sonic Power Filter @ £324.99 inc VAT
Blitz SUS Power air filter @ a slightly cheaper alternative of £177.99 inc VAT
http://www.scoobyworld.co.uk/trolleyed/31/index.htm
Blitz Sonic Power Filter @ £324.99 inc VAT
Blitz SUS Power air filter @ a slightly cheaper alternative of £177.99 inc VAT
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Featuring a design like no other filter ever produced, the Sonic power has a conical shield of polished stainless steel which surrounds the filter preventing engine heat from entering the intake system
325 quid for that? Could get the same effect with an old teapot and a saw!
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can remove the MAF sensor if you move over to a MAP based ECU like a GEMS, Link, MoTeC etc. Think John Banks has done a bit of research on simulating MAF values via an input from the MAP sensor, but barring something like that, on a Subaru ECU, the MAF sensor (and a properly reading one) is essential.
Last edited by greasemonkey; 25 February 2004 at 02:02 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post