Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

4.5 CONVERSION better than 2.5??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 September 2004, 01:09 PM
  #1  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool 4.5 CONVERSION better than 2.5??

you could be a little maverick and source an AJP v8 (TVR) 4.2 - only 21 inch cube and all alloy - cant cost any more than going 2.5 route- no lag - adequate power - best part of 400 ft lb - make bellhousing adapter - recoup development cost by selling copies on scoobynet - sump clearance? - length, height and weight should all be ok - make the ultimate Impreza hybrid?

Or use the 4.5 AJP with Red Rose upgrade in a new shape 6 speed with over 450lb ft and trounce the new EVO 400 FQ - not to mention a Pagani Zonda or two....

Dreaming? - Perhaps not? - All the intercooler and turbo costs and probs vanish - the engine comes complete and doesnt need upgrading - fantastic throttle response and therefore chassis adjustability when sliding (no turbo rush to anticipate)

Come on you top tuners - think outside the box and be a little radical - TVR Power can even supply with fully mapped Nitrous if you want over 500 bhp...................
Old 22 September 2004, 01:17 PM
  #2  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We heard you the first time!
Old 22 September 2004, 01:46 PM
  #3  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think the AJP would be even less reliable than a Subaru engine?
Old 22 September 2004, 02:03 PM
  #4  
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL at John. Rodney but Lionel, as they say darn sarf. Shame, as it's a cracking motor (no pun intended). That Russian chappie has got a job on his hands.

Industry sources confide that the FQ400 ain't exactly bullet-proof, either...
Old 22 September 2004, 04:04 PM
  #5  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TopBanana
We heard you the first time!
hows the 500?
Old 22 September 2004, 04:06 PM
  #6  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by john banks
I think the AJP would be even less reliable than a Subaru engine?
probably similar!

but would look truly cool under that there scoop..
Old 22 September 2004, 04:09 PM
  #7  
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
RB5_245's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the Idea, I'm fed up with turbo's. I was thinking along the lines of a charge cooled, supercharged EJ22 when my engine finally gives up the ghost.

However the cerbera has the borg warner T5 gearbox, with that in mind why not a 6-speed sequential and rwd

Dave
Old 22 September 2004, 04:13 PM
  #8  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GRIFF007
hows the 500?
500 what?
Old 22 September 2004, 04:18 PM
  #9  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TopBanana
500 what?
thought you had the yellow Griff?!
Old 22 September 2004, 04:23 PM
  #10  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by RB5_245
I like the Idea, I'm fed up with turbo's. I was thinking along the lines of a charge cooled, supercharged EJ22 when my engine finally gives up the ghost.

However the cerbera has the borg warner T5 gearbox, with that in mind why not a 6-speed sequential and rwd

Dave
Supercharging a 2.5 would be fun:

lag free
lovely neat installation would reveal engine layout better rather than being covered in I/C, turbo pipery etc
torque on demand

Go on, go on, go on - somebody?!
Old 22 September 2004, 04:26 PM
  #11  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by RB5_245
I like the Idea, I'm fed up with turbo's. I was thinking along the lines of a charge cooled, supercharged EJ22 when my engine finally gives up the ghost.

However the cerbera has the borg warner T5 gearbox, with that in mind why not a 6-speed sequential and rwd

Dave
just cast an adapter plate to Scoob Trans (Cerb twin plate and small flyweel could well be ok)

Alternatively - modern supercharger on a 2.5 US block could be v intersting?!
Old 22 September 2004, 04:41 PM
  #12  
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
RB5_245's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was thinking centrifugal blower on a 2.2 with very high rev limit. Limited exh back pressure from no turbo, and very short piping through a charge cooler should see a nice car to drive.

A Roots blower on a 2.5 would go nice too but if you're running out of puff at around 5-5.5k rpm the gearing of any sensibly priced box would be too low I'd think. I'd rather go for the 2.2 with a (hopefully) 8.5k rev limit.

Dave
Old 22 September 2004, 04:42 PM
  #13  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GRIFF007
thought you had the yellow Griff?!
Nope not me, but never say never
Old 22 September 2004, 04:54 PM
  #14  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not sure our cranks are up to driving a heavy duty supercharger?

Not sure you'd get the midrange torque that makes Scoobies so much fun?

With a 2.5 if you only want 450 BHP or thereabouts, you don't have to put up with much lag.... I whinged a bit about my iON turbo because I was spoilt by the 20G, and I still think you get more power for your lag out of the 20G, but with careful heat management and an AVC-R it isn't feeling so bad now with 1 bar at about 2750 RPM.
Old 22 September 2004, 04:55 PM
  #15  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
I was thinking centrifugal blower on a 2.2 with very high rev limit. Limited exh back pressure from no turbo, and very short piping through a charge cooler should see a nice car to drive.

A Roots blower on a 2.5 would go nice too but if you're running out of puff at around 5-5.5k rpm the gearing of any sensibly priced box would be too low I'd think. I'd rather go for the 2.2 with a (hopefully) 8.5k rev limit.

Dave
do you have the experience / connections for a sensible cost build? - sounds fun...
Old 22 September 2004, 04:56 PM
  #16  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not needed in my opinion


Last edited by Pavlo; 22 September 2004 at 05:03 PM.
Old 22 September 2004, 04:57 PM
  #17  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Not sure our cranks are up to driving a heavy duty supercharger?

Not sure you'd get the midrange torque that makes Scoobies so much fun?

With a 2.5 if you only want 450 BHP or thereabouts, you don't have to put up with much lag.... I whinged a bit about my iON turbo because I was spoilt by the 20G, and I still think you get more power for your lag out of the 20G, but with careful heat management and an AVC-R it isn't feeling so bad now with 1 bar at about 2750 RPM.

400bhp + with v low lag sounds fine to me - whats involved using new age Blob as base - realistic cost?
Old 22 September 2004, 04:59 PM
  #18  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pavlo
Not needed in my opinion

[img]www.cdtech.co.uk/pe_graph.jpg[/img]
what?
Old 22 September 2004, 05:04 PM
  #19  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GRIFF007
what?
link corrected above
Old 22 September 2004, 05:22 PM
  #20  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

New age blob 2.5 turbo:

EJ257 £1200
Headgaskets £110
Cam belt and tensioner £150
Oil and coolant £50
Six speed box £2000
Clutch £300
Fuel pump £130
TD05-20G turbo £800
550cc injectors £250-300
Remap £650
3 port solenoid £30
Boost gauge, AFR meter, knocklink, oil pressure/temp £400
STi intercooler £250, big scoop possibly
Spark plugs £35
Cone filter kit £80
Exhaust manifold and uppipe £300
Full exhaust £500
Reroute breathers, throttle body coolant recirculate mod

£7235 plus labour
Old 22 September 2004, 05:24 PM
  #21  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For 400 BHP and 400 lbft on Optimax with this setup you would need about 1.4 bar midrange, 1.2 bar at the top.
Old 22 September 2004, 05:32 PM
  #22  
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
RB5_245's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hadn't really put too much thought into build cost. I know my engine is not going to last forever (6 months would be enough ). When It does go I'm going to be going for a 2.2 anyway. The main costs are going to be new exh system, the charger it's self and charge cooler. If you were building a turbo from scratch you'd be looking at similar costs I reckon (just a lot less work).

I can have the use of a full workshop, and plenty of spare time so that's plausible.

As for the crank, I'd hope a steel crank would hold up to it. Maybe put too much pressure on already too small bearings though.

Power wise, If it drove like an n/a car I'd settle for 400bhp. As it stands I have 3 options. 2.2 turbo at around 500bhp, supercharger and see how it goes, or see what can be done with an n/a engine (250bhp? probably far too slow for me).

The third one might sound a bit stupid, but there's no way you'll find a better noise than a boxer 4 on throttle bodies.

Anyway that's completely off topic. The AJP sounds interesting, but I could not be done with messing about with the wiring loom and all the instrumentation. I also have no idea on where to start with that adaptor plate.

Dave
Old 22 September 2004, 05:33 PM
  #23  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
New age blob 2.5 turbo:

EJ257 £1200
Headgaskets £110
Cam belt and tensioner £150
Oil and coolant £50
Six speed box £2000
Clutch £300
Fuel pump £130
TD05-20G turbo £800
550cc injectors £250-300
Remap £650
3 port solenoid £30
Boost gauge, AFR meter, knocklink, oil pressure/temp £400
STi intercooler £250, big scoop possibly
Spark plugs £35
Cone filter kit £80
Exhaust manifold and uppipe £300
Full exhaust £500
Reroute breathers, throttle body coolant recirculate mod

£7235 plus labour
many thanks for detailed response - presumably the saving of £2k on six speed on Blob would be offset by labour making it a £7k job all in?
Old 22 September 2004, 05:36 PM
  #24  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Assuming you start with the blob STi model yes? Not if its a blob WRX though and dont forget the VAT ???
Old 22 September 2004, 06:08 PM
  #25  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A flat 6 Porsche, 3.8 litres.
No blower, no pipes, a bit of water cooling. Massive torque, all aluminium and a whole engine with ecu costs about 3K

And what a sound track.....

Height of the motor a bit tricky and dry sump comes standard, bit of trickery there too!
Short wide motor, mega reliable and about 30 mpg if your a wimp on the accellerator.

Better proposition?

If you need a bit more there is always the 3.6 turbo, 500 bhp, AND it has a TMIC!

Hmmmmmmm

911
Old 22 September 2004, 06:21 PM
  #26  
chrome
Scooby Regular
 
chrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well go on then graham!!
you have both options in your hands right now!!
porsche engined STi .. now that would make an interesting hill climber!!!
Old 22 September 2004, 06:30 PM
  #27  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Funny, I was wondering if 1UZ-FE Lexus/Toyota 4.0 V8 with a pair of TD05's would fit under the bonnet
Old 22 September 2004, 06:32 PM
  #28  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Put me straight into Sports Libre = Metro 6r4, Pilbeam country.
But it is an interesting thought!

Must concentrate on the mod, must concentrate on the mods.........no distractions!

When I was (much) younger I used to build hot rods with Rover V8's in 30's chassis, so not afraid...........

911
Old 22 September 2004, 07:24 PM
  #29  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911
A flat 6 Porsche, 3.8 litres.
No blower, no pipes, a bit of water cooling. Massive torque, all aluminium and a whole engine with ecu costs about 3K

And what a sound track.....

Height of the motor a bit tricky and dry sump comes standard, bit of trickery there too!
Short wide motor, mega reliable and about 30 mpg if your a wimp on the accellerator.

Better proposition?

If you need a bit more there is always the 3.6 turbo, 500 bhp, AND it has a TMIC!

Hmmmmmmm

911
OR... Scoob flat 6 enlarged to 3.5? tuned, HC and multiple throttle bodies - both would sound fantastic - would either actually fit Blob??!!
Old 22 September 2004, 07:37 PM
  #30  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

^^ dam ... ......jus bout ta say, dont subaru already do a 3 litre flat 6 ............svx.?...


Quick Reply: 4.5 CONVERSION better than 2.5??



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 PM.