Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

front/back drive ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31 December 2005, 04:00 PM
  #1  
steve1192
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
steve1192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleethorpes
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default front/back drive ratio

ive just bought a mint 2000 x plate turbo can anyone tell me the front/ back ratio for drive. i aa thinking 60% back 40% front is this correct.
thanks
Old 31 December 2005, 04:20 PM
  #2  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

45f/55r i think

Tony
Old 31 December 2005, 04:47 PM
  #3  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

50/50 assuming it a UK spec.
Old 31 December 2005, 06:05 PM
  #4  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always thought the UK spec was 60(f) 40(r), hence it tended to be a car that always wanted to understeer..
Old 31 December 2005, 06:27 PM
  #5  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...t=torque+split
Old 31 December 2005, 06:30 PM
  #6  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://bbs.22b.com/cgi-bin/ultimateb...=000196#000000
Old 31 December 2005, 06:32 PM
  #7  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://bbs.22b.com/cgi-bin/ultimateb...=001553#000000
Old 31 December 2005, 06:32 PM
  #8  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://bbs.22b.com/cgi-bin/ultimateb...=000129#000000
Old 31 December 2005, 06:33 PM
  #9  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://bbs.22b.com/cgi-bin/ultimateb...=000070#000003
Old 31 December 2005, 06:53 PM
  #10  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Too much to read John..
This thread is in relation to a UK X plate car, not a DCCD equipped or NewAge WRX or whatever. (NewAge WRX is 50:50)

When i get the chance to sober up i'll try and find out why i think the UK is a 60/40 F/R split, but this goes back to when i first bought mine back in '99 when i had problems in counteracting the understeering trait of the car.

I was aware at that time that the Jap spec Sti's with 4.444 diffs (and obviously 1:1 drop gears) were a 50/50 whereas the Uk had 1.1:1 drop gears and so split would be different.

Happy New Year btw and all the best when it comes.

cheers
Old 31 December 2005, 07:04 PM
  #11  
Tim W
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alan, I can remember some talk of the MY99 on non JDM cars with the phase 2 engines having 60/40 f/r split too, prior to that it was 50/50 on everything but the DCCD equiped. Problem is I've never seen anything in the available mechanical specs to support this, it was only in magazines...and, well, we know how accurate they are!

Electronic traction control, LSD for the first time... mutter... mutter...

Last edited by Tim W; 31 December 2005 at 07:11 PM.
Old 31 December 2005, 07:04 PM
  #12  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My basic understanding of it is that in non-slip conditions the drop gear makes no difference to the torque split. I wasn't aware that the newage WRX had a different drop gear or diff setup, if indeed it does. AFAIK the gearboxes are swappable and make no difference to understeer. A 6MT with the same drop gears and diff ratios does because of the Suretrac or similar front diff rather than the open front diff the GC8 UK cars came with.

I thought they were all 50:50 except the DCCD cars.
Old 01 January 2006, 01:43 AM
  #13  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My basic understanding of it is that in non-slip conditions the drop gear makes no difference to the torque split.
I'd agree with that.


Taken from one of the threads you posted above John..

"The only diference worth mentioning between a Japanese spec STi and a UK spec STi is the drop gear ratio and the rear diff ratio. You get the same final drive ratio out of both setups, but the leverage at the crown wheel is diferent on a UK spec front and rear, and that is what is altering the torque split. They arnt using the centre diff to give a torque split change in this case, they are using the leverage at the diffs."

"I can think of no other reason to make diferent specs of drop gears and diffs other than to alter the handling."

"I spoke to someone at Prodrive recently about this and they asured me this is how the drop gear/diferent diff setup works. The reason it is used in the Euro spec car was to provide a more FWD biased power delivery."

Last edited by AlanG; 01 January 2006 at 02:19 AM.
Old 01 January 2006, 01:53 AM
  #14  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's been an age old debate it seems, here's another couple..

Adam wrote this in a thread:Very oddly, been speaking to barratts and have been told again that prodrives testing was the reason they went for the 1.1:1 step down as it changed the torque distribution in the cars to 60 front 40 rear.


The Damian Harty Q&A

Last edited by AlanG; 01 January 2006 at 02:17 AM.
Old 01 January 2006, 09:27 AM
  #15  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks Alan, it does seem an age old debate that still continues as none of the threads on it seemed to reach a clear conclusion. On the 22B thread bottom of page 3 quotes Mike Wood as saying 55:45, but on page 4 it is still debated.

I'm puzzled with only 1.1:1 drop gearing it could get to 60:40, but I don't fully understand torque splits. And I think we all agree it is not rear biased.
Old 01 January 2006, 11:23 AM
  #16  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi John
Yeah that's what i noticed as well. After reading quite abit on various threads i came to the conclusion that i don't fully understand it either but oone thing came clear...

Does it really matter what the split is?.......... erm.... nah, not really.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
gazzawrx
Non Car Related Items For sale
13
17 October 2015 06:51 PM
InTurbo
Other Marques
20
08 October 2015 08:59 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Littleted
Computer & Technology Related
0
25 September 2015 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: front/back drive ratio



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 AM.