JDM Hatch spec C Remap
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 652
From: far, far west
JDM Hatch spec C Remap
Hi,
My hatch arrives this week from Japan, and I am looking for some advice on its remap, which Martyn J will be doing.I just want a smooth running daily, so I am just mapping for uk fuel, so plan open source as it is cheaper, keeping cats in place.
So I would like folks opinions on open source vs race rom, solely looking at drivability, not features, and would also like to know if it is worth upgrading the boost solenoid; I am chasing drivability, not higher figures.
Thanks.
My hatch arrives this week from Japan, and I am looking for some advice on its remap, which Martyn J will be doing.I just want a smooth running daily, so I am just mapping for uk fuel, so plan open source as it is cheaper, keeping cats in place.
So I would like folks opinions on open source vs race rom, solely looking at drivability, not features, and would also like to know if it is worth upgrading the boost solenoid; I am chasing drivability, not higher figures.
Thanks.
#2
For your requirements OS should be perfectly adequate: choice of mapper is more important than choice of software, so if you have a good OS mapper available to you then go with that. OS will be a fair bit cheaper than EcuTek as well.
My latest car was EcuTek mapped when I acquired it, and although I've had good success with an OS mapper I've chosen to retain EcuTek to retain (a) dual maps and (b) per-gear boost control. I personally have no use for flat-foot shifting, anti-lag or launch control, although others' needs may be different.
My latest car was EcuTek mapped when I acquired it, and although I've had good success with an OS mapper I've chosen to retain EcuTek to retain (a) dual maps and (b) per-gear boost control. I personally have no use for flat-foot shifting, anti-lag or launch control, although others' needs may be different.
#3
Agreed.
I asked my 1st mapper for 1.4 bar, I got 1.0 bar on rr
I asked my 2nd mapper for 1.6 bar he abandoned the session
I asked my 3rd mapper for 1.6 bar, he told me he got 1.4, I got 1.0 bar on rr
My 4th mapper forgot I'd booked him
I asked my 5th mapper for 1.6 bar, I got 1.35 on rr
I asked my 1st mapper for 1.4 bar, I got 1.0 bar on rr
I asked my 2nd mapper for 1.6 bar he abandoned the session
I asked my 3rd mapper for 1.6 bar, he told me he got 1.4, I got 1.0 bar on rr
My 4th mapper forgot I'd booked him
I asked my 5th mapper for 1.6 bar, I got 1.35 on rr
#4
Agreed.
I asked my 1st mapper for 1.4 bar, I got 1.0 bar on rr
I asked my 2nd mapper for 1.6 bar he abandoned the session
I asked my 3rd mapper for 1.6 bar, he told me he got 1.4, I got 1.0 bar on rr
My 4th mapper forgot I'd booked him
I asked my 5th mapper for 1.6 bar, I got 1.35 on rr
I asked my 1st mapper for 1.4 bar, I got 1.0 bar on rr
I asked my 2nd mapper for 1.6 bar he abandoned the session
I asked my 3rd mapper for 1.6 bar, he told me he got 1.4, I got 1.0 bar on rr
My 4th mapper forgot I'd booked him
I asked my 5th mapper for 1.6 bar, I got 1.35 on rr
#5
A missing actuator hose pill may have been the issue for the first 3 maps! Last map was stated for safety.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Autotweek
Non Scooby Related
25
18 March 2016 06:55 PM