2.5" or 3" Mid Pipe?
#1
2.5" or 3" Mid Pipe?
My 03 STI
TD05 18g Turbo
HKS SSQV
3" Decat (think it goes to a 2.5" at the bottom)
Standard PPP Mid pipe
ProDrive muffler
Ported and polished headers
Gems ECU
Running 312whp
The car is a little too quiet for me so was going to replace the resonated ppp mid pipe.
Do I go 2.5" or 3" will it make more less power or noise with 3"?
TD05 18g Turbo
HKS SSQV
3" Decat (think it goes to a 2.5" at the bottom)
Standard PPP Mid pipe
ProDrive muffler
Ported and polished headers
Gems ECU
Running 312whp
The car is a little too quiet for me so was going to replace the resonated ppp mid pipe.
Do I go 2.5" or 3" will it make more less power or noise with 3"?
#3
Can't be 312 WHP can it? Wheel horse power?
Personally I'd stay with the 2.5" pipe size you have and just go for de-resonated centre section. MAY not need a re-map as ECU might fuel correct enough.
Personally I'd stay with the 2.5" pipe size you have and just go for de-resonated centre section. MAY not need a re-map as ECU might fuel correct enough.
#4
Many thanks for reply, think i will stick with 2.5"
As far as power goes, all I am going on is this Dyno that came with the car
Was taken at AME on their hub dyno so the print out is at the wheels power
#5
Ah right. Makes sense. a Hub dyno is not strictly WHP figure. As the name suggests it's a figure at the hubs and does not take into account energy lost through tyre friction etc.
Still, looks like the car is fun!
Still, looks like the car is fun!
#6
Rough guess then what the above dyno would be at the fly? I'm hoping the GEMS should deal with the new mid and not need a remap. I have a wide and AFR gauge in the cab so can keep an eye on it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM