Fuel rails: Parallel or Series?
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
From: Taken to the hills
Fuel rails: Parallel or Series?
What's the thinking on parallel v series fuel rails? If parallel do the fuel hoses need to be the same length? Is there a 'cheap' way to go parallel using the existing rails?
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Parallel is the way to go as the OE setup is in series, which causes the potential for cylinder 3 to run lean. I fitted a parallel kit a few years ago, not sure if it is possible to re-jig the flexi pipes so it becomes a parallel system.
#3
Also the angle of the fuel in on the passenger side is wrong for decent hose-running (imo) and on the drivers side the fuel in pipe is under the manifold itself.
Ie is not pretty, but works. I've lopped off the fuel feed on the drivers side and rewelded it so that it is accessible and pointing in the right direction.
You also need an aftermarket fpr of course.
#4
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
From: Taken to the hills
I know the perceived wisdom is that the parallel option is better than the series set up but it begs the questions: why did Subaru not go parallel from the off, and is a typically complicated parallel system better than the series? The parallel set ups I've seen appear to have hoses in less than ideal positions.
#5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dean.mac
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
24 May 2016 06:13 PM
jonnyboy82
Subaru Parts
1
21 May 2016 06:43 PM