How does Millers Compare to NF Octane Boost
#1
My ECU is already mapped for Super, but I find that standard Esso UL and Octane boost gives better results.
Also found Optimax to be PANTS from cold.....
[Edited by Scott.T - 10/8/2002 7:43:18 AM]
Also found Optimax to be PANTS from cold.....
[Edited by Scott.T - 10/8/2002 7:43:18 AM]
#2
I've used NF before i.e just got through 3 bottles, and need some more.
However, Millers seems to be alot more widley available, hence I'm tempted to go with that.
Will that be a big mistake ? will I notice a difference between using Miller and NF.
I used to add about 50ml of NF to 35-40 litres of fuel.
However, Millers seems to be alot more widley available, hence I'm tempted to go with that.
Will that be a big mistake ? will I notice a difference between using Miller and NF.
I used to add about 50ml of NF to 35-40 litres of fuel.
#3
Hi Scott,
My car is a MY93 WRX.... i used to use NF (the race formula) and put in a very similar dose to you. I then switched to MIllers 'cos i was getting sick of pouring the NF into little containers etc. I then switched to NF one shot and to be honest i haven't noticed a slight bit of difference between them . Personally im just gonna get the one that's readily avaliable in my area.... then again i may not use it at all when i get the ECU remapped for just Super.
Tony.
My car is a MY93 WRX.... i used to use NF (the race formula) and put in a very similar dose to you. I then switched to MIllers 'cos i was getting sick of pouring the NF into little containers etc. I then switched to NF one shot and to be honest i haven't noticed a slight bit of difference between them . Personally im just gonna get the one that's readily avaliable in my area.... then again i may not use it at all when i get the ECU remapped for just Super.
Tony.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post