Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

How does Millers Compare to NF Octane Boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 July 2002 | 01:28 PM
  #1  
Scott.T's Avatar
Scott.T
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 1
From: East Sussex
Post

My ECU is already mapped for Super, but I find that standard Esso UL and Octane boost gives better results.

Also found Optimax to be PANTS from cold.....

[Edited by Scott.T - 10/8/2002 7:43:18 AM]
Old 07 October 2002 | 09:37 AM
  #2  
Scott.T's Avatar
Scott.T
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 1
From: East Sussex
Post

I've used NF before i.e just got through 3 bottles, and need some more.

However, Millers seems to be alot more widley available, hence I'm tempted to go with that.

Will that be a big mistake ? will I notice a difference between using Miller and NF.

I used to add about 50ml of NF to 35-40 litres of fuel.
Old 07 October 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #3  
Tone Loc's Avatar
Tone Loc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 1
From: UK
Post

Hi Scott,

My car is a MY93 WRX.... i used to use NF (the race formula) and put in a very similar dose to you. I then switched to MIllers 'cos i was getting sick of pouring the NF into little containers etc. I then switched to NF one shot and to be honest i haven't noticed a slight bit of difference between them . Personally im just gonna get the one that's readily avaliable in my area.... then again i may not use it at all when i get the ECU remapped for just Super.

Tony.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
psport
Subaru Parts
3
04 October 2015 08:35 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 10:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
01 October 2015 05:30 PM
WrxSti03
Drivetrain
11
29 September 2015 11:21 AM
tjapplejuice
Drivetrain
9
25 September 2015 04:46 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 AM.