Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Exhaust throat thickness on phase 2 heads ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 December 2002 | 10:04 AM
  #1  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

About to "set to" with the die grinder underneath the car on the exhaust ports (done the headers) but would like to know how much meat I can safely take out without breaking into the water gallery??
Did that once on a mini (sleeved the valve guide hole to get round it )


Cheers

Andy
Old 29 December 2002 | 10:13 AM
  #2  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

Andy,

are you planning to do this in the car

The swarf will go back into the engine, and errrrr, well that would be bad news.

You can do it with the heads off. This is a precision job that IMHO should only be done properly - and from what I have seen there are very few who can do it.

Personally I would not attempt this myself - even tho like you - I prepped and ported a 12G295 head for my Mini

Trout



[Edited by Trout - 12/29/2002 10:14:33 AM]
Old 29 December 2002 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

already though of that !
going to make sure both vales are shut on the one I am doing and then for double protection stuff a lump of rag in there as well.

explain to me the point of porting the headers if I'm not then going to do the head as well.
sounds like I will have wasted my time if I stick it back together without porting the heads

Cheers
Andy
Old 29 December 2002 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

Oi Mr Wallis

did you bother with your heads ???????

Andy
Old 29 December 2002 | 04:10 PM
  #5  
ustolemyname??stevieturbo's Avatar
ustolemyname??stevieturbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Post

I did mine, although my engine was in bits. If you are just matching to the manifold/gasket, then I think you would need to be grinding like mad to break through anywhere. The main port is quite large anyway, so just take it easy, you done need to be able to get your hand in there.
IMO a mini head would be a more complex head to port, with the siamese ports and very small ports. The subaru heads look very good to start with. I simply cleaned up and enlarged the valve seat area, and blended it to the port, and opened up to teh gasket line ( or slighlty smaller ). All pretty easy to get at.
Old 29 December 2002 | 04:16 PM
  #6  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Post

Why are you doing it ... you will only remove the reversion dam and allow pressure waves back into the heads.

bob
Old 29 December 2002 | 04:33 PM
  #7  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

what about the turbo inlet then ?

oops...too late



Old 29 December 2002 | 05:06 PM
  #8  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

Bob,

Rather than me try to explain my reasons badly I thought I would scribble something instead.
first pic being a before
second pic being...if I don't do anything with the heads
third pic being, what I hope to achieve.

I don't see much of a reversion dam in the "as standard form".
I would have made a good one if I left it alone after doing just the headers,
but alas, too late as I've done one port already

I'm back in the house for a cuppa as the toy air compressor I have in the garage threw a wobbly after being run non stop for the last hour or so.
best I give it chance to cool down.


Andy
Old 29 December 2002 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

I didnt do my heads.. considered it... Im doing my new heads...

David
Old 29 December 2002 | 07:58 PM
  #10  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Post

No what you are trying to achieve is fine in principle, its just that the pressure pulses coming back up the headers would normally be broken up by the lip, also you need to keep a parallel exit from a joint into a tapered flowed entry otherwise gas just expands into the joint and slows ... same when porting the header joints, parallel exit and flowed entry. What you've done to the turbo is good, just make sure the uppipe exit is parallel and preferably the same diameter as the turbo inlet flare.

Edited to add that the middle pic is the correct setup.

[Edited by Bob Rawle - 12/29/2002 7:59:34 PM]
Old 29 December 2002 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

cheers Bob

edit to add: the heads are as parallel as I dare make them
now I'm being stung round the neck by shards of ally, grrrrr

see you on the 11th

as for whether what i'm doing is going to make any difference, I'll find out on the 4th.

Andy
<always in it, just the depth that varies >

[Edited by Fuzz - 12/29/2002 8:25:13 PM]
Old 29 December 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #12  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

Stepped works fine.

Did you measure the gasket on the turbo? I hope it still works!

Save your efforts

Paul.
Old 29 December 2002 | 11:07 PM
  #13  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

paul,

Up pipe is exactly same size pipe as top gasket,
turbo bellmouthed out to meet full size of up pipe and gasket.
no step at all there
should work well, as the gas ramps up the gentle slope it's speed should increase and hit the turbine with a lot less turbulance than the standard item

all done for tonight but I'm stuck....

need at least three studs for the up pipe, as they would not come out of the old unit.
had the heat on them in the end but they left the threads behind

I got so bored, I dropped the oil out of her, changed the plugs, changed the oil filter and fitted a new centre exhaust section !
off to bramalls in the morn for some new studs.

Andy

Old 29 December 2002 | 11:17 PM
  #14  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

This should show you how much bigger the new up pipe is and the need to increase the throat of the turbo exhaust inlet to match
Old 30 December 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #15  
rex11's Avatar
rex11
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Post

I'm not sure, so this is a question not a statement.

I thought that the reversion lip is only necassary if your running an aggressive cam that has some intake/exhaust overlap. Otherwise I though you were fine to match the ports to the header, keeping the sidewalls straight at the joint.
Old 30 December 2002 | 08:16 PM
  #16  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

Anyway, I have some phase 2 heads here (on bench), what was the original question?

Okay, so I read it again and it made sense (scanned through before, duhh).

How much are you intending to remove? As bob says, parallel works for most applications, but a step is generally a good idea. It seems to be one of those things that is worse on a flow bench but better on a dyno, IOW, we don't fully know what's going on.

Paul

[Edited by Pavlo - 12/30/2002 8:20:09 PM]
Old 30 December 2002 | 11:43 PM
  #17  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

I made the exhaust ports as close as I could to parallel sided to match size of manifold gasket. then tapered manifolds out to meet this gasket too, so no lip.
I did leave more meat on the side of the head with the longest exhaust branch as it would have made a sharper turn into the manifold, tended to play the grinder on inside lip a little instead, to smooth out that bend (requires picture i think !)
I was too impatient to wait for much of an answer and I had done one port when Bob replied, so thought I aught to do the rest at least to match, good or bad .

I seem to see an improvement in throttle response, though that could be the up pipe, I was expecting it to be worse, (with respect to the up-pipe as it's a larger diameter than standard.)
Overall boost threshold is virtually smack on 2500rpm.
Boost now holds at a smidge over 1.1Bar in fifth,(between 1.0-1.1 before).
control is better too, very little spiking round to 1.3 as it did before (only if you come off throttle and back on again ).
exhaust gas temp can now be measured as I finally fitted the boss in the new up-pipe before it went on. the highest I managed to get that was 760oC.
sensor put here FYI

nice growl from the exhaust now too, doesn't sound like there's a banana stuffed up the tail pipe when on full chat anymore.
again this may not be all to do with the porting and up-pipe as I fitted a straight through centre section as well.
Will be nice to see a good improvement on 221BHP from last visit to P station....

Andy
Saturday will tell...
Old 30 December 2002 | 11:59 PM
  #18  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

The up-pipe looks nice, what is it? looks like it could be H&S.

Was the thermocouple bung welded in by the supplier?

Or did you make it all yourself? As I just remembered you're a welder by trade, so not a difficult job!

Paul
Old 31 December 2002 | 12:30 AM
  #19  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

Up-pipe it's self, made by Hayward and scott.

Connector welded in by yours truly.

Andy

edit punctuation

[Edited by Fuzz - 12/31/2002 12:32:54 AM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
buckerz69
Subaru Parts
7
08 October 2015 07:53 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
2
27 September 2015 07:52 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Exhaust throat thickness on phase 2 heads ???



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.