Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Flat 4 engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 February 2003 | 02:44 PM
  #1  
mikefyfe's Avatar
mikefyfe
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Was just having a quiet thought - we all seem to agree that the flat 4 (boxer) engine has many advantages, low slung in the car so lower centre of gravity, excellent noise due to unbalanced exhaust.

This being the case, why do not more manufacturers make boxer engines???

Porsche made the flat 6 but I can't think of any others ?

Is there some fundamental disadvantage to flat 4's???

Mike
Old 12 February 2003 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
Re-Bitten Hero's Avatar
Re-Bitten Hero
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Warwick
Post

Alfa have made a number of flat 4s over the years, with a similar sound... as have VW in the Beetle and camper vans. I think the main reason people don't make them so much is that they are much wider, and need more components - rather than just having one or two camshafts, for instance, you need two or four, etc.

And anyway if everyone made them, ours wouldn't be so unusual

Richard
Old 12 February 2003 | 04:14 PM
  #3  
mikefyfe's Avatar
mikefyfe
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Post

Re-bit,

Interseting about more components. Presumably in the reliability/cost vs weight distribution debate the former wins out.

Also presume that this is the reason why very few boxers in motorsport??

Mike
Old 12 February 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #4  
MGJohn's Avatar
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Post

Flat fours been around for years. All the millions of original VW beetles were aircooled flat fours as were the first Porsches which were simply tarted up VWs. Back in the 1950s, I believe the old Jowett Jupiter and other variants were flat fours, but, I could be wrong on that one.

The rear mounted flat fours in the old beetles were relatively lowslung taking good advantage of lower centre of gravity benefits. Those Subarus I've looked at whilst flat fours of course, have the power unit mounted fairly high in the engine bay thus negating some of the benefits of low c. of g.

Yes, they are more costly to produce ... two cylinder heads instead of one etc, etc, but, these aspects are true of any V4-V6-V8 engine too!
Old 12 February 2003 | 08:39 PM
  #5  
milkytadpole's Avatar
milkytadpole
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Post

The main reason that flat engines aren't used in motorsport is the fact that the exhaust system gets in the way. Therefore the engine can't be mounted low in the chasis and give the CoG advantage that it should. Hope that makes sense, I'm feeling particularly dyslexic today. J
Old 12 February 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #6  
RON's Avatar
RON
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 10,011
Likes: 1
From: Deepest Darkest Dorset!!
Post

Ferrari have made a few aswell, the 512Boxer springs to mind!!
Old 13 February 2003 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
Chris L's Avatar
Chris L
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
From: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Arrow

Subaru also make a flat 6 - the H6 as used in the Legacy.

Chris
Old 13 February 2003 | 07:38 PM
  #8  
WEBSTER's Avatar
WEBSTER
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Exclamation

wasn't the testarossa a flat 12 or was it a v12 i've got a model of one it looks like a flat 12
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Jamesh10
General Technical
3
01 October 2015 11:56 PM



Quick Reply: Flat 4 engines



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 PM.