Notices

afr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 November 2004, 03:38 PM
  #1  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default afr

what should the air fuel ratio on a new age stippp be?
martin
Old 05 November 2004, 03:47 PM
  #2  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How are you measuring it? At what load/revs? Short answer, 14.7:1 idle/cruise, rising to low 11s or richer on full boost I would think.
Old 05 November 2004, 03:50 PM
  #3  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

it is for a friend (honest) who ran his car at dastek and was told his car was running rich at 10:1 during the dyno run
it is an stippp with tsl grou n bb,centre section and sti air filter

martin
Old 05 November 2004, 04:38 PM
  #4  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

10:1 doesn't surprise me. It is very safe.
Old 05 November 2004, 10:22 PM
  #5  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

fair enough,you probably know more than some subaru specialists
thanks
martin
Old 06 November 2004, 10:32 AM
  #6  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No, just I've seen a lot of STi ECU maps (not the PPP, but I expect it is still rich) and the requested AFRs are rich +++.

Prodrive are engineering it to be suitable for hot weather conditions hammered continually without monitoring tools and potentially suspect fuel whilst keeping the pistons cool and will have tested it in those conditions I expect.

10:1 will probably lose about 10 BHP at most (pulled that number out the air from rough testing on non-STis) from running 11:1 which is probably lean enough with cats in place.
Old 06 November 2004, 02:05 PM
  #7  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

it was gerry saying it was running "very" rich,i know that prodrive do run their cars that way-the first thing i noticed on long journeys with the remap was an improvement in economy! i thought it sounded ok but was not 100% sure
thanks
martin

Trending Topics

Old 07 November 2004, 11:25 AM
  #8  
Spooks
Scooby Regular
 
Spooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Think yourself lucky, mine was 9:1 on my bugeye WRX........... now thats rich
Spooks
Old 07 November 2004, 09:57 PM
  #9  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

especially considering your results!
martin
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
12
17 September 2015 08:47 PM
HarryBoy
Drivetrain
4
08 March 2002 09:11 AM
Muncher
Drivetrain
13
17 February 2002 08:32 PM
MAFFA
Drivetrain
11
24 November 2001 06:05 PM



Quick Reply: afr



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 PM.