Please post your power graph scans..
05 August 2005 | 07:20 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Please post your power graph scans..
Interested to see actual power graphs you lot have..
Heard all the talk but would like to see the figures...
We all know different rollers can massage stats but all the same it's of interest to me and many others I'm sure.
I know the rolling road is not everything.. but it provides a good clear indication of the hard cash you throw at these cars...
Please include car specs as detailed as you can.
From UK to JAP, WRX to 22B lets see em
Mine (no scanner but..
)
##############
MY99 STi V5
1.3 Bar
Full decat
Link ECU mapped for optimax
290 Bhp (flywheel)
275 Torque
##############
Heard all the talk but would like to see the figures...
We all know different rollers can massage stats but all the same it's of interest to me and many others I'm sure.
I know the rolling road is not everything.. but it provides a good clear indication of the hard cash you throw at these cars...
Please include car specs as detailed as you can.
From UK to JAP, WRX to 22B lets see em
Mine (no scanner but..
)##############
MY99 STi V5
1.3 Bar
Full decat
Link ECU mapped for optimax
290 Bhp (flywheel)
275 Torque
##############
Last edited by SCOOBYD00; 05 August 2005 at 07:26 PM.
05 August 2005 | 08:28 PM
#4
Perhaps look at http://dyno.scoobynet.co.uk/ for runs from some of the old timers.
It hasn't been updated for a very long time - it would be good to see what newage cars are doing.
Nick
It hasn't been updated for a very long time - it would be good to see what newage cars are doing.
Nick
05 August 2005 | 08:28 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by RoRu
STi v4, RCMS short engine, td05/06, 550's, Walbro, FMIC, AP clutch, HKS hyper, HKS d/p, HKS headers, Link ecu (BRD) 1.6bar, and lots lots more. 383bhp/340lb/ft.
05 August 2005 | 08:31 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by Butty
Perhaps look at http://dyno.scoobynet.co.uk/ for runs from some of the old timers.
It hasn't been updated for a very long time - it would be good to see what newage cars are doing.
Nick
It hasn't been updated for a very long time - it would be good to see what newage cars are doing.
Nick
Trending Topics
05 August 2005 | 08:56 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by RoRu
It does feel quick yes
Forgot to say that it's mapped for BP
Forgot to say that it's mapped for BP
05 August 2005 | 09:52 PM
#10
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by Dave.K
MY98 WRX STI Type R
Gems ECU
1.4 bar
Vf24
A&H Fabrications FMIC
Full decat
314.7 bhp
330 lb/ft
Gems ECU
1.4 bar
Vf24
A&H Fabrications FMIC
Full decat
314.7 bhp
330 lb/ft
Compare to this one http://dyno.scoobynet.co.uk/jap/bob_rawle2.gif
from the lists here http://dyno.scoobynet.co.uk/PEindex/jap.htm
If you see what I mean? The torque/bhp seems to stay strong all the way to 6-7k.
Would also be interesting to carry out a run and then add octane boost. My car is mapped for 98ron but I wonder if the octane boost would help things along..
Last edited by SCOOBYD00; 05 August 2005 at 09:54 PM.
05 August 2005 | 10:32 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by scogsywrx
mine....
my93 wrx import,exhaust cat back,(afterburner centre section,ninja back box),blitz ind kit,manual boost controller.
my93 wrx import,exhaust cat back,(afterburner centre section,ninja back box),blitz ind kit,manual boost controller.
06 August 2005 | 01:03 PM
#18
Orange Club
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
After about 10 runs on the dyno, ambient temps exceeded 30degC (Wouldnt be as lumpy or fall off as bad after a cooler run without heatsoak).
Spec C with a couple of tweaks. Peak power made at 1.15bar of boost
361bhp/356lbft
Regards,
Shaun.
Spec C with a couple of tweaks. Peak power made at 1.15bar of boost
361bhp/356lbft
Regards,
Shaun.
06 August 2005 | 02:23 PM
#19
Very interesting seeing these figures.
Begs the question, why is it that 'dyno scoobs' hasn't been updated for so long. There should be a consertive (sp?) effort to rejuvenate (sp???) it.
Begs the question, why is it that 'dyno scoobs' hasn't been updated for so long. There should be a consertive (sp?) effort to rejuvenate (sp???) it.
06 August 2005 | 05:44 PM
#21
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by webmaster
After about 10 runs on the dyno, ambient temps exceeded 30degC (Wouldnt be as lumpy or fall off as bad after a cooler run without heatsoak).
Spec C with a couple of tweaks. Peak power made at 1.15bar of boost
361bhp/356lbft
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/images/sn...ucttest/rr.jpg
Regards,
Shaun.
Spec C with a couple of tweaks. Peak power made at 1.15bar of boost
361bhp/356lbft
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/images/sn...ucttest/rr.jpg
Regards,
Shaun.
06 August 2005 | 05:45 PM
#22
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by jasonius
Very interesting seeing these figures.
Begs the question, why is it that 'dyno scoobs' hasn't been updated for so long. There should be a consertive (sp?) effort to rejuvenate (sp???) it.
Begs the question, why is it that 'dyno scoobs' hasn't been updated for so long. There should be a consertive (sp?) effort to rejuvenate (sp???) it.
06 August 2005 | 05:48 PM
#23
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by Nick_Cat
Here is my recent run: a standard my97 uk turbo (catalunya), though it has a STi back box and was running on Tesco 99 ron (ecu reset after first fill up).
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...hp_torque2.jpg
Nick
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...hp_torque2.jpg
Nick
Begs the question... what about the big players... how much lag do they deal with.. are we talking boost by 5k onwards with 4-500bhp?
How about some 2.5 owners out there???
Lets see more
06 August 2005 | 06:08 PM
#24
Orange Club
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
ScoobyDoo,
I am looking at re-lanching the DYNO site in the Autumn, which will require some major rewriting...... one of those tasks for the long dark nights!
Back to the power graphs....
Personally I think people get too hung up on peak power figures, as in isolation they dont mean squat. Even comparing graphs in their entirety in isolation is not very indicative..... start over laying one graph with another, thats when you can start to see the better comparisons.
Remember you dont get anything for nothing.... what you gain in one area you will lose in another. If your after really good low down response and driveability, expect to be capped on outright power. If you want ***** out power, expect to sacrifice lowdown response and driveability. Of course some of these traits can be somewhat minimized by how you are prepared to adjust driving style and of course what your ultimate requirement for the car is (ie very quick A to B car or drag moster or top speed demon - or to a degree a accumulation of all). Obviously these are rule of thumb and not an exact science...... trial and error are the task of the day!
Regards,
Shaun.
I am looking at re-lanching the DYNO site in the Autumn, which will require some major rewriting...... one of those tasks for the long dark nights!
Back to the power graphs....
Personally I think people get too hung up on peak power figures, as in isolation they dont mean squat. Even comparing graphs in their entirety in isolation is not very indicative..... start over laying one graph with another, thats when you can start to see the better comparisons.
Remember you dont get anything for nothing.... what you gain in one area you will lose in another. If your after really good low down response and driveability, expect to be capped on outright power. If you want ***** out power, expect to sacrifice lowdown response and driveability. Of course some of these traits can be somewhat minimized by how you are prepared to adjust driving style and of course what your ultimate requirement for the car is (ie very quick A to B car or drag moster or top speed demon - or to a degree a accumulation of all). Obviously these are rule of thumb and not an exact science...... trial and error are the task of the day!
Regards,
Shaun.
06 August 2005 | 06:12 PM
#25
Orange Club
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
BTW,
I think Floyd should go for a JDM Twin Scroll Engine next...... with only basic mods the power to weight ratio on his Classic would be awesome. It's flaming quick and so responsive in mine, so christ knows what it would feel like with over 100kg's less weight!
Regards,
Shaun.
I think Floyd should go for a JDM Twin Scroll Engine next...... with only basic mods the power to weight ratio on his Classic would be awesome. It's flaming quick and so responsive in mine, so christ knows what it would feel like with over 100kg's less weight!
Regards,
Shaun.
06 August 2005 | 06:40 PM
#26
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by webmaster
ScoobyDoo,
I am looking at re-lanching the DYNO site in the Autumn, which will require some major rewriting...... one of those tasks for the long dark nights!
Back to the power graphs....
Personally I think people get too hung up on peak power figures, as in isolation they dont mean squat. Even comparing graphs in their entirety in isolation is not very indicative..... start over laying one graph with another, thats when you can start to see the better comparisons.
Remember you dont get anything for nothing.... what you gain in one area you will lose in another. If your after really good low down response and driveability, expect to be capped on outright power. If you want ***** out power, expect to sacrifice lowdown response and driveability. Of course some of these traits can be somewhat minimized by how you are prepared to adjust driving style and of course what your ultimate requirement for the car is (ie very quick A to B car or drag moster or top speed demon - or to a degree a accumulation of all). Obviously these are rule of thumb and not an exact science...... trial and error are the task of the day!
Regards,
Shaun.
I am looking at re-lanching the DYNO site in the Autumn, which will require some major rewriting...... one of those tasks for the long dark nights!
Back to the power graphs....
Personally I think people get too hung up on peak power figures, as in isolation they dont mean squat. Even comparing graphs in their entirety in isolation is not very indicative..... start over laying one graph with another, thats when you can start to see the better comparisons.
Remember you dont get anything for nothing.... what you gain in one area you will lose in another. If your after really good low down response and driveability, expect to be capped on outright power. If you want ***** out power, expect to sacrifice lowdown response and driveability. Of course some of these traits can be somewhat minimized by how you are prepared to adjust driving style and of course what your ultimate requirement for the car is (ie very quick A to B car or drag moster or top speed demon - or to a degree a accumulation of all). Obviously these are rule of thumb and not an exact science...... trial and error are the task of the day!
Regards,
Shaun.
06 August 2005 | 08:46 PM
#28
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by andypugh2000
Here's mine, complete bull**** over-read by PE as usual
http://www.andypugh.co.uk/pg.jpg
Other rolling roads it makes 285bhp but if you want big power go to PE
http://www.andypugh.co.uk/pg.jpg
Other rolling roads it makes 285bhp but if you want big power go to PE
07 August 2005 | 06:44 PM
#30
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Originally Posted by RB5-107
STi IV - full decat, panel filter running 1 bar
2 green on the KL and spot-on AFR readings.
307.5 bhp & 285.2lb/ft.
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~nelsdir/Scan1.JPG
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~nelsdir/Scan2.JPG
Neil
2 green on the KL and spot-on AFR readings.
307.5 bhp & 285.2lb/ft.
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~nelsdir/Scan1.JPG
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~nelsdir/Scan2.JPG
Neil