Notices

VTEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 March 2006, 01:42 PM
  #1  
proudy202
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
proudy202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default VTEC

Bit of a long one....

It turns out that there is significant relationship between the way the lobes are ground on the camshaft and the way the engine performs in different rpm (rotations per minute) ranges. To understand why this is the case, imagine that we are running an engine extremely slowly -- at just 10 or 20 rpm, so it takes the piston seconds to complete a cycle. It would be impossible to actually run a normal engine this slowly, but imagine that we could. We would want to grind the camshaft so that, just as the piston starts moving downward in the intake stroke, the intake valve would open. The intake valve would close right as the piston bottoms out. Then the exhaust valve would open right as the piston bottoms out at the end of the combustion stroke and would close as the piston completes the exhaust stroke. That would work great for the engine as long as it ran at this very slow speed.

When you increase the rpm, however, this configuration for the camshaft does not work well. If the engine is running at 4,000 rpm, the valves are opening and closing 2,000 times every minute, or thirty to fourty times every second. When the intake valve opens right at the top of the intake stroke, it turns out that the piston has a lot of trouble getting the air moving into the cylinder in the short time available (a fraction of a second). Therefore, at higher rpm ranges you want the intake valve to open prior to the intake stroke -- actually back in the exhaust stroke -- so that by the time the piston starts moving downward in the intake stroke, the valve is open and air moves freely into the cylinder during the entire intake stroke. This is something of a simplification, but you get the idea. For maximum engine performance at low engine speeds, the valves need to open and close differently than they do at higher engine speeds. If you put in a good low-speed camshaft, it hurts the engine's performance at high speeds, and if you put in a good high-speed camshaft it hurts the engine's performance at low speeds (and in extreme cases can make it very hard to start the engine!).

VTEC (which stands for Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control) is an electronic and mechanical system in some Honda engines that allows the engine to effectively have multiple camshafts. As the engine moves into different rpm ranges, the engine's computer can activate alternate lobes on the camshaft and change the cam's timing. In this way, the engine gets the best features of low-speed and high-speed camshafts in the same engine. Several of the links below go into the actual mechanics of the VTEC system if you are interested.

Several engine manufacturers are experimenting with systems that would allow infinite variability in valve timing. For example, imagine that each valve had a solenoid on it that could open and close the valve under computer control rather than relying on a camshaft. With this type of system, you would get maximum engine performance at every rpm range

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/framed...whatsvtec.html


Taken from howstuffworks.com

The question i pose is, can VTEC be incorparated into any engine(i.e. boxer)?

Ash
Old 08 March 2006, 02:17 PM
  #2  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pretty much, hasnt each car manufacturer got its own version now?

MiVEC - Mitsi
VVTi - Toyota
Zetec - Ford

etc etc

Subaru uses VVC in all UK Newage Stis and JDM cars...
Old 08 March 2006, 03:08 PM
  #3  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it can be yes, but your better getting an engine that has it fitted as standard as it would be cheaper and all the development has already been paid for
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LG John
Other Marques
64
06 November 2003 06:55 PM
LG John
Other Marques
79
06 October 2003 04:33 PM
Avi
Other Marques
3
01 May 2003 12:57 PM
kenny.c
Other Marques
19
02 March 2003 12:11 PM



Quick Reply: VTEC



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 PM.