Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

DP NITROUS 1 PORT OR 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 April 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #1  
stluciascooby's Avatar
stluciascooby
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Default DP NITROUS 1 PORT OR 4

I am going to be installing a direct port nitrous system on my V3 sti and would like to know if there is any advantage to install one port for each cylinder intake or just a single port at the throttle boby entrance. I think the 4 port would be better but maybe it wont make any difference?.
Old 05 April 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #2  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

Direct port is one on each inlet, usually used on higher powered installations. A single nozzle system will be fine for you I'd think. Good place for the nozzle would be in the under side of the intercooler at the outlet pipe. You want it as far away from the throttle body as poss but after the intercooler in order to give it time to mix thourghly with the inlet air.
Old 05 April 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #3  
stluciascooby's Avatar
stluciascooby
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Default

Im also going to an FMIC so I can put it well back of the throttle body.
Old 05 April 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #4  
gatecrasher3's Avatar
gatecrasher3
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Why would you want it as far away from the throttle body as possible? Would this not give it more chance to liquidize before it get's into the inlet?
Old 05 April 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #5  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gatecrasher3
Why would you want it as far away from the throttle body as possible? Would this not give it more chance to liquidize before it get's into the inlet?
Not unless you're getting charge temps lower that -100 odd degrees celcius.... In that case i think you'd have other problems to deal with
Old 05 April 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #6  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

recommended distance is 10" from the throttle body, which is very difficult unless you are running a frontmount...

i had mine set up in the throttle body hose and it worked fine, but i think it will be more effective when used a little further from the plenum..
Old 05 April 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #7  
gatecrasher3's Avatar
gatecrasher3
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

From all the info I have gathered, I run a WON kit on one of my cars and it performs better mounted in the plenum directly above the throttle body.

Don't know if it is different on N/A engines though.
Old 05 April 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

I rather have it as far away as possible given if it doesn't mix properly you'll have excessive charge going into certain cylinders and not enough into others
Old 05 April 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #9  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,470
Likes: 9
Default

Neil, didn't your car expire after using the laughing gas? You could say it died laughing
F
Old 05 April 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #10  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

never proven but if it did then it was due to doing a 1 minute+ burst where you should only do 15 seconds....(i.e. 1/4 mile type of duration)

and even then mine died 2 months later idling in traffic.....make of that what you will.
Old 05 April 2006 | 03:00 PM
  #11  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

it took you 1 minute+ to hit your top speed?
Old 05 April 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #12  
gatecrasher3's Avatar
gatecrasher3
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
Not unless you're getting charge temps lower that -100 odd degrees celcius.... In that case i think you'd have other problems to deal with
Apologies I got it the wrong way around. The further away the more chance you have of it turning into a gas which you certainly don't want.
Old 05 April 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #13  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
it took you 1 minute+ to hit your top speed?
Nope, i took 1 minute (well actually about 45 seconds) to hit the electronic limiter at 157....

try it....
Old 05 April 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #14  
gatecrasher3's Avatar
gatecrasher3
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
Nope, i took 1 minute (well actually about 45 seconds) to hit the electronic limiter at 157....

try it....
Did you hit the limiter whilst using nitrous?
Old 05 April 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #15  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

yes, not the best idea id ever had but to be honest i didnt even realise the limiter was there!!
Old 05 April 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #16  
stluciascooby's Avatar
stluciascooby
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Default

so four ports one at the entance to each cylinder plenum will work as will a single port but since I am going to a FMIC the four port may make more sence?. but there is no "right answer" but lots of ideas .
JOn
Old 05 April 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #17  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

even with a FMIC i would still use a single port....the 4 port will work out quite expensive and tricky to fit, the single jet is very cost effective and easy....just get a boss welded to your intercooler pipework around 8-10" away from the throttle body, thats what i am doing.
Old 05 April 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #18  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

If you've got the money and are serious about nitrous use, then a direct port system, with one separate nozzle at each inlet port, can't be beat. Inlet manifolds being what they are, you're bound to have some kind of slight imbalance between the flow rates along each runner, although from the looks of it, the Scooby manifold is less prone to this than most, not really having much in the way of a plenum, and it's right in the middle of the four runners rather than off at one end like many cars.

If I was personally doing a nitrous installation on my Scoob, best bang-per-buck would be from a single wet nozzle in the hose between TMIC and throttle body. IMHO you do want the nozzle as close to the TB as possible, but upstream of it so there's less danger of a nitrous backfire if the worst comes to the worst. And yes, I have experienced this - blew my entire inlet tract apart, cracked all four pistons, blew every gasket there was and a sheet of flame lifted the bonnet off its hinges. That's what happens when you use a single nozzle at the end of slightly unequal distribution inlet plenum but this was not on a Scoob.

If you've got a front mount on the way, then as Neilo says, weld in a boss but keep it in line with the TB if you can rather than round a harsh bend. You want the high velocity and turbulence entering the TB to be working on your wet mix to keep it atomised and even.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 02:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 08:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 10:22 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 AM.