Notices

would you be happy with 329.5 bhp and 305 lb/ft from a 93 wrx?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 May 2006, 08:25 PM
  #1  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default would you be happy with 329.5 bhp and 305 lb/ft from a 93 wrx?

I've spent a long year moding my standard 1993 wrx which has cost a lot of money. I was hoping for a 350bhp car. I had the car on the rollers last week and it's putting out 329.5bhp and 305 lb/ft torque. The guy at the rollers said the car usually runs 0.1 bar under on the rollers so on the road it's probably putting out about 340bhp. He also said it's a very high torque figure for a Subaru.

Would you be happy with this figure? I know it's sad, but I really wanted 350bhp!

I've put a lot of mods into it to get this figure and thinking about it I would have been better starting with an STi.

The mods fitted to the car are:

Walbro 255 Fuel Pump
Nismo 550cc Injectors
Custom Exhaust From Turbo Back, Titanium Back Box
XS Power Stainless Headers & Up Pipe
Hybrid Front Mount Intercooler
Blitz Induction Kit
TD05 18g With Samco 90 degree hose
Apexi Power FC
Apexi AVCR
Datalogit Kit
4 New Coil packs
4 Nre NGK PFR7B Plugs
SX Fuel Regulator
Helix Catch Can

Just looking for thoughts really?
Old 19 May 2006, 08:34 PM
  #2  
ticky
Scooby Senior
 
ticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much boost is it running?
Old 19 May 2006, 08:37 PM
  #3  
drb5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
drb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 9,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd be happy enough with that....but there's always people who'll question your estimated power output. Tell them to shut up.
Old 19 May 2006, 08:52 PM
  #4  
rossyboy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
rossyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Flying the Flag for the GC8A
Posts: 4,194
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Very similar to my mods (just different makes) on the same year of car. Only real difference is you have the 18g, whereas mine is the standard 90 degree 16g (gearbox preservation )

mine has only been mapped to 1.2 bar as the clutch was slipping during mapping. No idea what eventual bhp and more importantly torque will be.

Anyway, to the point. That sort of power on a car that age that weighs just 1200 kg, after spending that sort of money is IMO perfectly acceptable.

I'd be happy with mine at 310/300 (240/225 standard) without the 18g, so for the extra for the turbo, your figures are what I'd hope for.

You haven't mentioned if your gearbox is standard? If you have much more power than your figures, you need at least an sti4 (I think) gearbox at £700+ and your's will be on its limits at the moment.

Being disappointed with your car at 340 bhp, when you wanted 350 is just mad I think

Ah the old sti starting point. I regret that too, but I've left my old WRX sticker on to fool those not in the know
Old 19 May 2006, 08:58 PM
  #5  
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5OLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I maybe wrong suggesting this - but i would dump the manifold and get a set of Harveys ported headers.
Old 19 May 2006, 09:08 PM
  #6  
p1ggm
Scooby Regular
 
p1ggm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what fuel did you run it on?? bang some cvl turbo and try again see if it brings it up
Old 19 May 2006, 10:23 PM
  #7  
axgt_bwaii
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
axgt_bwaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: grimsby
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fairly realistci for the mods m8. who maped it?

stew (93wrx owner)
Old 19 May 2006, 10:31 PM
  #8  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

hoping for a power figure is a bad idea as when you put your car on the rollers and it doesnt make it, you spend more wedge trying to make it quicker. different rolling roads and days will have different power figures. !!! if your happy with the car and it drives sweet ignore the bhp figure
Old 20 May 2006, 12:36 AM
  #9  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ticky
How much boost is it running?
the car is running 1.5 bar of boost up to 5500rpm where it drops to 1.4 bar to 7k

Originally Posted by rossyboy

You haven't mentioned if your gearbox is standard? If you have much more power than your figures, you need at least an sti4 (I think) gearbox at £700+ and your's will be on its limits at the moment.
The box is standard. It should take 350bhp and seen as I'm not there yet it should be fine! I priced up an Sti 5 box as it is supposed to be stronger. It needs to be a hybrid as the diffs are different.

Originally Posted by T5OLF
I maybe wrong suggesting this - but i would dump the manifold and get a set of Harveys ported headers.
Heard this too. The thing was my standard up pipe was cracked and I needed something quick to sort it. I decided to get the stainless headers. They're not equal length so can't see why the standard ones ported would make much difference?

Originally Posted by p1ggm
what fuel did you run it on?? bang some cvl turbo and try again see if it brings it up
Only ever run the car on optimax. I could use additives etc, but I want the car to be running 350 all the time, not just when I stick race fuel or similar in it.

Originally Posted by axgt_bwaii
fairly realistci for the mods m8. who maped it?

stew (93wrx owner)
The car was mapped by Andy.F He'd suggested 330-360 bhp so was spot on really.

Originally Posted by stevebt
hoping for a power figure is a bad idea as when you put your car on the rollers and it doesnt make it, you spend more wedge trying to make it quicker. different rolling roads and days will have different power figures. !!! if your happy with the car and it drives sweet ignore the bhp figure
You're right, before I put it in to get checked I thought "I'm happy with the car regardless what the figure is. I don't want to spend any more money on it" Now look at me.
Old 20 May 2006, 12:47 AM
  #10  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is a picture of the car for those interested

Old 20 May 2006, 07:32 AM
  #11  
scoobysmiff
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
scoobysmiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: I want a Spec C!
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice motor m8,
imo if you think you have 340 would you be able to feel the difference if it was 350? after all its only another 10bhp which equates to about 3% of your cars current output, if it drives well and your happy with that then i'd leave it be unless you are after something extreme,
I guess it is still quite rapid? as has been said, its only a 1235 ish KG car so you will have about 275bhp per ton which is only 10 less than a Ferrari 355! (286/ton) 4 more than a 1999 Porsche GT3 and more than any road going M3 variant
you cant grumble at that mate
Old 20 May 2006, 08:21 AM
  #12  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobysmiff
10 less than a Ferrari 355! (286/ton) 4 more than a 1999 Porsche GT3 and more than any road going M3 variant
you cant grumble at that mate
I suppose when you put it like that it is quite quick compared to other cars. And it looks like a sport so most people assume it's a non-turbo ;-)
Old 20 May 2006, 09:46 AM
  #13  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your car looks mint, especially the tidy bonnet; you're running well over 300bhp in a 4wd road car, what's not to like. It's a slippery slope chasing a particular power figure tbh. If it feels right to you then be happy with it! Of course, if it feels gutless, then that's another matter.
Old 20 May 2006, 12:05 PM
  #14  
Ninnybobs
Scooby Regular
 
Ninnybobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice Car,

Could your disappointing rolling road figures be related to the intake temps during the Rolling Road run? With no bonnet scoop, what precautions have you taken to keep the induction temperatures low?

Just a thought

Martin
Old 20 May 2006, 12:21 PM
  #15  
wrxtreme96
Scooby Regular
 
wrxtreme96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow that's a really great looking car bud...

It's so easy to build an image or aspiration in your mind..but you really shouldn't be disappointed.

Yes of course if you were to do things again then perhaps you would begin with a different base -sti-
BUT what you have done is create a superb example of WHAT can be achieved. Perhaps its the same as any owner maintaining an older style car money is spent improving its appearence, interor or performance and in reality the money could just be spent on a NEWER car...but is that what car ownership is about...??

I similar to you have 'only' got the WRX yet am ploughing money into the car to 'improve' it...

Have fun and enjoy.....
Old 20 May 2006, 12:32 PM
  #16  
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
trails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,350
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ninnybobs
Nice Car,

Could your disappointing rolling road figures be related to the intake temps during the Rolling Road run? With no bonnet scoop, what precautions have you taken to keep the induction temperatures low?

Just a thought

Martin
martin, he's running a fmic...so i'd imagine losing the scoop shouldn't make any difference. at least i hope not, i want to go all stealth when i fit mine...

ian
Old 20 May 2006, 02:33 PM
  #17  
Ninnybobs
Scooby Regular
 
Ninnybobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ian,

I realise he is running a fmic........ but if the blitz induction kit is mounted within the engine bay and there is no means of feeding cold air he could be seeing induction temps while on the rollers of 30-40 degrees above ambient.

In those situations the FMIC will be hard pushed to cope and charge temps will be higher than ideal.

Heat management is very important

Just my opinion of course

Martin
Old 20 May 2006, 02:41 PM
  #18  
rigga
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
rigga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: midlands......
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if i recall correct,Andyf used to run his scoop backwards when he had the front mount on his car last year.... i presume to allow the engine heat built up in the engine bay a route out? with no scoop the heat generated might well affect the performance,air flow through the engine bay is worth looking at.
Old 20 May 2006, 04:32 PM
  #19  
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
trails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,350
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ninnybobs
Ian,

I realise he is running a fmic........ but if the blitz induction kit is mounted within the engine bay and there is no means of feeding cold air he could be seeing induction temps while on the rollers of 30-40 degrees above ambient.

In those situations the FMIC will be hard pushed to cope and charge temps will be higher than ideal.

Heat management is very important

Just my opinion of course

Martin
sorry martin, wasn't trying to be facetious ...tbh the induction side of things didn't occur to me, what with the ever increasing number of inner wing mounted kits now available.

surely removing the scoop shouldn't make any difference to air flow across the engine because its not designed for that purpose?
Old 20 May 2006, 04:53 PM
  #20  
scoobfan
Scooby Regular
 
scoobfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a V6 Mercedes
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ninnybobs
Ian,

I realise he is running a fmic........ but if the blitz induction kit is mounted within the engine bay and there is no means of feeding cold air he could be seeing induction temps while on the rollers of 30-40 degrees above ambient.

In those situations the FMIC will be hard pushed to cope and charge temps will be higher than ideal.

Heat management is very important

Just my opinion of course

Martin
A lot of places I have seen to do power runs with the bonnet open, so I don't think the scoop issue would come into their.

On the road, then yes, I would of thought it could be an issue, Subaru put the scoop their for a reason, That wasn't just to feed the top mount intercooler but also to keep the turbo cool because
of it's position.

Rob
Old 20 May 2006, 05:11 PM
  #21  
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
trails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,350
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobfan
A lot of places I have seen to do power runs with the bonnet open, so I don't think the scoop issue would come into their.

On the road, then yes, I would of thought it could be an issue, Subaru put the scoop their for a reason, That wasn't just to feed the top mount intercooler but also to keep the turbo cool because
of it's position.

Rob
if thats the case, why did they remove the splitter from inside the scoop that directs air straight onto the turbo on facelift cars?

ian
Old 20 May 2006, 05:26 PM
  #22  
scoobfan
Scooby Regular
 
scoobfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a V6 Mercedes
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trails
if thats the case, why did they remove the splitter from inside the scoop that directs air straight onto the turbo on facelift cars?

ian
True

Rob

Last edited by scoobfan; 20 May 2006 at 05:29 PM.
Old 20 May 2006, 06:12 PM
  #23  
DIPSY
Scooby Regular
 
DIPSY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about the number plate its covering a fair bit of the front mount intercooler.Is the induction kit under bonnet or inner wing ??
Old 20 May 2006, 07:15 PM
  #24  
Ninnybobs
Scooby Regular
 
Ninnybobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The problems with Rolling Roads are that we all make sure that are cars a upto normal operating temperatures and then let them stand whilst the cars are strapped down, During that time, underbonnet temps are rising all the time.

Unless specific measures are taken to combat the high intake temps, i.e. cold air feed, CAIK or heat shield for the induction kit, cars will not fulfill their potential on the rollers.

All IMHO

Martin
Old 20 May 2006, 07:53 PM
  #25  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very nice looking car.
Where did you do the RR?
If 330 bhp is accurate I would say there is still more to come.
What boost and fuel are you running?
Old 20 May 2006, 07:55 PM
  #26  
DIPSY
Scooby Regular
 
DIPSY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would say he used either dastek or star performance
Old 20 May 2006, 08:04 PM
  #27  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To answer a few questions...

When the car was rolling road'd they had the bonnet up. They also had two 80 mph fans blowing onto the car. They also put something in place to separate the induction kit from the heat of the engine bay.

On the road with the bonnet down, the car does get a little hot underneath. The rubber trim from the bonnet that closes on top of the light has been removed, so I get a thin flow of air in there. There is also a big hole in the wing where the FMIC pipes come through.

Saying that I could do with sorting something for more cold air. I was thinking about getting a vent of some sort in the wing. I've not really worried about it much as the car does run really well and Andy has been happy with it on the two times he's mapped it.

Below are a few more pictures of the car. Someone PM asking for some.

Cheers









































Old 20 May 2006, 08:08 PM
  #28  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DIPSY
I would say he used either dastek or star performance
I had the car done a Star. Once I get the headers wrapped I might put it in a Dastek to see why I get there.

Originally Posted by harvey
Very nice looking car.
Where did you do the RR?
If 330 bhp is accurate I would say there is still more to come.
What boost and fuel are you running?
Thanks Harvey, you won't recognise this car, but you'll recognise the front mount ;-) That came off the silver one that was written off which in turn came from yourself.

I am open to comments on how I can get more out of the car. I really would like more torque rather than bhp.

Originally Posted by DIPSY
What about the number plate its covering a fair bit of the front mount intercooler.Is the induction kit under bonnet or inner wing ??
The number plate is the same size as the mounting plate behind it, that's all.
Old 20 May 2006, 08:10 PM
  #29  
VAL113R
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
VAL113R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For those interested in the full specification of the car:

Walbro 255 Fuel Pump
Nismo 550cc Injectors
Custom Exhaust From Turbo Back Titanium Back Box
XS Power Stainles Headers & Up Pipe
Hybrid Front Mount Intercooler
Blitz Induction Kit
TD05 18g With Samco 90 degree hose
Apexi Power FC
Apexi AVCR
Datalogit Kit
4 Coil packs
4 NGK PFR7B Plugs
SX Fuel Regulator
Helix Catch Can
Forge Motorsport Header Tank

Full Respray in Flame Red
Face Lift Sport Bonnet
Sti 5 High Level Spoiler
Aero Splash Guards
Delocked Boot
Face Lift Grille
Face Lift Front Bumper
Face Lift Rear Bumper
Face Lift Crystal Side Lights
Face Lift Crystal Head Lights
Face Lift Crystal Fog Lights
Crystal Side Repeaters
Crystal Front Repeaters
P1 Style Front Splitter

Fox 18" Alloys Repainted In Gloss White
New Falken FK451 225/35/18"
Subaru 4 Pot Brakes
New P1 Pads
New Rear Discs
New Rear Pads
Whiteline Rear Drop Links
Whiteline Rear Adjustable Anti Roll Bar
Apexi Carbon Fibre Front Strut Brace

Sti 555 Limited Edition Front/Rear Seats
Nomad Racing Indiglo AFR Guage
Nomad Racing Indiglo Boost Guage
Nomad Racing Inidglo Oil Temperature Guage
White Dial Kit
Kenwood KDC-W7031 Stereo
Kenwood AMP
Kenwood 12" Sub
Infiniti Front Components
Infiniti Rear Components
Custom Boot Install
M1-ATX 90W Intelligent Car PSU
VIA EPIA ME6000 LVDS Motherboard
Gain 7" In Dash LCD Monitor VGA/Touchscreen
10GB 2.5" Hard Drive
Windows XP Genuine Licence
Old 20 May 2006, 08:26 PM
  #30  
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5OLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice mate, cheers for pics


Quick Reply: would you be happy with 329.5 bhp and 305 lb/ft from a 93 wrx?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.