Parallel fuel rail mod ?
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Parallel fuel rail mod ?
Is the parallel fuel rail mod really worth the money when I have an Apexi Power FC which can control injector duty anyway ?
I'm running 4 bar fuel pressure but have all high pressure fuel lines.
Any thoughts on this ?
I'm running 4 bar fuel pressure but have all high pressure fuel lines.
Any thoughts on this ?
#3
The hottest cylinder gets the fuel last.
I would say that anything that helps is a good Idea.
I know that there are lots of people that have done it (inc me), it may not be needed, but I see no reason not to do it
The fuel rail mod has nothing to do with injector duty (well actually if the IDC's go up, the 3rd may be starved of the fuel that it needs)
For the sake of a bit of hose, 2 y-pieces and some jubilee clips, I'd do it
I would say that anything that helps is a good Idea.
I know that there are lots of people that have done it (inc me), it may not be needed, but I see no reason not to do it
The fuel rail mod has nothing to do with injector duty (well actually if the IDC's go up, the 3rd may be starved of the fuel that it needs)
For the sake of a bit of hose, 2 y-pieces and some jubilee clips, I'd do it
#4
Spot on 500. Duty cycle has nothing to do with it.
The standard fuel setup is to provide petrol to the first cylinder then on to the 2nd 3rd and 4th in a row (cylinder number order not important for this example).
The parallel mod will T off the fuel pipe and send it to 1 and 3 at the same time, followed but 2 and 4 after. It means there is less chance that you loose the pressure you need at the end of a serial loop compared to a parallel setup.
The standard fuel setup is to provide petrol to the first cylinder then on to the 2nd 3rd and 4th in a row (cylinder number order not important for this example).
The parallel mod will T off the fuel pipe and send it to 1 and 3 at the same time, followed but 2 and 4 after. It means there is less chance that you loose the pressure you need at the end of a serial loop compared to a parallel setup.
Trending Topics
#9
#16
Former Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Yes its a manifold of job, If you keep the fuel pressure exactly where it is there is no need for a tweak. Give yourself half a day to carry it out.
#21
I don't disagree with most of what is on here and the philosophy of doing anything that MIGHT make an improvement is one with which I concur. However, depending on the mods you already have you might want to prioritise the mods you still have to do. At circa 350 bhp I would consider parallel fuel rails a relatively low priority.
What are the thoughts on replacing the O/E FPR and reversing the flow direction???
What are the thoughts on replacing the O/E FPR and reversing the flow direction???
#23
I don't disagree with most of what is on here and the philosophy of doing anything that MIGHT make an improvement is one with which I concur. However, depending on the mods you already have you might want to prioritise the mods you still have to do. At circa 350 bhp I would consider parallel fuel rails a relatively low priority.
What are the thoughts on replacing the O/E FPR and reversing the flow direction???
What are the thoughts on replacing the O/E FPR and reversing the flow direction???
With No.3 having the most documented problems, I wouldn't say it is a low priority
What is the point of reversing the flow, it's easier to make it parallel and better for flow. But you already knew that
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM