Notices

chargecooler versus intercooler !!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 August 2007, 10:44 AM
  #1  
rabskyline
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
rabskyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sunshine coast, queensland ! hot hot hot !
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default chargecooler versus intercooler !!

dont know if this has been done before but saw a chargecooler for sale on ebay..is this just like a radiator filled with water so its cooling air that way ? not sure the of the whole idea...whats best ??? and why ? sorry if its old but its new to me !
Old 28 August 2007, 01:28 PM
  #2  
Cake
Scooby Newbie
 
Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have seen 1 before. They seal a intercooler put a cap on top and fill it with water. and have a pump mounted somewhere else connected to a radiator to cool the water. Its only problem is when your still for long periods of time the radiator doesnt cool and it takes awhile to cool the water down. Where as a normal intercooler doesnt.
Old 28 August 2007, 06:32 PM
  #3  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A 'chargecooler' is a water-air intercooler. An 'intercooler' is an air-air chargecooler. The upshot is, an intercooler directly cools the air flowing through its inside by the airflow across its outside. A chargecooler consists of two main heat exchangers - one is a basic water radiator and the other is an intercooler core with air inlet/outlet inside a sealed box with plumbing for water to circulate. Water is pumped round in a closed circuit, from pump, to chargecooler box, to chargecooler radiator, back to pump etc. Heat picked up in chargecooler box from air flowing through its intercooler core is taken out to the rad, dumped to atmosphere just like a normal water rad does, and the cold water goes back round again.

There are pros and cons of both chargecoolers and intercoolers, but in some instances a chargecooler is the only option because of plumbing restrictions i.e. it's a lot easier to get a pair of half inch water hoses down to the front bumper for an extra water rad, than it is to plumb in 2-3" intercooler air hose to an intercooler up front. Chargecooler also means you get the benefit of frontal airflow over the rad but still keep the ability to have a very short boost circuit from turbo through chargecooler box to throttle body.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
Ginola
Subaru Parts
5
14 November 2015 05:30 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Flat4x4-again
General Technical
2
29 September 2015 06:32 PM



Quick Reply: chargecooler versus intercooler !!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM.