how laggy is a md321t on a 2.0ltr
#6
the T will be more laggy than the H on a 2 litre but still 1 of the less laggiest 450 bhp turbos out there
my T is on a 2.5 and there's no lag at all
my mate has the H on his 2 litre and i'm only 0.2 second quicker than him on the drag strip 1/4 mile . same gearbox and everything. but 40 bhp difference.
i'd stay stick with an H unless you REALLY want 'that' figure, then go with the H.
my T is on a 2.5 and there's no lag at all
my mate has the H on his 2 litre and i'm only 0.2 second quicker than him on the drag strip 1/4 mile . same gearbox and everything. but 40 bhp difference.
i'd stay stick with an H unless you REALLY want 'that' figure, then go with the H.
#7
This will give you an idea - video taken of my AVCR in 4th gear if I remember correctly - was a long time ago
See link below
MD321TAVCR.flv - Video - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
See link below
MD321TAVCR.flv - Video - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Trending Topics
#12
Oh yes However not for much longer as I am going 2.35 and rotated
I must say though I really don't think the T is too laggy for a 2.0, a 20G's spool is no better imo, I had a 20G on my other Scoob (another STI4) and that only hit 1 bar by just over 3k revs.
The obvious caveat being you do need a 'built' 2.0 to run a T
I must say though I really don't think the T is too laggy for a 2.0, a 20G's spool is no better imo, I had a 20G on my other Scoob (another STI4) and that only hit 1 bar by just over 3k revs.
The obvious caveat being you do need a 'built' 2.0 to run a T
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post